當代公共治理變遷與課責機制設計方向之思考

10.6581/lsgc.2015.68(9).02

許立一

課責 ； 間接治理 ； 多元課責途徑模式

中國地方自治

68卷9期（2015 / 09 / 01）

4 - 24

繁體中文

課責的一向是行政倫理的核心，尤其在新公共管理興起後，其更加受到學術界和實務界的關注。原因在於，新公共管理大力提倡民營他、委託外包、公私合夥、協力治理、網絡治理，並且這些治理途徑已經成為今日公共行政常態，治理參與者的多元他以及身分不再單純侷限於公務員，是以如何有效落實課責也成為更為重要的課題。本文首先扼要說明課責的意涵；其次，析論當代公共治理之變遷加深了課責的複雜性與困難性；再者指出課責的重要地位；進而引介當代著名學者所提出之多元課責途徑模式，以說明課責必須契合系絡與治理參與者之特性，提供作為課責機制設計的思考方向。

1. Aberbach, J.,Rockman, B.(2000).The Web of Politics.Washington, DC:Brookings Institution.
2. Ban, C.(Ed.),Riccucci, N. M.(Ed.)(1997).Public Personnel Management: Current Concerns, Future Challenges.New York, NY:Longman.
3. Banfield, E. C.(1975).Corruption as feature of governmental organization.Journal of Law and Economics,18,587-605.
4. Besley, T.,Ghatak M.(2003).Incentives, choice, and accountability in the provision of public services.Oxford Review of Economic Policy,19(2),235-249.
5. Day, P.,Klein, R.(1987).Accountabilities: Five Public Services.London, UK:Tavistock.
6. Dunn, Delmer D.(2003).Accountability, democratic theory, and higher education.Educational Policy,17(1),60-79.
7. Goldsmith, S.,Egger, W. D.(2004).Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector.Washington, DC:Brookings Institute Press.
8. Kettl, D. F.(2015).From intergovernmental to intersectoral.Public Administration Evolving: From Foundations to the Future,New York, NY:
9. Klingner, D. E.(2015).From local to global.Public Administration Evolving: From Foundations to the Future,New York, NY:
10. Koliba, C. J.,Mills, R. M.,Zia, A.(2011).Accountability in Governance Network: An Assessment of Public, Private, and Nonprofit Emergency Management Practices Following Hurricane Katrina.Public Administration Review,71(2),210-220.
11. Lipsky, M.(1980).Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service.New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
12. Mulgan, R.(2000).Accountability: an ever-expanding concept?.Public Administration,78(3),555-573.
13. Osborne, D.,Gaebler, T.(1992).Reinventing Govermnent: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector.New York, NY:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
14. Peters, B. G.(Ed.),Pierre, J.(Ed.)(2003).Handbook of Public Administration.London, UK:Sage.
15. Rohr, J. A.(1986).To Run a Constitution: The Legitimacy of the Administrative State.Lawrence, KS:University Press of Kansas.
16. Romzek, B. S.(2000).Dynamic of public sector accountability in an era of reform.International Review of Administrative Science,66(1),21-44.
17. Rosenbloom, D. H.(2015).The public context.Public Administration Evolving: From Foundations to the Future,New York, NY:
18. Shafritz, J. M.(Ed.)(2000).Defining Public Administration: Selections from the International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
19. Shafritz, J. M.(Ed.),Hyde, A. C.(Ed.)(1992).Classics of Public Administration.Pacific Grove, CA:Book/Cole Publishing Company.
20. Simon, H. A.(1997).Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization.New York, NY:The Free Press.
21. Sørensen, E.,Torfing, J.(2009).Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance.Public Administration,87(2),234-258.
22. Vinzant, J. C.,Crothers, L.(1998).Sheet-Level Leadership: Discretion and Legitimacy in Front-Line Public Service.Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
23. Wamsley, Gary L.(1990).Refounding Public Administraion.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
24. Wamsley, Gary L.(1990).The constitutional case for public Refounding Public Administration.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
25. 吳秀光,許立一(2008).公共治理.新北市:國立空中大學.
26. 許立一(2013).當代治理新趨勢.新北市:國立空中大學.
27. 許立一,張世杰(2011).公務倫理.新北市:國立空中大學.

1. 簡鈺珒、陳敦源(2019)。網絡治理與民主課責：監控民主下的理性選擇理論觀點。國家與社會，21，119-168。
2. 柯于璋(2020)。公私協力夥伴關係之爭議與課責－以我國文化創意產業園區委外經營為例。公共行政學報，58，55-87。
3. 張效通,高文婷(2019)。我國都市設計審議效能性與課責性之分析與改進。都市與計劃，46(3)，171-197。