帶領酒駕受刑人重新上路：酒後駕車二級防治團體課程之設計與實施經驗

Leading Drink- Driving Prisoners Back on the Road: Experiences in Designing and Practicing A Secondary Prevention Group Program for Drink Driving

劉乃瑛(Nai-Ying Liu)；陳婕依(Chieh-Yi Chen)；朱春林(Juno ChunLin Ju)

酒後駕車 ； 酒駕防制 ； 二級預防衛教團體 ； 酒癮 ； drink driving ； drink driving prevention ； secondary prevention group program ； alcohol addiction

中華團體心理治療

28卷3期（2022 / 09 / 30）

7 - 15

繁體中文

酒後駕車是置自己與他人生命安全於不顧的危險行為，資料顯示酒駕行為有緩降趨勢，然再犯率卻不降反升。為杜絕酒駕行為，貫徹酒駕零容忍之政策，相關配套措施不斷修改，如納入醫療處遇以處理酒駕行為的深層原因。近期酒駕受刑人在獄中必須接受衛教團體輔導，如何利用此機會修正酒駕行為之認知偏誤，建立酒後不開車的行為相當重要。本研究分享酒後駕車二級防治衛教認知輔導團體課程設計與實施兩梯次的經驗。在獄中進行課程有較多限制，與成員建立關係有較大挑戰，不過尊重與同理仍是關鍵。雖然極短的團體時數難以根除心癮，藉著專業介入可以與成員建立良好關係，關心其福祉，也能運用團體動力降低酒駕行為，催化戒癮的動機與準備。

Drink driving puts self and others in imminent danger. The statistics show that drink driving behaviors displayed a slow decline tendency in recent years, however the recidivism rate increased instead of dropped. In order to prevent drink driving and implement the zero tolerance policy of drink driving, relevant assistant measures have constantly been revised, such as introducing medical interventions into the policy. Recently, drink-driving prisoners are required to receive a secondary prevention group program for drink driving. It's a critical chance to correct target group member's cognitive biases and establish anticipated behaviors regarding drink driving. The current study shares a secondary prevention group program designed for drink driving prisoners, as well as the experiences of implementing the program. Conducting group therapy in prison is restricted, and establishing alliance with members is challenging. Nevertheless, respect and empathy are the keys. It's hard to get rid of psychological addiction via several hours of group intervention, and yet through professional intervention we can not only build good relationships with members, express caring for their well-being, but also reduce drink driving behaviors, facilitate motivation for abstinence even sobriety by means of group dynamics.

1. 王皇玉(2014)。2013 年刑事法發展回顧：酒駕與肇逃之立法與實務判決。臺大法學論叢，43(S)，1227-1264。
   連結：
2. 法務部統計處(2019)。酒駕案件統計分析。刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊，20，52-59。
   連結：
3. American Psychiatric Association(2022).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders fifth edition text revision (DSM-5-TR).American Psychiatric Publishing.
4. Beck, J. S.(2011).Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond.Guilford.
5. Carnes, P.(1983).Out of the shadows: Understanding sexual addiction.Comp Care.
6. Gorski, T. T.(1995).Relapse prevention counseling workbook: Managing high-risk situations.Herald House/Independence Press.
7. Hernández, O. H.,Vogel-Sprott, M.(2010).Alcohol slows the brain potential associated with cognitive reaction time to an omitted stimulus.Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,71(2),268-277.
8. Krans, M. F.,Maki, P. M.(1997).Effects of amantadine hydrochloride on symptoms of frontal lobe dysfunction in brain injury: Case studies and review.Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience,9,222-230.
9. Nestler, E. J.(2000).Genes and addiction.Nat Genet,26(3),277-281.
10. World Health Organization(2004).World report on road traffic injury prevention.Author.
11. 李俊珍,黃詠瑞,熊建璋(2017)。酒駕受刑人心理健康、拒酒自我效能與酒癮嚴重程度之研究。矯政期刊，6(2)，45-68。
12. 周文生,王玉玲(2013)。酒後違規者對酒駕行為認知之研究。交通學報，13(2)，153-178。
13. 翁栢萱（2020）。酒駕生命教育法制化研析。立法院議題研析，編號：R00928。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=192529
14. 陳玉書,林宜臻,廖秀娟(2019)。酒駕犯罪特性與酒駕情境的影響力。藥物濫用防治，4(4)，1-31。
15. 黃珮瑜（2019）。酒後駕車之法律責任。臺灣臺北地方檢察署。取自https://www.tpc.moj.gov.tw/292885/292897/661783/662745/
16. 鄒啟勳,陳玉書,林健陽(2020)。單純酒後駕車刑罰政策之德菲調查研究。矯政期刊，9(2)，4-35。