Teresa M. Amabile創造力動機理論於造形創造力的適用性與差異性研究

A study of using Amabile's creativity motivation principles in gestaltung creativity

李堅萍(Zen-Pin Lee)；朱素貞(Su-Jen Chu)；劉蕙儀(Huei-Yi Lin)

創造力動機 ； 造形創造力 ； Amabile ； Creativity motivation ； and Gestaltung creativity

藝術學報

97期（2015 / 10 / 01）

1 - 18

繁體中文

「創造力」是台灣少數得以於世界舞台爭雄的利器，Harvard大學Teresa M. Amabile創造力理論一直具有高度影響力，但是否也適用於本地？本研究目的為探究Amabile創造力動機理論於造形創造力的（1）適用性與（2）差異性。經發展研究工具「Amabile創造力動機調查問卷」與「造形創造力評量表」，以Amabile創造力動機九策略進行教學，調查206名學生創造力動機與造形創造力內涵。結論：（1）Amabile 創造力動機理論的確亦適用於造形創造力。（2）Amabile創造力動機理論14個細項於高造形創造力者仍有7項差異。建議後續研究鎖定大量樣本調查低創造力者的創造力動機。

To cultivate creativity may be the most important instructional purposes of visual arts departments. Teresa M. Amabile, a professor of Harvard University, supposed the ＂Componential Model of Creativity （CMC）＂ theory. Therefore, this study wanted to examine whether or not the creativity motivation principles of CMC is suitable to ceramic gestaltung creativity in Taiwan. The purposes are to investigate （1） the applicability and （2） the differences of Amabile' creativity motivation principles in ceramic gestaltung creativity. After instruction of using Amabile's 9 creativity motivation strategies and the questionnaire survey of 206 students' creativity motivation and gestaltung creativities, the results are: （1） the Amabile' creativity motivation principles are suitable to ceramic gestaltung creativity. （2） The seven fourteen sub-items of the Amabile's creativity motivation principles still were not suitable for excellent gestaltung creativity artists. The suggestion is to investigate continually mass samples' creativity motivations of low-level gestaltung creativity.。

1. 李堅萍、吳玉雯(2009)。畫骨或畫形？以基本幾何圖形引導學童繪圖的造形創造力表現研究。屏東教育大學學報，32，215-242。
   連結：
2. 李堅萍、游光昭、朱益賢(2008)。國中科技教育運用Teresa M. Amabile 創造力動機原則與自我效能激發策略之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，25(2)，129-159。
   連結：
3. Aish, D.(2014).Pennsylvania,University of Pennsylvania.
4. Akinlade, E.(2014).Illinois,University of Illinois at Chicago.
5. Alkhenaini, N.(2013).Ann Arbor, Pennsylvania,The University of the Arts.
6. Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.Oxford:Westview Press.
7. Awamleh, H.,Al Farah, Y.,El-Zraigat, I.(2012).The level of creative abilities dimensions according to Torrance formal test (B) and their relationship with some variables (sex, age, GPA).International Education Studies,5(6),138-148.
8. Borg, W. R.,Gall, M. D.(1979).Educational research: An introduction.New York:Longman.
9. Forgeard, M. J.,Mecklenburg, A.(2013).The two dimensions of motivation and a reciprocal model of the creative process.Review of General Psychology,17(3),255-266.
10. Gilmore, P. L.(2013).Virginia,George Mason University.
11. Glăveanu, V. P.(2013).Creativity and folk art: A study of creative action in traditional craft.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,7(2),140-154.
12. Hanchett Hanson, M.(2013).Author, self, monster: Using Foucault to examine functions of creativity.Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology,33(1),18-31.
13. Harrison, C. A.(2012).Minnesota,Walden University.
14. Huber, A. M.,Leigh, K. E.,Tremblay, K. R.(2012).Creativity processes of students in the design studio.College Student Journal,49(4),903-913.
15. Janus, K.,Browning, S. L.,F.A.C.H.E.(2014).The effect of professional culture on intrinsic motivation among physicians in an academic medical center / practitioner application.Journal of Healthcare Management,59(4),287-303.
16. Lorfink, R. L.(2012).Pennsylvania,Drexel University.
17. owers Schoen, J. L.(2011).Georgia,Georgia Institute of Technology.
18. Sacchetti, S.,Tortia, E. C.(2013).Satisfaction with Creativity: A Study of Organizational Characteristics and Individual Motivation.Journal of Happiness Studies,14(6),1789-1811.
19. Tan, A. G.(2012).An introduction to "creativity and leisure: An intercultural and cross-disciplinary journal".Creativity and Leisure,1(1),1-10.
20. van de Kamp, M. T.,Admiraal, W.,van Drie, J.,Rijlaarsdam, G.(2015).Enhancing divergent thinking in visual arts education: Effects of explicit instruction of meta-cognition.British Journal of Educational Psychology,85(1),47.
21. Wang, C.,Tsai, C.(2014).Managing innovation and creativity in organizations: An empirical study of service industries in Taiwan.Service Business,8(2),313-335.
22. Wang, L.(2011).Illinois,Northwestern University.
23. Wu, M.,Li, K.,Hau, C.(2011).Technology creativity ability analysis for vocational high school students by data mining association rule.Proceedings of International Conference on Education and e-Learning (EeL),Singapore:
24. Yunlu, D. G.(2013).Wisconsin,The University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee.