“實用語文能力診斷測驗”之編製研究

The Analysis of the Functional Language Diagnostic Test Results

10.6768/JSE.200309.0121

林千惠(Chien-Hui Lin)；林惠芬(Hui-Fen Lin)

實用語文 ； 能力診斷 ； 測驗編製 ； Functional Language ； diagnostic testing

特殊教育學報

17期（2003 / 09 / 01）

121 - 146

繁體中文

啓智教育語文教學的重點在於教導學生具備生活化與實用性的表達及理解能力，此即為「實用語文」领域的精神與內涵。藉由教師客觀且正確地偵測智能障礙學生的語文能力，並配合評量結果發展具體有效的教學計畫，正是今日啓智教育語文教學的重要工作。「實用語文能力診斷測驗」便是因應上述的需求而發展的一套適用於國中及高中階段的輕度、中度智能障礙學生的實用語文能力診斷測驗。本測驗共分成「聽覺理解」、「口語表達」、「閱读理解」、及「寫作」等四個分測驗，並再依試題的難易度區分為「基礎版」及「進階版」二個版本，方便施測者依據學生的語文起點能力参酌使用單一版本進行施測。 本測驗的效度資料包括內容效度與構念效度：內容效度係由八位專家學者以雙向細目分析方式確定試題範疇的廣度與深度；構念效度則依據因素分析結果呈現本測驗中四個分測驗的變異數解釋量(基礎版為43.79%，進階版45.19%)。就信度資料而言，本研究以重測、內部一致性、評分者一致性等方式進行分析：基礎版和進階版的重測信度值分別為.93和.94，內部一致性為.73和.81；書寫分測驗的評分者一致性值為1.00。此外，從不同背景變項的差異分析結果顯示，不論是基礎版、進階版或全量表的得分，一般生的得分顯著優於智障生；在智障程度方面，輕度智障生之得分顯著優於中度智障生；就不同年段而言，高中階段智障生之得分顯著優於國中階段者；至於性別方面，則男性智障生在聽覺理解平均得分高於女性，女性智障生則在基礎版的書寫分測驗得分高於男性，其餘各分測驗得分則並無顯著差異。

The purpose of this study is to develop the Functional Language Diagnostic Test (FLDT) in order to better understand the functional language ability of students with mental retardation in junior and senior high school levels. The FLDT is a battery of four subtests which measures functional language skills including listening comprehension, oral expression, reading compression and writing. Based on the difficult level of test items, the FLDT has Basic and Advanced versions separately. The content validity of FLDT is established by inviting eight experts to evaluate the test contents in accordance with functional language domains. The construct validity of the FLDT is investigated by factor analysis and by comparing the differences in term of gender, grade and severity of retardation. The results of factor analysis indicates that the Basic and Advanced versions has accounted for 43.79% and 45.19% variations, separately. The FLDT also has adequate reliability, in which the internal reliability of Basic version is .73 and .81; for Advanced version is .93 and .94.The inter-rater reliability for writing subtest is 1.00.The results of ANOVA indicate that students with mild mental retardation have higher scores in FLDT subtests and composites than the students with moderate retardation. Students in senior high school level have higher scores than those in junior high school

1. Alberto, P.,Elliott, N.,Taber, T.,Andrews, P.(1993).Vocational content for students with moderate and severe disabilities in elementary and middle grades.Focus on Exceptional Children,25,1-10.
2. Anastasi, A.(1991).Psychological testing.New York:MacMillan.
3. Baker, D.J.,Freeman, R.,High, R.(2000).Resident-directed communication patterns in community homes for persons with disabilities.Mental Retardation,38,489-497.
4. Baroody, A.J.,Kaufman, L.(1993).The case of Lee: Assessing and remedying a numeral-writing difficulty.Teaching Exceptional Children,25,14-16.
5. Belser, R.C.,Sudhalter, V.(2001).Conversational characteristics of children with Fragile X syndrome: Repetitive speech.American Journal on Mental Retardation,106,28-38.
6. Goodstein, H.A.,Kahn, H.,Cawley, J.F.(1976).The achievement of educable mentally retarded children on the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test.The Journal of Special Education,10,61-70.
7. Hallahan, D.P.,Kauffman, J.M.(1991).Exceptional children： Introduction to special education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
8. Hamre-Nietupski, S.,Nietupski, J.,Strathe, M.(1992).Functional life skills, academic skill, and friendship/social relationship development: What do parents of students with moderate/severe/profound disabilities value.Journal of the Association for Person with Severe Handicaps,17,53-58.
9. Hesketh, L.J.,Chapman, R.S.(1998).Verb use by individuals with Down syndrome.American Journal on Mental Retardation,103,288-304.
10. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,39,31-36.
11. Kirk, S. A.,Gallagher, J. J.(1993).Educating exceptional children.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
12. Roberts, J.E.,Mirrett, P.,Burchinal, M.(2001).Receptive and expressive communication development of young males with Fragile X syndrome.American Journal on Mental Retardation,106,216-230.
13. Semmel, M.I.,Barritt, L.S.,Bennett, S.W.(1970).Performance of EMR and non-retarded children in a modified close task.American Journal of Mental Deficiency,74,681-688.
14. Tabachnick, B. G.,Fidell, L. S.(2001).Using multivariate statistics.New York, NY:Harper & Row.
15. Vogt, W.P.(1992).Equality and literacy: Elements of a social theory of functional literacy.The Review of Education,14,317-327.
16. Wright, L.(1984).Modifying the bond and thinker formula for use with low IQ adolescents.Journal of Reading,28,224-227.
17. 林千惠(2001)。重視國小學童的書寫問題。國小特殊教育，31，30-35。
18. 林千惠、方淑秋、黃真真、鐘玲君(2000)。台中市國小低年級學童書寫問題及其相關因素之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，8，131-160。
19. 林千惠、何素華(1997)。國中啓智班新生功能性讀寫能力評估研究。嘉義師院學報，11，425-452。
20. 林寶貴(1988)。特殊教育新論。臺北:幼獅。
21. 林寶貴(1994)。語言障礙與矯治。臺北:五南。
22. 林寶貴、邱上真(1983)。智能不足兒童語言能力研究。國立台灣教育學院學報，8，197-228。
23. 張正芬(1987)。輕度智能不足學生語文能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，3，49-66。
24. 曾怡諄(1993)。臺北市國小啓智班中重度智能不足兒童與普通兒童口語表達能力之比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊，9，151-176。
25. 曾美惠(1993)。曾氏寫字問題檢核表之因素效度。職能治療學會雜誌，11，13-27。
26. 楊元享(1989)。智能不足兒童國語能力之診斷與補救教學。臺北:臺北省立師範專科學校。

1. 崔夢萍、王馨佾(2014)。多媒體教材與觸控螢幕教學對國中智能障礙學生語文學習之影響。教育傳播與科技研究，109，17-38。
2. (2003)。高職階段智能障礙學生實用語文能力及其相關因素之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，25，61-83。