本土性侵害加害人團體之氣氛變化及療效因子

The Change of the Group Climate and the Therapeutic Factors in the Group Psychotherapy for Taiwanese Sexual Offenders

10.30060/CGP.200409.0001

陳若璋(Joe-Chang Road Chen)；鍾明勳(Ming-Shun Chung)；陳筱萍(Sheau-Ping Chen)；沈勝昂(Sheng-Ang Shen)；林正修(Cheng-Hsiu Lin)；唐心北(Hsin-Pei Tang)；吳嘉瑜(Chia-Yu Wu)；黃健(Chien Huang)；黃介良(Chieh-Liang Huang)；施志鴻(Chin-Hung Shih)

本土性加害者 ； 團體治療 ； 團體氣氛 ； 療效因素 ； Taiwanese sexual offender ； group psychotherapy ； group climate ； therapeutic factors

中華團體心理治療

10卷3期（2004 / 09 / 30）

1 - 15

繁體中文

目的：本研究之目的在瞭解台灣本土性侵害加害人，在施以再犯預防模式之團體心理治療過程中團體氣氛及團體療效因子之變化。 方法：本研究針對監獄或社區中接受身心治療之性罪犯，實施為期二十次以預防再犯計畫為主的團體心理治療計畫，計得有效樣本80人。將團體過程中所收集之問卷資料以成對樣本T檢定、趨勢分析進行分析。 結果：本研究結果為1.團體氣氛投入度，在團體中期後，呈現越來越高的投入度。而衝突度，在團體中期後呈現緩和之趨勢。2.在團體早期至中期時，成員覺得家庭重現、感到普同感、及讓成員覺得有更深的自我瞭解等，皆具療效；而中期至晚期則以人際學習及希望灌注為最重要的療效因子。 結論：團體早期催化成員的自我瞭解及成長，則團體的投入度會上升且衝突度會下降。團體後期在人際互動的脈絡下，運用再犯預防等技術，可幫助成員看到希望，提升治療的效果。

Object: The purpose of this research was to find the change of the group climate and the therapeutic factors in the group psychotherapy for the Taiwanese sexual offenders. Method: This research applied the group psychotherapy with 20 sessions based on relapse prevention to 80 sexual offenders in the jail or in the community. All of the data collected by questionnaires during the course of the group psychotherapy are analyzed by paired-T test. Result: First, the engaging in the middle and late stage of the group became higher and the avoiding behavior reduced after the middle stage. Second, the reexperience of the family, universe and self-understanding were the most important therapeutic factors in the early to middle stage of the group and the interpersonal learning and installation of the hope were the most important therapeutic factors in the middle to late stage. Conclusion: Emphasizing on the childhood experience and the developmental history would facilitate the increase of the engaging and reduction of the conflict in early stage. Appling techniques such as relapse prevention in the interpersonal context would help the member to see the hope.

1. Becker, J. V.,Hunter, J. A.(1993).Aggressive sex offenders.Child Adolescent Psychiatry Clinical North American,2,477-487.
2. Beech, A.,Fordham, A. S.(1997).Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programs.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of research and Treatment,9,219-237.
3. Brake, S. C.,Shannon, D.,B.K. Schwartz,H.R.(1997).Using pretreatment to increase admission in sex offendersUsing pretreatment to increase admission in sex offenders,未出版
4. Carich, M. S.(2003).性罪犯治療及輔導處遇專業訓練工作坊講義.台南,台灣:內政部.
5. Carich, M. S.,Calder, M. C.(2003).Contemporary treatment of adult male sex offenders.Lyme Regis:Russell House Press.
6. Costell, R. B.,Yalom, I. D.,H.L. Resnik,M.E. Wolfgang(Eds.)(1972).Sexual behavious: Social, clinical and legal aspects.Boston:Little, Brown and Co..
7. Freeman-Longon, R.,Bird, S.,Stevenson, W.F.,Fiske, J.A.(1995).Nationwide Survey of Treatment Programs & Models.Brandon, VT:Safer Society Press.
8. Hudson, J.,Galaway, B.(1979).Evaluability assessments: Toward userul program evaluations. In Proceedings of the 1979 Research and Evaluation Conference on Criminal Justice in Minnesota.St. Paul, MN:The Crime Control Planning Board.
9. Jennings, J. L.,Sawyer, S.(2003).Principles and techniques for maximizing the effectiveness of group therapy with sex offenders.Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research & Treatment,15(4),251-267.
10. Knopp, F. H.,Freeman Longo, R.,Stevenson, W. F.(1992).Nationwide Survey of Juvenile and Adult Sex Offender Treatment Program and Models.Orwell, V.T.:Safer Society Program.
11. Marlatt, G. A.,Gordon, J. R. (Eds.)(1985).Relapse prevention.New York:Guilford Press.
12. Marques, J. K.(1988).The sex offender treatment and evaluation project California`s new outcome study.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,528,235-243.
13. Marshall, W. L.,Anderson, D.,Fernandez, Y.,Mulloy, R.,Eccles, A.(1999).Cognitive Behavioural Treatment of sex offenders.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
14. McGrath, R. J.(1991).Sex offender risk assessment and disposition planning: a review of empirical and clinical findings.International Journal of offender Rehabilitation and Comparative Criminology,35,328-350.
15. Pithers, W. D.,Gray, A. S.(1996).Utility of relapse prevention in treatment of sexual abusers.Sexual abuse,8,223-230.
16. Rada, R. T.(1978).Clinical aspect of rapist.New York:Grune Shatton.
17. Resnick, H. L.,Wolfgang, M. E. (Eds.)(1972).Sexual behaviors: Social, clinical and legal aspects.Boston:Little, Brown and Co..
18. Schaap, C.,Bennun, I.,Schindler, L.,Hoogduin, K.(1993).The therapeutic relationship in behavioural psychotherapy.New York:Wiley.
19. Schultz, G.(1965).How many more victims?.Philadelphia:Lippincott.
20. Schwartz, B.,Schwartz, B. K.,Cellini H. R. (Eds.)(1995).The sex offender: Corrections, treatment and legal practice.Kingston, NJ:Civic Research Institute.
21. Schwartz, B.K.(1992).Effective treatment techniques for sex offenders.Psychiatry Ann,22,315-319.
22. Yalom I.D.(1985).The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy.New York:Basic Books.
23. Yalom, I. D.(1995).The theory and practice of group psychotherapy.New York:Basic Books.
24. 台灣地區刑事案件及道路交通事故統計
25. 王家駿、林淑梨、吳台齡、顏永杰、陳筱萍、薛克利(2001)。性侵害加害人團體心理治療經驗報告。中華團體心理治療學會第三屆第二次年會暨性侵害防治團體心理治療研討會

1. 陳若璋(2007)。性罪犯團體治療十年研究之回顧暨展望。中華團體心理治療，13(2)，3-27。
2. 陳若璋(2007)。性罪犯團體治療十年研究之回顧暨展望。中華團體心理治療，13(2)，3-27。
3. 林原賢(2017)。性侵害加害人社區處遇後評估結案之研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，13(2)，1-25。
4. 林原賢(2018)。台灣地區性犯罪者社區處遇治療療效因子之研究：以治療者觀點為例。性學研究，9(1)，19-47。
5. 劉志如、陳若璋、林烘煜(2007)。比較強暴犯與兒童性侵害犯接受團體治療之療效評估。中華輔導學報，22，1-31。
6. 邱惟真(2017)。台灣性侵害加害人處遇成效初探。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，13(1)，113-134。
7. 宋宥賢(2015)。臺灣地區性侵害加害人團體心理治療內涵與成效概況之探究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，11(2)，103-126。
8. 宋宥賢(2015)。性侵害加害人團體諮商歷程與成效之探究。諮商與輔導，352，19-23+39。
9. 鍾明勳,張達人,杜家興(2021)。憂鬱症動力取向人際團體心理治療之團體療效因素的成長模式。中華團體心理治療，27(1)，3-18。
10. 鍾志宏、吳慧菁(2012)。性罪犯強制治療成效評估：社會控制理論觀點探討。犯罪學期刊，15(2)，1-28。
11. (2006)。預防再犯團體模式對性罪犯之療效評估與影響。教育與心理研究，29(2)，369-398。