運動自我設限量表之探索性與驗證性因素分析

The Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of "Self Handicap Scale for Sports"

10.5297/ser.200402_6(1).0010

吳佳煇(Chia-Huei Wu)；王澤惠(Che-Hui Wang)；林以正(Yi-Cheng Lin)

運動自我設限 ； 辯解 ； 降低努力 ； 探索性因素分析 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； Self Handicap Scale for Sports ； exploratory factor analysis ； confirmatory factor analysis

大專體育學刊

6卷1期（2004 / 02 / 01）

139 - 148

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在於利用不同的研究樣本，進行探索性與驗證性的因素分析，來檢視「運動自我設限量表」的因素結構。本研究參與者為581位台灣大學學生，參與者在隨機分派為兩個研究樣本後，分別用以進行探索性因素分析與驗證性因素分析。探索性因素分析的結果顯示，本量表具有「辯解」與「努力」等兩個自我設限的潛在因素，而驗證性因素分析則確立了二因素結構為較佳的模式，並且篩選出七題較為理想的測量題目。在未來研究中，研究者將可視議題需要利用此量表中的兩個次量表進行運動員自我設限的相關研究，藉以了解不同自我設限相關的心理與行為歷程與處置策略。

The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of the ”Self Handicap Scale for Sports” by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis with different samples. There were 581 students at National Taiwan University who participated in this study. The participants were first randomly assigned into two independent samples. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were then conducted respectively with these two samples. The result of exploratory factor analysis revealed that there were two factors underlying this scale, including ”making excuse” and ”reducing effort”. Moreover, the results of confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the two-factor structure model and retained seven items. In the future, researchers were suggested to use these two subscales, i.e., ”making excuse” and ”reducing effort”, to study relevant issues of self-handicapping, and to develop effective coping strategies.

1. Berglas, S.,Jones, E. E.(1978).Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36
2. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.
3. Can-on, A. V.,Prapavessis, H.,Grove, J. R.(1994).Group effects and self-handicapping.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,16
4. Hausenblas, H. A.,Carron, A. V.(1996).Group cohesion and self-handicapping in female and male athletes.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,18
5. Rhodewalt, F.(1990).Self-handicappers: Individual differences in the preference for anticipatory, self-protective acts.
6. Rhodewalt, F.,Saltzman, A. T.,Wittmer, J.(1984).Self-handicapping among competitive athletes: The role of practice in self-esteem protection.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,5
7. Ryska, T. A.,Yin, Z.,Boyd, M.(1999).The role of dispositional goal orientation and team climate on situational self-handicapping among young athletes.Journal of Sport Behavior,22
8. Strube, M. J.(1986).An analysis of the self-handicapping scale.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,7
9. 陳偉瑀(2001)。競爭情境及回饋方式對高、低自我設限學生在運勤練習行為、運動表現及歸因的影響。

1. 王澤惠(2003)。目標取向、自我評價及歸因型態對運動員自我設限行爲之影響。臺灣運動心理學報，3，1-20。
2. 王澤惠(2005)。體育課必修與選修學生在運動自我設限行爲之差異。臺大體育學報，7，127-148。
3. 鄭桂玫、潘豐泉、徐茂洲(2011)。2004-2009 結構方程模式在體育領域論文運用之探討。運動休閒管理學報，8(2)，19-37。
4. 卓國雄(2016)。學童運動自我設限量表之修訂研究。國立臺灣體育運動大學學報，5(2)，45-65。