《易經》與佛學的交會－智旭《周易禪解》試析

When "The Book of Change" Meets Buddhism-The Trial Analysis of Chih-Hsu's "Jhou-yi-chan-jie"

10.30091/JCDNCHU.200606.0009

林文彬(Wen-Ping Lin)

智旭 ； 周易禪解 ； 天台學 ； 一念三千 ； 性具善惡 ； Chih-Hsu ； Jhou-yi-chan-jie ； Tian-tai-syue ； Yi-nian-san-cian One-moment thought involves three thousand worlds ； Sing-jyu-shan-e Human beings have the nature of both good and bad

興大中文學報

19期（2006 / 06 / 01）

217 - 229

繁體中文

在儒家經學確立之後，易學的發展往往和歷代的思想潮流一致，例如漢易是卦氣，魏晉是玄學易而宋明則是理學易。但佛家易是很特別的一支，它並不隨著傳統儒家易的變遷而起伏。它穩定的順著格義的路向，進一步以佛教自家宗派的思想來解易。明末智旭的《周易禪解》是以佛入易最完整、最具代表性的著作。智旭用天台學的教理，以「一念三千」取代以理氣為主的天道論，而用「性具善惡」說超人性之善惡而言覺性，最後更從覺與不覺下開「流轉」與「還滅」的生命兩境，以此總攝各家天道性命相貫通之學。《周易禪解》可以說徹底改造了傳統儒家易的天人之學而歸之於佛。

After the Jingsyue (the study of classics) of Confucianism was established firmly, the development of the study of The Book of Change was usually consistent with the trend of thought of all the past dynasties. For examples, the study of The Book of Change in Han Dynasty emphasized Gua-ci, the one in Wei and Jin Dynasties stressed the metaphysics, and the one in Song and Ming Dynasties belonged to Neo-Confucianism. However, the Buddhist study of The Book of Change is a very special branch, which does not change with the transition and evolution of the traditional Confucian study of The Book of Change. It follows the way and direction of Ge-yi steadily to interpret The Book of Change further with the thoughts of Buddhist sects. Chih-Hsu's ”Jhou-yi-chan-jie” at the end of Ming Dynasty was the most complete and the most representative work to enter the study of The Book of Change from the Buddhist view. Chih-Hsu adopted the doctrines and principles of Tian-tai-syue, and used ”Yi-nian-san-cian (One-moment thought involves three thousand worlds)” to replace the noumenon theory that was mainly Li-ci, and used the theory ”Sing-jyu-shan-e (Human beings have the nature of both good and bad)” to go beyond and transcend the argument about human nature, and emphasize the consciousness. Finally, he developed the two realms of life of ”Liou-jhuan” and ”Huan-mie” from being conscious or unconscious to sum up the study of linking the natural law and the life of each school. We can say that ”Jhou-yi-chan-jie” had thoroughly reformed the study of the connection between the heaven and mankind of traditional Confucian study of The Book of Change to end in the Buddhism.

1. (2002)。試論智旭周易禪解天台學之特色。興大人文學報，32，148-149。
2. 宋黎靖德編(1988)。朱子語類。北京:中華書局。
3. 宋黎靖德編(1988)。朱子語類。北京:中華書局。
4. 梁•慧皎(1998)。大正藏。台北:新文豐出版社。
5. 梁•慧皎(1998)。高僧傳。
6. 王仲堯(2001)。易學與佛教。北京:中國書店。
7. 王麗英(1999)。論「化」在道教哲學中的地位。華中師範大學學報•人文社會科學版，38(3)，141。
8. 朱伯崑主編(2004)。周易通釋。北京:崑崙出版社。
9. 朱伯崑編(2004)。易學基礎教程。北京:九州出版社。
10. 夏金華(1997)。佛學與易學。台北:新文豐出版社。
11. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
12. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
13. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
14. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
15. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
16. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
17. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
18. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
19. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
20. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
21. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
22. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
23. 智旭(1989)。靈峰宗論。台北:佛教出版社。
24. 智旭(1996)。周易禪解。台北:自由出版社。
25. 智顓。大正藏。
26. 黃壽祺(1998)。易學群書平議。北京:北京師範大學出版社。
27. 廖名春等合著(1997)。周易研究史。長沙:湖南出版社。

1. 陳啟文(2014)。蓮池祩宏《阿彌陀經疏鈔》中的「一心不亂」義。慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊，16，61-91。
2. 林文彬(2013)。智旭《周易禪解》之「四悉檀」及其釋義。興大中文學報，34，69-100。
3. 釋正持(2015)。澄觀《華嚴經疏鈔》與易學之交涉。新世紀宗教研究，13(4)，49-76。