國小啓智班親職教育方案的發展與成效研究

An Educational Program for Parents of Mentally Retarded Students in an Elementary School

10.6768/JSE.200209.0105

劉城晃(Cheng-Hung Liu)；陳靜江(Ching-Chiang Chen)

特殊教育學報

16期（2002 / 09 / 01）

105 - 140

繁體中文

研究者以高雄市國小啟智班的六位家長為對象，用自編之「親職教育需求調查表」進行個別調查與訪談，深入了解其需求之內容和方式，據此發展擬訂個別化親職教育服務計劃，並進行十三週的親職教育方案，最後評估其成效。 在親職教育方案的發展方面，經由調查與訪談，發現六位家長共同的親職教育需求內容包括：學校提供諮詢服務（社會資源方面）；瞭解政府的社會福利殘障政策（相關法令方面）；瞭解孩子未來升學、就業與向家長說明孩子狀況及瞭解較有幫助的課程（特殊教育方面）；學習協助孩子清楚表達意見及與人溝通、學習協助孩子增進認知學習能力（教養技能方面）。 親職教育主要的成效，活動實施方式方面，對辦理小團體活動的方式、日期、時間及主題內容，家長均予正面肯定；個別晤談和電話聯繫家長均樂意接受；家長也肯定教養技能聯絡單的功能。家長參與方案之成效方面，以F家長的成效最顯著，其他依序B家長、C家長、E家長、A家長及D家長。活動實施內容方面，成效以社會資源最優，其次依序為特殊教育、家長諮商、相關法令及教養技能。 此外，班級老師建議多辦活動少用文字資料，教養技能聯絡單太頻繁，可增加辦理親子活動。

The purposes of this study were to develop the individualized parent education programsfor six parents of students with mental retardation in an elementary school, and evaluate the effects of the programs. The individual parent's needs were investigated, and a thirteen-week parents' education initiative has been undergone to finalize the effects of the evaluation. The major finding of the study were as follows： The parents' education needs mainly included: the counseling services (in terms ofsocial resources);understanding of the government's policies on social welfare and disabilities (in terms of related rules and laws); understanding of children's educational placement and career planning, as well as the current curriculum (in terms of special education); learning to help children communicate with others, and elevate their cognitive learning (in terms of skills in working with children). Beside, two parents needed helps from other professionals (in terms of social resources). One parent hoped to monitor the teaching in the class. No parent checked the item of ”Helping children take care of themselves”, while only one checked the item ”Helping children with self-management” (interms of skills in working with children). In addition, parent C was faced with financial problems, parent E had another child quitting classes frequently, and parent F strongly concerned about the educational placement in the future. As for scheduling the parents' education activities, there is no common time for parents, and the time for the activities must be therefore The Counseling Office laid out the guidelines for the parents' education program, and made schedules for coordination meeting. The class teachers carried out the program, prepared relevan written materials, and explained the information. Subject to adjustment arising from the changing needs of parents, objectives and content should becreated for the individual service plan in compliance with the needs. The carrying out of the program was realized as four small-group activities, two occurrences of individual service as well as the supply of written information. Coordination of other social services, and arrangement of the site visits were also included in the program. made certain in advance. Parents need diversified practice types. Among four small-group activities, there was only one parent participating all activities, three for three, one for two, and one for one of them. Individual counseling had been dispensed three and four times respectively for three parents. Telephone contacts hadbeen actively made by researcher eight to seventeen times. Every parent received newsletters and communication sheets concerning the information needed. Parents had positive responses to the ways, dates timing, and themes of thesmall-group activities. Parents also perceived individual interviews, telephone contactsand written communication positively. The class teachers' evaluation and suggestion for the program were also discussed in the study.

1. Allison, S. F.(1989).Implementation of an Educational Program for Parents of Students Enrolled in a Center for Reading and Learning Disabilities.Ed.D. Practicum, Nova University.
2. Ammer, J. J.,Littleton, B. R.(1983).Parent Advocacy: Now More Than Ever Active Involvement in Educational Decisions.
3. Austin Independent School District(1976).The Parent Program.
4. Barefoot, D.,Thomas, G.(1994).Effect of Participation on Parental Attitude Concerning the Use of the School Counselor as a Resource.
5. Brolin, D. E.(1995).Career Education-A Functional Life Skills Approach.New Jersey:Jane Lopez.
6. Dangel, H. L.,Bush, K.,Simon, A.,Crouthamel, W.(1988).The Education Needs of Parents of Handicapped Students.Georgia State University.
7. Hallahan, D. P.,Kauffman, J. M.(1994).Parents and Families: Exceptional Children Introduction to Special Education.Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon.
8. Halpin, S.(1994).A Program Designed and Implemented to Alleviate Feeling of Isolation for the Extend Families of Primary, Severely Emotionally and Social Support Network.Ed.D. Practicum Report, Nova University.
9. Kalyanpur, M.,Rao, S. S.(1989).The Perspectives of Low-Income, Black Mothers of Children with Disabilities Outreach Efforts.San Francisco, CA:
10. Leidner, H. R.(1991).Development and Implementation of Activities Designed to Target Uninvolved Parents and Increase Home and School Interaction of Disadvantaged Families.Nova University.
11. McKernan, J.,E. C. Short (Ed.)(1991).Form of Curriculum Inquiry Albany.NY:State University Press.
12. Scharf, M. K.(1990).The Effects of Communication Training on Parent Participation in School Programs for Children with Disabilities.Illinois State University.
13. Shea, T. M.,Bauer, A. M.(1991).Parents and Teachers of Children with Exceptionalities: A handbook for collaborraion.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
14. Turnbull, A. P.,Turnbull, H. R(1990).Families, Professionals, and Exceptionality: A special partnership.Merrill Publishing Company.
15. Western States Technical Assistance Resource(1979).Individualizing Parent Involvement.Washington Univ., Seattle, Western States Technical Assistance Resource.
16. Wright, E. M.(1988).Improving Parental Involvement in the Primary School through Increased Parental Awareness and Development of Parenting Skills.Dissertation, Nova University.
17. 何華國(1996)。啓智教育研究。台北:五南。
18. 李乙明(1991)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師大特研所。
19. 林儒倪、陳慧沁、劉娟芳、謝素靜(1990)。北市國中啟聰資源教室親職教育活動方案初探。特殊教育季刊，36，28-34。
20. 侯月端(1991)。學校親職教育的檢討與突破。諮商與輔導，63，16-17。
21. 教育部(1995)。全國身心障礙教育會議實錄。台北:教育部。
22. 陳小娟(1994)。不同階段/安置聽障學生親職教育需求研究。高雄師大學報，5，1-40。

1. 黃志雄(2011)。親師共同參與重度障礙學生個別化教育計畫之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，24，27-56。
2. 張英熙、張英熙(2014)。特殊兒童家長諮商。國小特殊教育，57，23-38。
3. (2003)。特殊兒童家庭支持與家長參與。特教園丁，19(2)，8-15。
4. (2009)。家庭服務導向之親職教育方案對發展遲緩幼兒的父母教養能力、家庭功能之研究。教育研究學報，43(1)，107-132。