公立樂團團員表演工作行爲意圖之研究

A Study of Performance Working Behavior Intention on Public Orchestra Musician

10.6793/JNTCA.200610.0024

鄭天明(Tian-Ming Cheng)；陳麗娟(Li-Chuan Chen)

公立樂團 ； 工作滿意度 ； 表演工作行爲模式 ； 行爲意圖 ； public Orchestra ； working satisfaction ； performance working behavior model ； behavior intention

藝術學報

79期（2006 / 10 / 01）

293 - 308

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討公立樂團團員之表演工作行為模式。以公立樂團專職團員為研究母群，共發出問卷389份，實得有效問卷244份。採用自編的問卷進行研究，問卷包括表演行為態度、表演行為主觀規範、表演行為控制知覺、表演工作滿意度、表演行為意圖及團員基本資料等六大項。將所收集的資料以SPSS 12.0進行統計分析與檢定，利用LISREL8.52進行驗證性因素分析及結構方程式的實證分析，以最大概似估計法(Maximum Likelihood Estimation, MLE)對本研究模式中各組變項間之因果關係進行估計。結果顯示：團員以女性居多(68%)，婚姻狀況以已婚有小孩居多(42.6%)，年齡以36至45歲者居多(41.4%)。實證研究結果顯示公立樂團團員表演行為模式中，團員表演行為態度會直接影響工作滿意度，亦會間接影響表演行為意圖，團員表演行為主觀規範會直接影響工作滿意度，亦會間接影響表演行為意圖，團員之工作滿意度會直接影響團員表演行為意圖。本研究以團員的工作滿意度為中介變數，利用修改的計畫行為理論可有效的建構及預測公立樂團團員之表演行為。

This study was finding performance working behavior model of public Orchestra Musicians. As a reseaching group on members of Orchestra Musicians, total of 389 questionnaires out of 244 were completed. The descriptive statistics socio-demographic was analyzed by SPSS 12.0. The confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation model were analyzed by LISREL 8.52 for windows. All the parameters were estimated by MLE method (maximum likelihood estimation method). The mainly findings were as follows: surveyed 244 Musicians, of whom 68% were woman, 42.69% were married with children, and 41.4% were between 36 to 45 years old. Empirical results indicated that performance working behavior affected working satisfaction directly and affected indirectly on behavioral intention. Also musicians' working satisfaction affected the behavioral intention directly. This study based on musicians' working satisfaction as a media, according to this behavior theory, one can construct and predict the musicians' working behavior.

1. 余泰魁、李能慧(2001)。台灣地區北部民眾對金門旅遊滿意度模式之建構與實證。戶外遊憩研究，14(4)，27-49。
   連結：
2. Ajzen, I.(1991).The Theory of Planned Behavior.Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50,179-211.
3. Ajzen, I.(1985).From intensions to actions-a theory of planned behavior, Actioncontrol: from cognition to behavior.Heidelberg:Springer.
4. Ajzen, I.,Driver, B. L.(1992).Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice.Journal of Leisure Research,24(3),207-240.
5. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation for structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
6. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.,Phillips, L. W.(1991).Assessing construct validity in organizational research.Administrative Science Quarterly,36(3),421-458.
7. Bentler, P. M.(1995).EQS structural equations program manual.Encino, CA:Multivariate Software.
8. Bentler, P. M.,Bonett, D. G.(1980).Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin,88,588-606.
9. Carmines, E.,McIver, J.,G. Bohmstedt,Borgatta (eds.)(1981).Social measurement: current issues.Beverly Hills, Calif:Sage.
10. DeVellis, R. F.(1991).Scale development.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
11. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.Mass:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc..
12. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
13. Hairs, Jr. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.New York:Macmillan.
14. Harrison, D. A.(1995).Volunteer motivation and attendance decision: competitive theory testing in multiple samples from a homeless shelter.Journal of Applied Psychology,80(3),371-383.
15. Hrubes, D.,Ajzen, I.,Daigle, J.(2001).Predicting hunting intensions and behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior.Leisure Sciences,23,165-178.
16. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria in fix indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6(1),1-55.
17. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1996).LISREL 8: User`s reference guide.Chicago:Scientific Software International.
18. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
19. Patterson, P. G..,Spreng, R. A.(1997).Modelling the Relationship between Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions in Business-to-Business, Services Context: An Empirical Examination.International Journal of Service Industry Management,8(5)
20. Rossi, A. N.,Armstrong, J. B.(1999).Theory of reasoned action vs theory of planned behavior: Testing the suitability and sufficiency of a popular behavior model using hunting intensions.Human Dimensions of Wildlife,4,40-56.
21. Sekaran, U.(1992).Research methods for business: a skill-building approach.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
22. Taylor, S. E.,Todd, P. A.(1995).Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions.International Journal of Research in Marketing,12,137-155.
23. 洪凡育(2002)。彰化縣，大葉大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文。
24. 唐至明(1993)。台北市，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
25. 陳亞萍(2000)。中壢市，國立中央大學藝術學研究所碩士論文。
26. 黃啟明(2002)。桃園，國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文。
27. 董育任(2000)。台北市，中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。
28. 蔡郁玟(2000)。台北縣，國立體育學院體育系碩士論文。
29. 酈佩珍(1996)。台北市，東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。