宗教戒毒歷程中生命轉化與家人關係復和的探究

The Processes of Recovery from Drug Abuse and Family Relationship by Religious Rehabilitation

10.29607/ZHWHGX.201112.0001

陳碧珍(Peck-Ting Tan)

藥物成癮 ； 藥癮戒治復原 ； 宗教戒毒 ； 家庭關係 ； drug addiction ； recovery ； family relationship ； religious rehabilitation

犯罪學期刊

14卷2期（2011 / 12 / 01）

1 - 39

繁體中文

吸毒或許是許多濫用藥物者逃離家的因素；但吸毒之後要與家重建關係更是困難重重，回家成了一條遙不可及的路；許多人或許再也無法踏上歸途。但對戒癮成功的人而言，當他們因吸毒而啷噹入獄到戒癮成功，其內在生命如何發生轉化？家人的關係復和的歷程又是如何？本研究以三位於福音戒毒機構戒治復原，並於五年內不再吸毒者為研究對象。研究者分別和參與者進行三至四次訪談，每次訪談時間約為一個半至兩小時。訪談資料則依據Denzin（1989）「詮釋互動論」所揭示的步驟來進行資料分析。透過不斷的閱讀與理解文本，將事件彼此之間在時間與空間中開展，形成一個脈絡化的故事。研究結果顯示家的意義之建構不是固定不變的，而是動態的過程。吸毒前，受訪者與家人的關係是疏離的，吸毒期間因無力面對自己吸毒的問題，選擇離家或自我放棄，越吸越嚴重，生活如行屍走肉。這些藥癮戒治者的生命轉化的歷程，可分成三個階段：（一）關鍵事件激發戒毒動力：這關鍵事件都與家人及情感失落有關，在他們生命的低潮中因家人的介紹來到戒治中心。（二）福音戒毒促成靈性提升：在戒毒中心因著信仰，向上締結關係，靈性提升，生命價值觀開始發生改變而能遠離毒品。（三）與家人重建關係：因為靈性重整，對家的視框產生變化，他們用實際行動與家人重建關係。

Addiction is the cause of leaving home for most of the drug abusers. It was hard for drug abusers to reconstruct the relationships of their families. Since it was a long distance to journey home, some people cannot get along with their families during their lifetime. For those who succeeded in drug rehabilitation, what happened to the changing of their family relationships? What happened in the processes in family reunion? These are the research questions addressed in this research.There were three research participants who had recovered from drug addiction while being placed in Christianity rehabilitation centers and were clean for at least five years. The narrative data were collected during three to four interview sessions for each participant. The narrative data was analyzed according to the procedure proposed by Denzin's (1989) ”Interpretive Interactionism”. The contextualized life stories were written for the report.The result shows that the construction of the meaning of home is a progressive process, not unchangeable. The meaning of home was different during the different stages in the life time. The family relationship was separated during the period of addiction. Since they were unable to face their life problems, lives become totally hopeless and they left home.There were three steps in the processes of returning home for these drug ex-abusers as the followings:(1) The motion of drug rehabilitation was triggered by critical events related to the loss of significant others in their families, thereby they took advices of their family members to the drug rehabilitation centers.(2) The Christianity made impact on their spirituality transcendence. The value of lives was changed by connected to the Higher Power.(3) The family relationship was reconstructed. Due to the spirituality transcendence, the meaning of home was changed. Therefore they took actions to reconnect with their families, and returned home eventually.

1. 吳芝儀(2002)。累犯犯罪者犯罪生涯及自我觀之發展與演變。二十一世紀亞太地區暴力犯罪問題與對策研討會，嘉義:
   連結：
2. Burkhardt, M.(1989).Spirituality: An analysis of the concept.Holistic Nursing Practice,3(3),66-77.
3. Clandinin, D. J.,Connelly, F. M.(1990).Stories of experience and narrative inquiry.Educational Researche,19,2-14.
4. Cooper, C.、徐詩思譯(2000)。家屋，自我的一面鏡子。台北:張老師文化出版社。
5. Denzin, N. K.(1989).Interpretive interactionism.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
6. Erick, J.(1993).The role of spirituality in recovery from chemical dependency.Journal of Addictions & Offender Councelling,13(2),58-61.
7. Erickson, J. Q.(1993).On being at home.Cross Currents,43(2),235-247.
8. Flynn, P. M.,Joe, G. W.,Kirk, M. B.,Dwayne, S. D.,Barry, S. B.(2003).Looking Back on Cocaine Dependence: Reasons for Recovery.American Journal on Addictions,12,398-411.
9. Henricson, C.,Roker, D.(2000).Support for the parents of adolescents: a review.Journal of Adolescence,23,763-783.
10. Knight, D. K.,Simpson, D. D.(1996).Influences of family and friends on client progress during drug abuse treatment.Journal of Substance Abuse,8(4),417-429.
11. Lavee, Y.,Altus, D.(2001).Family relationships as a predictor of post-treatment drug abuse relapse: A follow-up study of drug addicts and their spouses.Contemporary Family Therapy,23(4),513-530.
12. Lewis, R. T.(1989).The Family and addictions: An Introduction.Family Relations,38,254-257.
13. Mallett, S.(2004).Understanding home: a critical review of the literature.The Editorial Board of the Sociological Review,52(1),62-89.
14. Mallick, J.,Watts, M.(2001).Spirituality and drug education: a study in parent/ child communication.International Journal of Children's Spirituality,6(1),67-83.
15. Miller, W. R.(1998).Researching the spiritual dimensions of alcohol and other drug problems.Addiction,93(7),979-990.
16. Naifeh, S.(1995).Archetypal foundations of addiction and recovery.Journal of Analytical Psychology,40,133-159.
17. Reed, P. G.(1992).An emerging paradigm for the investigation of spirituality in nursing.Research in Nursing & Health,15,349-357.
18. Rotunda, R. J.,Doman, K.(2001).Partner enabling of substance use disorders: Critical review and future directions.The American Journal of Family Therapy,29,257-270.
19. Samson, R. J.,Laub, J. H.(1995).Crime in the Making:Pathways and Turning Points Through Life.Cambridge, MA:Havard University Press.
20. Sanders, M. R.(2000).Community-based parenting and family support interventions and the prevention of drug abuse.Addictive Behaviors,25(6),929-942.
21. Soko-Katz, J.,Dunham, R.(1997).Family structure versus parental attachment in controlling adolescent deviant behavior: A social control theory.Adolescence,32(125),199-216.
22. Tisdel, E. J.(2001).Spirituality in adult and higher education.Eric DIGEST.
23. Vaugh, C.,Long, W.(1999).Surrender to Win: How adolescent drug and alcohol users change their lifes.Adolescence,34(133),9-24.
24. Warfield, R. D.,Goldstein, M. B.(1996).Spituality: The key to recovery from alcoholism.Counseling & Values,40(3),196-206.
25. 石世明、余德慧(2001)。對臨終照顧的靈性現象考察。中華心理衛生學刊，14(1)，1-36。
26. 安辰赫(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣，臺北，台灣師範大學。
27. 余德慧(2002)。追索敘說自我的主體。應用心理研究，16，213-217。
28. 余德慧、蔡怡佳(1996)。親子「離合」關係與離家問題。高師輔導所刊，1，1-29。
29. 李思賢、吳憲璋、黃昭正、王志傑、石倩瑜(2010)。毒品罪再犯率與保護因子研究：以基隆地區為例。犯罪學期刊，13(1)，81-106。
30. 胡萃玲(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣，臺北，台灣師範大學。
31. 許秀琴(1990)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台灣，台北，私立東吳大學。
32. 陳紫凰(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣，嘉義，南華大學。
33. 程玲玲(1997)。海洛英成癮者的家庭研究。中華心理衛生學刊，10(2)，45-65。
34. 黃家慶(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣，臺北，國立台北大學。
35. 黃曉芬(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣，臺北，國立台北大學。
36. 蔡佩真(1986)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣，臺中，私立東海大學。
37. 謝淑敏(1989)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣，臺中，私立東海大學。
38. 顏文娟(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣，臺北，國防醫學院。

1. 白鎮福(2022)。邁向全人復元－以建構全人之架構與內涵來反思與突破藥癮者全人復元之困境。刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊，33，127-180。
2. 蔡佩真(2015)。靈性與戒癮：基督教戒毒村海洛因戒癮者的靈性之旅。東吳社會工作學報，28，109-137。
3. 蔡佩真(2019)。兒女傷、父母痛：K他命成癮者父母的傷痛經驗與搶救行動。臺大社會工作學刊，39，1-55。
4. 韓意慈(2021)。社會支持網絡之再建構：民間宗教型戒癮安置服務內涵的質性分析。臺大社會工作學刊，44，45-84。
5. 黃莉蕎、張鳳琴(2017)。家長面對子女藥物濫用的心理歷程及因應經驗之探究。學校衛生，71，75-109。
6. 劉心穎,陳毓文(2019)。少年時期藥物濫用者的復元歷程探究。社會政策與社會工作學刊，23(2)，1-48。
7. 鄭青玫(2021)。一位近高齡男性海洛因成癮／販賣者之停藥循環歷程、家人互動關係敘說探究。輔導與諮商學報，43(3)，71-104。