一名音樂資優生以類比法的音樂創作行動歷程

The Music Creation Process of a Musically Gifted Student through Analogical Skills

梁斐瑜(Feei-Yu Liang)；高振耀(Chen-Yao Kao)

音樂資優 ； 類比法 ； 創造力 ； musical giftedness ； analogy ； creativity

特殊教育學報

42期（2015 / 12 / 01）

27 - 58

繁體中文

本研究為一行動研究，透過觀察、訪談、行動契約以及文件分析等方式蒐集資料，目的旨在透過類比法解決一名音樂資優生小琴在創作音樂時所面臨的困境。行動分為三個階段，第一階段是以Mozart 的Sonata K545 第一樂章作為訓練小琴音樂創作的類比典範；第二階段除繼續以Mozart 的Sonata K545第一樂章讓小琴練習外，創作重點則是在作詞部分：第三階段是作曲技巧的類化情境應用，產出音樂作品。本行動研究發現：(1)音樂創作初期係一從熟悉到陌生之歷程，創作困境為「天才型的創作迷思」與「從無到有的實踐力」，所採取之類比策略為「擬人類比」與「直接類比」；(2)音樂創作中期係一同步歷程，創作困境為「不穩定性」與「創作倦怠」，所採取之類比策略為「擬人類比」與「壓縮衝突」；(3)音樂創作後期係一從陌生回到熟悉之歷程，創作困境為「創作技巧類化」與「產品候選因子的拾捨兩難」，所採取之類比策略為「直接類比」。

The purpose of this study, an action research study, was to investigate the difficulties in music creation by the musically gifted student Tsiao-Chin, as well as to help her with music creation through analogical skills. There were three stages of action research. At the first stage, the first movement of Mozart's Sonata K545 was used as a training model for musical creation of analogy. At the second stage, in addition to continuing training with the first movement of Mozart's Sonata K545, creation training placed emphasis on lyrics. At the third stage, compositional techniques were applied and musical works were created. Through observation, action contracts, file analysis, and interviews, the conclusions of this study are outlined as follows. (a) Early music creation was a process which ranged from the familiar to the unfamiliar. Creation difficulties included the myth of genius creation and the practicing from scratch. Both the strategies of personal and direct analogy were used to achieve results. (b) Mid-music creation was a process of synchronicity. Creation difficulties were instability and creation burnout. Both the strategies of personal analogy and compressed conflicts were used. (c) Late music creation was a process that stretched from the unfamiliar to the familiar. Creation difficulties were the analogy of creation skills and the dilemma of deciding to choose the product candidate factor. The strategy of direct analogy was used.

1. 高振耀(2012)。解開創造力的奧秘：創造力的四個P。特教論壇，12，1-12。
   連結：
2. 高振耀(2014)。從類比的觀點探討創造思考過程。特教論壇，16，80-90。
   連結：
3. 許嘉容、吳裕益(2010)。高雄市國小一般智能與藝術才能資優生在因應策略與學校適應之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，22，65-95。
   連結：
4. 郭靜姿、王雅奇、林美和、吳舜文、簡維君、張靖卿、胡寶玉、謝佳男、周佩蓉(2009)。五位高中資優班畢業優秀女性之人格特質與生涯發展分析。特殊教育研究學刊，34(1)，47-73。
   連結：
5. 陳昭儀(2006)。傑出音樂家創作歷程之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，31，221-239。
   連結：
6. 黃揚婷、蔡典謨(2011)。探訪傑出作曲家的樂曲創作歷程。特殊教育研究學刊，36(1)，85-107。
   連結：
7. Christie, S.,Gentner, D.(2014).Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment.Journal of Cognition and Development,11(3),356-373.
8. Davis, G. A.,Rimm, S, B.(2004).Education of the gifted and talented.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
9. Donald, J. T.、Patricia, F. S. 、Edwin, C. S.、鄭聖敏譯、王曼娜譯、桑慧芬譯、顏靖芳譯(2014)。創造力與創新教育：創造力教學實務指引。臺北市:華騰。
10. French, R. M.(2002).The computational modeling of analogy-making.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,6(5),200-205.
11. Gardner. H.(1999).Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century.New York, NY:Basic Books.
12. Gentner, D.(2010).Bootstrapping the minds: Analogical processes and symbol systems.Cognitive Sciences,34,752-775.
13. Gentner, D.(1983).Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal,7(2),155-170.
14. Haroutounian, J.(2000).The delights and dilemmas of the musically talented teenager.Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,12(1),3-16.
15. Marek-Schroer, M. F.,Schroer, N. A.(1993).Identifying and providing for musically gifted young children.Roeper Review,16(1),33-36.
16. Marques, J. F.,McCall, C.(2005).The application of interrater reliability as a solidification instrument in a phenomenological study.Qualitative Report,10(3),439-462.
17. Merriam, S. B.(1998).Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
18. Reis, S. M.(2002).Internal barriers, personal issues, and decisions faced by gifted and talented females.Gifted Child Today,25(1),14-28.
19. Starko, A. J.(2005).Creativity in the classroom: schools of curious delight.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Webster, P. R.(1990).Creativity as creative thinking.Music Educators Journal,76(9),22-28.
21. 吳永怡(2009)。音樂才能優異學生家庭教養對其音樂成就影響之初探研究─以東部地區為例。東臺灣特殊教育學報，11，79-100。
22. 邵俊德(1995)。高中音樂資優生自我效能與生涯決定之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，12，295-317。
23. 張世彗(2013)。創造力：理論、技法與教學。臺北市:五南。
24. 張琳筑(2002)。音樂資優兒童天賦特質研究─以莫札特童年期為例。資優教育季刊，82，18-24。
25. 鈕文英(2013)。研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
26. 黃曉嵐譯、蔡淑君譯、胡翠茵譯、張芝萱譯、James, C. K.、Robert, J. S.(2014)。創造力理論與當代議題面面觀。臺北市:華騰。
27. 蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。臺北市:五南。

1. 高振耀(2020)。探討四個語詞類比及其在創造思考活動中的應用。特教論壇，29，1-16。
2. (2024)。共感知覺在類比創造力教學之應用：以音樂與繪畫為例。特殊教育發展期刊，77，1-18。