高職特教班輕度智能障礙學生網路使用行為之調查研究

The Use of Internet among High School Students with Mild Mental Retardation: A Survey Study

10.6768/JSE.200706.0057

林千惠(Chien-Hui Lin)；胡雅各(Yea-Gen Hwu)

高職特教班 ； 輕度智能障礙 ； 網路使用行為 ； senior high school special education program ； mild mental retardation ； online behavior

特殊教育學報

25期（2007 / 06 / 01）

57 - 80

繁體中文

本研究旨在瞭解高職特教班輕度智能障礙學生包括居家使用網路情形、上網目的、網路交友，以及因上網而衍生的問題等相關網路使用行為，並進一步分析不同特質學生在前述行為表現上的差異。研究採調查研究法進行，以自編「高職特教班輕度智能障礙學生網路使用情形調查問卷」，依照北中南東四區隨機抽取全國高職特教班共423名學生，進行問卷調查，並進行量化資料蒐集與分析。 研究結果係分別依據全體調查對象，以及部分具有網路交友經驗學生加以討論。（一）就全體調查對象(N=423)而言：(1)上網的行為已十分普遍，有超過一半的學生之網齡在三年以上；(2)居家使用電腦的情況亦極為頻繁，無論平日或假日，絕大多數學生的上網時間都超過一小時，更有56%學生在假日期間每日上網超過三小時。然而僅有不到兩成的學生家長會針對子女上網行為加以限制；(3)不同性別、地區、年級、或網齡的學生，居家上網行為並未有顯著差異；(4)高職輕度智障生上網的主要目的多以玩線上遊戲、即時通、抓歌（影片）為主；(5)35%的學生反應自己或同儕曾因上網而衍生後遺症，其中有接近半數的學生曾與人在網路上發生口角，有近三成學生因上網而曾與父母發生衝突，更有23.6%的學生曾上過色情網站。 （二）就部分具有網路交友經驗的學生(N=182)而言：(1)有25.2%的學生一直都有上網交友的習慣；(2)大多數學生能清楚區辨上網交友的優缺點，只有11.9%學生不認為網路交友會有任何的缺失；(3)有29.2%的學生是以異性網友為交往對象，有35.0%係使用化名與網友互動，有30.7%的學生經常或偶爾會與網友相約見面，更有30.9%的學生會掩飾其為特教班學生的身份上網交友；(4)學生上網交友行為未因地區與性別的不同，而產生差異，然而不同年級與網齡的學生，確實在上網交友行為上表現較大的差別。

The study aimed at understanding the use of Internet among students with mild mental retardation in the special education program of senior vocational high schools. The online behavior, the motivation of using the Internet, as well as possible misconception and problematic online behavior among these students were the major focuses in the study. Through literature reviews and a conference with senior high school special education teachers, a self-developed survey questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data. A total of 243 students from the nation were surveyed. Data was analzed and discussed based upon the overall student responses, and a portion of students who had interacted with ”cyber friends” in the Internet. The results of the study were as follows: 1. By analzing the overall responses from the 243 students, the results indicated that: (1) the use of Internet had became a common behavior of the students, more than half of the students had online experiences for at least 3 years, (2) the use of Internet was also common at home, the majority of students spent more than one hour online everyday. The duration of online behavior increased to more than 3 hours per day during weekend, (3) regardless of sex, residential area, grade level, or cyber age, no significant difference was found within their online behavior at home, (4) the major purpose of using the Internet among these students was playing online games or chatting with friends using MSN, and (5) 35% of the students reported that either themselves or their classmates have had unpleasant online experiences. 2. By analzing the portion of respondents (i.e., 182 students out of the entire surveyed group) who had interacted with 'cyber friends' online, the results indicated that: (1) 25.2% of this group had cyber friends since they began to use the Internet, (2) the majority of this group can differentiate the pros/cons of having cyber friends, except 11.9% of them believed that there were no side effects searching friends online, (3) 29.2% of this group focused on meeting cyber friends with different gender, 35.0% of them used pseudonyms to interact online, 30.7% of them had dated with their cyber friends occasionally or regularly, and 30.9% of them would cover their disabled status before meeting friends online, and (4) regardless of sex or residential area, the online behaviors of this group of students were similar. However, the differences in grade levels as well as their cyber ages, might affect the students' interacting behaviors online with friends.

1. Chasey, W. C.,Wyrick, W.(1971).Effects of a physical development program on psychomotor ability of retarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency,75,566-570.
2. Hardman, M. L.,Drew, C. J.,Egan, M. W.(2005).Human exceptionality: School, community, and family.Boston, MA:Pearson.
3. Howard, P. E.,Rainie, L.,Jones, S.(2001).Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology.American Behavioral Scientists,45(3),383-404.
4. Jones, S. G.,S. G. Jones (ed.)(1995).Cyber society: Computer-Mediated com-munication and community.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
5. Is the Internet addictive, or are addicts using the Internet
6. Rockville, M. D.(1997).Parents guide to the Internet.ERIC.
7. Schacter, J.,Chung, G.,Dorr, A.(1998).Children's Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analysis.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,49(9),840-849.
8. Young, K. S.(1998).Welcome to the center for on-line addiction, available at a case that breaks the stereotype.Psychological Reports,1,899-902.
9. Young, K. S.,Rodgers, R. C.(1998).The relationships between depression and Internet addiction.Cyber Psychology and Behavior,1,25-28.
10. 王鍾和(2001)。網路交友。學生輔導，77，72-77。
11. 92少年生活狀況及價值觀調查報告
12. 2007年一月台灣寬頻網路使用調查
13. 朱美慧(1999)。大葉大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
14. 吳統雄、饒培倫(1999)。臺灣網路公民趨勢系列調查，1996-1998。資訊傳播與圖書館學，5(4)，21-33。
15. 林以正、王澄華(2001)。性別對網路人際互動與網路成癮之影響與中介效應。輔導季刊，37(4)，1-10。
16. 施依萍(1997)。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
17. 施香如(2001)。迷惘、迷網：談青少年網路使用與輔導。學生輔導，74，18-25。
18. 施香如(2003)。網路虛擬世界的特性及其對青少年的影響。學生輔導通訊，89，80-89。
19. 胡雅各、林千惠(2005)。性教育教學對高職特教班輕度智障女學生與網友發生性關係行為處遇之研究。嘉義大學第二屆學術研討會，嘉義:
20. 胡雅各、林千惠(2005)。高職特教班輕度智障女學生網路性行為之個案分析。轉型與發展－創造師範教育新風貌學術研討會，彰化:
21. 孫曼蘋(1997)。青少年家用電腦使用之研究：質化研究法初探。第一屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會，台北:
22. 孫曼蘋(1997)。中美青少年家用電腦使用及其家庭生活之比較研究。民意研究季刊，199，49-72。
23. 教育部(2006)。特殊教育統計年報。台北:教育部。
24. 郭欣怡(1998)。臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
25. 陳雪菱、梁朝雲(2004)。國高中生網路資訊尋求行為影響因素之研究。教學科技與媒體，67，4-24。
26. 陳增穎(2001)。開或關閉－網際網路對青少年人際關係的影響。師友，392，27-30。
27. 曾怡慧、施綺珍、楊宜青(2004)。網路成癮症。基層醫學，19(2)，35-40。
28. 游森期(2001)。e世代青少年網路成癮及網路使用之輔導策略。學生輔導，74，34-43。
29. 楊孝濚、孫秀蕙、吳嫦娥、汪季參、曾貴苓、謝仁春(2001)。台北市少年網路交友行為之研究。犯罪學期刊，7，37-98。
30. 蔡美智(1999)。網路交友的危險與陷阱。科學月刊，30(5)，364-366。

1. 葉耀明、陳淑雲、陳明聰、吳亭芳、王華沛(2012)。國小高年級輕度障礙學生電腦文字輸入能力之研究。人文社會學報，8(2)，139-156。
2. (2009)。國中資源班學生性別平等教育課程設計與教學心得。特殊教育季刊，110，22-32。
3. (2015)。高職輕度智障生性侵害防治教育的迫切性與性平教學媒材資源網建置的必要性。社區發展季刊，149，67-80。