题名

指數期貨價格跳動對現貨價格動態性的影響:制度轉換法

并列篇名

Effects of Index Futures Price Surges on Spot Price Dynamics: A Regime-Switching Perspective

DOI

10.6846/TKU.2016.00612

作者

莊曜維

关键词

期貨 ; 波動性 ; 制度轉換 ; SWARCH ; Futures ; Volatility ; Regime Switching ; SWARCH

期刊名称

淡江大學管理科學學系碩士班學位論文

卷期/出版年月

2016年

学位类别

碩士

导师

莊忠柱

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

股票與期貨市場是臺灣金融市場中的兩個主要市場,隨著金融自由化與國際化的世界潮流,現貨與期貨間的關係成為投資人熱門討論的話題。因此,本研究以1998年7月21日至2015年12月31日的臺灣發行量加權指數和臺灣指數期貨近月期為主要研究標的,利用Hamilton(1989)提出的制度轉換法(Regime-Switching Perspective)探討指數期貨價格跳動對現貨價格動態性的影響。經概似比檢定,相較於其他模型,由Hamilton and Susmel(1994)所提出的SWARCH模型最能捕捉到臺灣股票市場價格行為的特性。研究發現,期貨價格波動對現貨價格有正向影響,但期貨價格波動對現貨價格波動性並無顯著影響。此外,臺灣股票市場的價格波動性狀態持續性的機率相當高,其價格波動可能容易受全球經濟與政治因素影響。

英文摘要

Stock and futures markets are the two main markets in Taiwan’s financial market. With the world trend of financial liberalization and internationalization, the relations between the spot market and the future market have been becoming a hot topic of in-vestors. Therefore, the research subjects in this study are the Taiwan Stock Exchange Capitalization Weighted Stock Index (TAIEX) and Taiwan Index Futures (TX1) from July 21, 1998 to December 31, 2015. The dynamic influence of price jumps of index futures on spot prices with the regime-switching model proposed by Hamilton (1989) is explored. Being compared to other researched models, the SWARCH model proposed by Hamilton and Susmel (1994) can best capture the price behavior of Taiwan Stock Mar-ket on the likelihood ratio test. The resultant showed that futures price volatility has a positive impact on spot prices and futures price volatility has no significant impact on spot price volatility. Besides, the probability of price volatility persistence in Taiwan stock market is very high and price fluctuations may be susceptible to global economic and political factors.

主题分类 商管學院 > 管理科學學系碩士班
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 2.陳仕偉、葉兆龍(2003),「台灣景氣循環特性之探討:馬可夫轉換模型的應用」,台灣銀行季刊,54:1,1-27。
    連結:
  2. 1.Abhyankar, A. H. (1995). Return and volatility dynamics in the FTSE 100 stock index and stock index futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 15(4), 457-488.
    連結:
  3. 3.Beine, M., Laurent, S. and Lecourt, C. (2003). Official central bank interventions and exchange rate volatility: Evidence from a regime-switching analysis. European Economic Review, 47(5), 891-911.
    連結:
  4. 4.Bianchi, F. (2013). Regime switches, agents' beliefs, and post-world War II US macroeconomic dynamics. Review of Economic Studies, 80(2), 463-490.
    連結:
  5. 5.Black, F. (1976). The pricing of commodity contracts. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1), 167-179.
    連結:
  6. 6.Cai, J. (1994). A markov model of switching-regime ARCH. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 12(3), 309-316.
    連結:
  7. 7.Canarella, G. and Pollard, S. K. (2007). A switching ARCH (SWARCH) model of stock market volatility: some evidence from Latin America. International Review of Economics, 54(4), 445-462.
    連結:
  8. 8.Canarella, G., Fang, W. S., Miller, S. M. and Pollard, S. K. (2010). Is the great moderation ending? - UK and US evidence. Modern Economy, 1(1), 17-42.
    連結:
  9. 9.Chan, K. (1992). A further analysis of the lead-lag relationship between the cash market and stock index futures market. Review of Financial Studies, 5(1), 123-152.
    連結:
  10. 10.Cheung, Y. W. and Erlandsson, U. G. (2005). Exchange rates and markov switching dynamics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistic, 23, 314-320.
    連結:
  11. 11.Cong, R. G., Wei, Y. M., Jiao, J. L. and Fan, Y. (2008). Relationships between oil price shocks and stock market: an empirical analysis from China. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3544-3553.
    連結:
  12. 12.Ertugrul, H. M. and Ozturk, H. (2013). The drivers of credit default swap prices: evidence from selected emerging market countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(5), 228-249.
    連結:
  13. 13.Fama, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices. Journal of Business, 38(1),34-105.
    連結:
  14. 14.Fleming, J., Ostdiek, B. and Whaley, R. E. (1996). Trading costs and the relative rates of price discovery in stock, futures, and option markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 16(4), 353-387.
    連結:
  15. 15.Grossman, S. (1989). The informational role of prices. MIT Press Books, 1.
    連結:
  16. 16.Gulen, H., Xing, Y. and Zhang, L. (2011). Value versus growth: time‐varying expected stock returns. Financial Management, 40(2), 381-407.
    連結:
  17. 17.Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 357-384.
    連結:
  18. 18.Hamilton, J. D. and Susmel, R. (1994). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity and changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics, 64(1), 307-333.
    連結:
  19. 19.Hamilton, J. D. (1996). This is what happened to the oil price-macroeconomy relationship. Journal of Monetary Economics, 38(2), 215-220.
    連結:
  20. 20.Jammazi, R. and Nguyen, D. K. (2015). Responses of international stock markets to oil price surges: a regime-switching perspective. Applied Economics, 47(41), 4408-4422.
    連結:
  21. 21.Kang, J., Lee, C. J. and Lee, S. (2006). An empirical investigation of the lead-lag relations of returns and volatilities among the KOSPI200 spot, futures and options markets and their explanations. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 5(3), 235-261.
    連結:
  22. 22.Kawaller, I. G., Koch, P. D. and Koch, T. W. (1987). The temporal price relationship between S&P 500 futures and the S&P 500 index. Journal of Finance, 42(5), 1309-1329.
    連結:
  23. 23.Lamoureux, C. G. and Lastrapes, W. D. (1990). Heteroskedasticity in stock return data: volume versus GARCH effects. Journal of Finance, 45(1), 221-229.
    連結:
  24. 25.Mandelbrot, B. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business, 36, 294-419.
    連結:
  25. 26.Morgan, I. G. (1976). Stock prices and heteroscedasticity. Journal of Business, 496-508.
    連結:
  26. 27.Park, J. and Ratti, R. A. (2008). Oil price shocks and stock markets in the US and 13 European countries. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2587-2608.
    連結:
  27. 28.Pati, P. C. and Rajib, P. (2011). Intraday return dynamics and volatility spillovers between NSE S&P CNX Nifty stock index and stock index futures. Applied Economics Letters, 18(6), 567-574.
    連結:
  28. 29.Ramchand, L. and Susmel, R. (1998). Volatility and cross correlation across major stock markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 5(4), 397-416.
    連結:
  29. 30.Scholtens, B. and Yurtsever, C. (2012). Oil price shocks and European industries. Energy Economics, 34(4), 1187-1195.
    連結:
  30. 31.Schwarz, T. V. and Laatsch, F. E. (1991). Dynamic efficiency and price leadership in stock index cash and futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 11(6), 669-683.
    連結:
  31. 32.Smith, D. R. (2002). Markov-switching and stochastic volatility diffusion models of short-term interest rates. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(2), 183-197.
    連結:
  32. 33.Subrahmanyam, A. (1991). A theory of trading in stock index futures. Review of Financial Studies, 4(1), 17-51.
    連結:
  33. 34.Theissen, E. (2012). Price discovery in spot and futures markets: A reconsideration. European Journal of Finance, 18(10), 969-987.
    連結:
  34. 35.Tsai, I. C., Chen, M. C. and Ma, T. (2010). Modelling house price volatility states in the UK by switching ARCH models. Applied Economics, 42(9), 1145-1153.
    連結:
  35. 36.Tse, Y. K. (1995). Lead‐lag relationship between spot index and futures price of the nikkei stock average. Journal of Forecasting, 14(7), 553-563.
    連結:
  36. 37.Ye, W., Zhu, Y., Wu, Y. and Miao, B. (2016). Markov regime-switching quantile regression models and financial contagion detection. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 67, 21-26.
    連結:
  37. 38.Zhu, X. and Zhu, J. (2013). Predicting stock returns: A regime-switching combination approach and economic links. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(11), 4120-4133.
    連結:
  38. 一、 中文文獻
  39. 1.高櫻芬、呂廣仁與林建甫(2001),「變異數結構改變的SWARCH模型估計:台灣股價報酬之實證研究」,台灣金融財務季刊,1:1,21-39頁。
  40. 二、 英文文獻
  41. 2. Ang, A. and Timmermann, A. (2012). Regime changes and financial markets. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 4(1), 313-337.
  42. 24.Li, M. Y. L. and Lin, H. W. W. (2003). Examining the volatility of Taiwan stock index returns via a three-volatility-regime markov-switching ARCH model. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 21(2), 123-139.