雕塑藝術品審美愉悅感之先期研究

A Pilot Study on the Aesthetic Pleasure of Sculptures

鄭德輝(Tuck-Fai Cheng)；高洋(Yang Gao)；楊正翔(Cheng-Hsiang Yang)；林榮泰(Rungtai Lin)

雕塑 ； 審美愉悅感 ； 體驗經濟 ； 創意產業設計 ； sculpture ； aesthetic pleasure ； experience economy ； creative industry design

藝術學報

109期（2021 / 12 / 01）

49 - 73

繁體中文

愉悅感研究在一般的產品設計已經相當普遍，然而相關研究文獻中，以雕塑藝術品作為審美愉悅感探討的文獻，則付諸闕如。因此，本研究整理出世界最著名十五座雕塑作品，經專家諮詢、討論、分析後，選擇了九座雕塑作品作為審美愉悅感探討的標的，主要在於探討審美活動中，雕塑藝術品所產生的愉悅性是否具體可感。本研究提出雕塑作品表達愉悅感的形式美、象徵美、意念美與概念美等四種方式，相對於受試者認知雕塑藝術品的生理愉悅、社會愉悅、心理愉悅與觀念愉悅等四種愉悅感的強度。經由問卷調查透過量化分析進行相關研究，探討其偏好、差異性與共同性，以了解受試者如何感知審美愉悅感，研究結果顯示受試者的年齡對於愉悅感有顯著差異，作品熟悉度越高，愉悅感越高；同時，年齡與熟悉感對於愉悅感有顯著預測力，可以提供後續研究之參考。

The focus of product design had shifted from functional needs to emotional experiences in the age of experiencing economic consumption. In sighting into user's emotions tended to touch their inner emotions, and to meet the aesthetic experience design is a pressing matter of the moment. Nine of the world's 15 most famous sculptures were selected to distinguish from the pleasure study in sculptural art. After the consultation and analysis by experts, four ways of expressing the beauties (form, symbol, idea and concept) were relative to the intensity of the four senses of pleasure (physiological pleasure, social pleasure, psychological pleasure and conceptual pleasure) of the subject's cognitive sculptures. In order to understand the way the users perceive aesthetic pleasure, a quantitative analysis of the questionnaires were conducted to explore the preferences, differences, and commonality. The result showed that ＂age＂ had significant differences in pleasure. Meanwhile, the higher the ＂familiarity＂ of the work, the higher the pleasure was. Research conclusion showed that ＂age＂ and ＂familiarity＂ have a significant predictive effect on aesthetic pleasure. This study provided a reference on the subsequent research for the industry of creative design.

1. 伊彬,林演慶(2008)。近一世紀審美實徵研究趨勢。設計學報，13(2)，1-21。
   連結：
2. 房文婷,高婭娟,曾照薰,林伯賢(2018)。一般閱聽者對舞蹈藝術美學體驗之認知研究。設計學報，23(3)，23-46。
   連結：
3. 林銘煌,方裕民,鄭仕弘(2008)。幽默設計的類別與表現技巧。設計學報，13(3)，61-80。
   連結：
4. 孫怡康,林敬榮,林榮泰(2019)。從觀賞到體驗：經典畫作轉化室內設計之個案研究。藝術學報，15(2)，135-162。
   連結：
5. 莊明振,陳俊智(2004)。產品形態特徵與構成關係影響消費者感性評價之研究－以水壺的設計為例。設計學報，9(3)，43-58。
   連結：
6. 陳璽敬,顏惠芸,李仙美,林志隆(2016)。策展設計之個案研究─以「詩情畫意─仙雲之美油畫習作展」為例。設計學報，21(4)，1-24。
   連結：
7. 蕭坤安,莊瑋靖(2017)。產品造形的愉悅性、美感、吸引力與視覺注視時間之探討。設計學報，22(4)，1-20。
   連結：
8. 蕭坤安,陳平餘(2010)。愉悅產品之認知與設計特徵。設計學報，15(2)，1-17。
   連結：
9. 蕭坤安,陳玲鈴(2005)。造形形變於產品造形情感意象上的探討－以壺類產品為例。設計學報，10(3)，101-122。
   連結：
10. Apter, M. J.(1992).The dangerous edge: The psychology of excitement.New York, NY:Free Press.
11. Bevan, N.(2009).What is the difference between the purpose of usability and user experience evaluation methods.Proceedings of the Workshop UXEM,Uppsala:
12. Blijlevens, J.,Thurgood, C.,Hekkert, P.,Chen, L.,Leder, H.,Whitfield, T. W.(2017).The Aesthetic Pleasure in Design Scale: The development of a scale to measure aesthetic pleasure for designed artifacts.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,11(1),86-98.
13. Cabanne, P.,Duchamp, M.(1987).Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp.Boston, MA:Da capo press.
14. Chang, W. C.,Wu, T. Y.(2007).Exploring types and characteristics of product forms.International Journal of Design,1(1),3-14.
15. Crilly, N.,Moultrie, J.,Clarkson, P.(2004).Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design.Design Studies,25(6),547-577.
16. Demirbilek, O.,Sener, B.(2003).Product design, semantics and emotional response.Ergonomics,46(13-14),1346-1360.
17. Desmet, P. M. A.(2012).Faces of product pleasure: 25 positive emotions in human-product interactions.International Journal of Design,6(2),1-29.
18. Fiske, S. T.(2013).Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture.Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE.
19. Gao, Y.,Chen, L.,Lee, S.,Lin, R.,Jin, Y.(2017).A Study of Communication in Turning “Poetry.PaintingCross-Cultural Design,37-48.
20. Gao, Y.,Wu, J.,Lee, S.,Lin, R.(2019).Communication Between Artist and Audience: A Case Study of Creation Journey.Cross-Cultural Design Culture and Society,33-44.
21. Green, W. S.(Ed.),Jordan, P. W.(Ed.)(2002).Pleasure with products: Beyond the usability.London, England:Taylor &Francis.
22. Hagtvedt, H.,Patrick, V. M.,Hagtvedt, R.(2008).The perception and evaluation of visual art.Empirical studies of the arts,26(2),197-218.
23. Harcourt, G.(1987).Andreas Vesalius and the Anatomy of Antique Sculpture.Representations,17(1),28-61.
24. Hekkert, P.(2006).Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design.Psychology science,48(2),157-172.
25. Jakobson, R.,Pomorska, K.,Rudy, S.(1987).Language in Literature.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
26. Jordan, P. W.(2000).Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors.Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press.
27. Jordan, P. W.(1998).Human factors for pleasure in product use.Applied Ergonomics,29(1),25-33.
28. Jordan, P. W.(1999).Pleasure with products: Human factors for body, mind and soul.Human factors in product design: Current practice and future trends,London, England:
29. Kreifeldt, J.,Li, H.,Sun, M.,Bi, W.,Lin, R.(2018).S.A.D in Education and CHEER in Practice: A Case Study of DTIT Program at NTUA.International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design,Springer, Cham:
30. Leder, H.,Belke, B.,Oeberst, A.,Augustin, D.(2004).A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.British Journal of Psychology,95(4),489-508.
31. Lin, R.,Hsieh, H. Y.,Sun, M. X.,Gao, Y. J.(2016).From Ideality to Reality-A Case Study of Mondrian Style.Proceeding of International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design,Cham:
32. Lin, R.,Kreifeldt, J.,Hung, P.,Chen, J.(2015).From Dechnology to Humart-A Case Study of Taiwan Design Development.Cross-Cultural Design Applications in Mobile Interaction, Education, Health, Transport and Cultural Heritage,Cham:
33. Lin, R.,Li, H.,Wu, J.,Bi, W.(2018).Cross-Cultural Communication in Design Collaboration.Lecture Notes In Computer Science,31-42.
34. Lin, R.,Qian, F.,Wu, J.,Fang, W. T.(2017).A Pilot Study of Communication Matrix for Evaluating Artworks.Proceedings of International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design,Cham:
35. Norman, D. A.(2005).Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things.New York, NY:Basic Books.
36. Reber, R.,Schwarz, N.,Winkielman, P.(2004).Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?.Personality and Social Psychology Review,8(4),364-382.
37. Spillers, F.(2004).A dissertation degree of Doctor.
38. Tiger, L.(1992).The pursuit of pleasure.New York, NY:Little, Brown and Company.
39. Ziebarth, E.,Bickford,A.,Doering, Z.(1992).Appreciating art: a study of Comparisons, an exercise in looking at the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.Washington, D.C.:Institutional Studies, Smithsonian Institution.
40. Zuckert, R.(2009).Sculpture and Touch: Herder's Aesthetics of Sculpture.Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,67(3),285-299.
41. 王世德(1987).美學辭典.臺北:木鐸.
42. 王秀雄(1998).觀賞、認知、解釋、評價─美術鑑賞教育的學理與實務.臺北:國立歷史博物館.
43. 司有倫（編）(1996).當代西方美學新範疇辭典.中國:中國人民出版社.
44. 朱志榮(2011).康德美學思想研究.臺北:秀威.
45. 江怡瑩（譯）,Ocvirk, Otto G.(2004).藝術原理與應用.臺北:六合.
46. 西窗囈語（2017 年 10 月 22 日）。世界最著名的 15 座雕塑作品，竟然還有個小便器【新聞群組】。取自 https://kknews.cc/culture/kaj88vr.html。檢索日期：2019 年 10 月 15 日
47. 貴州雕塑（2017 年 10 月 16 日）。一分鐘帶你了解著名的 10 座雕塑。【新聞群組】。取自https://kknews.cc/culture/qo2bgly.html。檢索日期：2019 年 10 月 15 日
48. 腳步（2017 年 9 月 6 日）。享譽世界的五大雕塑，每一個後面都有一段傳奇故事【新聞群組】。取自https://kknews.cc/culture/26mk64e.html。檢索日期：2019 年 10 月 15 日
49. 謝東山(2000).藝術概論.臺北:偉華.
50. 顏惠芸,林榮泰(2017)。從文創產業的感質商品到商業模式的設計加值。藝術學報，8(2)，127-152。