幼兒書本和文字概念評量中文版之信度和效度探討

A Study on Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Preschool Word and Print Awareness Assessment

林湘雅(Hsiang-Ya Lin)；王秋鈴(Chiu-Ling Wang)

書本和文字概念 ； 信度 ； 效度 ； word and print awareness ； reliability ； validity

特殊教育學報

49期（2019 / 06 / 01）

35 - 61

繁體中文

有鑑於國內缺乏書本和文字概念的標準化評量工具，因此本研究轉譯Preschool Word and Print Awareness Assessment為「幼兒書本和文字概念評量中文版」（Preschool Word and Print Awareness Assessment- Chinese Version，PWPA-C），以138名四至六歲的正常發展幼兒和32名語言發展遲緩幼兒為對象，進行信度和效度的檢驗。PWPA-C的全量表內部一致性信度為.69，重測信度為.88，評分者間信度為.97。內容效度部分，PWPA-C轉譯後經學者專家審查調整為適用於臺灣幼兒的測驗工具。建構效度方面，PWPA-C全量表與書本概念、文字形式、文字常規和文字功能等分向度有中度到高度的顯著相關（r＝.57～.88，p＜.01），且四個分向度間呈現低度到中度的顯著相關（r＝.22～.44，p≦.01）。另外，四到六歲幼兒隨年紀增長，書本和文字概念也會持續的發展，除了四歲組與五歲組幼兒之間未達顯著差異外，其他年齡組間皆達顯著差異。最後，典型發展幼兒的分數顯著高於語言發展遲緩幼兒。效標關聯效度分析幼兒在PWPA-C與「早期讀寫發展困難檢核表」中「印刷覺識」得分之相關係數為.42，呈現中度顯著相關。以上結果顯示PWPA-C為具有良好信、效度的標準化測驗工具，可用於評量四歲到六歲幼兒的書本和文字概念發展。

The purposes of this study were to adapt the ＂Preschool Word and Print Awareness Assessment (PWPA)＂ into Chinese version, and to investigate its reliability and validity. One hundred and thirty-eight typical developing four-to-six year-olds children and 32 language development delayed children were examined by ＂Preschool Word and Print Awareness Assessment- Chinese Version (PWPA-C)＂. The internal reliability of PWPA-C was .69, test-retest reliability was .88, and inter-rater reliability was .97. The PWPA-C was viewed by scholars and experts, and each item has been examined carefully and adjusted to suit Taiwan's preschoolers. In terms of construct validity, the full scale of PWPA-C had a moderate to high correlation with the book convention, print convention, print form, and print function (r=.57~.88, p＜.01). And there was a significant low to moderate correlation (r=.22~.44, p≦.01) between subscale. In addition, as children between four to six years old grew older, their word and print awareness also developed. There were significant differences among age groups, except the comparison between the 4-year-olds and 5-year-olds. Children with normal development also had significantly higher scores in PWPA-C than those with language development delayed. Regarding to criterion-related validity, Pearson correlation coefficients of the scores between PWPA-C and Print Awareness Subtest of Early Literacy Screening Checklist was .42, indicated a significant moderate correlation. The results as above indicated that PWPA-C had adequate reliability and validity and could be used for assessing preschoolers' word and print awareness.

1. 錡寶香,張旭志,洪書婷(2012)。學前特定型語言障礙兒童進入小學的追蹤研究：語言、識字表現之探討。特殊教育學報，36，61-92。
   連結：
2. 蘇楷涵,王秋鈴(2018)。家長應用文字參照策略提升學前語言發展遲緩兒童的書本和文字概念之成效。特殊教育學報，47，63-94。
   連結：
3. 幼兒園教保活動課程大綱（2017 年 8 月 1日）。
4. Bleile, K. M.(1995).Manual of articulation and phonological disorder.San Diego, CA:Singular.
5. Boudreau, D.,Hedberg, N.(1999).A comparison of early literacy skills in children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,8,249-260.
6. Browne, A.(1998).A practical guide to teaching reading in the early years.London, England:SAGE Publications Ltd..
7. Catts, H. W.,Fey, M. E.,Tomblin, J. B.,Zhang, X.(2002).A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,45,1142-1157.
8. Clay, M. M. (Ed.)(1979).The early detection of reading difficulties.Auckland, New Zealand:Heinemann Education Books.
9. Colozzo, P.,McKeil, L.,Petersen, J.,Szabo, A.(2016).An early literacy program for young children with Down Syndrome: Changes observed over one year.Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,13(2),102-110.
10. Diamond, K. E.,Gerde, H. K.,Powell, D. R.(2008).Development in early literacy skills during the prekindergarten year in head start: Relations between growth in children's writing and understanding of letters.Early Children Research Quarterly,23,467-478.
11. Ezell, H. K.,Justice, L. M.(2005).Shared storybook reading: Building young children's language & emergent literacy skills.Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes.
12. Hayes, S.(1990).Nine ducks nine.Cambridge, MA:Candlewick Press.
13. Jones, P. S.,Lee, J. W.,Phillips, L. R.,Zhang, X. E.,Jaceldo, K. B.(2001).An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research.Nursing Research,50(5),300-304.
14. Justice, L. M.(2006).Emergent literacy: Development, domains, and intervention approaches.Clinical approaches to emergent literacy intervention,San Diego, CA:
15. Justice, L. M.(Ed.),Sofka, A. E.(Ed.)(2010).Engaging children with print: Building early literacy skills through quality read-aloud.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
16. Justice, L. M.,Bowles, R. P.,Skibbe, L. E.(2006).Measuring preschool attainment of print-concept knowledge: A study of typical and at-risk 3-to 5-year-old children using item response Theory.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,37,224-235.
17. Justice, L. M.,Ezell, H. K.(2001).Word and print awareness in 4-year-old children.Child Language Teaching and Therapy,17,207-226.
18. Lomax, R. G.,McGee, L. M.(1987).Young children's conceptions about print and reading: Toward a model of word reading acquisition.Reading Research Quarterly,22,237-256.
19. Lovelace, S.,Stewart, S. R.(2007).Increasing print awareness in preschoolers with language impairment using non-evocative print referencing.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in School,38(1),16-30.
20. McGee, L. M.(Ed.),Richgels, D. J.(Ed.)(1990).Literacy's beginnings.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
21. McGinty, A. S.,Justice, L. M.(2009).Predictors of print knowledge in children with specific language impairment: Experiential and developmental factors.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,52,81-97.
22. Neumann, M. M.,Hood, M.,Ford, R. M.(2013).Using environmental print to enhance emergent literacy and print motivation.Reading and Writing,26(5),771-793.
23. Owens, R. E., Jr.(2012).Language development: An introduction.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
24. Rescorla, L.(2005).Age 13 language and reading outcomes in late-talking toddlers.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,48,459-472.
25. Tomblin, J. B.,Zhang, X.,Buckwalter, P.,O’Brien, M.(2003).The stability of primary language disorder: Four years after kindergarten diagnosis.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,46,1283-1296.
26. van Kleeck, A.(2003).Research on book sharing: Another critical look.On reading books to children: Parents and teachers,Mahwah, NJ:
27. van Kleeck, K.,Schuele, C. M.(1987).Precursors to literacy: Normal development.Topics in Language Disorders,7(2),13-31.
28. Whitehurst, G. J.,Lonigan, C. J.(1998).Child development and emergent literacy.Child Development,69(3),848-872.
29. 方秋雅（譯）,Beverly, O.(2010).嬰幼兒的讀寫發展：0~8 歲的反省式語文教學.臺北市:華騰.
30. 王秋鈴(2011)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
31. 王嘉珮(2011)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
32. 吳明隆,涂金堂(2008).SPSS 與統計應用分析.臺北市:五南.
33. 李連珠(1995)。臺灣幼兒之讀寫概念發展。幼教天地，11，37-68。
34. 李連珠(2006).全語言教育.臺北市:心理.
35. 李連珠(1992)。早期閱讀發展釋疑之一：兼談家庭閱讀活動。幼兒教育年刊，5，109-126。
36. 李連珠,林慧芬(2001)。適合發展的幼兒語文課程。臺南師院學報，34，443-474。
37. 林玉霞(1995)。臺灣聽力正常兒童與聽覺障礙兒童對文字書本之概念表現。特殊教育與復健學報，4，249-266。
38. 林寶貴,黃玉枝,黃桂君,宣崇慧(2008).修訂學前兒童語言障礙評量表.臺北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組.
39. 宣崇慧(2000)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
40. 柯華葳（譯）,游雅婷（譯）,Burns, M. S.,Griffin, P.,Snow, C. E.(2001).踏出閱讀的第一步.臺北市:信誼.
41. 特殊教育通報網(2015)。特殊教育學前階段身心障礙類學生性別統計概況。取自 ： http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/Statis_history.asp.
42. 陳淑琴（譯）,Schickedanz, J. A.(2005).遠遠多於 ABC：談早期讀寫的萌發.臺北市:信誼.
43. 黃瑞琴(1993).幼兒的語文經驗.臺北市:五南.
44. 葛本儀（編）(2003).語言學概論.臺北市:五南.
45. 路喬甯(2011)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
46. 臺灣省國民學校教師研習會（編）(1993).國民小學國語科教材教法研究第三輯.臺北市:臺灣省國民學校教師研習會.
47. 鄭默（譯）,鄭日昌（譯）,Kaplan, R. M.,Saccuzzo, D. P.(1998).心理測驗：原理、應用與問題.臺北市:五南.
48. 謝國平(2011).語言學概論.臺北市:三民書局.

1. 劉秀丹(2020)。聽損兒童讀寫萌發技能及親子共讀促進策略。特殊教育季刊，157，19-29。