人際距離視覺量表在團體心理治療的效度與運用

Validity and Application of Interpersonal Visual Distance Scale in Group Psychotherapy

鍾明勳(Ming-Shun Chung)；杜家興(Juia-Hsin Tsu)；張達人(Ta-Jen Chang)

團體 ； 人際關係 ； 視覺距離 ； 效度 ； Group ； Interpersonal relationship ； Visual distance ； Validity

中華團體心理治療

22卷3期（2016 / 09 / 30）

25 - 41

繁體中文

目的：瞭解人際距離視覺量表運用到團體心理治療之效度與探討人際距離視覺量表運用到治療性團體的運用方式。方法：本研究於每次團體進行後，針對該次團體的過程，由團體成員及領導者填寫團體氣氛量表及人際距離視覺量表；同時亦由團體工作人員填寫觀察團體的多重層次系統，以作為人際距離視覺量表的比較依據。運用混合線性模式去檢定人際距離視覺量表與團體氣氛量表及觀察團體的多重層次系統的相關性。結果：每次團體個人在人際距離視覺量表中評他人的平均，經統計後發現，團體人際距離與團體氣氛之衝突和投入達顯著相關，但逃避未達顯著相關；與系統性多層次觀察之友善－不友善向度達顯著相關，但與接受－反抗工作取向權威向度及支配－順從向度未達顯著相關。結論：人際距離視覺量表是一個可行性高且效度相當可靠之團體評估工具。運用人際距離視覺量表可以協助團體帶領者評估團體整體的變化、團體內的人際關係和個人內在的特質與轉變。

Object: The purpose of this research is to assess the validity of and to explore the possible application of Interpersonal Visual Distance Scale (IVDS). Method: The group members and leaders filled in IVDS and group climate questionnaire (GCQ) after each group session. The staffs also evaluated A System for the Multiple Level Observation of Groups (SYMLOG) for group members. Mixed linear model was applied for testing the correlations among IVDS, GCQ and SYMLOG. Result: Conflict and engagement of GCQ were significantly related with IVDS, but avoidance was not. In SLMLOG, P (Friendly) -N (Unfriendly) dimension was correlated with the result of IVDS. Conclusion: IVDS is a accessible tool with good validity for group psychotherapy. Applying IVDS can help the leaders to evaluate the change in group-as-a-whole, intra-group interpersonal relationship, and the character and transition of individuals in the group.

1. Park, R., & Burgess, E. (1924). Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. (1983).Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice.
3. Freud S (1915a). Instincts and their Vicissitudes. London: Hogarth.
4. Freud, S (1915b). The Unconscious. London: Hogarth.
5. Bales, R.F.,Cohen, S.P.,Williamson, S.A.(1979).SYMLOG. A System for the Multiple Level Observation of Groups.Free Press.
6. Barkham, M.(2002).Dose-Effect Relations for Psychotherapy of Mild Depression: A Quasi-Experimental Comparison of Effects of 2, 8, and 16 Sessions.Psychotherapy Research,12(4),463-474.
7. Bion, W. R.(1960).Experiences in Group.New York:Basic Books.
8. Chung, Ming-Shun,Tsu, Juia-Hsin,Kuo, Chien-Cheng,Lin, Peing-Ein,Chang, Ta-Jen(2014).Therapeutic Effect of Dynamic Interpersonal Group Psychotherapy for Taiwanese Patients with Depressive Disorder.Int J group psychotherapy,64(4),537-545.
9. Foulkes, S. H.,Anthony, E. J.(1957).Group Psychotherapy : ThePsycho-Analytic Approach.Harmondworth, Middlesex:Penguin Books.
10. Fuhriman, A.,Burlingame, G.M.(1994).Handbook of Group Psychotherapy: An Empirical and Clinical Synthesis.New York:Wiley & Sons.
11. Hare, A.P.(2005).Analysis of Social Interaction Systems: SYMLOG Research and Applications.University Press of America.
12. Hill, W.F.(1965).Hill Interaction Matrix.Youth Studies Center, University of Southern California.
13. Kane, R.L.,Bershadsky, B.,Rockwood, T.(2005).Visual Analog Scale pain reporting was standardized.J.Clin.Epidemiol,58,618-623.
14. Klein, M.,Isaacs, S.(1952).Developments in Psycho-analysis.London:Hogarth.
15. Klerman, G.L.,Weissman, M.M.,Rounsaville, B.J.,Chevron, E.S.(1984).Interpersonal Psychotherapy of Depression.New York:basics books.
16. Moreno, J.L.,Fox, J.(1987).The essential Moreno: writings on psychodrama, group method, and spontaneity.New York:Springer Pub. Co..
17. Narozny, W.,Kuczkowski, J.,Mikaszewski, B.(2005).Measuring severity of tinnitus with a visual analog scale.Am.Fam. Physician,71,855-856.
18. Rutan, J.S.,Stone, W.N.(2001).Psychodynamic Group Psychotherapy.New York:The Guilford Press.
19. Segal, H.(1974).Introduction to the work of Melanie Klein.New York:Basic Books.
20. Vogelsang, J.,The Visual Analog Scale(1988).An accurate and sensitive method for self-reporting preoperative anxiety.J.Post Anesth.Nurs,3,235-239.
21. Wilfley, D.E.,MacKenzie, K.R.,Welch, R.R.,Ayres, V.E.,Weissman, M.M.(2000).Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Group.New York:basics books.
22. Yalom, I. D.,Leszcz, M.(2005).The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy.New York:Basic Books.
23. 吳麗雲(1997)。團體歷程分析方法─觀察團體的多層次系統（SYMLOG）簡介。諮商與輔導，141，26-30。
24. 鍾明勳、張達人、杜家興(2006)。人際距離視覺量表在團體心理治療的運用。台中:台灣精神醫學會。
25. 鍾明勳、郭珀如、杜家興、張達人(2013)。中文版團體氣氛量表之信效度。中華團體心理治療，19(4)，45-56。