就學與否對隔代教養學前兒童語言能力之影響探討

Effect of School Enrollment on the Language Ability of Preschool Children in Skipped-Generation Family

楊麗詩(Li-Shi Yang)；王秋鈴(Chiu-Ling Wang)

隔代教養 ； 語言能力 ； 學前兒童 ； 學前教育 ； skipped generation families ； language ability ； preschoolers ； preschool education

特殊教育學報

44期（2016 / 12 / 01）

69 - 94

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討隔代教養未就學和已就學之學前兒童在語言理解和語言表達能力上是否有差異。本研究採取方便取樣，選取新北市、雲林縣、臺南市、高雄市、花蓮縣3－4歲隔代教養未就學及已就學之學前兒童各10名進行配對。兩組兒童在年齡、性別、家庭社經水準、家中主要使用語言、家中同住兒童數等控制變項上，均未達顯著差異，但認知能力則有顯著差異。兩組兒童均接受「修訂學前兒童語言障礙評量表」、「華語兒童理解與表達詞彙測驗」及「中文色塊測驗」三項標準化語言測驗，並收集45句會話樣本及一個敘事樣本進行分析，以了解其語言理解與語言表達能力。研究結果以Wilcoxon等級和檢定方法進行統計分析，結果顯示，隔代教養未就學組兒童與隔代教養已就學組兒童在「中文色塊測驗」的表現達到統計上的顯著差異，但在「修訂學前兒童語言障礙評量表」和「華語兒童理解與表達詞彙測驗」之表現則無顯著差異。另外，兩組兒童在敘事樣本指標中的「結果」、「人稱代名詞凝聚完整率」及「敘事發展層次」亦達到統計上的顯著差異，但在會話樣本中各指標的表現則無顯著差異。

This study investigated the differences in the language comprehension and expression abilities between preschool children who have and have not enrolled in school. Convenience sampling was adopted to select preschool children 3-4 year of age in skipped-generation family living in New Taipei City, Yunlin County, Tainan City, Kaohsiung City, and Hualien County. A total of 10 children were recruited for both the enrolled and nonenrolled groups. The two groups differed nonsignificantly in control variables such as age, sex, family socioeconomic status, primary language at home, and number of siblings at home, but they demonstrated significantly different cognitive abilities. All participating children received three standardized language tests, namely, the Revised Language Disorder Assessment for Preschoolers, the Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary Test, and the Mandarin Token Test. In addition, 45 sentences from a conversation sample and a narration samples were collected from the participants, on the basis of which an analysis was made to examine the participants' language comprehension and expression abilities. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to analyze the collected data, revealing that the two groups attained significantly different scores on the Mandarin Token Test, whereas their scores for the remaining two tests differed nonsignificantly. Concerning the narration sample indicators, the two groups demonstrated significantly different performances in consequence (a story grammar element), personal pronouns reference, and story structure levels. However, their conversation indicators differed nonsignificantly.

1. 吳佳蓉、張德勝(2003)。隔代教養學生與非隔代教養學生學校生活適應之比較。花蓮師院學報，16，109-133。
   連結：
2. 林月仙(2007)。學前兒童色塊測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，32(4)，85-109。
   連結：
3. 林仰釩、王秋鈴(2014)。學前隔代教養兒童之語言能力初探。特殊教育發展期刊，58，61-76。
   連結：
4. 陳欣希、張鑑如、陳秀芬(2011)。學齡前幼兒的故事結構發展：故事文法之分析。教育心理學報，42(3)，359-378。
   連結：
5. 行政院主計處(2014)。103 年家庭收支調查統計表。取自http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/a11.asp?year=103
6. American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) (1998). Grandparents raising their grandchildren: What to consider and where to find help. Retrieved from http://www.aarp.org/confacts/programs/gic.html
7. Becklund, L. (1993). I wanted somebody to love. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/1993-03-14/news/vw-676_1_teen-births
8. Wilson, J. J. (2000). The high/scope perry preschool project. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/181725.pdf
9. 行政院主計處(2015)。家庭組織型態。取自https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_Category.aspx?fs=EcfUJy%2fsRRPbnOe4TvO%2fJg%3d%3d
10. Applebee, A.(1978).The child's concept of a story: Ages 2 to 17.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
11. Bramlett, M. D.,Blumberg, S. J.(2007).Family structure and children's physical and mental health.Health Affairs,26(2),549-558.
12. Brookeshire, R. H.,McNeil, M. R.(2015).Introduction to neurogenic communication disorders.St. Louise, MO:Elsevier Mosby.
13. Campbell, F. A.,Pungello, E. P.,Miller, J. S.,Burchinal, M.,Ramey, C. T.(2001).The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment.Developmental Psychology,37(2),231-242.
14. Campbell, F. A.,Ramey, C. T.(1994).Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income families.Child Development,64,684-698.
15. Currie, J.(2001).Early childhood education programns.Journal of Economic Perspectives,15(2),213-238.
16. Duncan, G. J.,Brooks-Gunn, J.(2000).Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development.Child Development,71(1),188-196.
17. Frede, E.,Jung, K.,Barnett, W. S.,Lamy, C. E.,Figueras, A.(2007).The Abbott preschool program longitudinal effects study (APPLES).New Brunswick, NJ:National Institute for Early Education Research.
18. Fuller-Thomson, E.,Minkler, M.,Driver, D.(1997).A profile of grandparents raising grandchildren in the United States.The Gerontologist,37(3),406-411.
19. Garces, E.,Thomas, D.,Currie, J.(2002).Longer-term effects of head start.The American Economic Review,92(4),999-1012.
20. Kisker, E. E.,Paulsell, D.,Love, J. M.,Raikes, H.(2002).Pathways to quality and full implementation in Early Head Start programs.
21. McCarton, C. M.,Brooks-Gunn, J.,Wallace, I. F.,Bauer, C. R.,Bennett, F. C.,Bernbaum, J. C.,Tyson, J.(1997).Results at age 8 years of early intervention for low-birth-weight premature infants.The Infant Health and Development Program,277(2),126-132.
22. National Institute of Child Health and Development(2002).The interaction of child care and family risk in relation to child development at 24 and 36 months.Applied Developmental Science,6(3),144-156.
23. Ou, S. R.,Reynolds, A. J.(2006).Early childhood intervention and educational attainment: Age 22 findings from the Chicago longitudinal study.Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk,11(2),175-198.
24. Reynolds, A.,Temple, J.,Robertson, D.,Mann, E.(2002).Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the title I Chicago child-parent center program.Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis,24(4),267-303.
25. Sameroff, A. J.,Seifer, R.,Baldwin, A.,Baldwin, C.(1993).Stability of intelligence from preschool to adolescence: The influence of social and family risk factors.Child Development,64(1),80-97.
26. Schweinhart, L. J.,Barnes, H. V.,Weikart, D. P.(1993).Significant benefits: The high/scope perry preschool study through age 27.Ypsilanti, MI:High-scope Educational Research Foundation.
27. Seif, E.(2014).Exploring the influence of developmental kindergarten attendance on later literacy and social-emotional outcomes: A records review investigation in one Michigan school district.East Lansing, MI:Michigan State University.
28. Walker, D.,Greenwood, C.,Hart, B.,Carta, J.(1994).Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors.Child Development,65,606-621.
29. Yorkey, M.(1993).Picking up the pieces.Focus on the Family,17,13.
30. Zill, N.,Lollins, M.,West, J.,Hausken, E. G.(1995).Approaching kindergarten: A look at preschoolers in the United States.Young Children,51(1),35-38.
31. 李玉冠(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，靜宜大學。
32. 李芸蓁(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
33. 李湘凌、高傳正(2006)。隔代教養幼兒在幼兒園生活適應之個案研究。幼兒保育研究集刊，2(1)，37-56。
34. 林月仙、曾進興、吳裕益(2014)。中文色塊測驗。臺北市:心理。
35. 林寶貴、杞昭安(1996)。兒童認知發展測驗。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
36. 林寶貴、林竹芳(1993)。語言障礙兒童語言發展能力及其相關因素之研究。聽語會刊，9，31-67。
37. 林寶貴、黃玉枝、黃桂君、宣崇惠(2008)。修訂學前兒童語言障礙評量表。臺北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
38. 胡玉鳳(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。
39. 孫世維(1994)。青少年與父母的情感關係：依附的性質與重要性。法商學報，29，257-304。
40. 教育部(2015)。白髮童顏祖孫情─隔代教養家庭教育實務工作手冊（家長版）。
41. 陳麗欣、翁福元、許維素、林志忠(2000)。我國隔代教養家庭現況之分析（上）。成人教育通訊，2，37-41。
42. 陳麗欣、翁福元、許維素、林志忠(2000)。我國隔代教養家庭現況之分析（下）。成人教育通訊，3，51-66。
43. 黃政吉(2000)。社會變遷中隔代教養與少年非行之關係實務調查研究。警學叢刊，31(3)，97-109。
44. 黃英虹(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
45. 黃瑞珍、簡欣瑜、朱麗璇、盧璐(2011)。華語兒童理解與表達詞彙測驗。臺北市:心理。
46. 楊德芬(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺南市，國立成功大學。
47. 蔡宜芳(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立大學。
48. 藍浩瑜(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮縣，國立東華大學。

1. (2023)。幼兒族語桌遊課程之發展歷程與成效。台灣原住民族研究，16(1)，77-117。