目標取向、自我評價及歸因型態對運動員自我設限行為之影響

Effects of Goal-Orientation, Self-Evaluation, and Attribution on the Self-Handicapping of Athletes

10.6497/BSEPT.20031101_(3).0001

王澤惠(Che-Hui Wang)

自我設限 ； 目標取向 ； 自我評價 ； 歸因 ； 運動員 ； self-handicapping ； goal orientation ； self evaluation ； attribution ； athlete

臺灣運動心理學報

3期（2003 / 11 / 01）

1 - 20

繁體中文

過去運動員自我設限行為的研究指出，目標取向、自我評價以及歸因型等三方面是影響運動員自我設限行為的可能主要機制，然而，過去研究並未直接比較何者對自我設限行為的影響較為重要，也沒有將自我設限行為區分為「減低努力」與「尋求辯解」等兩種不同自我設限行為來加以探討。因此，本研究從目標取向、自我評價以及歸因型態等三方面，來了解運動員在「減低努力」與「尋求辯解」自我設限行為的影響機制。本研究之研究對象為241名北部某國立大學運動代表隊之男女運動員，共填答了運動目標取向量表、運動自我設限量表、自尊量表、運動自信心量表、歸因問卷、自覺能力量表等問卷，並進行相關分析與迴歸分析。研究結果驗證，影響「減低努力」與「尋求辯解」們我設阧行為的因素並不相同。在「減低努力」自我設阧方面，自我評價對「減低努力」的自我設限行為影響最大，目標取向與歸因型態的影響較小；但是在「尋求辯解」自我設限方面，目標取向、自我評價及歸因型態等三者都具有顯著且重要的影響力。本研究結果顯示，不同的自我設限策略確實具有不同的影響機制，在未來研究與回應策略上應獨立評估與設計。

Previous researches of the self-handicapping of athletes indicated that the goal-orientation, self-evaluation, and attribution are three major mechanisms influencing the athletes’ self-handicapping behavior, while no comparison was provided to discuss the relative importance of these three mechanisms. In the present study the self-handicapping behavior was categorized into two kinds: effort-reduction (ER) and excuse-making (EM), and the effects of these three mechanisms on these two kinds of self-handicapping behaviors were studied. The participants were 241 students of various representative teams of a national university at northern Taiwan, whom filled out six questionnaires: Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaires, Self-Handicapping Scale, Self-Esteem Scale, Sport-Confidence Scale, Attribution Scale, and Perceived-Ability Scale, and regression analyses were conducted. Results from multiple regression analyses indicate that, for the ER-self-handicapping the self-esteem is the most significant factor while the goal-orientation and the attribution are relatively minor factors. For the EM-self-handicapping, however, the goal-orientation, the self-esteem and the attribution have equivalent influence. Present findings suggest that the self-handicapping behavior is influenced by different factors with various degrees, which merits further research in the future to attack more involved issues in details.

1. 吳佳輝、王澤惠、林以正(2004)。運動自我設限量表之探索性與驗證性因素分析。大專體育學刊
   連結：
2. Bachman, G. J.(1979).Self-esteem and education: sex and cohort comparsions among high school senior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37,1153-1159.
3. Bachman, G. J.,O`Malley, P. M.(1977).Self-esteem in young men: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of educational and occupational attainment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,35,365-379.
4. Berglas, S.(1985).Self-handicapping and self-handicapper: A cognitive/attributional model of interpersonal self-protective behavior.Perspectives in Personality,1,235-270.
5. Berglas, S.,Jones, E. E.(1978).Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36,405-417.
6. Bottomley, P. A.,Doyle J. R.,Green, R. H.(2000).Testing the Reliability of Weight Elicitation Methods: Direct Rating Versus Point Allocation.Journal of Marketing Research,37,508-513.
7. Burr, V.、楊宜憓、高之梅(2002)。性別與社會心理學。台北:五南。
8. Carron, A. V.,Prapavessis, H.,Grove, J. R.(1994).Group effects and self-handicapping.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,16,246-257.
9. Cohen, J.,Cohen, P.(1983).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum.
10. Duda, J. L.(1989).The relationship between task and ego orientation and the perceived purpose of sport among male and female high school athletes.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,11,318-335.
11. Duda, J. L.,Nicholls, J. G.(1991).The Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties.
12. Duda, J. L.,Nicholls, J. G.(1992).Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport.Journal of Educational Psychology,84,1-10.
13. Hausenblas, H. A.,Carron, A. V.(1996).Group cohesion and self-handicapping in female and male athletes.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,18,132-143.
14. James, K.(2003).多元文化：婦女與性別研究系列演講.臺北:國立台灣大學人口與性別研究中心婦女與性別研究組.
15. Jones, E. E.,Bergias, S.(1978).Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and role of underachievement.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,4,200-206.
16. Midgley, C.,Arunkumar, R.,Urdan, T. C.(1996)."If I don`t do well tomorrow, there`s a reason": Predictors of adolescents` use of academic self-handicapping strategies.Journal of Educational Psychology,88(3),423-434.
17. Nicholls, J. G.(1989).The competitive ethos and democratic education.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University.
18. Nicholls, J. G.,Patashnick, M.,Nolen, S. B.(1985).Adolescent`s theories of education.Journal of Educational Psychology,77,683-692.
19. Nicholls, J. G.,R. Ames,C. Ames (Ed.)(1984).Research on Motivation in Education: Student motivation.NY:Academic.
20. Prapavessis, H.,Grove, J. R.(1998).Self-handicapping and self-esteem.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,10,175-184.
21. Rhodewalt, F.,R. L. Higgins,D. R. Snyder,S. Berglas(1990).Self-handicapping: the paradox that isn`t.New York:Plenum Press.
22. Rhodewalt, F.,Saltzman, A. T.,Wittmer, J.(1984).Self-handicapping among competitive athletes: The role of practice in self-esteem protection.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,5,197-209.
23. Ryska, T. A.,Yin, Z.,Boyd, M.(1999).The role of dispositional goal orientation and team climate on situational self-handicapping among young athletes.Journal of Sport Behaviors,22,410-425.
24. Seifriz, J. J.,Duda, J. L.,Chi, L.(1992).The relationship of perceived motivational climate to intrinsic motivation and beliefs about success in basketball.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,14,375-391.
25. Tice, D. M.(1991).Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60,711-725.
26. Vealey, R. S.(1986).Conceptualization of sport-confidence and competitive orientation: Preliminary investigation and instrument development.Journal of Sport Psychology,8,221-246.
27. Walling, M. D.,Duda, J. L.,Chi, L.(1993).The perceived motivational climate in sport questionnaire: Construct and predictive ability.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,15,172-183.
28. Weiner, B.(1979).A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences.Journal of Educational Psychology,71,3-25.
29. 李明堂(1989)。歸因的測量。測驗與輔導，94，1855-1858。
30. 季力康(1994)。運動目標取向量表的建構效度－驗證性因素分析的應用。體育學報，18，299-308。
31. 林宜螢(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院教練研究所。
32. 張春興(1995)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
33. 莊耀嘉(1980)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
34. 許晊豪(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院教練研究所。
35. 許晊豪、季力康(1998)。擊劍運動員運動自信心與賽前狀態性焦慮之探討。1998國際大專運動教練科學研討會專刊，台北:
36. 郭爲藩(1975)。自我心理學。台北:開山書局。
37. 陳偉瑀(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院體育研究所。
38. 黃英哲、季力康(1994)。運動動機氣候與自覺能力對賽前狀態性焦慮和滿足感的相關研究。體育學報，18，321-332。
39. 盧俊宏(1994)。運動心理學。台北:師大書苑。

1. 黃鴻鈞(2017)。Conti 男子排球隊在企業排球聯賽之競技能力。大專體育，143，43-52。
2. 黃旨庭、卓國雄(2017)。不同性別、年級和成就目標取向國中運動選手之害怕失敗與自我設限之差異研究。體育學系系刊，16，9-24。
3. 盧俊宏、陳龍弘(2007)。成就目標理論需要革新嗎？從四向度成就目標理論到多重目標觀點。中華體育季刊，21(2)，42-53。
4. 王澤惠(2005)。體育課必修與選修學生在運動自我設限行爲之差異。臺大體育學報，7，127-148。
5. 鍾佳芸,黃崇儒,俞永日(2021)。運動員的自我設限、賦權動機氣候與集體效能和團隊承諾之關係。文化體育學刊，33，49-63。