性罪犯強制治療成效評估：社會控制理論觀點探討

The Effectiveness of Mandatory Treatment: A Social Control Theory Perspective

10.29607/ZHWHGX.201212.0001

鍾志宏(Chih-Hung Chung)；吳慧菁(Hui-Ching Wu)

性犯罪 ； 強制治療 ； 社會控制 ； Sexual Offenders ； Mandatory Treatment ； Social Control Theory

犯罪學期刊

15卷2期（2012 / 12 / 01）

1 - 28

繁體中文

研究目的在於以再犯率為治療成效評估基準，從社會控制理論探討已施行15年之性侵害強制治療實施的成效。本研究採文獻探討與次級資料調查分析方法，瞭解性侵害收容人的個人特質、強制治療執行紀錄與再犯情形。樣本蒐集係於台北、台中、高雄監獄提供該監於95年間期滿或假釋釋放（排除移監或死亡）性侵害罪收容人536名。研究結果為（一）目前的篩選機制無法辨別個案之危險性；（二）治療次數及治療時間的多寡與個案的再犯紀錄無顯著關係，但平均數值有所差異；（三）比較性犯罪與未再犯二組間的治療時間時，二組間差異達到顯著，即治療師在治療實施過程的判斷，產生影響。（四）目前使用的成效評估工具尚不足以反應個案再犯危險性；治療結果係表示個案是否完成治療，分析結果發現，不論是否完成治療，其再犯紀錄的表現未有顯著差異。在犯罪預防上要努力的方向並非僅針對犯罪人本身，更應加強其與社會控制機制的聯結及注意外在社區環境對犯罪機會的影響。對已出獄的性罪犯亦應加強獄中治療師與社區治療師的聯繫，維持縝密及連貫性的社區監控，定期長期性追蹤，加強社區安全維護措施，斷絕被害機會發生。

The purpose of the study is based upon the recidivism rate to examine the effectiveness of mandatory treatment for the male sexual offenders over the past 15 years using a social control theory perspective. This study employed literature review and secondary data analysis to investigate the characteristics, mandatory treatment records, and recidivism of the male sexual offenders. The collaborated study sites were Kaohsiung Prison, Taichung Prison, and Taipei Prison. At the year of 2006, 536 participants set off or are paroled from the prisons excluding those displaced to other prison or dead joined in this study. Descriptive statistics were conduct to characterize all characteristics. T-test and one-way ANOVA were performed to compare the variance in the reported six coping domains in the entire sample based on the participants' mandatory treatment and recidivism. The analyzed data reveals (1)the current evaluating mechanism doesn't tell the level of risky for the male sexual offender; (2)no significant difference between the number and length of mandatory treatment for the recidivism records; (3)the therapists have significant impact on valuating the durance of the treatment; (4)the effectiveness of mandatory treatment without significant relationship with the risky of recidivism. That is to say, mandatory treatment has no significant effect on the preventing recidivism. To prevent sexual recidivism, mandatory treatment is a passive approach on criminals. We should strengthen the social control and decrease the criminal opportunities in the community. For the released sexual offenders, the practitioners either providing treatment in the prison or in the community should keep comprehensive and continuous monitoring on them. Furthermore, we should solid the security facilities in the community to prevent the victim.

1. 許春金(2006)。人本犯罪學─控制理論與修復式正義。台北:三民。
   連結：
2. 陳若璋(2004)。本土性侵害加害人團體之氣氛變化與療效因子。中華團體心理治療學刊，10，1-15。
   連結：
3. Hanson, K. & Thornton, D.(1999) Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General Canada. Retrieved January 14, 2009 from http://www.sgc.gc.ca/publications/corrections/199902_e.pdf
4. 檢察性別統計（2007）〈地方法院檢察署執行性侵害案件、妨害風化罪、妨害婚姻及家庭罪裁判確定有罪人數〉.2009年1月13日，取自http://www.moj.gov.tw/site/moj/public/MMO/moj/stat/gender/g10.pdf。
5. 矯正統計指標（2008）〈性侵害案件受刑人統計〉.2009年1月28日，取自http://www.moj.gov.tw/site/moj/public/MMO/moj/stat/%20monthly/t11-1.pdf。
6. Alexander, M.(1999).Sexual Offender treatment efficacy revisited.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,11(2),101-116.
7. Cadsky, O.,Hanson, R. K.,Crawford, M.,Lalonde, C.(1996).Attrition from a male batterer treatment program: Client-treatment congruence and lifestyle instability.Violence and Victims,11,51-64.
8. Edens, J. F.(2009).Interpersonal characteristics of male criminal offenders: personality, psychopathological, and behavioral correlates.Psychological Assessment,21,89-98.
9. Gallagher, C. A.,Wilson, D. B.,Hirschfield, P.,Coggeshall, M. B.,Mackenzie, D. L.(1999).A quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending.Corrections Management Quarterly,3,19-29.
10. Gottfredson, Michael R.,Hirschi, Travis(1990).A General Theory of Crime.Standford University Press.
11. Grossman, L. S.,Martin, B.,Fichtner, C. G.(1999).Are sex offenders treatable? A research overview.Psychiatric Services,50(3),349-361.
12. Hall, G. C. N.(1995).Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,63,802-809.
13. Hall, G. C. N.(1995).The preliminary development of a theory-based community treatment for sexual offenders.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,26,478-483.
14. Hanson, R. K.(2004).Evaluating community sexual offender treatment programs: A 12-year follow-up of 742 offenders.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,36(2),87-96.
15. Hanson, R. K.,Thornton, D.(2000).Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales.Law and Human Behaviour,24,119-136.
16. Harris, G. T.,rice, M. E.,Quinsey, V. L.(1998).Appraisal and management of risk in sexual aggressors: implications for criminal justice policy.Psychology Public Policy Law,4,73-115.
17. Marques, J. K.,Day, D. M.,Nelson, M. G.(1989).,Sacramento:California State Department of Mental Health.
18. Morey, L.(2007).The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual.Lutz. FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.
19. Proctor, E.(1996).A five-year outcome evaluation of a community-based treatment program for convicted sexual offenders run by the probation service.Journal of Sexual Aggression,2,3-16.
20. Ren, X.(2008).Managing recidivist sex offenders.The International Conference on Crime and Preventive Strategies,Chai-Yi:
21. Schwartz, B. K.(2003).Overview of rehabilitative efforts in understanding and managing sexually coercive behaviors.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,989,360-383.
22. Wierzbicki, M.,Pekarik, G.(1993).A meta-analysis of psychotherapy dropout.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,24,190-195.
23. Wood, R.,Grossman, L.,Kulkarni, R.,Fichtner, C. G.(1999).Sexual offenders in custody for control, care and treatment.Current Opinion in Psychiatry,12(6),659-663.
24. 大淵憲一(2006)。日本性犯罪對策的新嘗試。2006年犯罪問題與對策國際研討會論文集，嘉義:
25. 甘桂安、陳筱萍、周煌智、劉素華、湯淑慧(2006)。性侵害加害人情緒管理團體治療的療效評估。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，2，1-26。
26. 李思賢、高千雲(2004)。性侵害犯非自願團體心理治療─台北監獄再犯預防認知行為療法成效之初探。犯罪與刑事司法研究，3，1-25。
27. 侯崇文編(1997)。巨視社會控制、微視社會控制與青少年犯罪。八十五年度行政院國科會：犯罪問題研究成果研討會論文集，台北:
28. 陳炯旭(2006)。,台北:行政院衛生署。
29. 陳若璋(2001)。性罪犯心理學─心理治療與評估。台北:張老師。
30. 陳若璋、林正修、施志鴻、李晏(2004)。不同類型性加害者本土化治療模式之建構。台北:行政院衛生署。
31. 蔡正道(2000)。,台北:行政院研考會。

1. 董道興、黃健、沈勝昂(2018)。桃園地區性侵害加害人之再犯風險評估相關因子探討。臺灣性學學刊，24(1)，73-92。
2. 林子軒(2020)。社區治療中性侵害加害人之改變階段與過程催化。諮商與輔導，417，21-25。
3. (2021)。一位社工在監所場域的矯治性工作經驗。社區發展季刊，174，151-163。