身心障礙者家庭暴力與性侵害之研究

A Study of Family Violence and Sexual Assault on People with Diabilities

10.29814/TSW.200601.0004

潘淑滿

身心障礙 ； 家庭暴力 ； 性侵害 ； 智能障礙 ； disability ； family violence ； sexual assault ； intellectual disability

臺灣社會工作學刊

5期（2006 / 01 / 01）

128 - 159

繁體中文

本研究主要是透過內政部「家庭暴力與性侵害」及「身心障礙」資料庫交叉比對過程，探討身心障礙個人特性與障礙類型，在家庭暴力與性侵害之分佈概況，同時也進一步瞭解身心障礙者遭受家庭暴力或性侵害之通報來源與居住區域之分佈概況。研究發現：在家庭暴力身心障礙的通報案件中，肢障與精障所占比例較高，在性侵害通報案件卻是以智障居多。女性障礙者並未因障礙類型不同而影響受暴率，男性肢障遭受家庭暴力風險較高。女性遭受性侵害的比例，占所有障礙人口的九成五，男性只占少數，無論女性或男性智障都是性侵害的高風險人口。通報來源中有五成來自高高屏與中彰投兩個區域，通報案件中有九成來自衛政與警政單位的通報，表示在家庭暴力與性侵害防治網絡中，衛政與警政單位通報參與較高，而其他單位參與較低。不同障礙類型的通報明顯不同，衛政單位通報中有三成是肢障、其次精障(29.8%)，而警政單位的通報有四成是肢障、其次為精障(24.6%)，社政單位的通報有28.7%是精障、肢障占27.8%，防治中心的通報精障比率高占第一，而來自教育單位的通報高達七成是智障。在家庭暴力通報案件中，有八成以上是熟識者；在性侵害通報案件中，熟識者只占五成五左右，陌生人(20.39%)與不詳(26.58%)高達四成五。受到資料庫完整性的限制，使得本研究結果無法進一步推論全國身心障礙者之受暴概況，建議政府應針對不同障礙類型進行調查，以瞭解障礙者受暴虐概況，同時也檢討資料庫設計，是否方便實務與研究的整合。

The purpose of this study, based on analyzing two databases of family violence and disability, are three. The first is to protrait the current status of family violence and sexual assault on people with disabilities. The second is to explore the characteristics and social backgrounds of family violence and sexual assault on people with diabilities. The third is to understand the interaction among the preventing systems of family violence and sexual assault. Due to shortages from databases, the researcher cannot predict, based on this study, the prevalence of family violence and sexual on people with diabilities. Previous studies have indicated that the prevalence of family violence and sexual assault on people with disabilities is higher than people without disabilities. The results of this study show that male disabilities are more likely to experience physical abuse than female disabilities, however, female disabilities are more likely to experience sexual abuse than male disabilities. Ninty-five percentage of victims of sexual assault are female, male consists less than 5%. People with physical or psychiatric disability are more likely to be victims of family violence, but people with intellectual disability are more likely to be victims of sexual assault. About 50% of victims of family violence and sexual assaut are from Kaohsiung city, Kaohsiung county and Pintong county, and ninety percentage of victims are reported by both police and health department. 80% abusers of family violence are from family members, relatives or friends. However, the cases of sexual assault by family members, relatives or friends are only 55%. The fact of sexual assault by strangers is desirable to be concerned.

1. 胡雅各(2003)。啓智教養機構女性院生性教育教學成效之研究。特殊教育學報，18，153-179。
   連結：
2. Ainscough, Carolyn,Toon, Kay(2000).Surviving Childhood Sexual Abuse: Practical Self-Help for Adults Who Were Sexually Abused as Children.Massachusetts:Fisher Books.
3. Bernard, Claudia(1999).Child Sexual Abuse and the Black Disabled Child.Disability & Society,14(3),325-339.
4. Briggs, Freda(1995).Developing Personal Safety Skills: In Children with Disabilities.London:Jessica Kingsley.
5. Calderbank, Rosemary(2000).Abuse and Disabled People: Vulnerability or Social Indifference?.Disability & Society,15(3),521-534.
6. Carlson, Bonnie. E.(1996).Dating Violence: Student Beliefs about the Consequences.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,18,924-941.
7. Carlson, Bonnie. E.(1997).Mental Retardation and Domestic Violence: An Ecological Approach to Intervention.Social Work,42(1),79-89.
8. Chang, Judy C.,Martin, Sandra L.,Moracco, Kathryn E.,Dulli, Lisa, Scandlin,Donna, Loucks-Sorrel,Mary Beth,Turner, Tracy,Starsoneck, Leslie,Dorian, Patty Neal,Bou-Saada, Ingrid(2003).Helping Women with Disabilities and Domestic Violence: Strategies, Limitations, and Challenges of Domestic Violence Program and Services.Journal of Women's Health,12(7),699-708.
9. Day, Andrew,Thurlow, Katie,Woolliscroft, Jessica(2003).Working with Children Sexual Abuse: A Survey of Mental Health Professionals.Child Abuse & Neglect,27(2),191-198.
10. Furey, Eileen M.(1994).Sexual Abuse of Adults with Mental Retardation: Who and Where.Mental Retardation,32(2),173-180.
11. Kvam, Marit Hoem(2000).Is Sexual Abuse of Children with Disabilities Disclosed? A Retrospective Analysis of Child Disability and the Likelihood of Sexual Abuse among those Attending Norwegian Hospitals.Child Abuse & Neglect,24(8),1073-1084.
12. Kvam, Marit Hoem.(2004).Sexual Abuse of Deaf Children: A Retrospective Analysis of the Prevalence and Characteristics of Childhood Sexual Abuse among Deaf Adults in Norway.Child Abuse & Neglect,28(3),241-251.
13. Marshall, Peter(1994).Reconviction of Imprisoned Sexual Offenders Home Office Research and Statistics Department.Research Bulletin,36,23-29.
14. Muccigrosso, Lynne(1991).Sexual Abuse Prevention Strategies and Programs for Persons with Developmental Disabilities.Sexuality and Disability,9(3),261-271.
15. Newman, Elana,Kaloupek, Danny G.,Keane, Terence M.,Folstein, Susan F.,Glenda Kaufman Kantor (Eds.),Jana L. Jasinski (Eds.)(1997).Out of the Darkness: Contemporary Perspectives on Family Violence.London:Sage.
16. Nosek, Margaret A.,Krotoski, Danuta (Eds.),Nosek, Margaret (Eds.),Turk, Margaret (Eds.)(1997).Women with Physical Disabilites: Achieving and Maintaining Health and Well-being.Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes.
17. Sobsey, Dick.(1994).Violence and Abuse in the Lives of People with Disabilities: The End of Silent Acceptance?.Baltimore:Paulh Brookes Publishing Co.
18. Sobsey, Dick,Doe, Tanis(1991).Patterns of Sexual Abuse and Assault.Sexuality and Disability,9(3),243-259.
19. Sobsey, Dick,Randall, Wade,Parrila, Rauno K.(1997).Gender Differences in Abused Children with and without Disabilities.Child Abuse ＆ Neglect,21(8),701-720.
20. Solomon, Phyllis L.,Cavanaugh, Mary M.,Gelles, Richard J.(2005).Family Violence among Adults with Severe Mental Illness: A Neglected Area of Research.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,6(1),40-54.
21. Stimpson, Liz,Best, Margaret. C.(1991).Courage above All: Sexual Assault against Women with Disabilities.Toronto:Disabled Women's Network.
22. Strong, Marlene,Freeman, Cupolo A.(1997).Caregiver Abuse and Domestic Violence in the Lives of Women with Disabilities.Oakland, California:Berkeley Planning Associates.
23. Watson, Mark,Bain, Alan,Houghton, Sterhen(1992).A Preliminary Study in Teaching Self-protective Skills to Children with Moderate and Severe Mental Retardation.Journal of Special Education,26(2),181-194.
24. Welner, Sandra(2000).A Provider's Guide for the Care of Women with Physical Disabilities and Chronic Medical Conditions.The North Carolina Office on Disability and Health.
25. Wolfe, David A.,Jaffe, Peter G.(1999).Emerging Strategies in the Prevention of Domestic Violence.The Future of Children,9(3),133-144.
26. 內政統計月報
27. 王懋雯(2003)。諮商與輔導受性侵害之智障者-建立關係及進行會談。學生事務，42(3)，13-20。
28. 王麗容、陳芬苓(2003)。台灣地區婚姻暴力問題之調查研究。內政部委託研究報告。
29. 胡雅各(2002)。中重度智障者性教育－相關問題及課程之探討。特教園丁，18(1)，63-73。
30. 張文英(2002)。淺談智障者的性騷擾問題。特教園丁，18(1)，57-61。
31. 張玨、葉安華(1993)。有關智障者性教育問題之意見調查。中華衛誌，12(1)，70-83。
32. 潘淑滿、黃東益、林惠芳(2005)。身心障礙者受暴問題之調查研究－以家庭暴力及性侵害被害人爲例。內政部委託研究報告。
33. 蔡光仁(1995)。智障者的性教育。特殊教育季刊，57，29-34。
34. 謝素芬(2000)。性侵害防治S檔案－性侵害被害人是智障者之案例。高雄縣政府。

1. 潘淑滿、楊榮宗、林津如(2012)。巢起巢落：女同志親密暴力、T婆角色扮演與求助行為。臺灣社會研究季刊，87，45-102。
2. 邱大昕(2012)。為什麼需要女性主義身心障礙研究？。婦研縱橫，96，16-24。
3. 嚴嘉楓、胡蓉、林金定(2008)。女性智能障礙者月經、性與人權進程之思考。身心障礙研究，6(4)，286-294。
4. 楊添圍(2013)。精神鑑定的特殊議題：智能障礙者之性自主。台灣法醫學誌，5(1)，41-46。
5. 張景茹、郎亞琴(2011)。家暴目睹兒防治課程對國小高年級學童家暴知識與態度之影響。教育科學期刊，10(2)，47-68。
6. 鍾易廷,蔡景宏(2018)。社會工作者服務未成年男性性侵害被害人之經驗－以台南高雄屏東三縣市為例。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，14(2)，31-46。