淨土僧侶自我觀之敘事研究

Narrative Research of Self-View of Pure Land Monks

10.7040/JGC.200512.0001

陳佩钰(Pei-Yu Chen)；林杏足(Shindrew Lin)

淨土僧侶 ； 自我觀 ； 敘事 ； Pure Land monk ； self-view ； narrative

輔導與諮商學報

27卷2期（2005 / 12 / 01）

1 - 32

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討僧侶的自我觀，研究參與者為六位淨土寺院的僧侶，運用敘事研究法的「類別內容」，針對僧侶自我敘說中的物質我、社會我、心理我與靈性我之表層內容與深層意義，進行文本資料的綜合分析。研究結果如下： 淨土僧侶對物質我的看法，將身體視為自利利他、成佛之道的工具。社會我，自覺僧侶是有勇氣、非享樂、小愛化大愛的角色認同；在僧團中以大團體為依歸，適度展現自我；人我互動重視共融和諧、尋求圓滿增上；尊重不同生命體的獨特，放下單一、絕對的標準。心理我，承認自己的不足與有限，涵融學習新事物；認知轉念將經驗事件意義化；檢視覺察自我狀態，打开空间突破限制；生活中有正向、負向與中性的情緒，修行經驗裡提醒自己行持中道觀，覺察而非否定情緒的存在。靈性我的深度教性，自身與佛法的相應契合；因緣為我師，以佛菩薩、高僧大德為標竿，學習慈悲、願力、實踐、智慧；奉獻自我，以生命完成成佛目標；應用佛法，相信因緣的意義，從中轉變與提升自我。 研究者根據研究結果，對諮商實務工作與未來研究提出具體建議。

The purposes of this study aims to understand the self-view of the monks. The researcher has interviewed six monks from different Pure Land temple and has analyzed the data by the method of categorical-content perspective of narrative research. The themes are the surface contents and profound meanings of physical self, social self, mental self, and spiritual self. The findings and significances are following: The monks explore physical self as a tool to benefit self and others, to improve themselves and to become a Buddha. They realize that the identity of the role of monk life is courageous, unpleasant. It is this realization that makes the self-view more frequent when they are expressing themselves moderately, getting along with others and looking harmony and improvement in the interpersonal relationships. In the mental self, they admit the limitations of self and learn new things. They make it meaningful of those experiences and events via the transfer of thoughts. In daily affairs, while facing positive, negative and neutral moods, they remind themselves to stay mid-way status and aware the existences of the emotions. It is this self-view, which makes the unity of self and dharma, they have deep faith of the meanings of cause and effect, they are willing to carry the consequences of being a monk and they take those Buddha, bodhisattva and sages as standard to practice compassion, vows, accomplishment and wisdom. They practice the teachings of Buddha, and finish the transference and sublimation of self. Based on the results of the study, the researcher provides concrete suggestions for counselors and related researchers on future study.

1. Bruner, J.(1990).Acts of meaning.London:Harvard university press.
2. Burr, V.、Butt, T.、許慧玲譯(1997)。個人建構心理學入門－解讀你的心靈。台北:心理。
3. Chandler, C.K.,Holden, J.M.,Kolander, C.A.(1992).Counseling for spiritual wellness: Theory and practice.Journal of counseling & development,71,168-175.
4. Christensen , L.W.(1999).Suffering and the dialectical self in buddhism and relational psychoanalysis.American Journal of psychoanalysis,59(1),37-58.
5. Conn, W.E.(1998).Self-transcendence, the true self, and self-love.Pastoral psychology,46(5),323-332.
6. Cooley, C. H.(1902).Human nature and the social order.NY:Schocken Books.
7. DeHoff, S.L.(1998).In search of a paradigm for psychological and spiritual growth: Implications for psychotherapy and spiritual direction.Pastoral psychology,46(5),333-346.
8. Frankl, V.E.(1978).The unheard cry for meaning: Psychotherapy and humanism.NY:Simon & Schuster.
9. Gergen, K. J.(2001).Narratives in Action: A strategy for research and analysis.NY:Columbia University.
10. Goleman , D.(1981).Buddhist and western psychology: some commonalities and differences.Journal of transpersonal psychology,13(2),125-136.
11. Goleman, D.、李孟皓譯(1998)。情緒療癒。台北:立緒。
12. Griffith, B.A.,Griggs, J.(2001).Religious identity status as a model to understand assess, and interact with client spirituality.Counseling and Values,46,14-25.
13. Hampson, S. E.(1988).The construction of personality.London:The Brikbeck College.
14. Hatch , J.A.,Winsniewski(1995).Life history and narrative.London:The Falmer Press.
15. Hewitt, J. P.(1997).Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
16. Ingersoll, R.E.(1994).Spirituality, religion, and counselling: Dimensions and relationships.Counseling and values,38,98-111.
17. James, W.(1985).The varieties of religious experience.NY:Mentor.
18. James, W.(1890).The principles of psychology.NY:Holt and Company.
19. Karasu, T.B.(1999).Spiritual psychotherapy.American journal of psychotherapy,53(2),143-162.
20. Koch, G.R.(1998).Spiritual empowerment: A metaphor for counseling.Counseling and values,43,19-27.
21. Leary, M.R.,Tangney, J.P.(2003).The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences.Self and identity.
22. Lieblich, A.,Tuval-Mashiach, R.,Zilber, T.(1998).Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation.London:Sage.
23. Logan, R.D.,Yardley, K,Honess, T. (Eds.)(1987).Historical change in prevailing sense of self.Self and identity: Psychosocial perspectives.
24. Loy, D.(1992).Avoiding the void: The lack of self in psychotherapy and Buddhism.Journal of transpersonal psychology,24(2),151-179.
25. Markus, H.,Nurius, P.(1986).Possible selves.American psychologist,41(9),954-969.
26. Maslow, A.H.(1968).Toward a psychology of being.NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
27. Matthews, C. O.(1998).Integrating the spiritual dimension into traditional counsellor education programs.Counseling and values,43(1),3-20.
28. Mead, G.H.(1934).Mind, self, and society.The University of Chicago.
29. Metz, T.(2002).Recent work on the meaning of life.Ethics,112(4),781-816.
30. Miller, J. P.(1996).Using self psychology in child psychotherapy.N.J.:Jason Aronson.
31. Mischel, W.,Morf, C.C.,Leary, M. R.,Tangney, J.P.(Eds.)(2003).The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: A meta-perspective on a century of the self in psychology.Self and identity.
32. Moustakes, C.E.(1974).The self: Explorations in personal growth.NY:Harper Colophon Books.
33. O`Leary, J.S.(2002).Emptiness and dogma.Buddhist-Christian Studies,22,163-180.
34. Oyserman, D.,Markus, H.R.,Flick, U. (Ed.)(1998).The psychology of the social.NY:Cambridge University Press.
35. Polkinghorne,Hatch, J.A.,Wisniewski, R.(Eds.)(1995).Life history and narrative.London:Falmer Press.
36. Revel, J.F.、Ricard, M.、賴聲川譯(2002)。僧侶與哲學家：父子對談生命意義。台北:先覺。
37. Richard, C.R.P.(1991).Characteristics of the self-actualized person: visions from the east and west.Counseling & Values,36(1)
38. Riessman, C. K.、王勇智、鄧明允譯(2003)。敘說分析。台北:五南。
39. Rubin, J.B.(1999).Close encounters of a new kind: Toward an integration of psychoanalysis and Buddhism.American Journal of Psychoanalysis,59(1),5-24.
40. Vaughan, F.(1991).Spiritual issues in psychotherapy.Journal of Transpersonal psychology,23(2),105-119.
41. Welhood, J.(2000).Toward a psychology of awakening-Buddhism, Psychotherapy, and the path of personal and spiritual transformationToward a psychology of awakening-Buddhism, Psychotherapy, and the path of personal and spiritual transformation,未出版
42. Yang, K.S.(1981).Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan: Further empirical evidence.Journal of Social Psychology,113,159-170.
43. Yardley, K,Honess, T.(1987).Metatheoretical commentaries: An introductory review.Self and identity: Psychosocial perspectives.
44. 王勇智(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
45. 王甄蘋(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
46. 王臨風(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
47. 朱儀羚(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中正大學犯罪防治研究所。
48. 佛使比丘(1997)。無我。嘉義:香光書鄉。
49. 呂依真(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
50. 李安德(1994)。超個人心理學。台北:桂冠。
51. 邱惟真(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
52. 唐雅鈴(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
53. 張翠芬(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
54. 郭爲藩(1996)。自我心理學。台北:師大書苑。
55. 陳怡璇(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮師範學院多元文化研究所。
56. 陳姵璇(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
57. 陳祥美(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
58. 楊中芳(2001)。如何理解中國人。台北:遠流。
59. 楊中芳(1996)。如何研究中國人。台北:桂冠。
60. 楊雅亭(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
61. 聖嚴法師(1996)。聖嚴法師教禪坐。台北:法鼓文化。
62. 詹朝旭(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學心理研究所。
63. 鄭石岩(2001)。生命轉彎處。台北:遠流。

1. 溫錦真、林美珠(2018)。臺灣心理與諮商敘事研究之回顧與展望。中華輔導與諮商學報，53，81-116。