新北市緝毒專案執行策略「支持及滿意程度」分析－以2011年至2018年為例

New Taipei City Drug Enforcement Project Implementation Strategy ＂Support and Satisfaction Degree＂ Analysis-Taking 2011 to 2018 as an example

10.6712/JCPA.202006_(26).0004

陳錦明(Chin-Min Chen)；張孟智(Meng-Chih Chang)；劉育偉(Yu-Wei Liu)；高哲翰(Che-Han Kao)

新北市 ； 緝毒專案 ； 支持度 ； 滿意度 ； 毒品 ； New Taipei City ； Drug Enforcement Project ； Support ； Satisfaction ； Drugs

中華行政學報

26期（2020 / 06 / 30）

65 - 87

繁體中文

縱觀臺灣六都，新北市於2008年改制為直轄市後，緝獲毒品犯罪件數均一直高居六都之冠，透由文獻可知，該市所執行之緝毒專案，深獲民眾及社會觀感滿意，亦獲政府施政支持，顯見緝毒專案策略之執行呈現正向能量；本文即係針對警察機關依行政院新世代緝毒專案工作所推動之專案緝毒策略作為－即從2011年至2018年新北市毒品犯罪之視角，透由8位專家之訪談結果，質化歸納新北市警察辦理10種緝毒專案之｢支持及滿意程度｣，所有專家對於毒品查緝專案，雖均持正面肯定態度及看法，但也表達實務上之建議作為，藉以提供未來提升緝毒能量的參考。

Throughout the six capitals of Taiwan, after the reorganization of New Taipei City into a municipality in 2008, the number of drug crimes seized has always been the highest among the six capitals. It is clear from the literature that the anti-drug program implemented by New Taipei City has been deeply satisfied by the public and the society, and also supported by the government. This article is aimed at the anti-drug strategy promoted by the police agencies according to the ＂New Generation Anti-Drug Project＂ of the Executive Yuan-that is, from 2011 to 2018 in New Taipei City's drug crime perspective. Based on the interview results of 8 experts, the ＂support and satisfaction＂ of the New Taipei City Police's handling of 10 anti-drug projects are summarized. Although all experts hold positive affirmative attitudes and views on the drug investigation project, they also expressed practical suggestions as a reference to provide future reference to enhance the energy of drug investigation.

1. (1990).Drugs,crime and the criminal justice system.Cincinnati,OH,US:Anderson Publishing CO..
2. Burgess, E.W. (1916). Juvenile delinquency in a small city. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminoloty 6：724-728.
3. Jaquith, S. M(1981).Adolescent marijuana and alcohol use： An empirical test of differential association theory.Criminology,19(2),271-280.
4. Kandel, D,Kandel, E(2015).The Gateway Hypothesis of substance abuse： developmental,biological and societal perspectives.Acta Paediatrica,104(2),130-137.
5. Kennedy, L. W.,Baron, S. W.(1993).Routine activities and a subculture of violence： A study of violence on the street.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,30(1),88-112.
6. Rengert,G.,Wasilchick,J.(1990).Space, Time,and Crime： Ethnographic Insights into Residential Burglary.Washington,DC:Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice,U.S. Department of Justice.
7. 孟維德(2001)。犯罪熱點的實證分析─警察局勤務指揮中心報案紀錄之分析與運用。犯罪學期刊，8，27-64。
8. 林佳璋(2008)。藥物濫用與犯罪關聯性之質化研究。警學叢刊，38(4)，57-90。
9. 林佳璋(2013)。毒品施用及其相關犯罪研究回顧。警專學報，5(6)，45-68。
10. 林健陽,柯雨瑞(2003).毒品犯罪與防治.桃園:中央警察大學.
11. 許華孚,楊士隆,賴昱堤,陳錦明(2016)。科技部專題研究計畫科技部專題研究計畫,科技部。
12. 許福生(2017).犯罪學與犯罪預防.臺北:元照.
13. 陳錦明(2019)。嘉義，國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所。
14. 黃富源,張平吾,范國勇(2012).犯罪學新論.臺北:三民.
15. 楊士隆,李思賢(2012).藥物濫用、毒品與防治.臺北:五南.
16. 蔡田木,林安倫,廖訓誠(2009)。吸毒行為與犯罪行為關聯性之分析。犯罪防治學報，10，189-307。
17. 蔡德輝,楊士隆(2012).犯罪學.臺北:五南.
18. 蔡鴻文(2002)。中央警察大學刑事警察研究所。