题名

非法藥物施用者家庭研究

并列篇名

A study on the experiences of the families of persons with drug dependence

DOI

10.6834/csmu202000096

作者

岳瑞霞

关键词

家庭生命歷程 ; 壓力 ; 累積效應 ; 標準化 ; 去標準化 ; 家庭角色 ; family life course ; stress ; cumulative effect ; standardization ; de-standardization ; family role

期刊名称

中山醫學大學醫學社會暨社會工作學系學位論文

卷期/出版年月

2020年

学位类别

碩士

导师

陳心怡

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究探討施用非法藥物事件之壓力情境對於家庭及個別成員的意義,分析家庭與個別成員面對壓力事件的因應與調適,研究的目的在於探索家庭面臨成員施用非法藥物時之特殊生命經驗,關注家庭整體及個別成員之經驗與意義的探討與詮釋。 採用滾雪球方式進行樣本蒐集,共訪談21位受訪者,19個家庭,參與者在家庭中的角色包含子女、父母、夫妻及手足等。以深度訪談的方法進行資料蒐集,透過主題分析法(Thematic Analysis)進行資料編碼、分析,形成概念與主題。研究發現與建議如下: 一、 非法藥物施用的壓力事件對於處於不同家庭生命歷程階段的家庭次系統,有不同的意義與反應,壓力累積的效應也影響家庭次系統中不同角色的壓力感知,感知的程度因著家庭成員在家庭角色中的份量而有差異。當家庭發生成員施用非法藥物的壓力事件時,家庭為因應壓力事件及事件的累積效應,原有的階段歷程及家庭內的成員角色功能與責任會因為因應的需要進行調整。 二、 家庭處於壓力事件長期的影響下,對於壓力的感知均顯得消極、負面,且家庭在因應壓力事件時所具備的資源、或所能獲得的資源也非常有限,不同的家庭角色因應壓力所選擇的策略也不相同,壓力因應結果影響家庭的調適;家庭面對壓力事件由因應走向調適再走向適應之關鍵因素或條件,力量生成的關鍵,包含家庭內部的動力、系統間的合作及時間因素。 三、 家庭的壓力態樣多重,除了家庭原已存在的壓力外,因壓力事件所衍生的問題也非常複雜,需要網絡合作,以連續性、系統性,從各個面向提供以案主為中心的照顧服務。施用者的家庭因處於不同生命歷程有不同的需求,家庭主要照顧度者的壓力感知也是影響服務需求的重要因素,因此對於非法藥物施用者的服務需要以個別化的服務模式,跨越標準化的服務流程,以家庭整體為中心的想像,提供符合家庭生活及文化脈絡的服務管道與服務。 四、 家庭雖面臨非法藥物施用所帶來的壓力與困境,但每個家庭系統仍持續運作,以他們自己的方式達到平衡的狀態,研究中也看到,家庭成員面對壓力事件時所呈現積極正面的價值觀、信念,及堅強的人格特質、家庭成員互助的凝聚力,讓家庭持續走下去。

英文摘要

This research explores how the stressful situations caused by substance use disorder impact the families of the drug users. Additionally, the responses and adjustments of the family and individual members to these events were assessed. This research sought to explore their interpretation of their family members’ problematic drug use and their definitions of the specific experiences that individual family members and the families as a whole undergo. This research adopted adult of persons with drug dependence as its sample. The families recruited for this research were those of individuals who consumed Class 1 (e.g., cocaine) and Class 2 (e.g., ecstasy) drugs. The snowball sampling method was used to recruit potential research interviewees to participate in this study. In total, 21 participants, who were either the children, parents, spouses, or siblings of adult drug users, were interviewed. These participants came from 19 distinct families. Thematic analysis was used to code and analyze the data in accordance with various concepts and topics that emerged from the transcripts. The research findings and recommendations are as follows: 1. The cumulative effects of the pressure caused by problematic drug use generated multiple complex problems for the families of users. The results indicated that at different stages of their life courses, the families encountered different challenges. The stressful effects of problematic drug use impacted various family sub-systems at distinct life course stages in differing ways. The effect of stress accumulation also affected the perceptions of stress of various members of the family sub-system. Upon the occurrence of a stressful event, such as substance drug disorder by a family member, the responses of the kinsfolk to the event and its consequent cumulative effects varied based on their familial role. 2. This study found that the stressful events had a long-term impact on the families and that their perception of the stress was negative. The resources that could assist the families in coping with these difficulties or could be applied in such situations were limited. In accordance with their role, different family members chose distinct strategies in response to stress. How a family responded to stress affected their familial adjustments. The inner power of the families, their cooperation with support systems outside of the family, and time were the key factors that facilitated the generation of a positive power in response to the stress caused by family members’ illicit drug use. 3. The stress faced by persons with drug dependence and their families varied. In addition to the existing pressure in families, the problems caused by stressful events were also complex. Based on the service-user-centered concept, network cooperation is required to provide continuous and systematic resolutions in all aspects. The families of persons with substance use disorder have different needs based on the distinct positions that they occupy. The degree of stress that the main family caregivers experience is also an important factor that influences service demand. Therefore, services provided for persons with drug dependence must be customized and de-standardized. Services should be based on the needs of the family as a whole. Thus, service options should be provided in accordance with the family’s life course stages and cultural context. 4. Although the interviewed families experienced stress and difficulties as a result of their relatives’ illegal drug use, each family system continued to operate and found balance in their own ways. This research also demonstrated that when family members encounter stressful events, they utilize their positive beliefs, strong personality traits, and the support of other family members in order to persevere and overcome these challenges. In conclusion, every family develops its own strategies to facilitate its survival.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
醫學院 > 醫學社會暨社會工作學系
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 高淑清(2001)。在美華人留學生太太的生活世界:詮釋與反思。本土心理學研究,16,225-285。
    連結:
  2. 中文部分
  3. 李信良(2009)。青少年與非法藥物。高雄:復文。
  4. 李增祿主編(2012)。社會工作概論。台北:巨流。
  5. 林萬億(2006)。當代社會工作:理論與方法(二版)。台北:五南。
  6. 林淑馨(2010)。質性研究-理論與實務。台北:巨流。
  7. 潘淑滿(2019)。質性研究-理論與應用。台北:心理。
  8. 謝秀芬(1986)。家庭與家庭服務(初版)。台北:五南。
  9. 謝秀芬(2014)。家庭社會工作:理論與實務(二版)。台北:雙葉書廊。
  10. 簡春安、趙善如(2010)。社會工作理論(初版)。台北:巨流。
  11. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2016)。103年「全國物質使用調查結果報告」。台北:衛 生福利部食品藥物管理署。
  12. 周愫嫻、侯崇文、曹光文(2014)。更生受保護人之就業促進資訊蒐集與就業服務模式建構計畫期末報告。台北:勞動部勞動力發展署
  13. 石雅萍、侯瑞瑜、孫子晴、黃家嫻、李朝煌、姚成榮(2010)。職業功能對於接受美沙冬替代療法的海洛因成癮者藥物施用信念之影響。東港安泰醫護雜誌,16(1),7-12。
  14. 江振亨(2003)。施用非法藥物者用藥循環之研究。彰化師大輔導學報,25,25-62。
  15. 李思賢、吳憲璋、黃昭正、王志傑、石倩瑜(2010)。非法藥物罪再犯率與保護因子研究:以基隆地區為例。犯罪學期刊,30(1),81-106。
  16. 李易蓁、林瑞欽(2011)。伴侶親密關係對於女性成癮成為發展之影響分析。玄奘社會科學學報,9,89-112。
  17. 林瑞欽、鄭添成、李易蓁(2013)。觸發不同用藥類型海洛因成癮者復發決意之生活事件比較研究。玄奘社會科學學報,11,145-188。
  18. 林哲寧(2013)。乘風少年學園-弱勢青少年職涯準備計畫。聯合勸募論壇,3,121-134。
  19. 何淑麗、傅秀雲、牛孝玲(2014)。探討愛滋更生人在就業之歷程。愛之關懷期刊:與HIV感染有關之藥物施用紀非法藥物防制的相關問題,88,32-42。
  20. 許華孚、林正昇(2009)。藥癮戒治者之社會復歸與社會支持接納系統之研究。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,12,53-80。
  21. 陳心怡、童伊迪、唐宜楨(2014)。精神疾患家庭之未成年子女的預防介入策略初探。身心障礙研究,12(2),106-119。
  22. 陳玉書、吳姿璇、林建陽(2017)。女性毒品受刑人矯正處遇與需求。台灣藥物濫用防治,2(1),85-112。
  23. 張麗玉、林子菲(2018)。台灣男性非法藥物再犯者之支持網絡與再犯影響之研究-以南台灣矯正機構收容人為例。藥物施用防治,3(2),75-98。
  24. 張淑慧、張文賢(2019)。施用非法藥物者家庭的社會安全網。社區發展季刊,165,220-235。
  25. 張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120。
  26. 阮光勛(2014)。促進質性研究的品質與可靠性。國教新知,61(1),92-102。
  27. 潘慧玲(2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊,11(1),115-143。
  28. 秦文鎮(2017)。是健康問題還是司法問題-非法藥物成癮治療之理論與實務。臺灣醫界,60(7),35-42
  29. 連鴻榮、劉士誠、謝文彥、林健陽、陳玉書(2018)。假釋受刑人持續與中止犯罪之縱貫研究:非正式社會控制與情境選擇的影響。矯正期刊,7(1),4-30。
  30. 郭玟蘭、吳訊寬、林正昇、蔡協利(2013)。藥癮者跨國婚姻文化適應教育團體初探。矯正期刊,2(2),1-44。
  31. 鄭于沛、陳俊全(2014)。藥物暴露兒童家庭之親職危機與復原。台灣社會福利學刊,11(2),141-184。
  32. 蔡震邦、鍾孟惠(2018)。家庭系統保護因子對於成年藥癮者復原歷程作用之探討。矯正期刊,7(1),135-156。
  33. 蔡佩真(2019)。兒女傷、父母痛:K他命成癮者父母的傷慟經驗與搶救行動。臺大社會工作學刊,39,1-56。
  34. 劉香蘭(2019)。掌握變遷中的家庭:家庭生命歷程發展理論與研究反思。社會政策與社會工作學刊,32(1),91-130。
  35. 劉子瑄、楊士隆(2016)。毒癮司法戒治效果之性別差異研究。藥物濫用防治期刊,1(1), 1-26。
  36. 薛瑞元(2007)。發展本土戒治醫療專業處遇方案-社區追蹤治療模式與社區藥癮復健治療模式之比較。研考雙月刊,31(6),50-59。
  37. 外文部分
  38. Babbie,E.(2010)。社會科學研究方法(劉鶴群、林秀雲、陳麗欣、胡正申、黃韻如譯)。台北:雙葉。(原著出版於2010)
  39. Boeije,H.(2013)。質性研究分析方法(張可婷譯)。台北:韋伯文化。(原著出版於2010)。
  40. Collins,D.,Jordan,C.&Coleman,H.(2016)。家庭社會工作(魏希聖譯)。台北:洪葉。(原著出版於2013)
  41. Chambliss,F. Schutt,Russell K.(2015)。社會科學研究法-理解人類社會的工具書(林佳瑩編譯)。台北:雙葉。(原著出版於2012)
  42. Goffman,E.(2016)。汙名(曾凡慈譯)。台北:群學。(原出版於1963)
  43. Mckenry,P.C.&Price,S.J.(Eds.).(2004)。家庭壓力(鄭維瑄、楊康臨、黃郁婷譯)。台北:五南。(原著出版於2000)
  44. Walsh,F.(2008)。家族再生<逆境中的家庭韌力與療癒>(江麗美、李淑珺、陳厚愷譯)。台北:心靈工坊。(原著出版於2006)
  45. White,J.M. Klein,D.M.(2016)。家庭理論(馬永年、梁婉華譯)。台北:五南。(原著出版於2008)
  46. Hartman,A. Laird,J(1983). Family-Centered Social Work Practice,N.Y.:The Free Press.
  47. Boss,P.,Bryant,C.M. Mancini,J.A.(2017).Family Stress Management:A Context Approach(Third ed).Los Angeles:SAGE
  48. Ahern ,J., Stuber ,J., Galea ,S. (2007).Stigma, discrimination and the health of illicit drug users.Drug and Alcohol Dependence,88,188–196.
  49. Baggio ,S., Iglesias ,K., Deline ,S., Studer ,J.,Henchoz , Kuo ,Y.,M.M. Gmel ,G. (2015).Not in Education, Employment, or Training Status Among Young Swiss Men. Longitudinal Associations With Mental Health and Substance Use.Journal of Adolescent Health ,56, 238-243.
  50. Beard ,J., Biemba ,G., Brooks ,M.I, Costello ,J., Ommerborn ,M., Bresnahan, M., Flynn ,D. Simon ,J.L. (2010).Children of female sex workers and drug users:a review of vulnerability, resilience and familycentred models of care..Journal of the International AIDS Society , 13(Suppl 2):S6.
  51. Bronfenbrenner ,U. (1986).Ecology of the Family as a Context for Human Development:Research Perspectives).Development Psychology,22(6),723-742.
  52. Bengtson,V.L. Allen,K.R.(1993).The Life Course Perspective Applied to Families over Time.in P.G.Boss et al.(eds),Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods:A Contextual Approach,p.p.469-504.New York:Plenum Press.
  53. Elzinga,C.H. Liefbroer,A.C.(2007).De-standardization of Family-Life Trajectories of Young Adults:A Cross-National Comparison Using Sequence Analysis.European Journal of Population,23(3-3),225-250.
  54. Ghanbaripanah ,A., Mustaffa ,M.S. Ahmad,R.( 2013 ).Structural Analysis of Family Dynamics Across Family Life Cycle in Iran.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,84,486 – 490.
  55. Hudson,C.R.,Kirby,K.C.,Firely,M.L.,Festinger,D.S. Marlowe,D.B.(2002).Social adjustmentof family members and significant others (FSOs) of drug users.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,23,171–181.
  56. Kopak ,A.M., Chen,A.C. , Haas ,S.A. Gillmore,M.R. (2012).The importance of family factors to protect against substance use related problems among Mexican heritage and White youth.Drug and Alcohol Dependence,124,34– 41.
  57. Morisano,D.,Babor,T.F.,&Robaina,K.A.(2014).Co-occurrence of substance use disorders with other psychiatric disorders:Implications for treatment services.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,31,5-25.
  58. Maluccio ,A.N. Ainsworth ,F. (2003).Drug Use by Parents:A Challenge for Family Reunification Pratice.Children and Youth Services Review,25(7),511-533.
  59. Macmillan,R. Copher,R.(2005).Families in the Life Course:Interdependency of Roles,Role Configurations, and Pathways..Journal of Marriage and Family,67(4),858-879.
  60. Rosen,D. Spencer,M.S. Tolman,R.M. Williams,D.R. Jackson,J.S.(2003).Psychiatric Disorders and Substance Dependence among Unmarried Low-Income Mothers. Health social work,28(2),157-165.
  61. Rush,B.(2014).Evaluating the complex: Alternative models and measures for evaluating collaboration among substance use services with mental health,primary care and other services and sectors.Nordic Studis On Alcohol and Drug,31,27-44.
  62. Ryan ,J.,Esaub ,M.V. Romana,N.V.(2018).Legislative response to family violence in South Africa: A family centered perspective.Aggression and Violent Behavior,42,1–8.
  63. Stokkebekk,J.,Iversen,A.C.,Hollekim ,R. Ness,O.(2019).Keeping balance”,“Keeping distance”and“Keeping on with life”:Child positions in divorced families with prolonged conflicts.Children and Youth Services Review,102,108–119.
  64. Wikler ,A. Rasor ,R.W. (1953).Psychiatric Aspects of Drug Addiction.American Journal of Medicine,566-570.
  65. 網路資料
  66. National Institute on Drug Abuse(NIDA)(2018)。非法藥物,大腦和行為:成癮的科學。擷取自:https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction。線上檢索日期:2019.9.8
  67. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)(2017)。藥物施用的健康後果。擷取自:https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/health-consequences-drug-misuse。線上檢索日期 2018, 10.16
  68. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)(2019)。2019年世界非法藥物問題報告書。擷取自:https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2019/prelaunch/WDR2019_B1_C.pdf。線上檢索日期:108年8月25日
  69. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime(UNODC)(2018)。2018年世界非法藥物問題報告書。擷取自https://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/prelaunch/WDR18_ExSum_Chinese.pdf,2018.11.7 。線上檢索日期:2018年10月6日。
  70. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)(2017)。2017年世界非法藥物問題報告書。取自:https://www.unodc.org/wdr2017/field/WDR_Booklet1_Exsum_Chinese.pdf.。線上檢索日期:2018年10月16日
  71. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)(2012)。2019年世界非法藥物問題報告書。擷取自:https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/WDR2012/Executive_summary_chinese.pdf。線上檢索日期:108年8月25日
  72. 衛生福利部主編(2018)。藥物施用案件暨檢驗統計資料<106年報分析>。擷取自:https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/site.aspx?sid=4482。線上檢索日期:107年11月16日
  73. 警政署統計室(2018)。警政統計通報。擷取自:https://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/lp?ctNode=12594 xq_xCat=27 mp=1。線上檢索日期:2018年10月16日
  74. 行政院(2018)。新世代反毒策略。擷取自:https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/47bbd6cf-5762-4a63-a308-b810e84712ce。線上檢索日期:108年8月25日
  75. 食品藥物管理署管制藥品組(2019)。107年全國物質使用調查結果。擷取自:https://drug-prevention.fda.gov.tw/AntiPoison/TheNewsDetail.aspx?nodeID=14 newsid=f498919。線上檢索日期:108年8月25日
  76. 法務部全國法規資料庫(2017)。毒品危害防制條例。擷取自:https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=C0000008。線上檢索日期:108年9月1日
  77. 法務部全國法規資料庫(2019)。民法。擷取自:https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=B0000001 。 線上檢索日期:108年9月1日
  78. 法務部(2018)。毒品案件性別分析。107年法務統計性別分析,擷取自:file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/00%E6%AF%92%E5%93%81%E6%A1%88%E4%BB%B6%E6%80%A7%E5%88%A5%E5%88%86%E6%9E%901071221.pdf。線上檢索日期:108年9月1日。
  79. 衛生福利部(2020)。家內兒童及少年保護案件-施虐者本身因素分析。108年衛生福利部統計分析,擷取自: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOPS/lp-1303-105-xCat-cat04.html。線上檢索日期:109年7月18日。
  80. 衛生福利部(2017)。脆弱家庭辨識面向與因子。107年強化社會安全網計畫,擷取自: https://topics.mohw.gov.tw/SS/cp-4531-50117-204.htmll。線上檢索日期:109年7月18日。
  81. 行政院主計總處(2019)。家庭組織型態。擷取自: file:///F:/%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99/StatResult-2020_07_18%20(1).xls.htm。線上檢索日期:109年7月18日。
  82. 行政院主計總處(2019)。家庭組織型態定義。擷取自:https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_DetailData.aspx?sn=iGJRpsNX45yniGDj%2bw1ueQ%3d%3d d=194q2o4%2botzoYO%2b8OAMYew%3d%3d。線上檢索日期: 109年7月18日。
  83. Braun,V Clarke,V.(2012). Thematic Analysis.APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Research Designs, H. Cooper (Editor-in-Chief).Retrieved July 7,2020 from :https://methods.sagepub.com/book/understanding-research-methods-and-statistics-in-psychology/n17.xml
  84. Marshall ,O. (2013).Associative stigma among families of achcohol and other drug users.Research Online,Retrieved July 17,2019 from http://ro.ecu.edu.an/theses_hons/104.
  85. Price ,S.J., Price, C.A., McKenry ,P.C. (2011)。Families Coping With Change-A Conceptual Overview。Families Change: Coping with Stressful Events and Transitions,Research Online,Retrieved July 20,2018 from https://www.corwin.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/30979_Chapter1.pdf