题名

審計委員會成員任期與盈餘管理之關聯性

并列篇名

The Association between Independent Audit Committee members’ Board Tenure and Earnings Management

DOI

10.6840/cycu201900202

作者

周榮聖

关键词

審計委員會 ; 任期 ; 盈餘管理 ; Audit Committee ; Tenure ; Earnings Management

期刊名称

中原大學會計學系學位論文

卷期/出版年月

2019年

学位类别

碩士

导师

高儷華

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究檢視2006年至2017年我國已設置審計委員會之上市(櫃)公司其審計委員會成員之任期與盈餘管理與兩者間之關聯。 盈餘管理之衡量本研究分為裁決性應計數絕對值(ABSDA),以及帶有方向性之裁決性應計數正值(DA+)和裁決性應計數負值(DA-)兩群子樣本進行評估。審計委員會成員之任期以三種方式衡量 - 平均任期(AVGTENURE)、最長任期(MAXTENURE),以及任期間距(最長任期與平均任期之間的差額)(MAXAVG)。 實證結果顯示,AVGTENURE,MAXTENURE和MAXAVG均與DA-呈顯著正相關,而與ABSDA和DA+呈顯著負相關(除MAXAVG和DA+外)。以上實證結果說明,當審計委員會成員之任期愈長,因經驗之累計以及對產業更加熟悉之原因,更能夠使其深入瞭解企業營運之過程,並且有效發揮審計委員會監督之功能,抑制企業盈餘管理之行為。

英文摘要

This study examines the relationship between earnings management and the independent audit committee members’ board tenure for Taiwan listed and over-the-counter (OTC) companies with audit committee from the year of 2006 to the year of 2017. The earning management is assessed with the discretion accruals absolute value (ABSDA), the discretion accruals positive value (DA+), and the discretion accruals negative value (DA-). The independent audit committee members’ board tenure is measured by three ways-average board tenure (AVGTENURE), the longest board tenure (MAXTENURE), and the difference between average board tenure and the longest board tenure (MAXAVG). The empirical results indicate that AVGTENURE, MAXTENURE, and MAXAVG are all significantly positively related to DA- , but negatively related to ABSDA and DA+; except for MAXAVG and DA+. In other words, the longer the independent audit committee members stay in the board, the more industrial expertise they get, and easier for them to understand the process of business operations. Therefore, the audit committee members can play the supervision role to mitigate the extent of earnings management behavior.

主题分类 商學院 > 會計學系
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
参考文献
  1. 李建然、廖秀梅與張卉諭,2016,審計委員會設置及其品質對公司價值的影響,中華會計學刊,第12卷第2期:231-265。
    連結:
  2. 陳錦村、葉雅薰,2002,公司改組、監督機制與盈餘管理之研究,會計評論,第34期,頁1~30。
    連結:
  3. 蔡柳卿、楊怡芬,2006,〈公司治理與符合績效門檻盈餘管理行為之關聯性研究〉,《東吳經濟商學學報》,第53期,33-72。
    連結:
  4. 王元章及張樁柏,2012,核心代理問題對盈餘管理之影響,會計審計論叢,第2卷第2期,69-113。
  5. 李建然、林秀鳳,2012,大型會計師事務所之審計品質真的比非大型會計師事務所好嗎?從抑制盈餘管理的角度探討-控制自我選擇偏誤的重要性,中華會計學刊,第9卷第1期,77-110
  6. 李建然、廖秀梅、蔡佳育,2016,上市櫃公司自願設置審計委員會及審計委員會品質之決定因素,當代會計 , 17(1),1–34。
  7. 陳雨珊,2009,不同經濟環境因素下之盈餘管理之研究。醒吾學報,第40卷,47-72。
  8. 葉銀華與林志豪,2014,上市櫃公司要設置審計委員會?審計委員會與盈餘管理之研究,輔仁管理評論,第21卷第3期:1-22。
  9. 廖益均,2015,董事會運作法規與制度變更,貨幣觀測與信用評等,5月:86-105。
  10. Abarbanell, J. S., and R. Lehavy. 2003. Biased forecasts or biased earnings? The role of earnings management in explaining apparent optimism and inefficiency in analysts' earnings forecasts.Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  11. Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 69–87.
  12. Agrawal, A. and Chadha, S. 2005. Corporate governance and accounting scandals.Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 371-406.
  13. Barton, J.,Simko, P. 2002.The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint.The Accounting Review,77(1),1-27.
  14. Bartov, E. (1993). The timing of asset sales and earnings manipulation. Accounting Review, 840-855.
  15. Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71 (4): 443-465.
  16. Beasley, M. S., Salterio S. E.. 2001.The relationship between board characteristics and voluntary improvements in audit committee composition and experience. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(4), 539–570.
  17. Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary accounting research, 15(1), 1-24.
  18. Bedard, J. C., and K. M. Johnstone. 2004. Earnings manipulation risk, corporate gorvrnance risk, and auditors’ planning and pricing decisions. The Accounting Review 79(2):277-304.
  19. Carcello, J. V., and T. L. Neal. 2003. Audit committee characteristics andeauditor dismissals following new going-concern audit reports. The Accounting Review 78: 95-117.
  20. Chan, K., N. Jegadeesh, and T. Sougiannis. 2004. The accrual effect on future earnings. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 22: 97-121.
  21. Chi, Wuchun and Lisic, Ling Lei and Pevzner, Mikhail.2010” Is Enhanced Audit Quality Associated with Greater Real Earnings Management? Accounting Horizons, Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 315–335, 2011.
  22. Chtourou, S. M., J. Bedard, and L. Courteau.(2001). Corporate governance and earnings management. Working paper, University of Laval.
  23. Chung R., Firth, M. and Kim, J. B. (2002). Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 29-48.
  24. Cohen, D., A. Dey, and T. Lys. 2008. Real and accrual-based earningsemanagement in the pre and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review 83(3):757-787.
  25. Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51(3):371-406.
  26. DeFond, M. L., R. N. Hann, and X. Hu. 2005. Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors? Journal of Accounting Research 43(2):153-193.
  27. Dhaliwal, D., V. Naiker, and F. Navissi. 2010. The Association Between Accruals Quality and the Characteristics of Accounting Experts and Mix of Expertise on Audit Committees*. Contemporary Accounting Research 27(3): 787-827.
  28. Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. The Journal of Political Economy 88(2): 288-307.
  29. Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26(2): 301-325.
  30. Farmer, T. A., L. E. Rittenberg, and G. M. Trompeter. 1987. An investigation of the impact of economicand organizational factors on auditor independence.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory6: 1–14.
  31. Felo, A. J., and Krishnamurthy, S., and Solieri, S. A. 2003.Audit committee characteristics and the perceived quality of financial reporting: An empirical analysis. Working Paper.
  32. Fich, E. M., and A. Shivdasani. 2006. Are busy boards effective monitors? The Journal of Finance 61(2): 689-724.
  33. Fouad, A., and R. B. Ahmed. (2001) “Growth opportunities and earnings management.” Managerial Finance, 27(12), 72-81.
  34. Francis, J. R., E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. (1999) “The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18(fall), 17-34.
  35. Geiger, M. A., and K. Raghunandan. 2002. Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21(1): 67-78.
  36. Gupta, M.,Pevzner, M.,Seethamraju, C. 2010.Implications of absorption costing for firm performance and valuation.Contemporary Accounting Research,28(3),1-34.
  37. Hambrick and Fukutomi, 1991(4).The seasons of a CEO's tenure. Academy of Management Review.
  38. Healy, P. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal ofeAccounting and Economics 7(1-3): 85-107.
  39. Healy, P.M. and G.P.Palepu.2001.Inforntion asymmetry corporate disclosure and the capital markets:A review of the empirical disclosure literature. journal of Accounting and Economics 31:405-440.
  40. Hunt, A.,Moyer, S. E.,Shevlin, T. 1996.Managing interacting accounting measures to meet and multiple objectives: A study of LIFO firms.Journal of Accounting and Economics,21(3),339-374
  41. Jones, J.J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29(2): 193-228.
  42. Klein, A. 2002.Economic determinants of audit committee independence. The Accounting Review 77: 435-453.
  43. Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J. and Wasley C. E. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.
  44. Krishnan, Gopal, Audit Quality and the Pricing of Discretionary Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, March 2003.
  45. Mark S. Beasley, Joseph V. Carcello, Dana R. Hermanson, and Paul D. Lapides (2000) Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate Governance Mechanisms. Accounting Horizons: December 2000, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 441-454.
  46. McVay, S. E. 2006.Earning management using classification shifting: An examination of core earnings and special items.The Accounting Review,81(3),501-531.
  47. Minton, B., and C. Schrand. 1999. The impact of cash flow volatility on discretionary investment and the costs of debt and equity financing. Journal of Financial Economics 54:423-460.
  48. Nelson, M., J. Elliott and R. Tarpley. 2002. Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors’ earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 175-202.
  49. Penman, H. S. 1980.An empirical investigation of the voluntary disclosure of corporate earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 18(1), 132-160.
  50. Press, E. G., and J. B. Weintrop. 1990. Accounting-based constraints in public and private debt agreements: Their association with leverage and impact on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12:65-95.
  51. Pritchard, Adam C. and Ferris, Stephen P. and Jagannathan, Murali, 2003.Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board Appointments. Journal of Finance. 58: 1087-1111.
  52. Raghunathan, B., B. Lewis, and J. Evans III. 1994. An empirical investigation of problem audits. Research in Accounting Regulation 8(1): 33-58.
  53. Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42(3): 335-370.
  54. Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons,3(4),91-102.
  55. Sharma, V. D., and E. R. Iselin. 2012. The association between audit committee multiple-directorships, tenure, and financial misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31(3): 149-175.
  56. Tanyi, P. N. and D. B. Smith, May 2015. Busyness, expertise, and financialareporting quality of audit committee chairs and financial experts. A Journal of Practice &Theory.34(2): 59–89.
  57. Warfield, T. D., J. J. Wild, and K. L. Wild. (1995) “Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(7), 61-91.
  58. Watts, R. L. and Zimmerman, J. L. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-hal, 388.
  59. Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9(3): 295-316.
  60. Yang, J. S., and J. Krishnan. 2005. Audit committees and quarterly earnings management. International Journal of Auditing 9(3): 201-219.