原住民國中學生休閒活動現況之研究－以宜蘭縣泰雅族學生為例

An Investigation of Leisure Activity of Aboriginal Junior-high Students: A Case Study of the Ethnic Group of Atayal in Ilan County

10.6231/CME.2002(12)09

曹天瑞(Tien-Jui Tsao)

原住民國中學生 ； 休閒認知 ； 休閒參與動機 ； 休閒活動類型 ； 休閒時間量 ； 休閒活動困境 ； Aboriginals ； Atayal ； Aboriginal junior high school students ； Leisure activities ； Leisure participating motivation ； Leisure activity type ； Leisure time ； Leisure activity trouble

公民訓育學報

12期（2002 / 07 / 01）

249 - 272

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在探討宜蘭縣原住民泰雅族學生之休閒活動現況，並依據研究發現提出改善原住民國中學生休閒活動之建議。本研究獲致之發現，臚陳如下：壹、休閒認知方面母親教育程度，有顯著差異。貳、休閒參與動機方面一、對增加知識，父母教育程度與職業類別，有顯著差異。二、對增加技術和能力，性別及母親教育程度，有顯著差異。三、使身體更健康，居住地，母親教育程度與父母職業類別，有顯著差異。四、交到更多的朋友，父母教育程度與父母職業類別，有顯著差異五、放鬆心情／減少緊張和壓力，母親教育程度與職業類別，有顯著差異參、休閒活動類型方面一、原住民國中學生所參與之休閒活動類型，依其參與頻率，最頻繁者為消遣類，其次為運動類，再其次依序為社交類、實用類，最少者為藝文類。二、屬於原住民傳統的休閒項目，在目前的原住民國中學生上，已幾乎看不到。肆、休閒時間量方面一、週一至週五每日平均的休閒活動時間量，以1 至2小時為最多。二、週休二日的總休閒活動時間量，以2 至4 小時為最多。伍、休閒活動困境方面「休閒困境2─沒有場所」、「休閒困境4─沒人指導」、「休閒困境8─父母或老師不鼓勵」、「休閒困境9─沒有同伴和家人陪同」，有顯著差異。根據本研究目的及上述發現，提出下列建議。壹、對推展原住民國中學生休閒活動的建議一、加強親職教育二、加強休閒教育的實施，培養多方面的休閒知能三、學校要安排多樣化的休閒活動四、增建休閒活動場所與設施五、提供休閒資訊與資源六、培育休閒教育專業人才七、各有關單位重視原住民文化之傳承八、改善原住民地區之交通與經濟貳、對未來研究的建議一、可擴大至全省原住民各族群，不同教育階段之研究，以建立普遍性之研究結果。二、若再繼續研究時，可將自變項如相互之間作交叉研究、也可再增加依變項。三、在編製問卷時更應嚴謹，務期問卷更具客觀性。四、爾後若要繼續研究，可運用其他各種不同的社會科學研究方法。

The purpose of this thesis was to investigate the recent condition of Atayal junior high school students' participating in leisure activities in Ilan county and make suggestions of improving aboriginal junior high school students' participating in leisure activities.The subjects for the study were Atayal junior high school students in Ilan county. There were 448 students. The study employed questionnaire to conduct general investigation. It also interviewed 15 local aboriginal grownups.The independent variables were students' gender, location, their parents' education levels and careers; while the dependent variables were leisure cognitive, leisure participating motivation, leisure-activity types and leisure-activity trouble. Hypotheses were tested by t-test, one-way analysis of covariance and χ2 test. And analyze the records of interview to fulfill the conclusions.The results of the study were summarized as followed:I. About leisure cognitiveThose whose parents' education levels are junior high school get more scores than those whose parents were not educated.II. About leisure participating motivationi. The lower parents' education levels and career levels are, the higher the need to increase knowledge is.ii. The higher their mothers' education levels are, the more important to improve technology and ability students felt.iii. Those who live in city areas and mountain areas and whose mothers' education levels and career types were lower will agree to develop a healthier body as a leisure participating motivation.iv. Those whose mothers' education level and career types were lower agree relaxing themselves, decreasing intension and pressure as leisure participating motivation.III. About leisure activity typesi. The leisure activity type which Atayal junior high school students in Ilan county participate most often is entertainment-type activity; the second one is sports-type activity; the third one is usefulness-type activity.ii. Of sports-type activity, the Atayal junior high school students play balls, games, and run most often.Of art- type activity, reading is the most popular.Of usefulness-type activity, taking care of younger brothers and sisters is the majority.Of social-type activity, playing in relatives' or friends' houses is the majority.Of entertainment-type activity, listening to radio or music is the majority.iii. The first eleven leisure activities which aboriginal junior high school students do most and like most are playing a ball, swimming, listening to radio or music, barbecuing, picnicking, singing, watching TV or video, playing computer games, reading comic books, and mountain-climbing.iv. The results of interviewing aboriginal grownups' leisure activities in their high school age are different from those of today's Atayal teenagers. For example, hunting, waving, playing in the water, singing, fishing, dancing, doing part-time job, doing housework are not done today.IV. About leisure timei. At work, the daily average leisure time is about one to two hours.ii. On weekends, the total average leisure time is two to four hours.V. About leisure activity troublei. Nine leisure activity troubles are designed. And the items are divided into agreement and disagreement. The rate of disagreement is higher than that of agreement.ii. The relationship of different variables to leisure activity trouble（1）Question 2- no places: among those who agree with it, people living near the beach are more than people living in the mountains.（2）Question 4- nobody teaches: among those who agree with it, boys are more than girls.（3）Question 8- parents or teachers don't encourage: among those who agree with it, people living in the city are more than living in the mountains. Those whose parents' education levels are higher are more than those whose parents' education levels are low.（4）Question 9- no partner and family accompany them: among those who agree with it, those whose mothers are not educated are more than those whose mothers' education levels are junior high school.As the results of this study mentioned above, some of the suggestions were discussed in Chapter V for developing aboriginal junior high school students' leisure activities and for more researches in the future.

1. 王文科(1999)。教育研究法。台北:五南圖書出版社。
2. 王保進(1999)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北:心理出版社。
3. 王美晶譯(1999)。台彎原住民風俗。台北:原民文化事業有限公司。
4. 王鍾和(1981)。兒童發展。台北:大洋出版社。
5. 台灣總督府臨時台灣舊慣調查會(1996)。番族慣習調查報告書第一卷泰雅族。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
6. 余嬪(1996)。提高全民休閒素養：由加強休閒教育開始。教育研究雙月刊，55，6-9。
7. 余嬪(1998)。輕鬆休閒操之在我。高雄:復文圖書出版社。
8. 呂建政(1994)。倡導休閒教育與輔導健全青少年身心發展。測驗與輔導雙月刊，137，2818-2821。
9. 呂建政(1994)。國民中學童軍教育課程研究。台北:水牛圖書出版事業有限公司。
10. 呂建政(1994)。開展休閒教育的幾個課題。訓育研究，33(2)，21-28。
11. 呂建政(1994)。休閒教育的發展。台灣教育月刊，523，18-20。
12. 呂建政(1999)。休閒教育的課程內涵與實施。公民訓育學報，8，181-195。
13. 阮昌銳(1994)。台灣土著的社會與文化。台北:台灣省立博物館。
14. 阮昌銳(1996)。台灣的原住民。台北:台灣省立博物館。
15. 林東泰(1993)。台北都會地區青少年休閒認知與態度研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系社會教育學刊，22，17-46。
16. 林建地(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學三民主義研究所。
17. 林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。
18. 林傳生(1994)。教育社會學。高雄:復文書局。
19. 徐淑芳譯(1996)。休閒與人類行為。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
20. 徐震(1986)。社會發展。台北:中國文化大學出版部。
21. 陳彰儀(1984)。休閒活動之選擇與休閒教育。幼獅月刊，384，50-53。
22. 博惠珍(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。
23. 黃郁宜(1984)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台灣師範大學教育研究所。
24. 賴哲民(1989)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所。
25. 顏妙桂(1994)。休閒與教育。台灣教育月刊，523，15-17。
26. 羅明訓(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所。

1. 侯雅齡(2009)。幼兒在動手做科學活動歷程之心流研究：以潛在成長模式進行分析。特殊教育研究學刊，34(3)，81-105。