题名

董事會多樣性與企業經營績效之關聯研究--以策略變動為調節變數

并列篇名

The Study of Association between Boardroom Diversity and Operating Performance: Strategic Change as a Moderating Variable

DOI

10.6846/TKU.2019.00326

作者

賴維宏

关键词

董事會多樣性 ； 經營績效 ； 策略變動 ； Diversity of boards ； strategic change ； Firm performance

期刊名称

淡江大學管理科學學系博士班學位論文

卷期/出版年月

2019年

学位类别

博士
导师

顏信輝;徐志順
内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究從公司治理的角度出發，探討董事會多樣性對企業經營績效之影響，並進一步考慮策略變動對董事會多樣性與經營績效之關係的調節效果。本研究將董事會多樣性區分為代表相對距離之「差距」，以呈現離散同業平均標準之董事會結構多樣性及代表「多種類」屬性之董事會成員多樣性；在董事會結構上，包括董事規模，董事持股比，獨立董事比及董事長是否兼任總經理。在董事會成員屬性上，包括性別，年齡，任期及專業背景多樣性。 本研究以中國大陸上海及深圳證券交易所掛牌之A股高度裁量權產業上市公司為研究樣本，樣本期間為2014年，從初步取得之樣本3, 013家中扣除H股、B股、金融保險業、董事會變數、策略變動變數、經營績效、行業別資料缺漏及極端值，並排除中、低度裁決性行業之公司資料後，最後取得A股高度裁量權產業之公司1,131家(董事會結構多樣性)及666家(董事會成員多樣性)樣本進行分析，分別以多元迴歸模型，深入分析中國上市公司董事會多樣性與經營績效的關聯性。 研究結果顯示，董事會結構多樣性與其企業經營績效呈現負向關係；即董事會結構多樣性(離散數)愈接近該產業的平均水準時，其經營績效表現愈佳，但若是董事會結構多樣性(離散數)遠離該產業平均數之極大或極小之企業，與其經營績效則呈現負向關係。但如果將策略變動因素加入考量後，策略變動差異較小之企業，其董事會結構多樣性與其經營績效為正向關係，而策略變動差異較大之企業，其董事會結構多樣性與其經營績效則為負向關係。另外，依據符合資源依賴理論，董事會成員多樣性與其企業經營績效呈現正向的關係。如果將策略變動因素加入考量後，策略變動差異較小之企業，其董事會成員多樣性與其經營績效為正向關係。 本研究實證發現董事會多樣性確實會影響其經營績效，且策略變動確實會調節董事會結構多樣性與其經營績效之間的關係，並受策略變動幅度大小所影響，除在理論貢獻上可強化現有董事會與其經營績效關聯研究之發現，並可為公司治理的實踐提供了適當的理論解釋和進一步的參考。
英文摘要

This study, from the aspect of the integrated multi-dimensional board member’s structural and demography, attempts to explore the effect of board diversity on the firm’s operating performance of Chinese listed companies. It also examines whether the relationship between board diversity and operating performance is moderated by strategic change. We divide the diversity of the board into a structural diversity of boards (Disparity, that represents the relative distance) and a demographic diversity in boards (Variety, demographic diversity). In the structure of the board of directors, including the size of the directors, the shareholding ratio of the directors, the ratio of independent directors and whether the chairman is also the general manager. On the board member's attributes, including gender, age, tenure and educational background diversity. This study is based on the A-share high-discretionary industrial listed companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges in mainland China. The sample period is 2014, and the H shares, B shares, and financials are deducted from the preliminary sample of 3,013. After the insurance industry, board of director’s variables, strategic changes, business performance, industry data gaps and extreme values, and excluding medium and low-discretionary corporation data, the company finally obtained 1,131 A-share high-discretionary corporations (board of diversity) A sample of 666 (diversity on board members) was analyzed, and multiple regression models were used to analyze the correlation between board diversity and operating performance of Chinese listed companies. The results show that the structural diversity of the board is negatively related to the performance of the enterprise; that is to say the closer the level of structural diversity of the board (which is a discrete level) is to the average level of the industry, the higher the level of operational performance. However, if the discrete level diversity of the board structure deviates far from the industry's average, these enterprises tend to have a negative operational performance. However, when taking into consideration the strategic change, the results shows those firms with larger strategic change tend to have a negative correlation, whereas firms with smaller changes in terms of strategy tend to have a positive correlation; and similar results have been observed in state-owned enterprises. The results show that the demography board diversity is positively related to the firm’s operating performance. Furthermore, when taking strategic change into consideration, we find that the firms with smaller strategic change tend to have a significant and positive association between board diversity and operating performance, while no evidence is found for the board-diversity-performance association exists in firms with larger strategic change. This study empirically finds that board diversity does affect its operating performance, and that strategic changes do regulate the relationship between board structure diversity and its operating performance, and are affected by the extent of the strategic changes, in addition to the theoretical contribution can strengthen the existing board of directors This study not only better identifies to what extent the diversity in the Chinese boardrooms affects the firm’s operating performance, but also provides appropriate theoretical explanations and further reference for the corporate governance practice.
主题分类 商管學院 > 管理科學學系博士班
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 劉美纓, 丁碧慧, & 朱奐聿. (2014). 企業社會責任與公司治理, 公司績效之關連性研究. 科際整合管理研討會, 17-30.
    連結：
  2. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    連結：
  3. 參考文獻
  4. 中文文獻
  5. 上海國家會計學院. 公司治理. 經濟科學出版社. 2011 年 6 月
  6. 于東智. (2003). 董事會, 公司治理與績效——對中國上市公司的經驗分析. 中國社會科學, (3), 29-41.
  7. 中華人民共和國全國人民代表大會常務委員會，(2013)，中華人民共和國公司法，北京：中華人民共和國全國人民代表大會常務委員會。
  8. 中華人民共和國職業分類大典. 中國勞動社會保障出版社, 2017.
  9. 王天習. (2005). 公司治理與獨立董事研究. 中國法制出版社.
  10. 王世權. (2011). 監事會治理的有效性研究. 中國人民大學出版社.
  11. 王綺楓. (2011). 自願設立獨立董事的決定因數及其對研發投資與公司績效的影響. 組織與管理, 4(2), 79-105.
  12. 王穎. (2012). 論獨立董事制度與監事制度的關係. 邢臺學院學報, 27(3), 46-47.
  13. 史惠華. (2007). 我國公司董事會知識水準的現狀及原因. 雲南財貿學院學報社會科學版, 22(2), 86-88.
  14. 田高良, 楊星, & 馬勇. (2013). 董事會多元化特徵對股價資訊含量的影響研究. 西安交通大學學報 (社會科學版), 33(6), 34-40.
  15. 任頲, & 王崢. (2010). 女性參與高管團隊對企業績效的影響: 基於中國民營企業的實證研究. 南開管理評論, (5), 81-91.
  16. 向銳, & 馮建. (2008). 董事會特徵與公司經營績效的關係-基於中國民營上市公司的經驗證據. 財經科學, 2008(11), 91-99.
  17. 朱博湧, 林裕淩, & 王筠傑. (2015). 獨立董事多樣性對於公司價值之研究. 管理資訊計算, 4(2), 65-82.
  18. 何震, & 胡曉業. (2010). 大股東掏空上市公司行為研究-由創業板兩次分紅說起. 山東紡織經濟, 2010(12), 19-21.
  19. 吳孟紋, & 孫鈴雅. (2014). 中國銀行業女性董事與銀行財務績效之關係. 兩岸金融季刊, 2(2), 1-27.
  20. 吳清津, & 林丹. (2008). 女性員工績效的影響因素分析. 廣東外語外貿大學學報, 19(2), 32-35.
  21. 李田樹(1997)，什麼是策略 (上)、(下)，世界經理文摘，125、126 期。投資中國月刊, 第119期。
  22. 李明輝. (2009). 股權結構, 公司治理對股權代理成本的影響——基於中國上市公司 2001~ 2006 年資料的研究. 金融研究, (2), 149-168.
  23. 李維安, & 徐業坤. (2013). 政治身份的避稅效應. 金融研究, 3, 114-129.
  24. 李維安, & 郝臣. (2006). 中國上市公司監事會治理評價實證研究 (Doctoral dissertation).
  25. 李維安, 陳小洪, &袁慶洪. (2013). 中國公司治理轉型與完善之路，北京:機械工業出版社.109
  26. 李維安. (2013). 中國公司治理: 轉型與完善之路. 機械工業出版社.
  27. 李德冠, 陳禹竹, 陳計良, & 張慧珊. (2015). 董事會職能與獨立董事角色: 從企業競爭策略和獨立董事背景來探討. 證券市場發展季刊, 27(4), 43-79.
  28. 杜沔, & 劉振傑. (2010). 董事會結構與公司績效實證研究的回顧與展望—一個內生的視角 Literature Review on the Relation between Board Structure and Corporate Performance: An endogenous perspective. 汕頭大學學報 (人文社會科學版), 6, 60-69.
  29. 周俊，2008，人口特徵異質性對高管離職率的作用研究，China Management Studies，3卷(4期)。
  30. 於鑫, & 黃鴻. (2010). 杜邦財務分析體系的局限與改進思考. 經營管理者, (6), 31-31.
  31. 林樂芬. (2005). 中國上市公司股權集中度研究. 經濟管理出版社.
  32. 洪榮華, 陳香如, & 柯璟瑩. (2005). 從代理理論的角度探討董事會特性, 股權結構與負債之關聯性. 管理與系統, 12(4), 33-53.
  33. 范林榜, 李錦生, & 潘善啟. (2010). 董事會特徵與公司績效關係的行業分析. 徐州師範大學學報 (哲學社會科學版), 36(1), 111-115.
  34. 唐宗明, & 蔣位. (2002). 中國上市公司大股東侵害度實證分析. 經濟研究, 4(2), 44-50.
  35. 孫永祥, & 章融. (2000). 董事會規模, 公司治理與績效. 企業經濟, (10), 13-15.
  36. 孫永祥, & 黃祖輝. (1999). 上市公司的股權結構與績效. 經濟研究, 12(2007), 12.
  37. 張功富. (2008). 我國公司治理研究的制度背景分析. 會計之友, 2008(5C), 106-110.
  38. 張建君, & 李宏偉. (2007). 私營企業的企業家背景, 多元化戰略與企業業績. 南開管理評論, 10(5), 12-25.
  39. 張為. (2010). 上市公司董事會特徵對公司績效影響的分析. 財務與金融, 2010(2), 93-95.
  40. 張晉芬. (2012). 性別與勞動. 《第二版》 『性別向度與台灣社會』 巨流圖書公司.
  41. 張照坤, 蔡建峰, & 李娟. (2011). 我國機械行業上市公司 CEO 背景特徵與企業績效關係的研究. 機械製造, 49(2), 1-4.
  42. 許小年. (1997). 以法人機構為主體建立公司治理機制和資本市場. 改革, (5), 28-30.
  43. 閆華紅, & 張小燕. (2011). 我國上市公司內部治理結構的問題分析. 會計之友, 2011(10A), 109-115.
  44. 陳建宏, & 陳品儒. (2017). 台灣銀行業多角化與獲利能力之研究. 財金論文叢刊, (27), 60-77.
  45. 陳美菊. (2003). 美國企業財報問題及對策之研析. 經濟研究, 3, 37-254.
  46. 陳曉, & 江東. (2000). 股權多元化, 公司業績與行業競爭性. 經濟研究, 8, 28-35.
  47. 喬友慶, 于卓民, & 林月雲. (2001). 國際化程度與產品差異化能力對廠商績效之影響─ 台灣大型製造廠商之實證研究. 管理學報, 第十九卷第五期, 頁, 811-842.
  48. 曾真真, 曾曉萍, & 鄭純姍. (2013). 經濟衰退時期的研發承諾: 董事會監督對成長機會的影響. 會計審計論叢, 3(2), 61-80.
  49. 游美惠. (2011). 樣板(token)與樣板主義(tokenism). 性別平等教育季刊, (64), 93-96.
  50. 程萍. (2006). 內隱性別刻板印象對女大學生成就動機的影響. 武漢理工大學學報 (社會科學版), 19(4), 581-583.
  51. 黃旭輝, & 王育偉. (2007). 績效不佳的經理人會被撤換嗎?. 證券市場發展季刊.
  52. 楊忠誠, & 王宗軍. (2008). 董事會結構與公司績效實證研究. 商場現代化, 10(530), 58-59.
  53. 葉銀華, 李存修, & 柯承恩. (2002). 公司治理與評等系統. Sunbright Publishing Co..
  54. 趙玲. (2010). 傳統杜邦財務分析體系的局限性及改進. 中國新技術新產品, (10), 216-216.
  55. 蔡柳卿, 楊怡芳, 吳幸蓁, & 黃昱凱. (2008). 資訊科技與人力資本對研發外溢效果之影響. 會計學報, 1(1), 53-81.
  56. 薛靖東. (2018). 《 2017 年國民經濟和社會發展統計公報》 發佈 GDP 達 827122 億元. 中國經濟資訊, (5), 11-11.
  57. 謝錦堂. (2009). 董事會功能理論模型之驗證: 台灣上市公司董監事的觀點. 管理學報, 26(2), 127-144.
  58. 魏文欽, & 詹士緯. (2015). 從公司價值探討公司績效-以台灣上市櫃電子業為例. International Journal of Lisrel, 8(2), 1-35.
  59. 鐘宜彬. (2008). 探討文化差異對會計資訊的影響. 中國管理資訊化, 11.8: 37-39.
  60.  
  61. 英文文獻
  62. Aaker, D. A., (1995), Strategic Market Management, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  63. Abu-Serdaneh, J. (2014). The asymmetrical behavior of cost: evidence from Jordan. International Business Research, 7(8), 113.
  64. Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of economic literature, 48(1), 58-107.
  65. Adams, S. M., & Flynn, P. M. (2005). Local knowledge advances women's access to corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 836-846.
  66. Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 31(3), 377-397.
  67. Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, G. N. (1990). Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 25(2), 143-161.
  68. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative science quarterly, 634-665.
  69. Ansoff, HI, (1965), Corporate Strategy, (McGraw-Hill, New York)
  70. Aoki, M. (1994). The contingent governance of teams: Analysis of institutional complementarity. International Economic Review, 657-676.
  71. Appelbaum, S. H., Kryvenko, O., Rodriguez Parada, M., Soochan, M. R., & Shapiro, B. T. (2015). Racial-ethnic diversity in Canada: competitive edge or corporate encumbrance? Part One. Industrial and Commercial Training, 47(6), 302-309.
  72. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433-448.
  73. Arfken, D. E., Bellar, S. L., & Helms, M. M. (2004). The ultimate glass ceiling revisited: The presence of women on corporate boards. Journal of Business ethics, 50(2), 177-186.
  74. Azeez, R. O., & Abimbola, M. M. (2016). Job Enrichment and Work-Related Attitudes of Non-Academic Staff of Selected Public Universities in Lagos State. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 6(1), 89-104.
  75. Azim, M. I. (2012). Corporate governance mechanisms and their impact on company performance: A structural equation model analysis. Australian journal of management, 37(3), 481-505.
  76. Banker, R., & Lopes, A. (2011). Report on ANEEL’s Proposal for Electricity Distribution Tariff Regulation Technical Note No. 101/2011.
  77. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic management journal, 10(S1), 107-124.
  78. Basant, R. & Nath Saha, S. (2005), Determinants of Entry in the Indian Manufacturing Sector, Modified version of a chapter in a forthcoming book entitled, Competition Policy in India: Issues for a Globalizing Economy by Rakesh Basant and Sebastian Morris.
  79. Bauer, R., Guenster, N., & Otten, R. (2004). Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: The effect on stock returns, firm value and performance. Journal of Asset management, 5(2), 91-104.
  80. Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management review, 15(1), 72-87.
  81. Belliveau, M. A., O'Reilly III, C. A., & Wade, J. B. (1996). Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Academy of management Journal, 39(6), 1568-1593.
  82. Bennis, W. G. (1959). Leadership theory and administrative behavior: The problem of authority. Administrative science quarterly, 259-301.
  83. Bergh, D. D. (2001). Executive retention and acquisition outcomes: A test of opposing views on the influence of organizational tenure. Journal of Management, 27(5), 603-622.
  84. Berle, A.A. & Means, G.C. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, MacMillan, New York, NY.
  85. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management journal, 42(5), 488-506.
  86. Bhagat, S. & Black, B., (2002). The Non-correlation between Board Independence and Long-term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27(2) 231-273.
  87. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. The Business Lawyer, 921-963.
  88. Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. The Journal of Business, 76(3), 455-475.
  89. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (7). New York: Free Press.
  90. Boeker, W. (1992). Power and managerial dismissal: Scapegoating at the top. Administrative Science Quarterly, 400-421.
  91. Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301-312.
  92. Boyd, B. K., Haynes, K. T., & Zona, F. (2011). Dimensions of CEO–board relations. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1892-1923.
  93. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2007). Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 393-403.
  94. Brealey, R., Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. The journal of Finance, 32(2), 371-387.
  95. Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: is there an expectations gap? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 577-593.
  96. Burke, R. J., & Mattis, M. C. (Eds.). (2013). Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (14). Springer Science & Business Media.
  97. Buzzell, R. D., Gale, B. T., & Gale, B. T. (1987). The PIMS principles: Linking strategy to performance. Simon and Schuster.
  98. Callen, J. L., Morel, M., & Fader, C. (2005). Productivity measurement and the relationship between plant performance and JIT intensity. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(2), 271-309.
  99. Campbell, J. T., Campbell, T. C., Sirmon, D. G., Bierman, L., & Tuggle, C. S. (2012). Shareholder influence over director nomination via proxy access: Implications for agency conflict and stakeholder value. Strategic Management Journal, 33(12), 1431-1451.
  100. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of business ethics, 83(3), 435-451.
  101. Capar, N., Chinta, R., & Sussan, F. (2015). Effects of International Diversification and Firm Resources on Firm Performance Risk. Journal of Management and Strategy, 6(1), 10.
  102. Capkun, V., Hameri, A. P., & Weiss, L. A. (2009). On the relationship between inventory and financial performance in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(8), 789-806.
  103. Carpenter, M. A. (2000). The price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1179-1198.
  104. Carter, D. A., D'Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414.
  105. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial review, 38(1), 33-53.
  106. Chang, X., & Zhang, H. F. (2015). Managerial entrenchment and firm value: A dynamic perspective. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(5), 1083-1103.
  107. Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It's all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 52(3), 351-386.
  108. Chen, C. H., & Al-Najjar, B. (2012). The determinants of board size and independence: Evidence from China. International Business Review, 21(5), 831-846.
  109. Chen, H., Frank, M. Z., & Wu, O. Q. (2005). What actually happened to the inventories of American companies between 1981 and 2000? Management science, 51(7), 1015-1031.
  110. Chou, H. I., Hamill, P. A., & Yeh, Y. H. (2016). Are all regulatory compliant independent director appointments the same? An analysis of Taiwanese board appointments. Journal of Corporate Finance.
  111. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial management, 70-74.
  112. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112.
  113. Coffey, B. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1991). Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(6), 437-444.
  114. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of management, 23(3), 239-290.
  115. Cooper, R. & Kaplan. R., 1998, The Design of Cost Management Systems: Text, Cases, and Readings.
  116. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management journal, 37(6), 1603-1617.
  117. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta‐analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic management journal, 19(3), 269-290.
  118. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management journal, 42(6), 674-686.
  119. Dalton, D.R. & Dalton, C.M. (2011), The integration of micro-and macro-studies in corporate governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance, Organizational Research Methods, 37(2), 404-411.
  120. Davis, G. (2015). The Twilight of the Berle and Means Corporation. In Shareholder Empowerment (pp. 155-168). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  121. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management review, 22(1), 20-47.
  122. Dayan, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2010). The impact of structural and contextual factors on trust formation in product development teams. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 691-703.
  123. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms’ subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary accounting research, 13(1), 1-36.
  124. Demb, A., & Neubauer, F. F. (1992). The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. Long range planning, 25(3), 9-20.
  125. Demsetz, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. The Journal of law and economics, 26(2), 375-390.
  126. Desender, K. A., Aguilera, R. V., Crespi, R., & GarcÍa‐cestona, M. (2013). When does ownership matter? Board characteristics and behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 823-842.
  127. Deutsch, Y. (2005). The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 31(3), 424-444.
  128. DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.
  129. Dittmann, I., E. Maug, & C. Schneider. (2010). Bankers on the boards of german firms: What they do, what they are worth, and why they are (still) there. Review of Finance, 14(1): 35-71.
  130. Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of management Review, 15(3), 369-381.
  131. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of management, 16(1), 49-64.
  132. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
  133. Dooley, R. S., Fowler, D. M., & Miller, A. (1996). The benefits of strategic homogeneity and strategic heterogeneity: Theoretical and empirical evidence resolving past differences. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 293-305.
  134. Dowell, G. W., Shackell, M. B., & Stuart, N. V. (2011). Boards, CEOs, and surviving a financial crisis: Evidence from the internet shakeout. Strategic Management Journal, 32(10), 1025-1045.
  135. Doyle, M. J., & Cole, K. (2008). Impact of automation on decision making.
  136. Doyle, P., & Wong, V. (1998). Marketing and competitive performance: an empirical study. European Journal of Marketing, 32(5/6), 514-535.
  137. Duru, A., Iyengar, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. (2016). The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4269-4277.
  138. Dutton, J. E., & Duncan, R. B. (1987). The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic management journal, 8(3), 279-295.
  139. Earley, C. P., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 26-49.
  140. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative science quarterly, 504-529.
  141. Ellwood, S., & Garcia-Lacalle, J. (2014). The Influence of Presence and Position of Women on the Boards of Directors: The Case of NHS Foundation Trusts. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-16.
  142. Escribá‐Esteve, A., Sánchez‐Peinado, L., & Sánchez‐Peinado, E. (2009). The influence of top management teams in the strategic orientation and performance of small and Medium‐sized enterprises. British Journal of Management, 20(4), 581-597.
  143. Faleye, O. (2007). Does one hat fit all? The case of corporate leadership structure. Journal of Management & Governance, 11(3), 239-259.
  144. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of political economy, 88(2), 288-307.
  145. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  146. Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of financial economics, 84(2), 330-357.
  147. Feizpour, M. A., & Moradi, M. (2014). Determinants of new firm formation: Evidence from Iranian manufacturing industries. Journal of Economic Cooperation & Development, 35(4), 135.
  148. Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D.C. (1996), Strategic Leadership: Top executives and their Effects on Organizations, West, St. Paul, MN.
  149. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative science quarterly, 484-503.
  150. Firstenberg, P. B., & Malkiel, B. G. (1980). Why corporate boards need independent directors. Management Review, 69(4), 26-38.
  151. Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095-1102.
  152. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489-505.
  153. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
  154. Galaskiewicz, J., Anderson, K., & Thompson-Dyck, K. (2014). Communities Mobilizing to Help Themselves.
  155. García-Ramos, R., & García-Olalla, M. (2014). Board independence and firm performance in Southern Europe: A contextual and contingency approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(3), 313-332.
  156. Gaur, S. S., Bathula, H., & Singh, D. (2015). Ownership concentration, board characteristics and firm performance: a contingency framework. Management Decision, 53(5), 911-931.
  157. Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 654-681.
  158. Ginsberg, A. (1988). Measuring and modelling changes in strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical directions. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 559-575.
  159. Ginsberg, A., & Abrahamson, E. (1991). Champions of change and strategic shifts: The role of internal and external change advocates. Journal of Management Studies, 28(2), 173-190.
  160. Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination× power= strategic change. Strategic management journal, 22(12), 1087-1111.
  161. Gordon, S. S., Stewart Jr, W. H., Sweo, R., & Luker, W. A. (2000). Convergence versus strategic reorientation: The antecedents of fast-paced organizational change. Journal of management, 26(5), 911-945.
  162. Gottesman, A. A., & Morey, M. R. (2006). Manager education and mutual fund performance. Journal of empirical finance, 13(2), 145-182.
  163. Graham, J., & Harvey, C. (2002). How do CFOs make capital budgeting and capital structure decisions? Journal of applied corporate finance, 15(1), 8-23.
  164. Griffin, J. J. and J. F. Mahon, (1997), The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Social, 36, 5-31.
  165. Hafsi, T. & Turgut, G. (2013) Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: conceptualization and empirical evidence, Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463-479.
  166. Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management journal, 36(4), 844-863.
  167. Hambrick, D. C., & Abrahamson, E. (1995). Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1427-1441.
  168. Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in organizational behavior.
  169. Hambrick, D. C., & Fukutomi, G. D. (1991). The seasons of a CEO's tenure. Academy of management review, 16(4), 719-742.
  170. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206.
  171. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future: Breakthrough strategies for control of your industry and creating markets of tomorrow. New York, NY: Harvard Business School Press.
  172. Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier.
  173. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 929-964.
  174. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of management review, 32(4), 1199-1228.
  175. Hassan, S. U., & Farouk, M. A. (2014). Board of director’s characteristics and performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Bank Management, 2(1), 89-105.
  176. Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management J. 31(11):1145–1163.
  177. Heiens, R. A., Kroll, M., & Wright, P. (2001). Macro-economic risk factors in industrial markets: are elite firms less susceptible? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 16(4), 246-257.
  178. Hendry, K., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organisational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 500-520.
  179. Heracleous, L. (2001). What is the impact of corporate governance on organisational performance? Corporate governance: an international review, 9(3), 165-173.
  180. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2005). Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69-78.
  181. Hilb, M. (2005). New corporate governance: successful board management tools. Berlin: Springer
  182. Hili, W., & Affess, H. (2012). Corporate boards gender diversity and earnings persistence: The case of French listed firms. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(22), 51-59.
  183. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management review, 28(3), 383-396.
  184. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management studies, 37(2), 235-256.
  185. Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.
  186. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management journal, 40(4), 767-798.
  187. Hoang, T. C., Abeysekera, I., & Ma, S. (2016). Board diversity and corporate social disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-20.
  188. Hoang, T. C., Abeysekera, I., & Ma, S. (2017). The Effect of Board Diversity on Earnings Quality: An Empirical Study of Listed Firms in Vietnam. Australian Accounting Review, 27(2), 146-163.
  189. Hofer CW, & Schendel D (1978) Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts (West, St. Paul, MN).
  190. Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1994). Corporate divestiture intensity in restructuring firms: Effects of governance, strategy, and performance. Academy of Management journal, 37(5), 1207-1251.
  191. Hwang, B. H., & Kim, S. (2009). It pays to have friends. Journal of financial economics, 93(1), 138-158.
  192. Idris, F., Abdullah, M., Idris, M. A., & Hussain, N. (2003). Integrating resource-based view and stakeholder theory in developing the Malaysian excellence model: a conceptual framework. Singapore Management Review, 25(2), 91.
  193. Ingram, K., & O’Boyle, I. (2017). Sport governance in Australia: questions of board structure and performance. World Leisure Journal, 1-17.
  194. Irvine, J. J. (2003). Educating teachers for diversity: Seeing with a cultural eye. New York: Teachers College Press
  195. Ismail, K., Abdullah, S. N., & Nachum, L. (2013, April). Women on boards of directors of Malaysia firms: Impact on market and accounting performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. aomafr-2012). Academy of Management Africa Conference.
  196. Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, 204, 261.
  197. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative science quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
  198. Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
  199. Jhunjhunwala, S., & Mishra, R. K. (2012). Board diversity and corporate performance: The Indian evidence. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(3), 71.
  200. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic inquiry, 36(4), 620-630.
  201. Jing, R., Huang, X., & Wang, Z. (2014). Assessing managerial discretion across different industries in China. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 8(1), 98-112.
  202. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 22(3), 409-438.
  203. Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599-627.
  204. Judge, W. (2009). Editorial–toward a global theory of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), iii-iv.
  205. Kanter, B. (2004). Pocketbook power: how to reach the hearts and minds of today's most coveted consumers--women. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  206. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965-990.
  207. Keck, S. L. (1997). Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organization science, 8(2), 143-156.
  208. Kesner, I. F. (1987). Directors' stock ownership and organizational performance: An investigation of Fortune 500 companies. Journal of Management, 13(3), 499-508.
  209. Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189-205.
  210. Kim, H., & Lim, C. (2010). Diversity, outside directors and firm valuation: Korean evidence. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 284-291.
  211. Kim, I., Pantzalis, C., & Park, J. C. (2013). Corporate boards' political ideology diversity and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 21, 223-240.
  212. Kipkirong Tarus, D., & Aime, F. (2014). Board demographic diversity, firm performance and strategic change: A test of moderation. Management Research Review, 37(12), 1110-1136.
  213. Klapper, L. F., & Love, I., (2004). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets, Journal of corporate Finance, 10(5),703-728.
  214. Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational dynamics, 37(2), 145-164.
  215. Kotler, P. (1991), Marketing Managemen: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 7th ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc, 1991.
  216. Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2013). Corporate governance, board of directors, and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(4), 311-313.
  217. Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2014). Ownership, managerial entrenchment, and corporate performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(1), 1-3.
  218. La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The journal of finance, 54(2), 471-517.
  219. La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. The journal of finance, 57(3), 1147-1170.
  220. Lins, K. V. (2003). Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 38(1), 159-184.
  221. Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., & Yang, T. (2015). Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 223-244.
  222. Long, T. (2007). The evolution of FTSE 250 boards of directors: key factors influencing board performance and effectiveness. Journal of General Management, 32(3), 45-60.
  223. Lovata, L. M., & Costigan, M. L. (2002). Empirical analysis of adopters of economic value added. Management Accounting Research, 13(2), 215-228.
  224. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of management journal, 44(4), 779-793.
  225. Luk, C. L., Yau, O. H., Chow, R. P., Tse, A. C., & Sin, L. Y. (2005). Stakeholder orientation and business performance: The case of service companies in China. Journal of International Marketing, 13(1), 89-110.
  226. Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 553–563.
  227. MacAvoy, P. W., & Millstein, I. (2003). The Emergence and the Development of the Governance Problem. The Recurrent Crisis in Corporate Governance.
  228. Macus, M. (2008). Board capability: An interactions perspective on boards of directors and firm performance. International Studies of Management and Organization, 38, 98–116.
  229. Mahadeo, J. D., Soobaroyen, T., & Hanuman, V. O. (2012). Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 375-388.
  230. Mallin, C. (2004) Corporate Governance. Oxford University Press: New York
  231. Mandzila, E. E. W., & Zéghal, D. (2016). Content analysis of board reports on corporate governance, internal controls and risk management: evidence from France. Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(3), 637-648.
  232. Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological science in the public interest, 6(2), 31-55.
  233. Mayur, M., & Saravanan, P. (2017). Performance implications of board size, composition and activity: empirical evidence from the Indian banking sector. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(3), 466-489.
  234. McCahery, J. A., & Vermeulen, E. P. (2014). Understanding the board of directors after the financial crisis: Some lessons for Europe. Journal of Law and Society, 41(1), 121-151.
  235. McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership on corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 595-612.
  236. Meyer, J. W. & Scott, W.R. (1983). ‘Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government’, in Meyer, J.W. and Scott, W.R. (eds), Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 199–215.
  237. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
  238. Miles, R.E., and Snow, C.C. (1978), Organizational strategy, structure, and process, (1 ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
  239. Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (2001). Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the Hollywood studio heads. Strategic Management Journal, 22(8), 725-745.
  240. Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management science, 24(9), 934-948.
  241. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. The American economic review, 53(3), 433-443.
  242. Morales, C., & Marquina, P. (2009). Evidence on the role of age in team performance. A comparative study in Peru and Spain. Employee Relations, 31(3), 264-275.
  243. Mueller, D.C. & Tilton, J.E. (1969). Research and Development Costs as a Barrier to Entry, Canadian Journal of Economics, 2(4), 570579.
  244. Müller, J., & Kunisch, S. (2017). Central perspectives and debates in strategic change research. International Journal of Management Reviews.
  245. Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Mengüç, B. (2005). Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance-financial performance relationship. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 1184-1198.
  246. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate governance: An international review, 18(2), 136-148.
  247. OECD(Development). Steering Group on Corporate Governance. 1999. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 1999. OECD Publishing.
  248. OECD(Development). Steering Group on Corporate Governance. 2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2004. OECD Press.
  249. Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of management studies, 29(4), 411-438.
  250. Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization science, 7(6), 615-631.
  251. Petrovic, J. (2008). Unlocking the role of a board director: a review of the literature. Management Decision, 46(9), 1373-1392.
  252. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative science quarterly, 218-228.
  253. Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in organizational behavior.
  254. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. NY: Harper and Row Publishers.
  255. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors.
  256. Powell, G. N. (1999). Handbook of gender & work. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  257. Puni, A., Osei, B. A., & Ofei, S. B. (2014). The Effect of Board Composition on Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Listed Firms in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(8), 170.
  258. Pye, A., & Camm, G. (2003). Non-Executive Directors: Moving beyond the ‘One-size-fits-all’View1. Journal of General Management, 28(3), 52-70.
  259. Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155-160.
  260. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21–31.
  261. Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335-370.
  262. Sanidas, E. (2005), Organizational Innovations and Economic Growth, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  263. Scott, W.R. (2001), Institutions and Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  264. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783.
  265. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of management journal, 42(6), 662-673.
  266. Snow, C. C., & Hambrick, D. C. (1980). Measuring organizational strategies: Some theoretical and methodological problems. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 527-538.
  267. Solakoglu, M. N., & Demir, N. (2016). The role of firm characteristics on the relationship between gender diversity and firm performance. Management Decision, 54(6), 1407-1419.
  268. Spence, M. (1973). Job market singaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, (87), 355-374.
  269. Stiles, P., & Taylor, B. (2001). Boards at work: How directors view their roles and responsibilities: How directors view their roles and responsibilities. OUP Oxford.
  270. Swamidass, P. M. (2007). The effect of TPS on US manufacturing during 1981–1998: inventory increased or decreased as a function of plant performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(16), 3763-3778.
  271. Tanikawa, T., & Jung, Y. (2016). Top management team (TMT) tenure diversity and firm performance: Examining the moderating effect of TMT average age. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(3), 454-470.
  272. Tarus, D. K., & Aime, F. (2014). Board demographic diversity, firm performance and strategic change. Management Research Review, 37(12), 1110.
  273. Thomas, D. A., & Ely, R. J. (1996). Making differences matter. Harvard business review, 74(5), 79–90.
  274. Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of money, credit and banking, 1(1), 15-29.
  275. Triana, M. D. C., Miller, T. L., & Trzebiatowski, T. M. (2013). The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organization Science, 25(2), 609-632.
  276. Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323.
  277. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative science quarterly, 549-579.
  278. Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual review of psychology, 58.
  279. Wang, J., & Dewhirst, H. D. (1992). Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation. Journal of business ethics, 11(2), 115-123.
  280. Wang, J., Mei, J., Hu, R., Sun, J. Z., Qin, A., & Tang, B. Z. (2012). Click synthesis, aggregation-induced emission, E/Z isomerization, self-organization, and multiple chromisms of pure stereoisomers of a tetraphenylethene-cored luminogen. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 134(24), 9956-9966.
  281. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of management journal, 36(3), 590-602.
  282. Weitz, B. A., & Wensley, R. (1984). Strategic marketing: Planning, implementation, and control. Kent Pub. Co.
  283. Wellens, L., & Jegers, M. (2014). Effective governance in nonprofit organizations: A literature based multiple stakeholder approach. European Management Journal, 32(2), 223-243.
  284. West III, G. P. (2007). Collective cognition: When entrepreneurial teams, not individuals, make decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 77-102.
  285. Westphal, J. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1113-1137.
  286. Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management journal, 35(1), 91-121.
  287. Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. (1993). Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of management Journal.
  288. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Sage Publications, Inc.
  289. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1998). Demography and. Research in organizational behavior, 20, 77-140.
  290. World Bank. (1999). Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation Overview.
  291. Wu, Y. (2004). The impact of public opinion on board structure changes, director career progression, and CEO turnover: Evidence from CalPERS' corporate governance program. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(1), 199-227.
  292. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics, 40(2), 185-211.
  293. Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of management, 15(2), 291-334.
  294. Zhang, Y. (2006). The presence of a separate COO/president and its impact on strategic change and CEO dismissal. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3), 283-300.
  295. Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2003). Explaining new CEO origin: Firm versus industry antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 327-338.
  296. Zona, F. (2013). Board leadership structure and diversity over CEO time in office: A test of the evolutionary perspective on Italian firms. European Management Journal.
print cancel