警察實施家庭暴力案件危險分級查訪之研究－以高雄市警察局小港分局為例

A Study of the Police Enforcing Risk Stratification of Domestic Violence Cases Illustrated by Siaogang Police District in Kaohsiung City

10.29607/ZHWHGX.200612.0006

林瓊如(Chiung-Ju Lin)；林明傑(Min-Chieh Lin)；鄭瑞隆(Jui-Lung Cheng)；吳慈恩(Tsyr-En Wu)

家庭暴力 ； 危險評估 ； 危險分級 ； domestic violence ； risk assessment ； risk stratification

犯罪學期刊

9卷2期（2006 / 12 / 01）

129 - 165

繁體中文

94年高雄市小港分局試辦家庭暴力案件危險分級DA量表防治暴力方案，加強對加害人暴力程度之評估，於保護令核發前實施查訪，提高處理家暴案件之服務品質與成效。 本研究採文獻探討法及調查研究法等方式進行。研究結果發現半數以上的受訪員警同意應於保護令核發前即執行分級查訪，但絕大多數的員警認為應由家暴中心或社工員執行危險評估與查訪。七成的受訪員警認為試辦方案有助提升其對家庭暴力再犯危險之認識。執行成效面上，大多數受訪員警不認為執行危險分級查訪能嚇阻家暴加害者，半數以上的受訪員警不滿意試辦方案對於家庭暴力之防治成效。 家暴被害者方面，45%的受訪者表示警察機關執行兩造查訪有助提升其人身安全保障，僅37%的受訪者表示，警察執行兩造查訪對家暴加害人具威嚇作用，且僅有四成的受訪者表示警察執行兩造查訪有改善加害人再次施暴之情形。 研究建議應提升基層員警決策參與度及對自身角色之認同；加強員警家庭暴力相關在職教育、提升員警專業能力；需提供警察人員與家庭暴力被害者更透明精實的執行程序；改善績效評比方式；並強化網絡成員間之聯繫。

In order to increase the police's quality and efficiency of dealing with domestic violence cases, the Siaogang Police District was authorized by the mayor of Kaohsiung City, Yeh Chu-Lan, to implement the project of risk stratification of domestic violence cases in 2005. This research was to understand the performance process and effectiveness of the project. It was found that more than 50% of the police interviewed believe that it is necessary to enforce risk stratification before the protection order was issued. However, most of the interviewees thought that risk stratification should be carried out by social workers instead of the police. 70% of the interviewees indicated that they would learn the danger of domestic violence much more by participating in this project. Nevertheless, the majority of the interviewees thought that enforcing risk stratification could not efficiently deter the offenders from recidivism. In addition, most of the interviewees were not satisfied with the result of the project. As for the victims, 45% of the interviewees expressed that if the police enforced risk stratification and visited both parties involving in domestic violence cases may help enhancing their personal security. In addition, 37% of the interviewees indicated that the police enforced risk stratification might deter offenders from recidivism. Furthermore, only 40% of the interviewees expressed that the police enforced risk stratification could reduce the offenders' domestic violence. There were five recommendations derived from the research: (1) frontline police officers' opinions should be considered in the decision-making process and improve the police officers' identify to their new role; (2) strengthen the education and training of police officers；(3) provide definite assessment procedures to both police officers and victims；(4) modify the police's performance appraisal and (5) strengthen the police's contact with other net-workers.

1. Buzawa, S. E.,Bazuwa, G. C.(2003).Domestic violence: The criminal justice response.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
2. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
3. Ford, A. D.,Reichard, R.,Goldsmith, S.,Regoli, J. M.,Buzawa, S. E.,Buzawa, G. C.(Eds.)(1996).Do Arrests and Restraining Orders Work?.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
4. Policing domestic violence what works? Policing domestic violence
5. Hilton, N. Z. (Ed.)(1993).Legal Responses to Wife Assault.Nwebury Park, CA:Sage.
6. Hirschel, J. D.,Hutchison, W.I.(1992).Female spouse abuse and the police response: The Charlotte, North Carolina experiment.The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology,83(1),73-119.
7. Holy, C.(1998).Negotiation domestic violence: Police, criminal justice and victims.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Jaffe, G. P.,Hastings, E.,Reitzel, D.,Austin, W. G.,N. Z. Hilton (Ed.)(1993).Legal Responses to Wife Assault.Nwebury Park, CA:Sage.
9. O`Leary, P.,Richards, J.,Chung, D.,Zannettino, L.(2004).Project SAFER evaluation of Southport pilot program.Gold Coast: Gold Coast Domestic Violence Integrated Response.
10. Sherman, W. L.,Schmidt, D. J.,Rogan, P. D.(1992).Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas.NY:The Free Press.
11. Policing & Reducing Crime Unit
12. Wang, Pei-Ling(2003).Newark, N.Y.,Rutgers University.
13. Domestic violence
14. 內政部警政署(1999)。警察機關防治家庭暴力工作手冊。台北:內政部警政署。
15. 王樂民(2003)。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所。
16. 對社區民警干預家庭暴力問題的思考
17. 周月清、高鳳仙(1997)。台北市政府專題委託研究計畫成果報告台北市政府專題委託研究計畫成果報告,未出版
18. 孟維德(2005)。警察與犯罪控制。台北:五南。
19. 林山田、林東茂、林燦璋(2002)。犯罪學。台北:三民。
20. 林明傑、鄭瑞隆、蔡宗晃、張秀鴛、李文輝(2005)。家庭暴力危險分級管理試辦方案及其成效之介紹。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，1(1)，215-244。
21. 柯麗評、王佩玲、張錦麗(2005)。家庭暴力：理論政策與實務。台北:巨流。
22. 高雄市警察局小港分局(2005)。高雄市警察局小港分局試辦家庭暴力案件危險分級DA量表報告資料。高雄:高雄市警察局小港分局。
23. 高鳳仙(1997)。論警察人員在家庭暴力事件之角色扮演。全國律師，1(6)，48-61。
24. 陳明志(2002)。中央警察大學行政警察研究所。
25. 黃富源(1999)。警察與家庭暴力處理模式之研究。全國律師，3(7)，16-25。
26. 黃富源(2000)。警察與女性被害人：警察系統回應的被害者學觀察。桃園:新迪文化有限公司。
27. 黃富源(1995)。警察系統回應婚姻暴力的理論與實務。警政學報，26，59-92。
28. 黃富源、陳明志(2001)。探討家庭暴力受虐者對員警處理模式之感受。社區發展季刊，94，76-95。
29. 黃翠紋(1999)。家庭暴力防制策略之探討－兼論台灣地區警察處理家庭暴力問題之現況。警學叢刊，29(5)，151-172。
30. 黃翠紋(1999)。刑事司法人員在處理婚姻暴力中所扮演的角色及其處理策略之探討（上）。警學叢刊，29(6)，285-306。
31. 黃翠紋(2001)。婚姻暴力事件中警察逮捕現行犯作爲與改進策略之研究。社區發展季刊，94，60-75。
32. 葉毓蘭(2001)。內政部委託研究報告內政部委託研究報告,未出版
33. 葉麗娟(1996)。中央警察大學警政研究所。
34. 廖健男、林時機、張德銘、黃守高、監察院內政及少數民族委員會編(2004)。家庭暴力防治法執行成效及面臨問題之探討專案調查研究報告。台北:監察院。
35. 蔡德輝、楊士隆(2004)。犯罪學。台北:五南。

1. 傅莉蓁(2015)。家庭暴力防治社工對危險評估之知能探討-以高雄市親密關係高危機案件為例。屏東科技大學社會工作系學位論文。2015。1-141。