英文摘要
|
Mainstream economics adopts the falsificationism. From the philosophical perspective, however, we find its deficiencies concerning the logical reasoning and the empirical examination, which give rise to many criticisms to such methodology. This paper explores a new approach, i.e. the application of the theory of dependent arising to economics. Philosophical characteristics of the theory and the feasible methods of dissolving this theory into economic research are carefully examined in the paper. Results indicate the proposed approach retains the merits of logical reasoning and, at the same time, avoids the problem of underdetermination and evades the risk of letting logic becomes the art of going wrong with confidence. The utilization of such approach is appropriate under this concern.
The theory of dependent arising, one of the major theories of the Buddhism, attributes the major as well as the related factors to the arising of any phenomenon, including the economic one. Under this notion, instead of concentrating on the main factor, like the mainstream economists do, one needs to examine these factors, the interrelations among these factors, and the possible multi-impact from these factors, in order to reach a meaningful result. This research proposes a network analysis to economics in order to strengthen the truthfulness feature of such analyses.
|
参考文献
|
-
林沁雄(2002)。經濟學方法論之演進-兼論超驗實在主義之應用
連結:
-
Adams, E. M.(1999).American Resource Center Newsletter.American Institute in Taiwan.
-
Alexandrin, G.(1993).Elements of Buddhist Economics.International Journal of Social Economics,20(2),3-11.
-
Azzi, C.,R. Ehrenber(1975).Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance.Journal of Political Economy,83(1),27-56.
-
Beed, C.,C. Beed(1999).A Christian Perspective on Neoclassical Rational Choice.International Journal of Social Economics,26(4),501-520.
-
Clower, R. W.(1994).Economics as an Inductive Science.Southern Economic Journal,60(4),805-514.
-
Fox, G.(1996).Reason and Reality in the Methodologies of Eocnomics.UK:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
-
Hall, T. W.,J. Elliott(1999).Methodological Controversies in Economics and Political Economy.International Journal of Social Economics,26,1249-1284.
-
Hands, D. W.(2001).Reflection Without Rules. Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory.New York:Cambridge University Press.
-
Hausman, D. M.(1992).Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology.New York:Cambridge University Press.
-
Iannaccone, L.(1998).Introduction to the Economics of Religion.Journal of Economic Literature,36,1465-1496.
-
Katouzian, H.(1980).Ideology and Method in Economics.New York:New York University Press.
-
Kline, M.(1985).Mathematics for the Nonmathematician.New York:Dover.
-
Lipford, J.,R. McCormick,R. O. Tollison(1993).Preaching Matters.Journal of Economic and Behavioral Organization,21(3),235-250.
-
Pagano, R. R.(1998).Understanding Statistics in the Behavioral Science.California:Brook/Cole Publishing Company.
-
Popper, K.(1968).The Logic of Scientific Discovery.London:Hutchinson & Co.
-
Quine, W. V.O..Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Philosophical Review.
-
于宗先(2000)。現代經濟觀念的薪傳者-吳幹教授的經濟理念與政策取向。東吳經濟商學學報,29,1-14。
-
于凌波(1999)。八識規矩頌講記。圓明出版社。
-
王炯如(1999)。佛教經營學入門。慧炬出版社。
-
吳汝鈞(1999)。龍樹中論的哲學解讀。台灣商務印書館。
-
范錡(1993)。哲學概論。台灣商務印書館。
-
陸民仁(2000)。五十年學術生涯的回顧與沈思。東吳經濟商學學報,29,31-46。
-
楊惠南(1992)。龍樹與中觀哲學。東大圖書公司。
-
劉孟奇(1999)。Lakatos之科學哲學與經濟學方法論。經濟論文叢刊,27(1),101-142。
-
蕭全政(1994)。兩種社會科學典範。政治科學論叢,5,59-85。
-
釋果煜(1997)。中觀論頌直了-佛法的心要。法鼓文化事業股份有限公司。
|