教練領導行為與教練－選手關係滿意度之相關研究

The Relationship of Coach's Leadership Behaviors and Coach-Athlete Relationship Satisfaction

10.5297/ser.200212_4(2).0006

李烱煌(Chiung-Huang Lee)

教練行為 ； 選手 ； 教練－選手關係滿意度 ； coaching behavior ； athlete ； coach-athlete relationship satisfaction

大專體育學刊

4卷2期（2002 / 12 / 31）

67 - 77

繁體中文

本研究目的有二，(l)探討由同一受試者同時提供偏好領導行為、知覺領導行為、與領導行為的差異等三組資料時，領導行為的差異能否像偏好領導行為、知覺領導行為對效標變項（教練一選手關係滿意度）解釋相等的變異量；(2)瞭解高中手球教練之領導行為與教練－選手關係滿意度間的關係。研究對象為162名來自國內13所高中手球校隊選手（男選手=96名；女選手=66名），平均年齡為16.80 歲（SD=0.73歲），完成填寫四種研究量表，經由多元迴歸分析，結果顯示高中男女手球選手的知覺領導行為對教練－選手關係滿意度與領導能力滿意度之總解釋變異量都高於偏好領導行為與領導行為的差異；高中男子手球選手之知覺關懷行為、知覺專制行為、與知覺民主行為均能顯著預測教練－選手關係滿意度，而知覺關懷行為、知覺專制行為、與知覺訓練與指導則是領導能力滿意度之主要預測變項；在高中女子手球選手方面，只有知覺關懷行為能顯著預測教練－選手關係滿意度，而知覺訓練與指導則是領導能力滿意度之主要預測變項。

This study explored (a)whether the discrepancy score might explain as much variance of criterion variable (coach-athlete relationship satisfaction) as one of the two components used to derive that score, especially when those components were provided by a single subject as in the present case, and (b)the relationships between coach’s leadership behaviors and coach-athlete relationship satisfaction in high school handball athletes. Subjects, 162 handball players (ma1e=96; female=66) from 13 high school teams, were requested to complete the four instruments. The mean age of high school handball athletes was 16.80 years (SD=0.73). Results of multiple regression analyses showed that perceived leadership was the stronger determinant of coach-athlete relationship satisfaction as well as satisfaction with leadership competence than either the preferred leadership or discrepancy score of preferred and perceived leadership in these dimensions. Perceived leadership behaviors, social support, autocratic behavior, as well as democratic behavior, were associated with coach-athlete relationship satisfaction in high school male athletes. The perceived leadership behaviors, social support, autocratic behavior, as well as training and instruction, were related to satisfaction with leadership competence in high school male athletes. The perceived leadership style, only social support, was related to coach-athlete relationship satisfaction in high school female athletes. The perceived leadership style, only training and instruction, was associated with satisfaction with leadership competence in high school female athletes.

1. Chelladurai, P.(1978).A contingency model of leadership in athletic..
2. Chelladurai, P.(1993).Leadership..Handbook of research on sport psychology
3. Chelladurai, P.(1984).Discrepancy between preferences and perceptions of leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports..Journal of Sport Psychology,6
4. Chelladurai, P.(1994).Manual for the leadership scale for sports..
5. Chelladurai, P.(1990).Leadership in sports: A review..International Journal of Sport Psychology,21
6. Chelladurai, P.,Carron, A.V.(1978).Leadership..
7. Chelladurai, P.,Imamura, H.,Yamaguchi, Y.,Oinuma, Y.,Miyauchi, T.(1988).Sport Leadership in a cross national setting: The case of Japanese and Canadian University Athletes..Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,10
8. Home, T.,Carron, A.V.(1985).Compatibility in coach-athlete relationships..Journal of Sport Psychology,7
9. Johns, G.(1981).Difference score measures of organizational behavior variable critique..Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,27
10. Weiss, M.R.,Friedrichs, W.D.(1986).The influence of leader behaviors, coach attributes, and institutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball teams..Journal of Sport Psychology,8
11. White, M.C.,Crino, M.D.,Hatfield, J.D.(1985).An empirical examination of the parsimony of perceptual congruence scores..Academy of Management Review,28
12. 王俊明(1986)。影響級任教師領導行為之因素及其相關問題之研究。光武學校學報，11
13. 楊純碧(1999)。教綀領導行為對團隊氣氛與教練-選手關係滿意度之影響。
14. 鄭伯薰(1990)。領導與情境-互動心理研究途徑。
15. 鄭志富(1997)。多元領導模式的驗證性研究-台灣地后運動教綀領導行為之比較。運動教綀領導行為論文集
16. 鄭志富、蕭嘉惠、牟鐘福(1997)。運動領導量表(中文版)編製研究。臺灣師大體育研究，3

1. 蔡堡樺、蔣任翔、柯伶玫(2016)。中等學校木球運動代表隊選手參與動機、社會支持、知覺教練領導行為與選手滿意度之研究。運動休閒管理學報，13(2)，1-13。
2. 陳律盛(2011)。田徑選手教練領導行為、選手組織承諾與選手滿意度之研究。運動休閒管理學報，8(1)，127-141。
3. 陳其昌、王俊明(2008)。大專院校女子排球選手知覺教練領導行為和運動目標取向對運動動機的影響。排球教練科學，12，27-39。
4. 黃淑玲、張簡坤明(2016)。教練領導行為與目標取向對運動表現之影響。海峽兩岸體育研究學報，10(2)，35-49。
5. 黃致豪(2015)。不同性別大專運動教練性格與轉換型領導之相關研究。淡江體育學刊，18，12-25。
6. 簡瑞宇(2006)。大專網球選手知覺教練領導行爲對運動參與動機及訓練滿意度之影響。臺灣運動心理學報，8，65-86。
7. 廖焜福、張家銘、孫美蓮、吳浩瑀(2018)。教練與選手關係對運動員運動涉入之影響。交大體育學刊，14，11-21。
8. 劉維群,張同廟,林株啟(2022)。指導老師領導風格、希望感對社團效能之影響－以四所大學運動性社團為例。學生社團學刊，10，1-26。
9. 聶喬齡、黃義翔(2012)。教練—選手關係在教練決策領導行為與團隊凝聚力關係中的中介效果探討。臺灣運動心理學報，12(1)，19-38。
10. 邱炳坤、王俊傑、王元聖(2014)。跆拳道選手心理資本與教練領導行為對滿意度之影響。運動教練科學，33，51-65。
11. 王俊明(2007)。大專運動員偏好與知覺教練領導行爲差距及代理效能對教練領導效能的影響。臺灣運動心理學報，11，1-16。
12. 王耀聰(2005)。男、女田徑選手知覺教練領導行為與運動樂趣來源之相關研究。大專體育學刊，7(3)，127-140。
13. 張瑞興(2008)。「運動教練領導」領域中涉及的前置變項：台灣近十年實證研究之分析。大專體育，95，148-152。
14. (2007)。運動教練領導行爲之探討。運動健康與休閒學刊，6，47-51。