家庭暴力加害人非自願性團體治療之團體歷程探討

The Phenomenon and Process of Male Batterers' Group Therapy

10.30060/CGP.200506.0001

張芳榮(Fang-Rong Chang)；李娟娟(Jiuan-Jiuan Lee)；謝宏林(Hung-Lin Hsieh)；王梅麗(Mei-Li Wang)；張達人(Ta-Jen Chang)

家庭暴力 ； 非自願性團體治療 ； 團體歷程 ； domestic violence ； mandatory group therapy ； group processes

中華團體心理治療

11卷2期（2005 / 06 / 30）

1 - 13

繁體中文

目的：本研究希望針對家庭暴力加害人的非自願性團體治療，在團體治療歷程上，進行分析與探討。 方法：本團體共舉行十八週，為每週一次、每次九十分鐘的結構性及封閉性的團體治療。治療架構則是以認知行為治療取向合併情緒支持的模式進行。自90年10月至93年9月，共實施了四梯次的家庭暴力加害人之團體治療，共計有二十四位成員參加治療，所有成員均為男性。我們採用了G.. Corey將團體發展分為四個階段的模式，然後開始整理四個團體分成四個階段下其各自的歷程發展，再整理出共同的團體歷程。 結果：二十四位成員中有三位成員因故未完成治療，成員之治療完成率為87.5%。在團體歷程部份則整理出以：1．抗拒、否認；2．反抗體制、權威；3．凝聚力及效能；4．與治療師關係；5．情緒層面，共五個主題作為描述團體歷程的主軸。據此再將團體歷程分成四個階段，並以上述五個主題來共同描述團體歷程上的變化。 結論：因為此團體有許多成員的特別屬性，包括家庭暴力的主題、為接受強制治療的非自願性案主、均為男性等。所以在團體進行中，強制治療的因素、成員的參與動機、家暴議題上的否認、對治療師角色上的疑慮等，都會明顯地影響整個團體的歷程發展。

Objectives: The treatment program for batterers of domestic violence has been provided since 2001 in Taiwan. We explored and analyzed the phenomenon and process of this unfamiliar and challenging male batterers' group. Methods: The cognitive-oriented group program was run 90 minutes each session, weekly for 18 sessions. Each group was led by one male and one female therapist. The type of group was close, and emotional sharing and support were encouraged. The whole course of group was videotaped and recorded by the observer. And then these materials were provided for content review and process analysis. Subjects: There were 24 male batterers attended our treatment program in 4 groups. All of them were referred from the court for mandatory treatment. Three of them dropped out from the groups. The drop out rate was 12.5%. The average age of group clients was 44.04 years. Results: The following 5 key items were regarded as the most important issues in the 4 groups. From the points of these 5 items, the varieties of group picture and the evolution of the process could be delineated well. The 5 key items were: Denial and resistance: Not surprisingly, a common characteristic of the group members was the denial and minimization of their violence toward family members. Against social norms and authority: The groups were served as a form of judicial punishment, thus lowering member's initial trust, interest, and attraction to the group. Cohesion and effectiveness: The premature form of cohesion was repetitively emerged in the beginning of group therapy. We had to go through this particular stage and move to more mature and cohesive stage. Role of therapists: The group leaders worked hard in bringing out and bridging members' feelings toward others, especially in the initial period. As the group progressed, the role of the therapists was changing. Emotional disclosure: To ignore the batterer's life or emotional problems may strengthen their defensiveness. The batterer's emotional disclosure in the group was highly correlated with the positive development of group process.

1. Carwright, D.,A. Zander (Eds)(1986).Group Dynamics: Research and Theory.NY:Harper & Row.
2. Ceasar, P. L.,Hamberger, L. K.(Eds.)(1989).Treating men who batter: Theory, practice, and programs.NY:Springer.
3. Corey, G.、張景然、吳芝儀譯(1990)。團體諮商的理論與實務。California:Brooks/cole publishing Co.。
4. Flapan, D.,Fenchel, G. H.(1987).The development ego and the emerging self in group therapy.Northvale, NJ:Jason Aronson Inc.
5. Lindsey, M.、McBride, R.W.、Platt, C.M.、林明傑、陳文心、陳慧女、劉小菁譯(1996)。家庭暴力者輔導手冊。台北:Gylantic。
6. Pirog-Good, M. A.,Stets, J.(1986).Programs for abusers: Who drops out and what can be done.Response,2,17-19.
7. Robbins, R.N.(2003).Developing Cohesion in Court-Mandated Group Treatment of Male Spouse Abusers.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy,53(3),261-284.
8. Schwartz, J. P.,Waldo, M.(1999).Therapeutic Factors in Spouse-Abuse Group Treatment.Journal for Specialists in Group Work,24(2),197-207.
9. Tolman, R. M.,Bennet, L. W.(1990).A review on quantitative research on men who batter.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,5,87-118.
10. Yalom, I. D.、方紫薇、馬宗潔譯(1995)。團體心理治療的理論與實務。NY:Basic Books。
11. Yalom, I. D.、方紫薇、馬宗潔譯(1995)。團體心理治療的理論與實務。NY:Basic Books。
12. 張秀鴛(2003)。「從心出發」談家庭暴力加害人處遇計畫。性別、暴力與權力研討會論文集，高雄:

1. 陳秀蓉,刑志彬(2018)。莫忘初始：心理治療初談增進來談者動機的重要性。輔導季刊，54(3)，57-66。
2. 林東龍、王增勇、王美懿(2010)。「病人」、「犯人」或「個人」？男性家暴「加害人」之再認識。社會政策與社會工作學刊，14(2)，147-193。
3. 林育陞(2015)。司法臨床工作非自願案主輔導。諮商與輔導，355，2-6+18。
4. 林子軒(2016)。非自願性個案在強制治療性團體內之抗拒行為。諮商與輔導，366，35-38。
5. 汪淑媛(2006)。家暴婦女庇護中心工作者情緒張力與因應策略。社會政策與社會工作學刊，10(1)，189-226。
6. 蕭文、鄭青玫、黃瑛琪(2013)。男性婚暴者參與處遇團體之療效因素與停止暴力轉化歷程初探。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，25，7-63。
7. 蕭文、鄭青玫、黃瑛琪(2014)。男性婚暴者參與開放式處遇團體之反療效因素變化歷程初探。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，27，81-135。
8. 葉琳,陳姵穎,張景然(2021)。諮商心理師帶領家暴相對人團體之經驗分析。輔導與諮商學報，43(1)，21-55。
9. 張高賓(2013)。喚醒他們的愛：親子遊戲治療對於提升施虐父母的親職功能及改善受虐兒童情緒困擾之成效。教育心理學報，44(S)，499-520。