题名

競選行為效應的審視

并列篇名

Review the Campaign Effects

DOI

10.6712/JCPA.200506_(2).0006

作者

廖益興(I-Hsing Liao)

关键词

競選行為 ; 政黨認同 ; 人際溝通 ; election campaign ; party identity ; personal communication

期刊名称

中華行政學報

卷期/出版年月

2期(2005 / 06 / 01)

页次

95 - 102

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

在選民投票行為研究中長期存在著一個爭議,那就是政黨或候選人在競選期間的競選行為,對選民投票抉擇的影響力如何?美國1940年代至70年代間的選民投票行為研究發現,競選行為對選民的投票抉擇並沒有顯著的影響力,選民的政黨認同及其所屬的社經地位,才是影響選民投票行為的關鍵因素。因為,絕大多數選民對選舉議題或候選人了解有限,而傾向根據政黨認同或執政表現等,較可信賴的資訊來作投票決定,並且競選期間不同陣營提供不同的訊息,導致競選行為對選民傳播的效應相互抵銷。但是,晚近的經驗研究發現,隨著選民政黨認同的衰退,以及選民人際溝通網絡的中立化,候選人評價和政見主張成為影響選民投票抉擇的重要變項,而重新開啟對競選行為研究的重視。

英文摘要

A persistent argument in political science is that party/candidates' election campaigns do not have strong effects. Because most people (1) are not care political information about issues and candidates, (2) tend to vote by party identity and government performance, and (3) face balanced information environments, (4) personal communication mediates the influence of mass communication on individual voters. But recently empirical studies find that (1) voters party identity is decline, (2) personal communication environment is heterogeneous or neutral, and (3) issue/candidate factors have strong effects on voters decision making. The main purpose of this paper is to find necessary conditions of an effective election campaign.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Althau, S. L.(1998).Information Effects in Collective Preferences.American Political Science Review,92,545-558.
  2. Bartels, L.(1993).Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.American Political Science Review,87(March),267-286.
  3. Berelson(1954).Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in Presidential Campaign.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
  4. Campbell(1960).The American Voter.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Dalton, R. J.,Beck, P. A,Huckfeldt, R.(1998).Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election.American Political Science Review,92(March),111-126.
  6. Erbring, L.,Goldenberg, E.,Millrt, A. H.(1980).Front-page News and Real-world Cues: A New Look at Agenda Setting by the Media.American Journal of Political Science,24,16-49.
  7. Finkel, S. E.(1993).Reexamining the Minimal Effects Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns.The Journal of Politics,55,1-21.
  8. Gilens, M.(2001).Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences.American Political Science Review,95,379-396.
  9. Graber, D.A.(1980).Mass media and American Politics.Washington, D.C.:Congressional Quarterly Press.
  10. Huckfeldt, R.,Sprague, J.(1995).Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  11. Joslyn, R.(1984).Mass Media and Elections.Reading, Mass.:Wesley.
  12. Joslyn, R.,Ceccoli, S.(1996).Attentiveness to Television News and Opinion Chang in the Fall 1992 Presidential Campaign.Political Behavior,18,141-170.
  13. Kahn, K. F.,Kenney, P. J.(1999).Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation.American Political Science Review,93,877-889.
  14. Kenny, C. B.(1998).The Behavioral Consequences of Political Discussion: Another Look at Discussant Effects on Vote Choice.The Journal of Politics,60,231-244.
  15. Klapper, J. T.(1960).The Effects of Mass Communication.Illinois:Free Press of Glencoe.
  16. Lazarsfeld, P. F.,Berelson, B. R.,Gaudet, H.(1944).The People`s Choke: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign.New York:Columbia University Press.
  17. Nieuwbeerta, P.,Flap, H.(2000).Crosscutting Social Circles and Political Choice: Effects of Personal Network Composition on Voting Behavior in The Netherlands.Social Networks,22,313-335.
  18. Pattie, C. J.,Johnston, R J.(2001).Talk as Political Context: Conversation and Electoral Change in British Elections, 1992-1997.Electoral Studies,20,17-40.
  19. Popkin, S. L.(1991).The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in President Election.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
  20. Schmitt-Beck. R.(2003).Mass Communication, Personal Communication and Vote Choice: The Filter Hypothesis of Media Influence in Comparative Perspective.British Journal of Political Science,33,233-259.
  21. Sears, D. O.,Lindzey, G.,Aronson, E. (eds.)(1969).Handbook of Social Psychology.Reading, Mass.:Wesley.
  22. Wattenberg, M. P.,Brians, C. L.(1999).Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?.American Political Science Review,93,891-900.
  23. Zaller, J.,Diana (eds)(1996).Political Persuasion and Attitude Change.Michigan:Michigan University Press.
  24. 洪永泰(2001)。政治版圖重組:2000總統選舉後評估。政治大學選舉研究中心主辦2000年選舉研究學術研討會論文
  25. 郭正亮(2000)。變天與挑戰。台北:天下文化。
被引用次数
  1. 劉子昱,廖達琪,黃郁慈,林福仁,李承訓(2012)。台灣立法委員政見資料庫之建置。選舉研究,19(2),129-158。
  2. (2010)。校園選舉策略測量指標之建構。教育研究與發展期刊,6(3),183-222。