题名

專利侵害鑑定

并列篇名

Assessment on Patent Infringement

DOI

10.6374/IPJ.200307.0049

作者

蘇玉櫻

关键词
期刊名称

智慧財產

卷期/出版年月

46期（2003 / 07 / 01）

页次

72 - 73

内容语文

繁體中文
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Tex. Digital, 308 F.3d at 1204-05.
  2. Young Dental Mfg. Co. v. Q3 Special Prods., Inc. 112 F.3d 1137,1141, 42 USPQ2d 1589, 1592(Fed. Cir. 1997)
  3. Warner-Jenkinson, 117 S. Ct. at 1047, 1049-51
  4. Cybor Corp. v. FAS Tech. Inc., 138 F. 3d 1448, 1460, 46 USPQ2d 1169, 1178(Fed Cir. 1998)(in banc).
  5. citing Miller v. Bridgeport Brass Co., 104 U.S. 350, 352 (1881).
  6. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States, 140 F.3d 1470, 1476, 46 USPQ2d 1285, 1290(Fed. Cir.1998).
  7. Personalized Media, 161 F.3d at 704.
  8. Cole v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 102 F.3d 524, 531, 41 USPQ2d 1001, 1006 (Fed. Cir. 1996).
  9. Micro Chem., Inc. v. Great Plains Chem. Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1250, 1258, 52 USPQ2d 1258, 1263 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
  10. Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc.927 F.2d 1565, 1581, 18 USPQ2d 1001, 1013(Fed.Cir.1991).
  11. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chem. Co., 520 U.S. 17,39 n.8 (1997)
  12. A patent license agreement is in essence nothing more than a promise by the licensor not to sue the licensee. Jim Arnold Corp. u. Hydrotech Sys., Inc., 109 F. 3d 1567, 42 USPQ2d 1129 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
  13. Elkay Mfg. v. EBCO Mfg., 192 F.3d 973, 980, 52 USPQ2D 1109, 1114(Fed. Cir. 1999).
  14. Milcor Steel Co. v. George A. Fuller Co., 316 U.S. 143, 146 (1942).
  15. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. Dauid Geoffrey &Assoc., 904 F. 2d 677, 14 USPQ2d 1942 (Fed. Cir.1990)
  16. Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Resources, Inc., 279 F.3d 1357, 1369, 61 USPQ2d 1647, 1656 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
  17. DeMarini Sports, Inc. v. Worth, Inc. 239 F.3d 1314, 1332, 57 USPQ2d 1889, 1900 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
  18. 專利法
  19. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Prods. Co., 339 U.S. 605,608(1950).
  20. Hilton Davis Chem. Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Co., 62 F 3d. 1512, 1517-18, 35 USPQ2d 1641, 1645 (Fed. Cir. 1995), rev'd on other grounds, 520 U.S. 17 (1997).
  21. Jack Guttman, Inc. v. Kopykake Enters., Inc. 302 F.3d 1352, 1361, 64 USPQ2d 1302, 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
  22. Fromson u. Western Litho & Supp. Co., 853 F 2d 1568, 7 USPQ2d 1606 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
  23. Lantech, Inc. v. Keip Mach. Co., 32 F.3d 542, 31 USPQ2d 1666(Fed. Cir. 1994).
  24. Sunrace Roots Enter. Co., LTD v. SRAM Corp., No. 02-1524, slip op. at 8 (Fed. Cir. July 17, 2003) (quoting CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp., 288 F.3d 1359, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
  25. Johnson Worldwide Assocs. V. Zebco Corp., 175 F.3d 985, 988, 50 USPQ2d 1607, 1609 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
  26. Warner-Jenkinson, 520 U.S at 33-34
  27. Pall Corp. v. Micron Separations, Inc., 66 F.3d 1211, 1219, 36 USPQ2d 1225, 1231(Fed. Cir.1995),cert. Denied, 117 S. Ct. 1243(1997).
  28. 歐洲專利公約(EPC)
  29. Maxwell v. J.Baker, Inc..
  30. Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.,140 F.3d 1449, 1456, 46 USPQ2d 1321, 1325(Fed. Cir.1998).
  31. US patent 6, 319, 530.
  32. SRI Int'l v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. 775 F2d 1107, 1121, 227 USPQ 557, 585, n.14 (Fed Cir. 1985)
  33. Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934-35, 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739-40 (Fed. Cir. 1987).
  34. Senmed, Inc. u. Richard-Allan Med. Indus., Inc.,888 F.2d 815. 12 USPQ2d 1508(Fed. Cir. 1989).
  35. Warner-Jenkinson,520 U.S. at 30
  36. 美國專利法
  37. Warner-Jenkinson, 520 U.S. at 39-40
  38. Inverness Med. Switz. Gmbh v. Princeton Biomeditech Corp., 309 F.3d 1365, 1371-72 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
  39. Lockheed Martin, 249 F.3d at 1324, 58 USPQ2d at 1678.
  40. 台灣高等法院八十六年度上易字第四二六三號判決
  41. Gart v. Logitech, Inc., 254 F.3d 1334, 1339, 59 USPQ2d 1290, 1293-94 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
  42. Personalized Media Communications, L.L.C. v. International Trade Comm'n, 161 F.3d 696, 702, 48 USPQ2d 1880, 1885 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
  43. 歐洲專利公約
  44. 專利法
  45. International Visual Corp. v. Crown Metal Mfg. Co., 991 F.2d 768, 775 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
  46. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. City of Pontiac, 767F.2d 1563, 226 USPQ 676 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
  47. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co.v. Linde Air Prods. Co., 339 U.S. 605, 608 (1950).
  48. Marquip, Inc. v. Forsber Am., Inc., 198 F.3d 1363, 1367, 53 USPQ2d 1015, 1018(Fed. Cir. 1999).
  49. 86 F.3d 1098, 1106-07(Fed. Cir. 1996)(quoting Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1562-63(Fed. Cir. 1991).
  50. Amtel Corp. v. Info. Storage Devices, Inc., 198 F.3d 1374, 1378-79, 53 USPQ2d 1225, 1227-28 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
  51. Budde v. Harley-Davidson, Inc., 250 F.3d 1369, 1376, 58 USPQ2d 1801, 1806 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (citing In re Dossel, 115 F.3d 942, 945, 42 USPQ2d 1881, 1884 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
  52. Del Mar Avionics, Inc. v. Quinton Instr. Co., 836 F.2d 1320, 1325, 5 USPQ2d 1255, 1259(Fed.Cir.1987)(citing Graver Tank, 339 U.S. at 608-09).
  53. Dolly, Inc. v. Spalding & Evenflo Cos., 16 F.3d 394, 397,29 USPQ2d 1767, 1769(Fed. Cir. 1994).
  54. Telemac Cellular Corp. v. Topp Telecom, Inc., 247 F.3d 1316, 1324, 58 USPQ2d 1545, 1549 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (citing Kemco, 208 F.3d at 1361, 45 USPQ2d at 1610)
  55. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chem. Co., 520 U.S.17,40(1997)
  56. Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934-35, 939, 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739-40 (Fed. Cir. 1987)(en banc).
  57. Cybor Corp. v. FAS Techs., In., 138 F.3d 1448, 1454, 46 USPQ2d 1169,1172(Fed. Cir. 1998)(en banc).
  58. Spindelfabrik S., S & G. GmbH u. Schubert & Salzer Mas. Ak., 829 F 2d 1075, 4 USPQ2d 1044 (Fed. Cir. 1987)
  59. 35 U.S.C. § 112.
  60. citing Dolly, Inc. v. Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc., 16 F.3d 394, 398, 29 USPQ2d 1767, 1769-70 (Fed. Cir. 1994).
  61. 35 U.S.C 112.
  62. Ishida Co. v. Taylor, 221 F.3d 1310, 1316, 55 USPQ2d 1449, 1452-53 (Fed. Cir. 2000).
  63. Medtronic, 248 F.3d at 1311, 58 USPQ2d at 1614 (quoting B Braun Med., Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 124 F.3d 1419, 1424, 43 USPQ2d 1896, 1900 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
  64. Kustom Signals Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc., 264 F.3d 1326, 1333(Fed. Cir. 2001).
  65. Mas-Hamilton Group v. LaGard, Inc., 156 F.3d 1206, 1211, 48 USPQ2d 1010, 1014-15 (Fed. Cir. 1998)(citations omitted).
  66. Tex. Digital Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc, 308 F.3d 1193, 1202, 64 USPQ2d 1812, 1818 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
  67. 我國專利法
  68. Hybritech, Inc. v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc., 802 F.2d 1367, 1385, 231 USPQ 81, 94-95 (Fed. Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 947 (1987).
  69. citing Genentech, Inc. v. Wellcome Found. Ltd., 29 F.3d 1555, 1564 (Fed. Cir. 1994).
  70. Tex. Digital, 308 F.3d at 1204.
被引用次数
  1. 曾華松(2007)。民刑事訴訟中智慧財產有效性抗辯之處理。法令月刊，58(7)，67-97。
  2. 曾華松(2007)。民刑事訴訟中智慧財產有效性抗辯之處理。法令月刊，58(7)，67-97。
  3. 李柏靜(2009)。專利法修正草案對損害賠償計算修訂之思考與評析。法令月刊，60(11)，103-121。
  4. (2005)。申請專利範圍之手段功能用語解釋及其侵害判斷。科技法學評論，2(1)，147-204。
  5. (2006)。美國專利產品的修理與再製之區分與案例類型。科技法學評論，3(2)，203-247。
  6. (2006)。散佈侵害智慧財產權警告函之正當性—以公平交易法為論述中心。法學叢刊，51(2)，57-78。
  7. (2013)。我國專利法上均等論適用之實證研究：是變奏還是變調？。科技法學評論，10(2)，1-71。
print cancel