詮釋學在教學上之應用

Hermeneutic in the Theory and Practice of Pedagogy

10.7038/BREE.200312_(11).0007

蘇美麗(Me-li Sue)

詮釋學 ； 先前結構 ； 距離化 ； Hermeneutics ； forestructure ； distanciation

國民教育研究集刊

11期（2003 / 12 / 01）

121 - 129

繁體中文

本文首先指出實證科學在教育研究受到的挑戰，進一步對詮釋學的意義，相關流派，加以討論；最後闡述本文主題詮釋現象學在教學上的應用。希望藉由理論與實務的對話，提供教師作為參考。

This article firstly indicates criticism to the positive sciences in educational research. Secondly, the author reviews meaning, related branches of hermeneutics. Finally, according to the insights drawn from analyzing and examining hermeneutics, this paper further expounds hermeneutic application in teaching. It is hoped to offer suggestions for teachers according to dialogues between theory and practice.

1. Borg, W. R.,Gall, M.D.(1971).Educational research: An introduction.New York:David McKay Company.
2. Culberston, J.,V. Blanlce (Ed.)(1991).Knowledge and administration.Columbus:The Ohio State University.
3. Danner, H.(Ed.)(1997).Hermeneutis and Educational Discourse.Sandton:Heinemann.
4. Ferraris, M.(1996).History of Hermeneutics.New Jersey:Humanities Press.
5. Freire, P.(1971).Pedogoty of the oppressed.New York:Herder and Herder.
6. Gadamer, H.(1989).Truth and method.New York:Crossroad.
7. Gadamer, H.,Sullivan, R. R.(trans.)(1985).Phiosophy Apprenticeships.London, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
8. Gallagher, S.(1992).Hermeneutics and Education.Albany:State University of New York Press.
9. International Educational Journal
10. Habermas, J.(1972).Knowledge and human interests.London:Heinemann.
11. Hahn, L.E. (ed.)(2000).Perspectives on Habermas.Chicago, La Salle:Open Court.
12. Heidegger, M.(1962).Being and time.New York:Happer and Row.
13. Lyons, N.,LaBoskey, K. (Eds.)(2002).Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching.NY:Teacher College Press.
14. McDonald, J.(1992).Teaching Making sense of an uncertain craft.New York:Teachers College Press.
15. Merton, T.(1961).Emblems of a season of fury.Norfolk, VA:New Directions.
16. Messer, S. B.,Sass, L.A.,Woolfolk, R.L.(1988).Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory.New Brunswick:Rutgers University Press.
17. R.E. Palmer、嚴平譯(1995)。詮釋學。台北:桂冠。
18. Smith, J.K.(1989).The nature of social and educational inquiry: Empiricism verse interpretation.Norwood, N.J.:Ablex.
19. Wasserman, S.(2001).Quantum theory, the uncertainty principle, and alchemy of standardized teaching.Phi Delta Kappan,83(1),28-40.
20. Williamson, K.(2000).Research methods for students and professionals: Information management and system.Wagga:Charler Sturt University Centre for Information Studies.
21. 王文科(1990)。教育研究法。台北:五南圖書公司。
22. 李奉儒、高淑清、鄭瑞隆、林麗菊、吳芝儀、洪志成、蔡清田譯、R.C. Bogdan原著(2001)。質性教育研究：理論與方法。嘉義:濤石。
23. 梁福鎮(1999)。普通教育學。台北:師大書苑。
24. 梁福鎮、中正大學教育研究所主編(2000)。質的研究法。高雄:麗文文化。
25. 游家政、賈誨茗、楊深坑主編(1993)。教育學方法論。台北:五南。
26. 楊深坑(2002)。科學理論與教育學發展。台北:心理。
27. 楊深坑(1986)。教育學科學陸之詮釋學分析。教育研究所集刊，28
28. 楊深坑(1988)。理論、詮釋與實踐。台北:師大書苑。