题名

未婚伴侶的時間觀、愛情關係品質與趨避承諾之相關研究

并列篇名

The Relationship between Time Perspective, Love Relationship Quality and Approach versus Avoidance Commitment among Unmarried Couples

DOI

10.6345/THE.NTNU.DEPC.010.2018.F02

作者

游心慈

关键词

時間觀 ； 愛情關係品質 ； 趨避承諾 ； 未婚伴侶 ； Time Perspective ； Love Relationship Quality ； Approach versus Avoidance Commitment ； Unmarried Couples

期刊名称

臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文

卷期/出版年月

2018年

学位类别

碩士
导师

陳慧娟
内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文旨在探討時間觀、趨避承諾與愛情關係品質之關聯。共722位18-34歲之未婚伴侶參與研究。以時間觀量表、趨避承諾量表及愛情關係品質量表為測驗工具，調查參與者之時間觀、趨避承諾與愛情關係品質。透過SPSS 23與Lisrel 8.52統計軟體執行t考驗、變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析、因果路徑分析及中介效果分析以考驗研究假設。 主要研究結果顯示：趨避承諾與所有關係品質指標均呈顯著相關；時間觀與部分關係品質指標出現顯著相關；趨避承諾與時間觀亦有顯著相關性。再者，趨避承諾、過去負向、當下宿命、未來正向與未來負向時間觀能預測整體關係品質；過去正向、未來正向、過去負向與當下宿命時間觀預測趨向式承諾；過去正向、過去負向、當下宿命及未來負向時間觀預測迴避式承諾。趨避承諾對時間觀與整體關係品質之相關性具顯著中介效果。 末尾指出本研究之限制與貢獻，並提供未來研究與實務工作者建議。
英文摘要

The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationships among time perspective, approach versus avoidance commitment and love relationship quality. The participants are 722 unmarried couples, aged 18-34. We used Time Perspective Inventory, Approach Versus Avoidance Commitment Test and Love Relationship Quality Form to test their time perspective, approach versus avoidance commitment and relationship quality. Data obtained in this study were tested by t test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, causal path analysis and mediating effect analysis with the Statistical Analysis System including SPSS 23 and Lisrel 8.52. The main findings showed that there are significant relationship between general relationship quality and approach versus avoidance commitment, time perspective and part of the relationship quality. And also, approach versus avoidance commitment and time perspective are significant correlated. Other than that, approach versus avoidance commitment, Past Negative, Present Fatalistic, Future Positve and Future Negative time perspective predicted general relationship quality, Past Positive, Future Positive, Past Negative and Present Fatalistic time perspective predicted approach commitment. Past Positive, Past Negative, Present Fatalistic and Future Negative time perspective predicted avoidance commitment as well. Furthermore, approach versus avoidance commitment could be a mediator between time perspective and relationship quality. Finally, the limitations and contributions of the research were pointed out, and some suggestions for future applications in counseling and research directions were also presented.
主题分类 教育學院 > 教育心理與輔導學系
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 孫頌賢、李宜玫（2011）：約會伴侶的愛情動機導向與愛情依戀系統之關聯性研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊，10，95-110。
    連結：
  2. 一、中文文獻
  3. 女王（2015）：相信你值得幸福。台北市：圓神出版社。
  4. 王慶福、林幸台、張德榮（1996）：愛情關係發展與適應之評量工具編制。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，43，227-240。
  5. 方美文（2015）：預測華人未婚女性婚前承諾之研究—以臺灣樣本為例。國立臺北教育大學心理與諮商學系碩士學位論文。
  6. 內政部（2017）：106年第22週內政統計通報。取自
  7. http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/week10622.pdf
  8. 古芸妮（2004）：未婚男女婚姻信念、婚姻態度與婚姻承諾之相關研究。中國文化大學碩士學位論文。
  9. 行政院性別平等會（2016）：重要性別統計資料庫－初婚者之年齡平均數。取自https://goo.gl/f1r566
  10. 李怡真、林以正（2006）：愛情關係中的情緒表達衝突之縱貫研究。中華心理學刊，48(1)，53-67。
  11. 李茂能（2008）：SEM適配度指標的潛藏問題：最佳模式難求。測驗統計年刊，16（下），17-29。
  12. 呂靜宜（2007）：大學生的愛情態度與婚前承諾─以台北市為例。實踐大學家庭研究與兒童發展研究所碩士學位論文。
  13. 沈怡廷（2013）：伴侶條件差距、愛情關係品質與主關幸福感之關聯性研究。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士學位論文。
  14. 沈素雲（2013）：成人婚姻承諾與婚姻品質之相關研究。國立臺南大學諮商與輔導學系碩士在職專班碩士學位論文。
  15. 林以正、黃金蘭（2006）：親密感之日常社會互動基礎：一個縱貫式的研究。中華心理學刊，48(1)，35-52。
  16. 吳明隆（2009）：結構方程模式：方法與實務運用。高雄市：麗文。
  17. 吳懿珊（2012）：現代婚姻樣態分析－從婚前經驗與華人性格探討婚姻溝通、婚姻承諾與婚姻品質間之關係。國防大學政治作戰學院心理碩士班碩士學位論文。
  18. 孟祥森（譯）（2003）：愛的藝術（原作者：E. Fromm）。臺北市：志文。
  19. 紙老虎（2016年11月22日）：愛情觀大不同！美國人愛情見立在「獨立」，台灣人太害怕失去？【新聞群組】。取自https://buzzorange.com/vidaorange/2016/11/22/love-4/
  20. 秦穗玟、黃馨慧（2011）：青少年愛情關係滿意度：以台北縣市高中職學生為例。應用心理研究，49，219-251。
  21. 郭生玉（2012）：心理與教育研究法。台北市：精華書局。
  22. 教育部終身教育司（2015）：重編國語辭典修訂本網路版。取自
  23. http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/
  24. 楓秋（2015年7月26日）：＜面對愛情＞忍　不該是愛情墳墓。自由時報電子報。取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/supplement/paper/901215
  25. 陳柏熹（2011）：心理與教育測驗－測驗編製理論與實務。新北市：精策教育。
  26. 陳亭潔（2011）：大學生依附風格、愛情關係品質與寂寞感之相關研究。中國文化大學心理輔導學系研究所碩士學位論文。
  27. 陳素幸（2008）：生命的時間學。台北市：大塊文化。
  28. 陳詩潔、吳麗娟（2008）：大學生的共依附特質、自我感受與愛情關係品質之相關研究，教育心理學報，40（1），153-177。
  29. 陳碧祥（2011）：以網路為研究媒介之研究倫理問題新挑戰：85-97學年度教育類論文之分析研究。教育科學研究期刊，56（2），27-67。
  30. 陳慧娟、游心慈、劉怡佳（2016）：教育鐘點戰：時間觀在適性教學與輔導的啟示。中等教育，67(1)，18-35。
  31. 黃芳銘（2007）：結構方程模式理論與應用（五版）。台北市：五南圖書。
  32. 張小嫻（2015）：愛情使人忘記時間【線上論壇】。取自
  33. http://www.millionbook.net/gt/z/zhangxiaoxian/swj/078.htm
  34. 張采君（2014）：愛情關係適應、自我證實與婚前承諾之關係研究。國防大學政治作戰學院心理碩士班碩士學位論文。
  35. 張春興（2011）：張氏心理學辭典簡明版。台北市：東華書局。
  36. 鄧惠文（2013）：學習，在一起的幸福。台北市：三采文化。
  37. 鄭斐文（2009）：不同世代女性的愛情觀、性態度及關係滿意度。佛光大學心理學系碩士班碩士學位論文。
  38. 廖婉如（2011）：大學生的婚姻承諾之研究。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士學位論文。
  39. 謝文宜、曾秀雲（2007）：探討伴侶關係滿意度及其相關因素：比較已婚夫妻、未婚情侶與同志伴侶的差異。臺灣性學學刊，13(1)，71-86。
  40. 鍾子偉（2015年8月）：沒有對的人，只有對的時間，感謝前女友教我的事。商周.COM。文章來源網址http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.aspx?id=13652&type=Blog
  41. 鍾秉融、謝宏仁、鍾金原(2017）：我還不想結婚：七位女性對於婚姻的共同想像。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報。13(3)，191-217。
  42. 顏欣怡、卓紋君（2013）：大學生情侶之愛情風格、溝通姿態、關係滿意度及關係承諾度之探討-對偶分析研究。中華心理衛生學刊，26(3)，443-485。
  43. 羅梅英（2013年3月）：黃金5年，還是失落5年？畢業5年，人生勝負成定局！Career職場情報誌，442，66-69。
  44. 劉立慈（2012）：大學生愛情關係之情緒表達衝突、生氣表達方式與衝突管理方式對愛情關係滿意度之影響—以東吳大學為例。東吳大學心理學系碩士論文。 
  45. 二、英文文獻
  46. Acevedo, B. P., & Aron, A. (2009). Does a long-term
  47. relationship kill romantic love?. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 59-65.
  48. Acker, M., & Davis, M.H. (1992). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in adult romantic relationships:A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(1), 21–50.
  49. Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(4), 939-954
  50. Agnew, C. R., & Dove, N. (2011). Relationship commitment and perceptions of harm to the self. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 322–332.
  51. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American psychologist, 55(5), 469.
  52. Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1190-1203. doi:10.1177/0146167201279011
  53. Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American journal of Sociology, 66 (1), 32-40.
  54. Bernstein, M. J., & Benfield, J. A. (2013) Past perspective is related to present relationships: Past-positive and negative time perspectives differentially predict rejection sensitivity. The Psychological Record, 63(3), 615.
  55. Boniwell, I., & Osin, E. (2015). Time perspective coaching. In Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application (pp. 451-469). Springer International Publishing.
  56. Brown, S. W. (2005). Time Is Everywhere: Review of H. Helfrich,(Ed.), Time and Mind II: Information Processing Perspectives. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(2), 139-142.
  57. Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview.Journal of
  58. Family Psychology, 5(3-4), 295.
  59. Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B., & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and construct validation of the Swedish Zimbardo time perspective inventory. European
  60. Journal of Psychological Assessment. 27(4): 220–227.
  61. Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B., & Åström, E. (2015). Broadening the TP profile: future negative time perspective. In Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application (pp. 87-97). Springer International Publishing.
  62. Cloutier, A., & Peetz, J. (2016). People, they are a changin’The links between anticipating change and romantic relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1-23. DOI: 10.1177/0265407516652967
  63. Cox, C. L., Wexler, M. O., Rusbult, C. E., & Gaines, S. a , Jr. (1997).Prescriptive support and commitment processes in close relationships.Social Psychology Quarterly, 60(1), 79-90.
  64. Dainton, M., & Gross, J. (2008). The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25(3), 179–191.
  65. Davis, K. E., & Latty-Mann, H. (1987). Love styles and relationship quality: A contribution to validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(4), 409-428.
  66. De Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of
  67. self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 332-344.
  68. Desmyter, F., & De Raedt, R. (2012). The relationship between time perspective and subjective well-being of older adults. Psychologica Belgica, 52(1), 19-38.
  69. Drigotas, S. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Verette, J. (1999). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Personal Relationships, 6(3), 389–409.
  70. Dunkel, C. S., & Harbke, C. (2017). A review of measures of Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development: Evidence for a general factor. Journal of Adult Development, 24(1), 58-76.
  71. Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 73-92.
  72. Elliot, A. J., Gable, S. L., & Mapes, R. R. (2006). Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 378–391.
  73. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and
  74. Social Psychology, 82(5), 804-818.
  75. Engel, G., Olson, K. R., & Patrick, C. (2002). The personality of love: Fundamental motives and traits related to components of love. Personality and Individual
  76. Differences, 32(5), 839-853.
  77. Erol, R. Y., & Orth, U. (2016). Self-esteem and the quality of romantic relationships. European psychologist. 21(4), 274-283.
  78. Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., Wu, T. F., & Wei, M. (2013). Attachment and the investment model: Predictors of relationship commitment, maintenance, and persistence. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 546 –567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 6811.2012.01423.x
  79. Farooqi, S. R. (2014). The construct of relationship quality. Journal of Relationships Research, 5(e2), 1-11.
  80. Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 557.
  81. Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 956– 974. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.956
  82. Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007
  83. Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(1), 72.
  84. Frank, E., & Brandstätter, V. (2002). Approach versus avoidance: different types of commitment in intimate relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(2), 208.
  85. Fraenkel, P. (2011). Sync Your Relationship, Save Your Marriage: Four Steps to Getting Back on Track. [ St. Martin's Press ebook version].
  86. Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 74(1),175–222.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00373.x
  87. Gable, S. L. (2008). Approach and Avoidance Motivation in Close Relationships. In J. P. Forgas & J. Fitness (Eds.), Social relationships: Cognitive, affective and motivational processes (pp.219-234). New York: Psychology Press.
  88. Gable, S. L., & Berkman, E. T. (2008). Making connections and avoiding loneliness: Approach and avoidance social motives. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation (pp. 203–216). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  89. Gage, K. (2017, Dec). There is no „right person, wrong time“- the real right person is timeless ,and right regardless. Retrieved from https://psiloveyou.xyz/there-is-no-right-person-wrong-time-ac38f05dd0e6
  90. García, J. A., & Ruiz, B. (2015). Exploring the Role of Time Perspective in Leisure Choices: What About the Balanced Time Perspective?. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(5), 515.
  91. Givertz, M., Burke, T., Segrin, C., & Woszidlo, A. (2016). Attachment orientation moderates the relationship between dedication and constraint commitment and felt constraint in married couples. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and
  92. Practice, 5(1), 1.
  93. Goodboy, A. K., Myers, S. A., & Members of Investigating Communication. (2010). Relational quality indicators and love styles as predictors of negative relational maintenance behaviors in romantic relationships. Communication Reports, 23(2), 65-78.
  94. Goodfriend, W., & Agnew, C. R. (2008). Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1639-1652.
  95. Gruber, J., Cunningham, W. A., Kirkland, T., & Hay, A. C. (2012). Feeling stuck in the present? Mania proneness and history associated with present-oriented time perspective. Emotion, 12(1), 13.
  96. Güell, P., Orchard, M., Yopo, M., & Jiménez-Molina, Á. (2015). Time Perspectives and Subjective Wellbeing in Chile. Social Indicators Research, 123(1), 127-141.
  97. Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social
  98. Psychology, 54(6), 980.
  99. Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137-142.
  100. Hill, C. A. (2002). Gender, relationship stage, and sexual behavior: The importance of partner emotional investment within specific situations. Journal of sex research, 39(3),
  101. 228-240.
  102. Holman, E. A. (2015). Time perspective and social relations: a stress and coping perspective. In Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application (pp. 419-436). Springer International Publishing.
  103. Holman, E. A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2009). The social language of time: The time perspective–social network connection. Basic and applied social psychology, 31(2), 136-147.
  104. Impett, E. A., Beals, K. P., & Peplau, L. A. (2002). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20, 312–326.
  105. Impett, E. A., Gere, J., Kogan, A., Gordon, A. M., & Keltner, D. (2014). How sacrifice impacts the giver and the recipient: Insights from approach‐avoidance motivational theory. Journal of personality, 82(5), 390-401.
  106. Impett, E. A., Gordon, A., Kogan, A., Oveis, C., Gable, S. L., & Keltner, D. (2010). Moving toward more perfect unions: Daily and long-term consequences of approach and avoidance goals in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 948–963.
  107. Johnson, M. P. (1973). Commitment: A conceptual structure and empirical application. Sociological Quarterly, 14(3), 395-406.
  108. Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1),160–177.
  109. Jones-Smith, E. (2011). Theories of counseling and psychotherapy: An integrative approach. Sage Publications.
  110. Kelmer, G., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S., & Markman, H. J.(2013). Relationship quality, commitment, and stability in long‐distance relationships. Family process, 52(2), 257-270.
  111. Knopp, K., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S., Owen, J., & Markman, H. (2014). Fluctuations in commitment over time and relationship outcomes. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3(4), 220-231.
  112. Komura, K. (2014). Association between Commitment, Positive and Negative Affects, and Depression in Romantic Relationships. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 113, 124-128.
  113. Košťál, J., Klicperová-Baker, M., Lukavská, K., & Lukavský, J. (2015). Short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI–short) with and without the
  114. Future-Negative scale, verified on nationally representative samples. Time & Society, 25(2), 169-192.
  115. Laghi, F., Pallini, S., Baumgartner, E., & Baiocco, R. (2016). Parent and peer attachment relationships and time perspective in adolescence: Are they related to
  116. satisfaction with life?. Time & Society, 25(1), 24-39.
  117. Lagoutina, Y. (2016). Perfectionism and time perspectives: An inquiry into the association between perfectionism subtypes and categorical time perspectives. Time & Society, 0(0), 1-19.
  118. Landis, M., Bodenmann, G., Bradbury, T. N., Brandstätter, V., Peter-Wight, M., Backes, S., ... & Nussbeck, F. W. (2014). Commitment and dyadic coping in long-term relationships. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and
  119. Geriatric Psychiatry, 27(4), 139.
  120. Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 37–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00035
  121. Lemay, E. P. (2016). The Forecast Model of Relationship Commitment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 111(1), 34-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000052
  122. Lydon, J. E., Pierce, T., & O’Regan, S. (1997). Coping with moral commitment to long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
  123. 73(1), 104–113.
  124. McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1992). Temporal Context and Temporal Patterning Toward a Time-Centered Perspective for Social Psychology. Time & Society, 1(3), 399-420.
  125. Molinari, L., Speltini, G., Passini, S., & Carelli, M. G. (2016). Time perspective in adolescents and young adults: Enjoying the present and trusting in a better
  126. future. Time & Society, 25(3), 594-612.
  127. Owen, J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2010). The revised commitment inventory: Psychometrics and use with unmarried couples. Journal of family issues, 0192513X10385788.
  128. Owen, J., Rhoades, G., Shuck, B., Fincham, F. D., Stanley, S., Markman, H., & Knopp, K. (2014). Commitment uncertainty: A theoretical overview. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3(4), 207.
  129. Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2010). Helping each other grow: Romantic partner support, self-improvement, and relationship quality.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1496–1513
  130. Overbeek, G., Ha, T., Scholte, R., de Kemp, R., & Engels, R. C. (2007). Brief report: Intimacy, passion, and commitment in romantic relationships—Validation of a ‘triangular love scale’for adolescents. Journal of adolescence, 30(3), 523-528.
  131. Peetsma, T. T. (2000). Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(2), 177-192.
  132. Peetz, J., & Kammrath, L. (2011). Only because I love you: why people make and why they break promises in romantic relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 100(5), 887-904.
  133. Ponzi, D., Henry, A., Kubicki, K., Nickels, N., Wilson, M. C., & Maestripieri, D. (2015). The slow and fast life histories of early birds and night owls: Their
  134. future-or presentorientation accounts for their sexually monogamous or promiscuous tendencies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(2), 117–122.
  135. Przepiorka, A. (2016). What makes successful entrepreneurs different in temporal and goal-commitment dimensions?. Time & Society, 25(1), 40-60.Reynolds, J., Houlston, C., & Coleman, L. (2014). Understanding relationship quality.
  136. London: OnePlusOne. Available online at: http://www. oneplusone. org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/UnderstandingRelationship-Quality-by-Jenny-Reynolds-Dr-Catherine-Houlston-and-Dr-Lester-Coleman. pdf.
  137. Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment. Journal of family psychology, 24(5), 543-550.
  138. Rindfuss, R. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28(4), 493-512.
  139. Rogge, R. D., Fincham, F. D., Crasta, D., & Maniaci, M. R. (2016). Positive and Negative Evaluation of Relationships: Development and Validation of the Positive–Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) Scale. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000392
  140. Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of experimental social psychology, 16(2),
  141. 172-186.
  142. Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary commitment. Personality and Social
  143. Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 558-571.
  144. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and
  145. investment size. Personal relationships, 5(4), 357-387.
  146. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
  147. Sabourin, S., Valois, P., & Lussier, Y. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model.
  148. Psychological assessment, 17(1), 15-27.
  149. Segal, N., & Fraley, R. C. (2016). Broadening the investment model An intensive longitudinal study on attachment and perceived partner responsiveness in commitment dynamics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(5),
  150. 581-599.
  151. Seginer, R., & Lens, W. (2015). The motivational properties of future time perspective future orientation: Different approaches, different cultures. In Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application (pp. 287-304). Springer
  152. International Publishing.
  153. Stolarski, M., Bitner, J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011). Time perspective, emotional intelligence and discounting of delayed awards. Time & Society, 20(3), 346-363.
  154. Stolarski, M., Wojtkowska, K., & Kwiecińska, M. (2015). Time for love: partners’ time perspectives predict relationship satisfaction in romantic heterosexual couples. Time & Society, 0(0), 1-23. doi:10.1177/0961463X15596703
  155. Slotter, E. B., Finkel, E. J., DeWall, C. N., Pond Jr, R. S., Lambert, N. M., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Putting the brakes on aggression toward a romantic partner: the inhibitory influence of relationship commitment.
  156. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(2), 291-305.
  157. Spann, S. (2013, Dec 23). How your “Time Perspective” can impact your marriage. [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/Ddt2Cb
  158. Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 595-608.
  159. Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Whitton, S. W. (2010). Commitment: Functions, formation, and the securing of romantic attachment. Journal of family theory &
  160. review, 2(4), 243-257.
  161. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological review, 93(2), 119-135.
  162. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(3), 313-335.
  163. Strachman, A., & Gable, S. L. (2006). What you want (and don’t want) affects what you see (and don’t see): Avoidance social goals and social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1446–1458.
  164. Tan, K., & Agnew, C. R. (2015). Ease of Retrieval Effects on Relationship Commitment The Role of Future Plans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(2), 161–171.
  165. The Time Paradox. (2012, September). The New Psychology of Time That Will Change your Life. Retrieved from http://www.thetimeparadox.com/surveys/
  166. Updegraff, J., Gable, S., & Taylor, S. (2004). What makes experiences satisfying? The interaction of approach-avoidance motivations and emotions in well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 496–504.
  167. Van Beek, W., Berghuis, H., Kerkhof, A., & Beekman, A. (2011). Time perspective, personality and psychopathology: Zimbardo’s time perspective inventory in psychiatry. Time & society, 20(3), 364-374.
  168. Webster, J. D. (2011). A new measure of time perspective: Initial psychometric findings for the Balanced Time Perspective Scale (BTPS). Canadian Journal of
  169. Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 43(2), 111-118.
  170. Webster, G. D., Laurenceau, J. P., Smith, C. V., Mahaffey, A. L., Bryan, A. D., & Brunell, A. B. (2015). An investment model of sociosexuality, relationship satisfaction, and commitment: Evidence from dating, engaged, and newlywed
  171. couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 112-126.
  172. Weigel, D. J. (2010). Mutuality of commitment in romantic relationships: Exploring a dyadic model. Personal Relationships, 17(4), 495-513.
  173. Weigel, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (2002). Investigating the behavioral indicators of relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(3), 403–423.
  174. Weigel, D. J., Davis, B. A., & Woodard, K. C. (2015). A two-sided coin Mapping perceptions of the pros and cons of relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(3), 344-367.
  175. Weigel, D. J., Weiser, D. A., & Lalasz, C. B. (2017). Testing a Motivational Model of Relationship Maintenance: The Role of Approach and Avoidance Relationship Goals. Western Journal of Communication, 81(3), 341-361.
  176. Whitton, S. W., Rhoades, G. K., & Whisman, M. A. (2014). Fluctuation in relationship quality over time and individual well-being main, mediated, and moderated effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(7), 858-871.
  177. Winterheld, H. A., & Simpson, J. A. (2011). Seeking security or growth: a regulatory focus perspective on motivations in romantic relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(5), 935.
  178. Yela, C. (2006). The evaluation of love: Simplified version of the scales for Yela's Tetrangular Model based on Sternberg's Model. European Journal of
  179. Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 21-27.
  180. Ysseldyk, R., & Wohl, M. J. (2012). I forgive therefore I'm committed: A longitudinal examination of commitment after a romantic relationship transgression.
  181. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 44(4), 257-263.
  182. Zajenkowski, M., Carelli, M. G., & Ledzińska, M. (2015). Cognitive processes in time perspective. In I. M. Stolarski, W. van Beek, & N. Fieulaine (Eds.), Time perspective theory; review, research and applications (pp. 243–255).
  183. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  184. Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Bowerman, T. (2013). Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Time & Society, 22(3), 391-409.
  185. Zhang, J.W., Howell, R.T. & Stolarski, M. (2013) Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and
  186. subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1): 169–184.
  187. Zacher, H., & de Lange, A. H. (2011). Relations between chronic regulatory focus and future time perspective: Results of a cross-lagged structural equation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1255-1260.
  188. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2010). The Time Paradox: Using the New Psychology of Time to Your Advantage. [Random House eBooks version]. ISBN: 978-1846041556
  189. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2015). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. In Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research
  190. and Application (pp. 17-55). Springer International Publishing.
  191. Zimbardo, P. G., & Sword, R.K.M. (2017). Living and Loving Better with Time Perspective Therapy: Healing from the Past, Embracing the Present, Creating an Ideal Future. California, USA: McFarland.
print cancel