探討團隊導向學習對加護病房護理人員安寧相關法令教育之學習成效

The Effects of Applying Team-Based Learning on Learning Palliative Care Act for ICU Nurses

蔡姈砡

團隊導向學習法 ； 安寧緩和醫療條例 ； 病人自主權利法 ； 加護病房護理人員 ； Team-Based Learning ； Palliative Care Act ； Patient Self-Determination Act ； Intensive Care Unit Nurses

高雄醫學大學護理學系碩士班學位論文

2018年

碩士

陳麗糸

繁體中文

背景：現今加護病房需要照護許多末期的病人，而加護病房的護理人員對多次變革的「安寧緩和醫療條例」及108年即將實施的「病人自主權利法」卻有認知不足的情形。可能因為機構對安寧相關法令教育的不足或是教學方法的不具創新性所致，因此，需要導入創新的教學方法提升加護病房護理人員對安寧相關法令的知能學習。 目的：本研究旨在(一)探討團隊導向學習對改善加護病房護理人員安寧相關法令之學習成效。(二)探討介入TBL後加護病房護理人員安寧相關法令之成績表現、自主學習能力、學習滿意度及團體參與評價之相關。 方法：本研究為一類實驗設計之非隨機分派的「實驗組與控制組前-後測」設計；研究對象以方便取樣選取97位南部某教學醫院加護病病房護理師(含專科護理師)。實驗組為TBL教學共59人，控制組為傳統教學法共38人，全部研究對象接受「安寧相關法令認知評估量表」前測後，實驗組介入團隊導向學習法，控制組介入傳統教學法，並分別於課後隨即執行認知第一次後測以及課後2週進行認知第2次後測。資料以IBM SPSS Statistics 22 中文版套裝軟體進行描述性統計及Paired t-test、t test、Pearson’s correlation、ANOVA及Repeated Measure等推論性統計分析。 結果：研究結果顯示：(一)介入TBL教學方法比起傳統教學法，對提升加護病房護理人員學習安寧相關法令認知得分具顯著成效。(二)介入TBL之實驗組之IRAT與TRAT的成對樣本t檢定具顯著性差異(t =-16.48, p< .000)，顯示TBL教學方法之團體互動可以讓學習成績具明顯提升效果。(三)實驗組之團體參與評價的高低，與個人認知前測與IRAT、團體成績TRAT與TBL、學習滿意度及自主學習能力具有正相關。(四)TBL成績表現與自主學習能力、學習滿意度及團體參與評價高低具正相關。 結論：本研究個人認知前測結果顯示加護病房護理人員對安寧法令認知仍是不足，而創新/翻轉教育TBL能提升知能並引發自主學習動機；同時，課前的預習準備以及TBL課中的小組討論，都有助於提升課程內容的了解及學習滿意度。

Background: Many terminal patients received end of life care in intensive care units (ICU) in Taiwan. However, most of ICU nurses do not have adequate knowledge of “ Palliative Care Act” and “ Patient Self-Determination Act”. The main reasons may be caused by the lack of continue education of Palliative Care Act or using the traditional pedagogy as a teaching method. It is significant to intervene some creative learning methods to improve the knowledge of Palliative Care Act for ICU nurses. Purpose: This study tried to 1)evaluate the effects of applying team-based learning on Palliative Care Act for ICU nurses, 2)investigate the relationships within knowledge scores of Palliative Care Act, learning satisfaction, self-directed learning and peer evaluation after intervening the TBL. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental design study with the pre-test and post-test for experiment group and control group. Ninety-seven ICU nurses who work in a teaching hospital in southern Taiwan were recruited. The participants were divided non-randomly into 59 nurses in the TBL experiment group and 38 nurses in the traditional pedagogy control group. All of the research members received “ The knowledge of Palliative Care Act Assessment Scale” tests for four times those were before and just after teaching class, followed by 1 week and 2 weeks after class. Data were analyzed by IBM SPSS Statistics 22 with Paired t-test, t-test, Pearson’s correction coefficient, ANOVA and Repeated Measure. Results: The results indicated that 1) The ICU nurses in the TBL group may have significantly higher scores of knowledge on Palliative Care Act than those in the traditional pedagogy group, 2) In the TBL group, the TRAT scores may significantly higher than the IRAT scores (t=-16.48, p<.000). That meant the team work may improve the effects of learning. 3) The levels of peer evaluation in the TBL group were positively correlated with the scores of individual pre-test, IRAT, TRAT, TBL, students’ satisfaction and self-directed learning. 4) TBL grades were significantly associated with learning satisfaction, self-directed learning and peer evaluation scores. Conclusion: According to the pre-test scores, the lack of knowledge of Palliative Care Act still existed within ICU nurses. The creative/flipped education, such as TBL, may improve the motivation of self-directed learn- ing and the pre-class readiness may play an important role in understand the content of Palliative Care Act and learning satisfaction as well.

1. 周希諴、李選、羅旭宜、周裕銓、張梅芳(2006)．某教學醫院護理人員對安寧療護知識、態度及參與工作意願之探討．中山醫學雜誌，17(1)，23-32。
   連結：
2. 王英偉、謝至鎠(2010)．團隊導向學習簡介．醫學教育，14(1)，79-89。
3. 內政部統計處(2015年11月30日)．簡易生命表編製結果分析．取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/Life/103年簡易生命表提要分析.pdf
4. 行政院衛生署衛生福利部(2013)．安寧緩和醫療條例．取自http://
5. www.tho.org.tw/ xms/content/show.php?id=1216
6. 朱思盈、林明慧、陳曾基、黃信彰（2008）．影響臺灣死亡地點的臨
7. 床與心理社會因子．北市醫學雜誌，5(5)，484-494。 doi:10.6200/TCMJ.2008.5.5.02
8. 宋宜盉、鐘淑英、吳宏蘭、劉紋妙（2016）．護理之家護理人員對安
9. 寧療護知識及態度的探討．安寧療護雜誌，21(1)，30-45。
10. doi:10.6537/TJHPC.2016.21(1).3
11. 宋佳霖(2014)．護理之家工作人員對安寧療護知識、態度及相關因素的探討．已發表之碩士論文，中台科技大學。
12. 李皎正、鍾聿琳(2012)．談護理臨床教育．護理雜誌，59(5)，5-9。doi:10.6224/JN.59.5.5
13. 吳春桂、林宏茂、林芳如、林亞陵、蔡紋苓、廖婉伶…黃勝堅(2011)
14. ．重症生命末期照護之新趨勢．臺灣醫學，15(1)，37-47。 doi:10.6320/FJM.2011.15(1).07
15. 林文絹(2010)．教學方法．於林佩芬總校閱，教學原理於護理實務上之應用(2版，159-182頁)．台北市：華杏。
16. 林真瑜(2008)．問題導向學習評量表之建構．已發表之碩士論文，高雄醫學大學。
17. 林真瑜、曾惠珍、李子奇、金繼春、簡淑媛、黃玉珠、周汎澔(2010)
18. ．問題導向學習評量表之建構．醫學教育，14(1)，36-48。
19. 周佳慧(2014)．探討加護病房護理人員對生命末期病患安寧療護知識與態度的相關性．已發表之碩士論文，輔英科技大學。
20. 胡文郁、張媚(2015)．安寧緩和護理之教育觀．護理雜誌，62(2)，25-33。doi:10.6224/JN.62.2.25
21. 翁益強(2012)．對急重症病人生命末期之照護．榮總護理，29(3)，220-224。 doi:10.6142/VGHN.29.3.220
22. 孫效智(2016，1月21日)．《病人自主權利法》的精神與內涵．取自
23. http://www.leeandli.org.tw/download/%E6%B3%95%E7%90%86%E6%83%85%E8%AB%87/201601/20160121-病人自主權利法(楊玉欣委員).pdf
24. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會(2016年，7月27日)．105年教學醫院評鑑基準及評量項目．取自http://www.jct.org.tw/admin/
25. Upload/A011474B-7CFC-44AE-B41E-12B0ED34979B/01-105年教學醫院評鑑基準及評量項目-105.04.pdf
26. 馬瑞菊、蔡惠貞(2013)．提供重症善終服務：改善加護病房生命末期照護．馬偕護理雜誌，7(1)，7-13。
27. 陳亭儒、胡文郁(2011)．善終之概念分析．長庚護理，22(1)，45-52。
28. 陳殷正、劉郁孚、蔡蕙珊、林玉書、范建得（2016）．安寧緩和醫療條例回顧與探討．醫學與健康期刊，5(1)，25-34。
29. 許淑芬(2012)．新北市護理人員對安寧療護認知、態度之調查研究．已發表之碩士論文，國立台北教育大學。
30. 張夢凡、張松山（2010）．自我導向學習與繼續進修意願 之探討－以滿意度為中介變項之實證研究．工業科技教育學刊，3，33-40。
31. 莊艷妃、黃錦鳳、黃雅庭(2015)．比較北部與東部加護病房病患簽署
32. 不施行心肺復甦術同意書對臨終前醫療處置影響之差異．慈濟技術學院學報，(24)，1-18。
33. 葉芳辰(2016)．新生兒加護病房護理人員對安寧緩和醫療條例認知與不施行心肺復甦術態度．已發之碩士論文，國立台灣大學。doi:10.6342/NTU201603301
34. 楊淑溫、劉介宇、廖松語(2008)．加護病房護理人員對照顧瀕死病患態度及其影響因素探討．輔仁醫學期刊，6(4)，163-173。
35. 趙可式(2007a)．安寧伴行．台北市：天下文化。
36. 鄭夙芬、劉雪娥、方震中、萬國華（2010）．影響急診醫護人員對安寧緩和醫療條例認知及不施行心肺復甦術態度之因素．台灣醫學，
37. 14(2)，124-132。 doi:10.6320/FJM.2010.14(2).03
38. 潘美伶(2016)．團隊導向學習對護理系學生學習成果之統合分析．未發表之碩士論文，中台科技大學。
39. 劉伯聖(2016)．瞭解中台灣兩家區域級醫院護理人員對安寧療護現況
40. 之認知．未發表之碩士論文，美和科技大學。
41. 劉淑如、蔡淑玲、劉秀珍、鄭靜瑜(2014)．TBL教學策略之成效探討：以護理導論課程為例．長庚科技學刊，(21)，63-73。doi:10.6192/CGUST.2014.12.21.6
42. 蔡麗雲、李英芬、劉景萍、賴允亮、張澤芸、杜金錠(2003)．實施「安寧緩和醫療條例教育訓練方案」成效之初探．安寧療護雜誌，8(4)，364-380。 doi:10.6537/TJHPC.2003.8(4).2
43. 衛生福利部(2016年，12月9日)．安寧醫療緩和條例．取自http://
44. law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=L0020066
45. 衛生福利部(2016年，12月9日)．病人自主權利法．取自http://law.
46. moj.gov.tw/Law/LawSearchResult.aspx?p=Z&k1=%E7%97%85%E4%BA%BA%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%BB%E6%AC%8A%E5%88%A9%E6%B3%95&t=B1B2B3B4A1A2C1C2D1D2&fei=0&TPage=1
47. 鍾聿琳(2007)•護理研究實務與應用•台北：高立。
48. 謝至鎠、黃家琪、王英偉(2012)．以團隊導向學習運用於預立醫療自主計畫繼續教育之教學．安寧療護雜誌，17(3)，249-260。
49. 謝至鎠、葉日弌、楊孝友、程慧娟、王文利、王英偉(2010)．以團
50. 隊導向學習運用於家庭醫學科教學之初步嘗試．醫學教育，14
51. (2)，96-106。
52. Alimoglu, M. K., Yardım, S. & Uysal, H. (2017). The effectiveness of TBL with real patients in neurology education in terms of knowledg-
53. eretention, in-class engagement, and learner reactions. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(1), 38-43. doi: 10.1152/advan. 00130.
54. 2016.
55. Boysen-Osborn, M., Anderson, C. L., Navarro, R., Yanuck, J., Strom, S., McCoy, C. E., … Langdorf, M. I. (2016). Flipping the AdvancedCardiac Life Support Classroom with Team-based Learning: Comparison of Cognitive Testing Performance for Medical Students at the University of California, Irvine, United States. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 13(11). doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.11. eCollction 2016
56. Brieva, J. L., Cooray, P., & Rowley, M. (2009). Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in intensive care: an Australian experience. Critical care and resuscitation, 11(4), 266-268.
57. Campbell, S. (2006). Palliative care education in primary health. Australian Nurses Journal, 14(3), 35.
58. Cheng, C. Y., Liou, S. R., Tsai, H. M., & Chia-Hao Chang, C. H. (2014). The effects of Team-Based Learning on learning behaviors in the maternal-
59. child nursing course. Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 25-30.
60. Cheng, S.F., Kuo, C.L., Lin, K.C., & Hsieh, J. (2010). Development and preliminary testing of self-rating instrument to measure self-directed learning ability of nursing students. International Journal of Nursing
61. Studies, 47(9), 1152-1158.
62. Devictor, D. J., & Latour, J. M. (2011). EURYDICE II study group Forgoing life support: how the decision is made in European pediatric intensive care units. Intensive Care Medicine, 37(11), 1881-1887.
63. Emke, A. R., Butler, A. C., & Larsen, D. P. (2016). Effects of Team-Based Learning on short-term and long-term retention of factual knowledge. Medical Teacher, 38(3), 306-311. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1034663
64. Farland, M. Z., Franks, A. S., Barlow, P. B., Shaun Rowe, A., & Chisholm-Burns, M. (2015). Assessment of student learning patterns, performance, and long-term knowledge retention following use of didactic lecture compared to team-based learning. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(3), 317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2014.12.009
65. Ferrell, B. R., Dahlin, C., Campbell, M. L., Paice, J. A., Malloy, P., & Virani, R. (2007). End-of-life Nursing Education Consortium (ELNEC) Training Program: improving palliative care in critical care. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 30(3), 206-212.
66. Floriani, C. A., & Schramm, F. R. (2012). Routinization and Medicalizeation of palliative care: Losses, gains and challenges. Palliative and Supportive Care, 10(4), 295-303. doi: 10.1017/S1478951511001039
67. Haidet, P., O'Malley, K. J., & Richards, B. (2002). An initial experience with “team learning” in medical education. Academic Medicine, 77, 40–44.
68. Hall, J. B., Schmidt, G. B., & Kress, J. P. (2015). Principles of Critical Care (4th ed.). The United States, MO: Mc Graw-Hill Education.
69. Kolluru, S., Roesch, D. M., & Akhtar de la Fuente, A. (2012). A Multi-Instructor, Team-Based, Active-Learning Exercise to Integrate Basic and Clinical Sciences Content. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(2), 33.
70. Kühne-Eversmann, L., Eversmann, T., & Fischer, M. (2008). Team- and case -based learning to activate participants and enhance knowledge: An evaluation of seminars in Germany. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 165-171.
71. Loftin, C., & West, H. (2017). Evaluating Self-Efficacy After a Team-Based Learning Activity. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 28(2), 96-102. doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000119.
72. Mennenga, H. A. (2010, August). Team-based learning: Engagement and accountability with psychometric analysis of a new instrument. Retrieved from http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/854
73. Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (2004). Team-Based Learning : A Transformative Use of Small Groups in CollegeTeaching.
74. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing. Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008a). Fundamental principles and
75. practices of teambased learning. In L. Michaelsen, D. Parmelee, K. McMahon, & R. Levine (Eds.), Team-based learning for health professions education: A guide to using small groups for improving learning (pp. 9-31). Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
76. Morris, J. (2016). The use of team-based learning in a second year undergraduate preregistration nursing course on evidence-informed decisi-
77. on making. Nurse Education in Practice, 21, 23-28. doi: 10. 1016/j.nepr.2016.09.005
78. Myburgh, J., Abillama, F., Chiumello, D., Dobb, G., Jacobe, S., Kleinpell, R., … Zimmerman, J. (2016). End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: Report from the Task Force of World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Journal Critical Care, 34, 125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.04.017
79. Nation, L. M., Tweddell, S., & Rutter, P. (2016). The applicability of a validated team-based learning student assessment instrument to assess United Kingdom pharmacy students’ attitude toward team-based learning. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 13(30), 1-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp. 2016.13.30
80. Nishigawa, K., Hayama, R., Omoto, K., Okura, K., Tajima T., Suzuki, Y., …Matsuka, Y. (2017). Validity of Peer Evaluation for Team-Based Learning in a Dental School in Japan. Journal of Dental Education, 81(12), 1451-1456. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.106.
81. Parmelee, D., Michaelsen, L. K., Cook, S., & Hudes, P. D. (2012). Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65. Medical Teacher, 4(5), e275-87. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179.
82. Piva, J., Lago, P., Othero, J., Garcia, P. C., Fiori, R., Fiori, H., . . . Dias, F. S. (2010). Evaluating end of life practices in ten brazilian paediatric and adult intensive care units. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(6), 344-348. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.035113
83. Renea, L., Beckstrand, R. L., Callister, L. C., & Kirchhoff, K. L. (2006). Providing a “Good Death”: Critical Care Nurses’ Suggestions for Improving End-of-Life Care. American Journal of Critical Care, 15(1), 38-45.
84. Roh, Y. S., Lee, S. J., & Choi, D. (2015). Learner Perception, Expected Competence, and Satisfacttion of Team-Based Learning in Korean Nursing Students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(2), 118-120.
85. Seymour, B., Kinn, S., & Sutherland, N. (2003). Valuing both Critical and
86. creative thinking in clinical practice: Narrowing the research-practice gap? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(3), 288-296.
87. Sibbald, R., Downar, J., & Hawryluck, L. (2007). Perceptions of “futile care” among caregivers in intensive care units. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 177(10), 1201-1208.
88. Sisk, R. J. (2011). Team-based learning: Systematic research review. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(12), 665-669. doi:http://ezproxy.oxy.
89. kmu. edu.tw:2061/10.3928/01484834-20111017-01
90. Taglieri, C., Schnee, D., Dvorkin, Camiel, L. D., Zaiken K., Mistry A., … Goldman, J. (2017). Comparison of long-term knowledge retention in lecture-based versus flipped team-based learning course delivery. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(3):391-397. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2017.01.007
91. Tsai, M. F., Sheu, C. C., Tsai, J. C., Tien, Y. C., & Liu, K. M. (2016). Constructing a conceptual model for team-based learning program in medical school through a qualitative lens. Journal of Medical Education, 20(1), 22-32. doi: 10.6145/jme201603
92. Tseng, H. C., Chou, F. H., Wang, H. H., Ko, H. K., Jian, S.Y., & Weng, W.
93. C. (2011). The effectiveness of problem-based learning and concept mapping among Taiwanese registered nursing students. Nurse Educa- tion Today, 31(8), e41-e46. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.11.020. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
94. Vasan, N. S., & DeFouw, D. O. (2007) The Use of Reading Assignments and Learning Issues as an Alternative to Anatomy Lectures in a Team-Based Learning Curriculum. Michaelsen, L. K., Parmelee, D. X., McMahon, K. K., & Levine, R. E. (Ed.), Team-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Guide to Using Small Groups for Improving Learning(1st ed,. pp. 169-175). Columbia: Stylus Publishing.
95. Wakabayashi, N. (2015). Flipped classroom as a strategy to enhance active learning. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 81(3)-82(1), 1-7.
96. Yasuhara, T., Konishi, M., Nishida, T., Kushihata, T., Sone, T., Kurio, W., … Nakamura, M. (2014). Practical chemistry education provided by team-based learning (TBL) and peer evaluation. Yakugaku Zasshi, 134(2), 185-194.