《韓非子》的官僚課責智慧

Wisdom of Bureaucratic Accountability from Han-Fei-Tzu

10.6712/JCPA.202206_(30).0002

鄧婷婷(Ingrid Ten)；張國偉(Kuo-Wei Chang)；周成虎(Cheng-Hu Chow)；周芸成(Yun-Cheng Chow)

公共組織管理 ； 官僚課責 ； 韓非子 ； Public Organization Management ； Bureaucratic Accountability ； Han-Fei-Tzu

中華行政學報

30期（2022 / 06 / 30）

45 - 65

繁體中文

《韓非子》的學說師承儒家，融合道家智慧，而以法家為本位，被譽為中國古代最完整、最重要之政治學典籍；《韓非子》一書文勢雄偉峻峭、詞章華美酣暢，是先秦四大散文巨著之一，其核心論點圍繞在「崇法」、「用術」、「任勢」等三種主張之上。本研究試圖運用比較研究方法，分析《韓非子》一書的內容，根據現代「官僚課責」的內、外部重要機制，建構比較分析架構，以此分析《韓非子》一書中的「無為術」、「形名術」、「參伍術」、「聽言術」等有關公共組織管理方法。研究結果發現，《韓非子》的內容特別強調組織的內部課責機制。包括在「層級課責」當中，運用「內部紀律準則」與「首長權威」的制度設計；以及，在「專業課責」部分，則是強調「建構專業倫理規範」與對「個人行為要求」上進行規範。本研究透過中西方公共組織管理內涵的比較分析，有助於當代學者瞭解《韓非子》中的官僚課責智慧。

The theory of Han-Fei-Tzu is from Confucianism, incorporates Taoist Wisdom, and based on Legalism. It has a reputation as the most complete and significant political classic in ancient China. With its majestic writing and luxuriant flowery language, Han-Fei-Tzu is one of the four prose monumental works of the Qin Dynasty. Its core argument revolves around three notions: respecting laws, using methods, and following the circumstances. This exploratory study attempts to use comparative research methods to analyze its contents. Making a comparative analysis framework from internal and external mechanisms of modern bureaucratic accountability analyzes the public organization management methods. The studies discovered that the content of Han-Fei-Tzu particularly emphasizes the internal accountability mechanism of the organization. It uses the internal discipline standard and senior official authority system design in hierarchy accountability, and builds professional ethics regulation and personal behavior request in professional accountability. Through the comparative analysis of the connotation of Chinese and Western public organization management, this research helps contemporary scholars understand the wisdom of bureaucratic accountability in Han-Fei-Tzu.

1. 黃柏勲(2003)。韓非領導觀的探究與啟示。學校行政雙月刊，26，54-65。
   連結：
2. Bovens, M.,Schillemens, T.,Thart, P.(2008).Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool.Public Administration,86(1),225-242.
3. Callahan, K.(2007).Elements of Effective Governance: Measurement, Accountability and Participation.New York:Taylor & Francis.
4. Chang, Y. N.(1976).Early Chinese management thought.California Management Review,19,71-76.
5. Dubnick, M.(2005).Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search of the Mechanisms.Public Performance and Management Review,28(3),376-417.
6. Erkkilä, Tero(2007).Governance and Accountability- A Shift in Conceptualisation.Public Administration Quarterly,31(1),1-38.
7. Etzioni, E.(1975).Alternative Conceptions of Accountability: The Example of Health Administration.Public Administration Review,35(3),279-286.
8. Finer, Herman. 1941. “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government”. Public Administration Review, 1(4): 335-350.
9. Friedrich, C.J. 1940. “Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility”. In Public Policy eds. C. J. Friedrich and A. M. Mason. Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press, 3-24.
10. Gilardi, F.(2003).Evaluating Independent Regulators.Expert Meeting: Ex Post Evaluation of Regulatory Policies Proceedings,Paris:
11. Gilbert, Charles E.(1959).The Framework of Administrative Responsibility.The Journal of Politics,21(3),373-407.
12. Hammond, T. H.,Knott, J. H.(1996).Who controls the bureaucracy? Presidential power, congressional dominance, legal constraint and bureaucratic autonomy in a model of multiinstitutional policy-making.The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,12(1),119-166.
13. Held, David(ed.),Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias(ed.)(2005).Global Governance and Public Accountability.Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishing.
14. Herbig, P.,Genestre, A.(1997).International motivational differences.Management Decision,35(7),562-569.
15. Hodge, G. A.,Coghill, K.(2007).Accountability in Privatized State.Governance,20(4),675-702.
16. Hughes, Owen E.(2003).Public Management and Administration.New York:Palgrave.
17. Koppell, J. G. S.(2005).Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of Multiple Accountabilities Disorder.Public Administration Review,65(1),94-108.
18. Levine, C. H.,Peters, B. G.,Thompson, F. J.(1990).Public Administration: Challenges, Choices, Consequences.Glenview, IL:Scott, Foresman/Little Brown Higher Education.
19. McCubbin, M.,Noll, R.,Weingast, B. R.(1987).Administrative procedures as instruments of political control.Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,3(2),243-275.
20. McCubbin, M.,Noll, R.,Weingast, B. R.(1989).Structure and process as solutions to the politician´s principal-agency problem.Virginia Law Review,74,431-482.
21. McCubbin, M.,Schwartz, T.(1984).Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms.American Journal of Political Science,28,165-179.
22. Mulgan, R.(2003).One Cheer for Hierarchy-Accountability in Disjointed Governance.Political Science,55(2),6-18.
23. Peters, G.B.(1989).The Politics of Bureaucracy.New York:Longman.
24. Romzek, Barbara S.,Dubnick, Melvin J.(1987).Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy.Public Administration Review,47(3),227-238.
25. Rosenbloom, David H.(1998).Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector.New York:McGraw-Hill.
26. Satow, T.,Wang, Z. M.(1994).Cultural and organizational factors in human resource management in China and Japan: a cross-cultural and socio-economic perspective.Journal of Managerial Psychology,9(4),3-11.
27. Starling, Grover(2008).Managing the Public Sector.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
28. 王立仁,孟曉光(2008)。韓非的治國方略述論。東北師大學報，235，101-105。
29. 王梅(2001)。向古人借智慧。遠見雜誌，175，331-340。
30. 林淑琪(2006)。台北，國立政治大學國文教學碩士學位班。
31. 林榮彬,林國良(2003)。韓非子的領導觀─勢的鞏固、掌握與運用。吳鳳學報，11，43-52。
32. 林榮斌(1997)。新竹，國立交通大學管理科學研究所。
33. 高宜凡(2011)。從四書五經中，提出「動態競爭」理論。遠見雜誌，297，331-340。
34. 張清貴(1995)。韓非子管理思想初探。人事管理，32(10)，28-30。
35. 張緯良(2003).人力資源管理.台北:雙葉書廊.
36. 張簡堯(2003)。台北，國立台北大學公共行政學研究所。
37. 許倬雲(1992).從歷史看領導.台北:洪健全基金會文經學苑.
38. 郭美玲(2003)。從人性論初探韓非管理哲學的現代意義。景文技術學院學報，13，154-162。
39. 陳志瑋(2005)。邁向民主課責：透明化機制運用之分析。國家菁英季刊，1(4)，131-147。
40. 陳佩君(1998)。韓非思想及其在人事管理上之啟示。人力發展月刊，57，16-27。
41. 陳敦源(2009)。透明之下的課責：台灣民主治理中官民信任關係的重建基礎。文官制度季刊，1(2)，21-55。
42. 陳策(1986).強者管理學—韓非子.台北:武陵出版社.
43. 黃光國(1991).王者之道.台北:學生書局.
44. 黃光國(1995).知識與行動：中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋.台北:心理.
45. 楊國樞（編）(1989).社會及行為科學研究方法下冊.台北:東華書局.
46. 楊富田(1997)。台北，文化大學政治學研究所。
47. 楊輝南(2009)。儒家與法家觀點之人力資源管理意涵。建國科大學報，28(4)，65-84。
48. 葛榮晉,邱忠來(2012)。“自為”人性論與規範化管理——韓非管理哲學探析。北京行政學院學報，2012(6)，108-112。
49. 謝雲飛,余坤東,謝效昭(1997)。從韓非子的「術」探討現代人的人事管理。中華學苑，50，52-70。
50. 謝雲飛,余坤東,謝效昭(1999)。經以現代理論架構轉換之韓非子領導觀點。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，9(4)，703-717。