题名

學生創造力影響因素之研究:三層次分析架構

并列篇名

A Study on Influential Factors of Students' Creativity: The Three-Level Analysis as Analytic Framework

DOI

10.6768/JSE.201106.0151

作者

蕭佳純(Chia-Chun Hsia)

关键词

創造力 ; 創造力教學 ; 學校創新氣氛 ; 動機 ; creativity ; creativity teaching ; school innovation climate ; motivation

期刊名称

特殊教育學報

卷期/出版年月

33期(2011 / 06 / 01)

页次

151 - 177

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究採取匯合取向,藉由階層線性模式以三層次角度來探討學校層次(學校創新氣氛)、教師層次(教師創造力教學)以及學生層次(動機)對創造力表現的影響。本研究採用自編量表與創造力測驗,經43所學校、333位教師、3,330位學生的問卷資料分析後發現以下四點結論:第一,學生的內在動機、教師的創造力技能及校長鼓勵對學生的創造力表現具有直接影響效果。第二,創造力技能在內、外在動機與創造力表現間扮演不同的調節效果。第三,學校鼓勵對於教師創造力教學行爲具有直接影響效果。第四,校長鼓勵、資源充分、以及學習成長扮演重要的調節效果。

英文摘要

With confluence approaches, this study, from the aspect of three levels, discussed the effects of school (school innovation climate), teachers (creativity teaching), and students (motivation) on the performance of creativity through hierarchical linear model. This study used the self-developed scale and creativity test, and haved questionnaire analyses on 43 schools with 333 teachers and 3,330 students. Four conclusions were drawn: First, the internal motivation of students, the creative skills of teachers, and the encouragement from the principal to the creativity of students presented direct effects on student creativity; second, creative skills played various moderation effects on internal and external motivation and the performance of creativity, third, the encouragement from the school to teachers' creative instructions appeared direct influence, and fourth, the encouragement from the principal, sufficient resources, and learning to grow played important roles in moderation effects.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 江美惠(2005)。創造性問題解決教學方案對資優學生創造力及問題解決能力影響之研究。資優教育研究,5(2),83-106。
    連結:
  2. 何偉雲、葉錦燈(2003)。RAT-like測驗中的發散性思考分析。科學教育學刊,11(2),195-210。
    連結:
  3. 林偉文(2006)。學校創意守門人對創意教學與創造力培育態度與教師創意教學之關係。教育學刊,27,69-92。
    連結:
  4. 邱皓政、陳燕禎、林碧芳(2009)。組織創新氣氛量表的發展與信效度衡鑑。測驗學刊,56(1),69-97。
    連結:
  5. 洪素蘋、黃宏宇、林珊如(2008)。重要他人回饋影響創意生活經驗?以模式競爭方式檢驗創意自我效能與創意動機的中介效果。教育心理學報,90,303-322。
    連結:
  6. 陳玉樹、胡夢鯨(2008)。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響:階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報,40(2),179-198。
    連結:
  7. 蔡執仲、段曉林、靳知勤(2007)。巢狀探究模式對國二學生理化學習動機影響之探討。科學教育學刊,15(2),119-144。
    連結:
  8. 鄭英耀、王文中(2002)。影響科學競賽績優教師創意行為之因素。應用心理研究,15,163-190。
    連結:
  9. 蕭佳純、董旭英(2007)。教師參與團隊學習行為之跨層次分析:層級線性模式之應用。師大學報,52(3),65-89。
    連結:
  10. 教育部(2010)。國民中小學校概況統計。臺北市:教育部統計處
  11. Amabile, T. M.(1993).Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of ins-trinsic and ex-trinsic motivation in the workplace.Human Resource Management Review,3,185-201.
  12. Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.Bouler, CO:Westview.
  13. Amabile, T. M.,Hill, K. G.,Hennessey, B. A.,Tighe, E. M.(1994).The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,66(5),950-967.
  14. Amabile, T. M.,Schatzel, E. A.,Moneta, G. B.,Kramer, S. J.(2004).Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support.The Leadership Quarterly,14,5-32.
  15. Bharadwaj, S.,Menon, A.(2000).Making innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organization creativity mechanisms or both?.Journal of Production Innovation Management,17,424-434.
  16. Bickel, R.(2007).Multilevel analysis for applied research.New York:The Guilford press.
  17. Cheng, M. Y. V.(2001).Hong Kong,Hong Kong Baptist University.
  18. Choi, J. N.(2004).Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes.Creativity Research Journal,16,187-199.
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996).Creativity: Flow and the psychological discovery and invention.New York:Harper Collins.
  20. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,12,303-310.
  21. Fraser, B. J.(1989).Twenty years of classroom climate work: progress and prospect.Journal of Curriculum Studies,21(4),307-327.
  22. Furman, A.(1998).Teacher and pupil characteristics in the perception of the creativity of classroom climate.Journal of Creative Behavior,32(4),258-277.
  23. Gagne, M.,Deci, E. L.(2005).Self-determination theory and work motivation.Journal of Organizational Behavior,26,331-362.
  24. Gardner, H.(1993).Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi.New York:Basic.
  25. Glynn, M. A.(1996).Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation.The Academy of Management Review,21,1081-1111.
  26. Hamza, K. N.,William, R.(1996).,未出版
  27. Hox, J.(2002).Multilevel analysis.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
  28. Hunter, S. T.,Bedell, K. E.,Mumford, M. D.(2007).Climate for creativity: A quantitative review.Creativity Research Journal,19,69-90.
  29. Litwin, G.,Stringer, R.(1968).Motivation and organizational climate.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  30. Luke, D.(2004).Multilevel modeling.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  31. McEvoy, A.,Welker, R.(2000).Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review.Journal of Emotional and Behavior Disorders,8(3),130-140.
  32. Moneta, G. B.,Siu, C. M. Y.(2002).Trait intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, academic performance, and creativity in Hong Kong college students.Journal of College Student Development,43,664-683.
  33. Morgan, S.,Forster, J.(1999).Creativity in the classroom.Gifted Educational International,14,29-43.
  34. Niu, W.,Sternberg, R. J.(2003).Societal and school influences on student creativity: The case of China.Psychology in the Schools,40(1),103-114.
  35. Oldham, G. R.,Cummings, A.(1996).Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work.Academy of Management Journal,39,607-635.
  36. Qin, Z.,Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(1995).Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving.Review of Educational Research,65(2),129-143.
  37. Raudenbush, S.W.,Bryk, A. S.(2002).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  38. Rejskind, G.(2000).TAG teachers: Only the creative need apply.Roeper Review,22(3),153-157.
  39. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,54-67.
  40. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Selfdetermination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist,55,68-78.
  41. Schneider, B.(1990).Organizational climate and culture.San Francisco:Jossey- Bass.
  42. Shalley, C. E.,Gilson, L. L.,Blum, T. C.(2000).Matching creativity requirement and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave.Academy of Management Journal,43,215-223.
  43. Shally, C. E.,Zhou, J.,Oldham, G. R.(2004).The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?.Journal of management,30,933-958.
  44. Snijders, T.,Bosker, R.(1999).Multilevel analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  45. Starko, A. J.(2000).Creativity in the classroom: School in the curious delight.Mahwah, NJ:LEA.
  46. Sternberg, R. J.(ed.)(1999).Handbook of Creativity.New York:Cambridge.
  47. Sternberg, R. J.,Lubart, T. I.(1995).Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity.New York:The Free Press, a Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.
  48. Vista, C.(2000).Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative teacher.Education,120(4),675-680.
  49. 毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。臺北市:心理。
  50. 林碧芳、邱皓政(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編制與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊,4(1),141-169。
  51. 邱皓政(2000)。工作動機的內生性與外生性:臺灣與美國大學生工作動機取向的計量研究。應用心理研究,7,221-252。
  52. 國立臺灣海洋大學教育研究所主編(2003)。創新教學理論與實務。臺北市:師大書苑。
  53. 張玉山、許雅婷(2008)。以問題解決為基礎的科技教學活動設計─以創意機器人研習為例。研習資訊,25(3),61-69。
  54. 張景媛、呂玉琴(2000)。國科會專題研究計畫報告國科會專題研究計畫報告,未出版
  55. 教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北市:教育部。
  56. 符碧真(2000)。國科會專題研究計畫報告國科會專題研究計畫報告,未出版
  57. 許玫琇、張富鈞、鄭秀貴(2008)。高中體育教師創造人格特質、創意教學自我效能、內在動機及教學行為之相關研究。美和技術學院學報,27(2),113-124。
  58. 陳順利(2008)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄市,國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
  59. 陳霞鄢、王振德(2004)。國小資優班教師創造力教學行為之研究。資優教育研究,4(1),29-50。
  60. 游建弘(2003)。CoRT創造思考教學對國小資優班學生語文創造能力學習成效之研究。資優教育研究,3(2),37-63。
  61. 黃惠君、葉玉珠(2008)。國中教師教學玩興、教學動機、教學快樂感受與創意教學之關係。教育與心理研究,31(2),85-118。
  62. 黃麗美(2005)。國民中小學組織創新氣氛內涵與教師知覺之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報,36(2),171-210。
  63. 葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學─過去、現在與未來。臺北市:心理。
  64. 葉玉珠、葉玉環、李梅齡、彭月茵(2006)。以創作性戲劇教學啟發幼兒創造力之行動研究。師大學報,創造力特刊,1-27。
  65. 路婉林、陳兆敏(2008)。創意教學法教學設計在綜合活動領域教學上的應用。教師之友,49(5),16-29。
  66. 蕭佳純(2007)。教師內在動機以及知識分享合作對創意教學行為關聯性之階層線性分析。當代教育研究,15(4),57-92。
  67. 謝亞恆(2008)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄市,國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
被引用次数
  1. 吳冠翰(2018)。技術型高級中等學校家政群科教師美感經驗、創造力教學與新課程綱要認知之調查研究。台南應用科技大學生活服務產業系生活應用科學碩士班學位論文。2018。1-161。