擴增實境（AR）之比與比值數學教材對國小六年級學習障礙學生學習及課堂注意力成效提升之探討

The Effects of Learning and Attention in the Classroom for Students with Learning Disabilities by Using Augmented Reality in Rate and Ratio Instruction

10.3966/207455832020060051003

蔡浩軒(Hao-Syuan Cai)；孟瑛如(Ying-Ru Meng)

學習障礙 ； 擴增實境 ； 數學學習 ； 比與比值 ； 課堂注意力 ； students with learning disabilities ； augmented reality ； mathematics learning ； rate and ratio ； attention in the classroom

特殊教育學報

51期（2020 / 06 / 01）

65 - 99

繁體中文

本研究利用擴增實境（AR）設計數學比與比值教材，以單一受試研究法之撤回設計研究4位國小學習障礙學生，進行每週3次，持續8週，共24次教學。透過改編「課堂注意力行為檢核表」、自編「數學學習成效測驗」、數學診斷測驗（MDA）及訪談瞭解本教材對受試者的學習成效及課堂注意力成效。以目視分析法及C統計分析發現：（1）使用擴增實境（AR）教材教學後，受試者在自編「數學學習成效測驗」上比與比值學習成效達顯著，顯示學習具立即與維持成效，未使用擴增實境（AR）教材教學的圓面積學習成效顯著下降，同時MDA後測與前測結果相較下，百分等級皆提升，在比與比值題型作答皆正確；（2）根據改編「課堂注意力行為檢核表」，受試者在課堂注意力之圖畫、語文、推理注意力向度上皆具立即提升成效；（3）AR數學教材搭配教學介入，對於受試者認知負荷測量有學習反應時間上的個別差異，顯示學習障礙學生在計算能力上確實有瓶頸，但經教學介入後，正確率皆上升，顯示確實能降低認知負荷量並依照自身學習速率進行學習。

This study used Augmented Reality (AR) to design mathematical instruction in rate and ratio and single subject withdraw design to evaluate effects of the 4 six grade students with learning disabilities on learning and attention in the classroom. The instruction lasted 8-weeks and was performed three times a week. Instruments were adapted ＂Classroom Attention Behavior Checklist＂, self-administered ＂Mathematics Learning Effectiveness Test＂, Mathematical Diagnostic Test (MDA), and interviews. The findings of visual analysis and C statistic showed that: (1) After using AR in teaching rate and ratio, the participants demonstrated significant achievement of learning outcomes in the rate and ratio on the self-administered Mathematics Learning Effectiveness Test, indicating an immediate and sustain effective learning. The achievement of learning outcomes in the circular has decreased significantly without using AR in the classroom. Most students identified correct answers in post-tests and increased their certainty compared to pre-tests on the Mathematical Diagnostic Test (MDA). (2) The participants' attention in drawing, language, and reasoning were better than before, according to the results of adapted ＂Classroom Attention Behavior Checklist＂. (3) Individual differences existed in cognitive load and reaction times when using AR in the classroom, indicating that computational skills acts as a bottleneck for the students with learning disabilities. The teaching intervention did increase the percentage of correct answers and reduce cognitive load of the participants so they can learn at their own pace.

1. 王明志(2013)。運用地理資訊與擴增實境技術整備社會科數位教材之研究。國教新知，60(1)，21-29。
   連結：
2. 李來春,郝光中(2013)。擴增實境應用於互動式英語教材教學之研究──以國小五年級英語三個單元為例。國際數位媒體設計學刊，5(1)，51-64。
   連結：
3. 林鋐宇,劉國政,張文典,洪福源(2012)。特殊需求學生之注意力表現探究。身心障礙研究，10(3)，179-195。
   連結：
4. 柯華葳(2005)。數學學習障礙學生診斷與確認。特殊教育研究學刊，29，113-126。
   連結：
5. 張菀珍(2015)。運用 AR 學習系統輔助大學生地方宗教民俗文化學習成效之探究。數位學習科技期刊，7(3)，43-81。
   連結：
6. 連文宏,洪儷瑜(2017)。數學學障與數學合併閱讀障礙國中生計算能力表現之特徵及其差異分析。臺灣數學教育學刊，4(1)，35-62。
   連結：
7. 陳志鴻,許庭嘉,鄭立娜(2017)。四年級自然與生活科技之擴增實境探究式學習教案設計──以昆蟲單元為例。科技與人力教育季刊，4(1)，15-28。
   連結：
8. 陳明璋,李俊儀,李健恆,楊晨意(2016)。逐步引導注意力之多媒體教學設計對圓切線性質學習之成效研究。臺灣數學教育期刊，3(2)，1-30。
   連結：
9. 陶淑瑗,莊宗嚴(2015)。數位科技應用於小學低年級學童數學學習之反思。數位學習科技期刊，7(2)，53-71。
   連結：
10. 湯志民(2019)。智慧校園（Smart Campus）的理念與推展。學校行政，121，125-140。
    連結：
11. 錢昭萍,梁麗珍,黃國豪,黃恆霖(2017)。數位繪本或擴增實境融入國文教學對學習之影響：以科技大學資訊與非資訊學院學生為例。數位學習科技期刊，9(1)，1-32。
    連結：
12. 簡吟文,孟瑛如(2009)。注意力訓練對國小學習障礙學生在課堂學習時注意力影響之探討。特殊教育與復健學報，20，25-52。
    連結：
13. 身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法（2013年 9 月 2 日）。
14. Amir, M. F.,Chotimah, C.,Afandi, R.,Rudyanto, H. E.,Anshori, I.(2018).Design research study : Investigation of increasing elementary student’s spatial ability using 3D metric.Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems,10(6),1707-1713.
15. Ariyana, Y.,Wuryandari, A. I.(2012).Virtual interaction on augmented reality with nonparametric belief propagation algorithm.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,67,590-599.
16. Atkinson, R. K.(2002).Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents.Journal of Educational Psychology,94(2),416-427.
17. Ayres, P.(2013).Can the isolated-elements strategy be improved by targeting points of high cognitive load for additional practice?.Learning and Instruction,23,115-124.
18. Azuma, R. T.(1997).A survey of augmented reality.Teleoperators and Virtual Environments,6(4),355-385.
19. Billinghurst, M.,Dünser, A.(2012).Augmented reality in the classroom.Computer,45(7),56-63.
20. Billinghurst, M.,Grasset, R.,Looser, J.(2005).Designing augmented reality interfaces.ACM Siggraph Computer GraphiCs,39(1),17-22.
21. Bressler, D. M.,Bodzin, A. M.(2013).A mixed methods assessment of students’ flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,29(6),505-517.
22. Broadbent, D. E.(1958).Perception and Communication.New York, NY:Pergamon Press.
23. Broadbent, D. E.(1954).The role of auditory localization in the attention and memory span.Journal of Experimental Psychology,44,51-55.
24. Brünken, R.,Plass, J.,Leutner, D.(2003).Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning.Educational psychologist,38(1),53-61.
25. Cahyono, B.,Firdaus, M. B.,Budiman, E.,Wati, M.(2018).Augmented reality applied to geometry education.2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT),Makassar, Indonesia:
26. Carroll, W. M.(1994).Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology,86(3),360-367.
27. Chao, W. H.,Chang. R. C.(2018).Using augmented reality to enhance and engage students in learning mathematics.Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal,12(5),455-464.
28. Chao, W.,Yang C.,Chang, R.(2018).A study of the interactive mathematics mobile application development.1st IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention 2018,Jeju,South Korea:
29. Chin, K. Y.,Lee, K. F.,Chen, Y. L.(2017).Using an interactive ubiquitous learning system to enhance authentic learning experiences in a cultural heritage course.Interactive Learning Environments,26(4),444-459.
30. Chiu, J. L.,DeJaegher, C. J.,Chao, J.(2015).The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students’ understanding of gas properties.Computers & EduCation,85,59-73.
31. Chung, M. C.,Wang, C. H.(2018).The effects of augmented reality representations on student’s’ understanding on learning fraction.Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL 2018,Kidmore End, England:
32. Cicchetti, D.(Ed.),Cohen, D. J.(Ed.)(1995).Developmental Psychopathology.New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
33. Clark, R. C.,Mayer, R. E.(2008).E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning.San Francisco, CA:Pfeiffer.
34. Cooper, J. O.,Heron, T. E.,Heward, W. L.(2007).Applied behavior analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education.
35. Dunleavy, M.,Dede, C.,Mitchell, R.(2009).Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning.Journal of Science Education and Technology,18(1),7-22.
36. Estapa, A.,Nadolny, L.(2015).The effect of an augmented reality enhanced mathematics lesson on student achievement and motivation.Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research,16(3),40-48.
37. Fuchs, L. S.,Fuchs, D.(2002).Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,35(6),564-574.
38. Gerjets, P.,Scheiter, K.,Catrambone, R.(2006).Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations?.Learning and Instruction,16,104-121.
39. Hanich, L. B.,Jordan, N. C.,Kaplan, D.,Dick, J.(2001).Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties.Journal of Educational Psychology,93(3),615-626.
40. James, W.(2007).The principles of psychology.New York, NY:Cosimo Classics.
41. Jeung, H. J.,Chandler, P.,Sweller, J.(1997).The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction.Educational Psychology,17(3),329-343.
42. Jordan, N. C.,Hanich, L. B.(2000).Mathematical thinking second-grade children with different forms of LD.Journal of Learning Disabilities,33(6),567-579.
43. Jordan, N.,Montani, T. O.(1997).Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematical difficulties.Journal of Learning Disabilities,30(6),624-634.
44. Kaplan, J. S.,Cater, J.(1995).Beyond behavior modifiCation: A Cognitive-behavioral approach to behavior management in the school.Austin, TX:Pro-Ed.
45. Karplus, R.,Pulos, S.,Stage, E. K.(1981).Proportional reasoning of early adolescents: Comparison and missing value problem in three schools.Proceedings of the fifth conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education,Grenoble, France:
46. Kellems, R. O.,Cacciatore, G.,Osborne, K.(2019).Using an augmented reality-based teaching strategy to teach mathematics to secondary students with disabilities.Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals,42(4),253-258.
47. Kesim, M.,Ozarslan, Y.(2012).Augmented reality in education: Current technologies and the potential for education.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,47,297-302.
48. Kronfli, B. (2019). Intelligent campuses: How universities are getting smart with technology. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/transforming-the-student-experience/2019/mar/26/intel ligent-campuses-how-universities-are-getting-smart-with-technology
49. Lamon, J.(1993).Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children’s thinking.Journal for Research Mathematics Education,24(1),41-61.
50. Lee, K.(2012).Augmented reality in education and training.TechTrends,56(2),13-21.
51. Lerner, J. W.,Johns, B. H.(2012).Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities: Teaching strategies and new directions.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
52. Lesh, R.,Post, T. R.,Behr, M.(1988).Proportional reasoning.Number Concepts and operations in the middle grades,Reston, VA:
53. Lotz, D. (2018). The digital campus: Not if, but how. [Online forum comment] Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/ pulse/digital-campus-how-david-lotz
54. Mayer, R. E.(2009).Multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
55. Mayer, R. E.(Ed.)(2005).The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
56. Mayer, R. E.(Ed.)(2005).The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
57. Mayer, R. E.,Moreno, R.(2003).Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning.Educational Psychologist,38(1),43-52.
58. Mousavi, S. Y.,Low, R.,Sweller, J.(1995).Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes.Journal of Educational Psychology,87(2),319-334.
59. Noelting, G.(1980).The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept part I - Differentiation of stages.Educational Studies in Mathematics,11,217-253.
60. Salmi, H.,Kaasinen, A.,Kallunki, V.(2012).Towards an open learning environment via augmented reality (AR):Visualising the invisible in science centres and schools for teacher education.Procedia-Social and BehavioralSciences,45,284-295.
61. Silver, L. B.(1990).Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorders: Is it a learning disability or a related disorder?.Journal of Learning Disabilities,23,394-397.
62. Sweller, J.,Ayres, P.,Kalyuga, S.(2011).Cognitive load theory.New York, NY:Springer.
63. Sweller, J.,Cooper, G. A.(1985).The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra.Cognition and Instruction,2(1),59-89.
64. Sweller, J.,van Merrienboer, J. J. G.,Paas, F. G. W. C.(1998).Cognitive architecture and instructional design.Educational Psychology Review,10,251-296.
65. Tourniaire, F.,Pulos, S.(1985).Proportional reasoning: a review of the literature.Educational Studies in Mathematics,16,181-204.
66. Treisman, A. M.(1969).Strategies and models of selective attention.Psychological Review,76(3),282-299.
67. Treisman, A. M.,Gelade, G.(1980).A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12,97-136.
68. van der Stappen, A.,Liu, Y.,Xu, J.,Yu, X.,Li, J.,van der Spek, E. D.(2019).MathBuilder: A collaborative AR math game for elementary school students.CHI PLAY 2019 Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play,New York, NY:
69. Van Dooren, W.,De Bock, D.,Evers, M.,Verschaffel, L.(2006).Pupils’ over-use of proportionality on missing vaule problems: How numbers may change solutions.Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,Prague, Czech Republic:
70. van Merriënboer, J. J. G.,Kirschner, P. A.,Kester, L.(2003).Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning.Educational Psychologist,38(1),5-13.
71. Zak, E.(2014).Do you believe in magic? Exploring the conceptualization of augmented reality and its implications for the yser in the field of library and information science.Information Technology & Libraries,33(4),23-50.
72. 王立志,張藝闡,何美慧(2011)。從注意力的成分探討學習障礙學生與注意力缺陷過動症學生在鑑定與教學上的迷思。中華民國特殊教育學會 2011 年刊：迎向素養導向的特殊教育
73. 李穎漢(2018)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
74. 沈明明(2018)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
75. 辛芸芸(2018)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
76. 孟瑛如,簡吟文(2014)。由 DSM-5 的改變談學習障礙未來的鑑定與教學輔導趨勢。輔導季刊，50(4)，28-34。
77. 孟瑛如,簡吟文(2014).孩子可以比你想得更專心：談注意力訓練.臺北市:心理.
78. 孟瑛如,簡吟文,邱佳寧,陳虹君,周文聿(2015).國民小學五至六年級數學診斷測驗.臺北市:心理.
79. 孟瑛如,簡吟文,陳虹君(2016).學前至九年級注意力缺陷過動症學生行為特徵篩選量表.臺北市:心理.
80. 林福來,郭汾派,林光賢(1986)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
81. 柯華葳(1999).閱讀理解困難篩選測驗.臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作小組.
82. 張春興(1989).張氏心理學辭典.臺北市:東華.
83. 張菀珍,吳明騰,陳景章,陳星宏,王盈翔(2012)。應用無所不在多媒體學習系統於大學生人際關係之研究。2012臺灣網際網路研討會
84. 張菀珍,葉榮木(2012)。應用無所不在多媒體學習系統於大學生情緒管理之研究。2012 臺灣數位學習發展研討會
85. 教育部(2019)。十二年國民基本教育身心障礙相關之特殊需求領域課程綱要。取自 https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter=11C2C6C1-D64E-475E-916B-D20C83896343
86. 教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要 ──數學領域 。取自 https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter=11C2C6C1-D64E-475E-916B-D20C83896343
87. 陳竹村,林淑君,陳俊瑜(2002).國小數學教材分析──比.新北市:國立教育研究院籌備處.
88. 陳虹霏(2017)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
89. 陳淳迪,李志唐(2013)。數位科技在設計實務教學中的實踐與展望。國民教育，53(6)，53-61。
90. 陳榮華,陳心怡(2007).魏氏兒童智力量表第四版（WAIS-IV）中文版技術與解釋手冊.臺北市:中國行為科學社.
91. 曾慈祥(2018)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
92. 黃秀霜(2001).中文年級識字測驗.臺北市:心理.
93. 楊佑盛(2018)。中壢市，中原大學。
94. 廖翊廷(2016)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
95. 趙文鴻(2018)。臺中市，亞洲大學。
96. 劉曼麗（編）(2017).國小數學與其教材之知識補給站.屏東市:國立屏東大學.
97. 鄭竹君(2018)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
98. 蕭英勵(2014)。擴增實境正在流行。師友月刊，563，57-60。
99. 羅賴煊(2016)。中壢市，中原大學。
100. 鐘敏綺(2019)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。

1. 蔡仕廷,黃馨儀,張登文(2022)。The Effect of Motion Infographics on the Learning of Third and Fourth Grade Resource Classes and Regular Classes in Elementary School。圖書資訊學刊，20(1)，31-48。
2. 黃郁雯,吳柱龍(2023)。擴增實境結合影片提示策略對國小學習障礙學生學習分數運算之成效研究。科學教育學刊，31(1)，81-107。
3. 連倖誼,吳慕萱(2021)。情境教學影片對學習障礙生學習動機及注意力之影響。臺北市立大學學報.教育類，52(2)，79-94。
4. (2023)。探討AR輔助教學之學習成效－以Scratch程式連接micro:bit為例。嶺東學報，50，233-254。
5. (2023)。探討擴增實境融入圖書館導覽學習系統對大學生學習成效之影響。教育傳播與科技研究，133，1-19。