替代經驗策略對陶藝拉坯學習者造形創造力的成效影響與利弊觀點研究

A Study of the Effectiveness and Viewpoints of the Form Creativity by Using the Vicarious Experience Strategy on Learning Ceramic Throwing Technique

李堅萍(Zen-Pin Lee)

自我效能 ； 造形創造力 ； 替代經驗 ； form creativity ； self-efficacy ； vicarious experience

藝術學報

108期（2021 / 06 / 01）

41 - 63

繁體中文

新近理論主張自我效能才是個體實現創造力的關鍵，陶藝拉坯頗適合施行替代經驗策略以激發自我效能提升創造力。研究目的為實驗替代經驗策略1.對造形創造力的成效影響，2.探索學習者看法，3.分析利弊。採不相等控制組設計準實驗研究法，陶藝成形技法課程各34名與35名學生為對照組與實驗組，實驗操弄為替代經驗策略。結論：替代經驗策略1.能正向提升造形創造力成效。2.彌補起點知能更有非同步學習優點，但無法取代技術實作。3.促進大膽回應、推升產出與變通創意之利，但亦可能有銘印效應之弊。建議技術教學實施替代經驗策略。

The new theory indicated that self-efficacy is the key to realize creativity, and the ceramic throwing technique is suitable for implementing the vicarious experience strategy to stimulate self-efficacy and enhance creativity. The purposes of the study are to experiment the vicarious experience strategy: 1. The effectiveness of form creativity, 2. to explore learners' views, and 3. to analyze the pros and cons. The study used the quasi-experimental research method of nonequivalent-control group design, and each 34 and 35 students of the ceramic forming technique course were compared with the control group and the experimental group, and the vicarious experience strategy was as the experiment. The conclusions are that the vicarious experience strategy 1. can positively improve the effectiveness of form creativity. 2. Not only to make up for the starting point of knowledge more asynchronous learning advantages, but cannot replace the technical practice. 3. There are advantages to promoting bold responses, boosting output and changing ideas, but there may are also drawbacks to the inscription effects. The suggestion is that the technique instruction should implement the vicarious experience strategy.

1. 李堅萍(2018)。陶藝造形創造力的演進線形與領域相關技能的性質和層級研究。國立清華大學清華藝術學報，1(1)，62-82。
   連結：
2. Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.Oxford:Westview Press.
3. Bartle, N. C.,Harvey, K.(2017).Explaining infant feeding: The role of previous personal and Vicarious Experience on attitudes, subjective norms, self-efficacy, and breastfeeding outcomes.British Journal of Health Psychology,22(4),763-785.
4. Barton, E. A.,Dexter, S.(2020).Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning.Educational Technology, Research and Development,68(1),89-108.
5. Brazeal, D. V.,Schenkel, M. T.,Kumar, S.(2014).Beyond the organizational bounds in CE research: Exploring personal and relational factors in a flat organizational structure.Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship,19(2),78-106.
6. Cavanagh, T. M.,Leeds, C.,Peters, J. M.(2019).Increasing oral communication self-efficacy improves oral communication and general academic performance.Business and Professional Communication Quarterly,82(4),440-457.
7. Clark, S.,Newberry, M.(2019).Are we building preservice teacher self-efficacy? A large-scale study examining teacher education experiences.Asia - Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,47(1),32.
8. Concannon, J. P.,Serota, S. B.,Fitzpatrick, M. R.,Brown, P. L.(2019).How interests, self-efficacy, and self-regulation impacted six undergraduate pre-engineering students' persistence.European Journal of Engineering Education,44(4),484-503.
9. Declercq, J.,Jacobs, G.(2019)."It's such a great story it sells itself"? Narratives of vicarious experience in a European pharmaceutical company.Journal of Pragmatics,152,89.
10. Hong, E.,Peng, Y.,O'Neil, H. F., Jr.(2014).Activities and accomplishments in various domains: Relationships with creative personality and creative motivation in adolescence.Roeper Review,36(2),92.
11. Huang, J. L.,Ryan, A. M.,Mujtaba, B. G.(2015).Vicarious Experience of justice: When unfair treatment of one's colleague matters.Personnel Review,44(6),826-846.
12. Hunt, C. M.,Fielden, S.,Woolnough, H. M.(2019).The potential of online coaching to develop female entrepreneurial self-efficacy.Gender in Management,34(8),685-701.
13. Jaussi, K. S.,Randel, A. E.(2014).Where to look? Creative self-efficacy, knowledge retrieval, and incremental and radical creativity.Creativity Research Journal,26(4),400.
14. Kalimullin, A. M.,Utemov, V. V.(2017).Open type tasks as a tool for developing creativity in secondary school students.Interchange,48(2),129-144.
15. Karwowski, M.(2014).Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,8(1),62-70.
16. Lau, C.,Kitsantas, A.,Miller, A. D.,Drogin Rodgers, E. B.(2018).Perceived responsibility for learning, self-efficacy, and sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A study of international baccalaureate primary years programme students.Social Psychology of Education : An International Journal,21(3),603-620.
17. Lines, R. L. J.,Crane, M.,Ducker, K. J.,Ntoumanis, N.,Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, C.,Fletcher, D.,Gucciardi, D. F.(2020).Profiles of adversity and resilience resources: A latent class analysis of two samples.British Journal of Psychology,111(2),174-199.
18. Lockwood, P. L.(2016).The anatomy of empathy: Vicarious Experience and disorders of social cognition.Behavioural Brain Research,311,255-266.
19. Mando, J.(2016).Constructing the Vicarious Experience of proximity in a Marcellus shale public hearing.Environmental Communication,10(3),352-364.
20. O'Neill, S.(2011).The Cambridge handbook of creativity.Canadian Psychology,52(4),323-324.
21. Pretz, J. E.,McCollum, V. A.(2014).Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,8(2),227-236.
22. Puvimanasinghe, T.,Denson, L. A.,Augoustinos, M.,Somasundaram, D.(2015).Vicarious resilience and vicarious traumatisation: Experiences of working with refugees and asylum seekers in south australia.Transcultural Psychiatry,52(6),743-765.
23. Rowland, S. A.,Cohen, M. Z.,Pullen, C. H.,Schulz, P. S.,Berg, K. E.,Kupzyk, K. A.,Pozehl, B. J.,Yates, B. C.(2020).Vicarious Experience to affect physical activity in women: A randomized control trial.Western Journal of Nursing Research,42(4),286-292.
24. Simmons, A. L.,Payne, S. C.,Pariyothorn, M. M.(2014).The role of means efficacy when predicting creative performance.Creativity Research Journal,26(1),53.
25. Soga, M.,Gaston, K. J.,Yamaura, Y.,Kurisu, K.,Hanaki, K.(2016).Both direct and Vicarious Experiences of nature affect children's willingness to conserve biodiversity.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,13(6),1.
26. Sowińska, A.,Sokół, M.(2019)."Luckily, she's alive": Narratives of Vicarious Experience told by polish doctors.Journal of Pragmatics,152,76.
27. Stixrud, E. A.(2014).Chicago, Illinois,Chicago School of Professional Psychology.
28. Thundiyil, T. G.,Chiaburu, D. S.,Li, N.,Wagner, D. T.(2016).Joint effects of creative self-efficacy, positive and negative affect on creative performance.Chinese Management Studies,10(4),726-745.
29. Van De Mieroop, D.(2019).Implying identities through narratives of Vicarious Experience in job interviews.Journal of Pragmatics,152,61.
30. Vandenbroucke, S.,Bardi, L.,Lamm, C.,Goubert, L.(2016).The role of the right temporoparietal junction in the elicitation of Vicarious Experiences and detection accuracy while observing pain and touch.Experimental Brain Research,234(4),1019-1032.
31. Wang, S.,Zhang, X.,Martocchio, J.(2011).Thinking outside of the box when the box is missing: Role ambiguity and its linkage to creativity.Creativity Research Journal,23(3),211.
32. Webb, D. L.,LoFaro, K. P.(2020).Sources of engineering teaching self‐efficacy in a STEAM methods course for elementary preservice teachers.School Science and Mathematics,120(4),209-219.
33. Willis, J.,Weiser, B.,Smith, D.(2016).Increasing teacher confidence in teaching and technology use through Vicarious Experiences within an environmental education context.Applied Environmental Education and Communication,15(3),199-213.
34. Yunlu, D. G.(2014).Milwaukee, Wisconsin,The University of Wisconsin.
35. Zhang, X.,Zhou, J.(2014).Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,124(2),150.
36. 李堅萍(2001)。Simpson、Harrow 與 Goldberger 技能領域教育目標分類之比較研究。屏東師院學報，14，675-710。
37. 國家教育研究院（2020 年）。雙語詞彙、學術名詞、辭書資訊網。2020 年 10 月 12 日取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679150/。

1. (2022)。數位在陶藝創作之工藝精神。藝術研究學報，15，21-40。