從「稠密翻譯」角度看翻譯小說之譯註—以安潔拉．卡特為例

"Thick Translation" as an Approach to Translational Footnotes: Angela Carter's Fiction in Taiwan

10.29786/STI.201210.0002

趙睿音(Jui-Yin Chao)

稠密翻譯 ； 側文本 ； 譯註 ； 資本 ； 安潔拉．卡特 ； thick translation ； paratexts ； translational footnotes ； capital ； Angela Carter

翻譯學研究集刊

15輯（2012 / 10 / 01）

19 - 40

繁體中文

本研究試圖探討法國社會學家皮耶．布迪厄（Pierre Bourdieu）的資本（capital）概念，將之應用於詮釋分析英國作家安潔拉．卡特（Angela Carter, 1940-1992）小說譯本中的譯註。卡特的小說是由行人出版社於2004年起陸續譯介引進台灣，至2007年止共計出版五部九冊，其目的在補足翻譯文學市場上，後現代前衛實驗小說的空缺。採用社會學的角度來分析該系列譯本中的大量譯註，讓我們得以深入探討包括原作者、編輯與譯者在內等多位影響譯本產出的作用者（agent）其文化與社會資本效益；譯註作為一種翻譯側文本（paratext），促成了稠密譯本（thick translation）的產生，而建構稠密譯本時，各語言文化參與者間互動的模式，則可透過資本的概念將之清晰勾勒描繪。譯註分析在本研究中有兩項主要功能：其一，重建編輯與翻譯過程，藉由釐清各方影響力來描述翻譯小說文本敘事的形成。其二，提供與文本交叉比對的管道，除正文外，譯註中的印記有助於研究者理解出版過程中的多面向考量，並探討此一理解譯本的索引，如何建立讀者閱讀卡特小說的蹊徑。本研究嘗試指出，譯註的使用並非僅是文本的詮釋或補遺，而是出版過程中各語言文化多方參與者資本與權力平衡下的結果。

This paper attempts to examine the way in which ”capital” (Bourdieu, 1986) and ideology are reflected in translational footnotes, a major paratextual feature that characterises the Chinese translation of English novelist Angela Carter's fiction published in Taiwan. Flâneur, an independent publisher who has identified the lack of experimental literary fiction in Taiwan as an opportunity to appeal to a niche market, releases five translations of Angela Carter's works between 2004 and 2007. A sociological approach to the composition of footnotes is used in order to allow for a consideration for the agents involved in the production of translated fiction; these include publishers, editors and translators. In particular, the study adopts Bourdieu's concept of ”capital” to discuss the workings of ”thick translation” (Appiah, 1993) as evident in works using translational footnotes.The analysis of footnotes serves two major functions: first, it allows the reconstruction of the editing and translating process, revealing how a certain narrative around a translated work of fiction was elaborated by various forces. Second, it enables the examination of strategies used to introduce readers to Carter's fiction, which extend beyond the main texts. This paper suggests that translational footnotes are more than an explanatory apparatus that facilitates readers' comprehension. They also provide an insight into the negotiation of various forms of capital and power.

1. (2003).Kenkyusha's New Japanese-English Dictionary.Tokyo:Kenkyusha.
2. Allen, G.(2000).Intertextuality.London:Routledge.
3. Appiah, K. A.(1993).Thick Translation.Callaloo,16(4),808-819.
4. Carter, A.(1996).Burning Your Boats.London:Vintage.
5. Carter, A.(1985).Nights at the Circus.London:Vintage.
6. Carter, A.(1981).The Magic Toyshop.London:Virago.
7. Carter, A.(1982).The Passion of New Eve.London:Virago.
8. Carter, A.(1992).Wise Children.London:Vintage.
9. Casanova, P.,DeBevoise, M. B.(Trans.)(2004).The World Republic of Letters.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
10. Chao, J.-y.(2011).Translating Victorian Slang in Taiwan: Telling a Fable in Paratexts.Translation Quarterly,61,25-39.
11. Cheung, M. P. Y.(2006).An Anthology of Chinese Discourse on Translation.Manchester, U.K.:St. Jerome.
12. Derrida, J.(1991).This is Not an Oral Footnote.Annotation and Its Texts,New York:
13. Geertz, C.(1973).The Interpretation of Cultures.New York:Basic Books.
14. Genette, G.,Lewin, J. E.(Trans.)(1997).Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
15. Hegerfeldt, A. C.(2005).Lies that Tell the Truth: Magic realism seen through contemporary fiction from Britain.Amsterdam:Rodopi.
16. Hermans, T.(2003).Cross-Cultural Translation Studies as Thick Translation.Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies,66(3),380-389.
17. Jack, I.(1982).Novels and those 'Necessary Evils': Annotating the Brontës.Essays in Criticism,XXXII(4),321-337.
18. Lamont, C.(1997).Annotating a Text: Literary Theory and Electronic Hypertext.Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory,Oxford:
19. Milsom, A.(2010)."Thick" Translation and the Archive as Impetus.Archive': BCLA XII International Conference
20. Moi, Toril(Ed.)(1986).The Kristeva Reader.New York:Columbia University Press.
21. Orr, M.(2003).Intertextuality: Debates and Contexts.Cambridge:Polity.
22. Richardson, John G.(Ed.)(1986).Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education.New York:Greenwood Press.
23. Ryle, G.(1971).Collected Papers.London:Hutchinson.
24. Sage, L.(1994).Angela Carter.Plymouth:Northcote House in association with The British Council.
25. Sage, Lorna(1994).Flesh and the mirror: Essays on the art of Angela Carter.London:Virago.
26. Venuti, L.(1998).The Scandals of Translation: Towards an ethics of difference.London:Routledge.
27. Wandor, Michelene (Ed.)(1983).On Gender and Writing.London:Pandora.
28. Warner, M.(2001).Ballerina: The Belled Girl Sends a Tape to an Impresario.Angela Carter and the Fairy Tale,Detroit:
29. 張明敏(2009)。村上春樹文學在台灣的翻譯與文化。臺北:聯合文學。
30. 陳光興 編(2001)。文化研究在台灣。巨流圖書公司。
31. 單德興(2009)。翻譯與脈絡。臺北:書林。
32. 楊雅婷 譯(2007)。馬戲團之夜。臺北:行人。
33. 嚴韻 譯(2007)。明智的孩子。臺北:行人。
34. 嚴韻 譯(2005)。焚舟紀。臺北:行人。
35. 嚴韻 譯(2007)。新夏娃的激情。臺北:行人。
36. 嚴韻譯(2004)。魔幻玩具鋪。臺北:行人。