運用結構方程模式探討個人－組織契合、知識分享與知識創新之關聯性

Applying Structural Equation Model to study the relationship of personal-organization fit, knowledge sharing and knowledge innovation

10.6581/lsgc.202009_73(9).0003

郭彥谷(Yen-Ku Kuo)

個人組織契合 ； 知識分享 ； 知識創新 ； personal-organization fit ； knowledge sharing ； knowledge innovation

中國地方自治

73卷9期（2020 / 09 / 01）

32 - 44

繁體中文

現今的社會已不同與以往世代，高度的競爭壓力隨處可見於企業內部與商業環境當中，故所有組織應當思考自身的競爭力來源，同時以人力資源的價值開創更長遠的發展，提昇知識工作者的創新效益，達成組織發展的願景。本研究旨在探討個人組織契合、知識分享與知識創新的關聯性，目的想要瞭解員工在組織當中與整體環境的契合度，是否可達成知識分享的機制，進而達到知識創新的效果。本文以量化典範的方式進行實證研究，先對各項理論基礎進行探究與綜整，推論研究假設的邏輯與脈絡，以建立理論構念模型。回收有效問卷後以驗證性因素分析檢驗研究工具之信效度，再以結構方程模式驗證各項假設。本研究發現個人組織契合對知識分享、知識創新有正向顯著關聯性，知識分享對知識創新亦有正向顯著影響，在整體結構模式中亦可得知知識分享在主要關係之間發揮中介作用。結論中提出相關的管理措施以增進組織當中得以締造知識創新的策略。

The current social environment is different from the past. High levels of competitive pressure can be seen everywhere in the enterprise and the business environment. Therefore, all organizations should consider their own sources of competitiveness, and at the same time use the value of human resources to create long-term development and improve the innovative benefits of knowledge workers can achieve the vision of organizational development. This research aims to explore the relationship between personal-organization fit, knowledge sharing and knowledge innovation. The purpose is to understand the fit of employees in the organization with the overall environment, and whether they can achieve the mechanism of knowledge sharing, and then achieve the effect of knowledge innovation. This article conducts empirical research in a quantitative paradigm, first inquiries into and comprehensively integrates various theoretical foundations, and infers the logic and context of the research hypotheses to establish a theoretical construct model. After collecting valid questionnaires, confirmatory factor analysis is used to test the reliability and validity of the research tools, and then the structural equation model is used to verify various hypotheses. This study found that personal-organization fit has a positive and significant correlation to knowledge sharing and knowledge innovation, and knowledge sharing also has a positive and significant effect on knowledge innovation. In the overall structure model, it can also be learned that knowledge sharing acts as a mediation between the main relationships. The conclusion puts forward relevant management measures to enhance the strategy of creating knowledge innovation in the organization.

1. Bock, G. W.,Zmud, R. W.,Kim, Y. G.,Lee, J. N.(2005).Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate.MIS quarterly,87-111.
2. Bollen, K. A.(1998).Structural equation models.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..
3. Cable, D. M.,DeRue, D. S.(2002).The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.Journal of Applied Psychology,87(5),875-884.
4. Cable, D. M.,Judge, T. A.(1996).Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry.Organizational behavior and human decision processes,67(3),294-311.
5. Davenport, T. H.,Prusak, L.(1998).Working Knowledge: How organization manage what the know.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
6. Davenport, T. H.,Thomas, R. J.,Cantrell, S.(2002).The mysterious art and science of knowledge-worker performance.MIT Sloan Management Review,44(1),23-31.
7. De Cieri, H.,Holmes, B.,Abbott, J.,Pettit, T.(2005).Achievements and challenges for work/life balance strategies in Australian organizations.The International Journal of Human Resource Management,16(1),90-103.
8. Drucker, P. F.(1985).The discipline of innovation.Harvard business review,63(3),67-72.
9. Drucker, P. F.(1998).Management’s new paradigms.Forbes Magazine,10,98-99.
10. Furnham, A.(2001).Vocational preference and P–O fit: Reflections on Holland’s theory of vocational choice.Applied Psychology,50(1),5-29.
11. Gattiker, U. E.(1990).Technology management in organizations.Newbury Park, CA:Sage publications.
12. Kim, T. T.,Lee, G.(2013).Hospitality employee knowledge-sharing behaviors in the relationship between goal orientations and service innovative behavior.International Journal of Hospitality Management,34,324-337.
13. Kline, R. B.(1998).Software review: Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL.Journal of psychoeducational assessment,16(4),343-364.
14. Kristof, A. L.(1996).Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications.Personnel psychology,49(1),1-49.
15. Nonaka, I.(1995).The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation.Oxford university press.
16. Nonaka, I.,Byosiere, P.,Borucki, C. C.,Konno, N.(1994).Organizational knowledge creation theory: a first comprehensive test.International Business Review,3(4),337-351.
17. Rademakers, M.(2005).Corporate Universities: Driving Force of Knowledge Innovation.Journal of Workplace Learning,17,130-136.
18. Rogers, E. M.(2002).Diffusion of preventive innovations.Addictive behaviors,27(6),989-993.
19. Scott, S. G.,Bruce, R. A.(1994).Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace.Academy of management journal,37(3),580-607.
20. Senge, P. M.(1997).The fifth discipline.Measuring Business Excellence,1(3),46-51.
21. Smith, J.,Gardner, D.(2007).Factors Affecting Employee Use of Work-Life Balance Initiatives.New Zealand Journal of Psychology,36(1),3-12.
22. SO'Cass, A.,Song, M.,Yuan, L.(2013).Anatomy of service innovation: Introduction to the special issue.Journal of Business Research,66(8),1060-1062.
23. Steijn, B.(2008).Person-environment fit and public service motivation.International public management journal,11(1),13-27.
24. Tsui, A. S.(1989).Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads.Academy of management journal,32(2),402-423.
25. Vancouver, J. B.,Schmitt, N. W.(1991).An exploratory examination of person‐organization fit: Organizational goal congruence.Personnel psychology,44(2),333-352.
26. Zhou, J.,George, J. M.(2001).When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice.Academy of Management journal,44(4),682-696.