金門的轉型正義研究：以軍方占用民地為例

Study on Transitional Justice in Kinmen: Focusing on the Use of Private Land by the Military

10.6712/JCPA.202212_(31).0005

王宏男(Hung-Nan Wang)

金門行政區 ； 轉型正義 ； 財產權 ； Administrative Regions in Kinmen ； Transitional Justice ； Property Rights

中華行政學報

31期（2022 / 12 / 31）

59 - 93

繁體中文;英文

自從臺灣二次政黨輪替後，臺灣民主更為鞏固。同為臺灣實施民主政體一島的金門，相較走得慢，一直到1992年才解除戰地政務；當《促進轉型正義條例》通過後，真正落實在地方上的少之又少特別是財產權土地正義。如何透過修法落實土地正義即為本文目的。本文將採田野調查、深度訪談與個案研究，藉以釐清二個問題：一、尚有多少被軍方占用土地？與二、相應作法？範圍限制在金門五鄉鎮，不含烏坵鄉；對象為鄉鎮中之戰備道、雷區與營區等個案。研究發現：首先，在金門面積149.8510平方公里中，計4,071（筆）軍方占用地，計830.89公頃。依序分別是金湖鎮1,750（筆）、金沙鎮738（筆）、金城鎮508（筆）、金寧鄉495（筆）與烈嶼鄉368（筆）；最後，將五鄉鎮之個案與訪談紀錄整理，以及近年二次協調會，歸納出以下問題與作法：（一）如何解決落日條款問題？修正或刪除《離島建設條例》第9條第1項與第9-3條第1項之「五年內」條款；（二）如何修正《離島建設條例》9-3條第1項、第2項與第3項？下修年齡放寬土地所有人耕作認定標準；（三）如何修正《離島建設條例》9-3條第3項「……『應』設籍於申請返還土地所在……」？修改為「得」設籍於申請返還土地所在；（四）如何修正《離島建設條例》9-3條7項？執行上特別法優於普通法；（五）遭駁回之46件雷區土地如何救濟？協請縣籍立委處理。

Democracy has become more consolidated in Taiwan since it underwent the second transfer of political power. Kinmen, as a part of the Taiwanese democracy, has been progressing at a relatively slow pace. It was not until 1992 that the battleground administration of Kinmen was terminated. Additionally, after the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice was passed, very few transitional justice mechanisms have been actually implemented locally, particularly in respect of property rights and land justice. In view of this issue, the present study aims to investigate how to achieve land justice through legislation revisions. In this study, field research, in-depth interview, and case study approaches were adopted to address two questions: a) How much land is still being used by the military? b) What corresponding solutions can be adopted? The scope of research was limited to five townships in Kinmen (excluding Wuqiu Township), and the research subjects were specific sites in these townships, including roads of armaments, landmine areas, and military camps. The findings of this study are as follows: first, in Kinmen, which has a total area of 29.8540 km2, 4,071 pieces of land are being used by the military, totaling 830.89 hectares. The townships in descending order of quantity of military-used land are Jinhu Township (1,750), Jinsha Township (738), Jincheng Township (508), Jinning Township (495), and lastly Lieyu Township (368). Finally, based on a summary of the specific sites in the five townships and the records of interviews conducted therein, as well as the two coordination councils held in recent years, the following problems and solutions were concluded: (a) How should the problem of sunset clauses be resolved? The term "within five years" stipulated in Paragraph 1, Article 9 and Paragraph 1, Article 9-3 of the Offshore Islands Development Act may be revised or removed. (b) How should Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, Article 9-3 of the Offshore Islands Development Act be revised? The eligibility age can be lowered and the criteria for the recognition of land ownership and cultivation relaxed. (c) How should the statement "…'should' register as permanent residents at address(es) located in the land to be returned…" in Paragraph 3, Article 9-3 of the Offshore Islands Development Act be revised? The statement can be revised as "… 'may' register as permanent residents at address(es) located in the land to be returned…" (d) How should Paragraph 7, Article 9-3 of the Offshore Islands Development Act be revised? The special law should take precedence over the common law in regulatory implementation. (e) How can relief be provided for the 46 rejected cases of land located in landmine areas? Assistance can be sought from county legislators.

1. 王宏男(2020)。旅臺金門同鄉會之比較性研究。中華行政學報，27
   連結：
2. Brito, De. Barahona, Alexander.,Aguilar, Paloma.,Carmen, González-Enríquez.Introduction.The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies
3. Elster, Jon(2004).Closing the book: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective.M. A.:Cambridge University Press.
4. 平井堅(2020).黨產研究.台北:不當黨產委員會出版.
5. 江柏煒(2006).海外金門會館調查實錄：馬來西亞篇.金門:金門縣文化局.
6. 吳乃德(2006)。轉型正義和歷史記憶：臺灣民主化的未竟之業。思想，2
7. 吳定(2003).公共政策辭典.
8. 宋怡明(2016).前線島嶼：冷戰下的金門.臺北市:臺大出版中心出版.
9. 李怡俐(2012)。轉型正義的機制及脈因素─以臺灣為例。臺灣人權學刊，1(2)
10. 李金生，2022，〈金門海岸田變「雷區」，楊鎮浯：盡快幫鄉親要回土地〉，《中時新聞網》。
11. 卓遵宏,董群廉(2003).金門民防時期的民防組訓與動員訪談錄（一）.國史館.
12. 花亦芬(2016).在歷史的傷口上重生：德國走過的轉型正義之路.龍岡數位文化股份有限公司.
13. 金門縣府(2009)。金門縣志・土地志。金門縣金城鎮:金縣府。
14. 金門縣府(2009)。金門縣志・兵事志。金門縣金城鎮:金縣府。
15. 金門縣府(2009)。金門縣府，2009，《變更金門特區計畫》。
16. 促進轉型正義委員會(2022).不義遺址：轉型正義的空間實踐.五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
17. 徐鳳儀(2004)。國立政治大學地政研究所。
18. 國立金門技術學院(2004).金門戰地政務的法治與實踐.金門縣政府民政局.
19. 張文貞(2005)。另類憲改工程：擘建臺灣的法治與政治信任。新興民主的憲政改造：國際視野與臺灣觀點國際研討會，臺北市:
20. 張炎憲,黎中光,董群廉(2004).金門民防時期的民防組訓與動員訪談錄（三）.國史館.
21. 張炎憲,黎中光,董群廉(2003).金門民防時期的民防組訓與動員訪談錄（二）.國史館.
22. 陳永富(2020).戰地 36：金馬戒嚴民主運動實錄.行政院金馬聯合服務中心.
23. 陳立夫(2007).土地法之研究.台北:新學林.
24. 陳滄江，2003，〈紅色東州溝別為我哭泣〉，《金門日報》。
25. 陳榮昌(2002).浯土浯民：浯島金門人的真情故事.金門縣政府.
26. 黃世明(1995)。臺大社會學研究所。
27. 黃清琦(2012)。黃清琦，2012，金門政區變遷圖。
28. 愛德華・索亞、顏亮一譯、謝碩元譯、王丹青譯(2019)。空間正義。臺北市:開學文化。
29. 楊肅獻(2009).金門近代史.金門縣金城鎮:金縣府.
30. 黎家維(2016)。臺灣推動轉型正義的思考。國政評論