整合社工處遇與修復式司法協助家暴成人保護個案之實務經驗省思－以台南市女權會為例

The Reflection on an Integrated Implementation of Social Work and Restorative Justice Treatment for Adult Victims in the Domestic Violence, illustrated by the Tainan Women's Rights Association

李易蓁(I-Chen Lee)；楊巧鈴(Qiao-Ling Yang)

社會工作 ； 修復式司法 ； 家庭暴力 ； 成人保護 ； social work ； restorative justice ； domestic violence ； adult protection

臺灣社會工作學刊

13期（2014 / 01 / 01）

69+71 - 99

繁體中文

傳統上多將家暴被害人與施暴者分開處遇，但親密暴力涉及糾葛情感，關係不易切割。而即使法入家門，期待藉由司法嚇阻暴力，卻似乎亦未能十足保障被害人安全。其次，Bowker（1983）已論證受虐婦女可與施暴者在維繫關係的情況下成功終止暴力（引自Davis, 1998）。故如何協助打造非暴力互動關係，而非一昧隔絕，方是終止暴力的關鍵要素。有鑑於此，修復式司法是否為另類解決模式在近年有不少討論。台南市女權會基於在提供保護性服務過程中，看到一定比例的家暴被害人仍期待與施暴者修復關係或仍有一定生活交集。乃在2011、2012年嘗試結合社工處遇及修復式司法，跨專業共同協助具刑事訴訟困擾之成人保護個案。只是，修復式司法是否適用於家暴事件，仍有爭論；跨專業合作不免需要磨合、實驗性方案的挑戰，被害人困境是否能確實化解更是需關注之焦點。筆者有幸分別擔任此方案之外聘督導與專案社工，並均有多年服務家暴被害人之實務經驗，僅以本文統整服務期間所見、所聞、所思，並與相關文獻對話。期待能藉此拋磚引玉，激發更多人思考結合社工處遇與修復式法之可行性，進而開發嶄新服務模式。

In a traditional manner, the victims and abusers of the domestic violence are treated separately. However, complex emotions are often involved in the intimate violence so that it is difficult to detach victims and abusers' relationships. Even the legal actions had been taken; it still cannot provide fully protection for the victims of domestic violence. According to Bowker(1983), he verified that the violence could be terminated successfully while the battered women and abusers keep maintaining their relations. Therefore, how to help victims and abusers to create a non-violence interactive relationship instead of isolation is the key to terminate the occurrence of the domestic violence. In view of this, applying the restorative justice could be an alternative solution which has been brought up to attention recently. During the process of providing protective services, the Tainan Women's Right Association found out that a certain percentage of victims of domestic violence are willing to restore relationship or keep their interactions with the abusers. Therefore, an integrated social work and restorative justice treatment were implemented to help those adult victims between the year of 2011 and 2012. However, there are some arguments while applying restorative justice on the cases of the domestic violence. For example, during the process of this service, some conflicts among professions are the challenges that to be deal with. Also, whether the project could help those victims relief from their difficulties or not is still an issue to be concern. The researcher has been worked for abused women with practical experience many years and also acted as a supervisor of this project. By reviewing and discussing the implications and limitations of this project, the suggestions are provided for the future practices and also could inspire more people reflect on feasibilities for integrating social work and restorative justice treatment.

1. 沈慶鴻(2009)。弱勢社工服務弱勢案主？！婚暴防治社會工作者實務困境之研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊，13(2)，87-142。
   連結：
2. 黃翠紋(2003)。婚姻暴力受虐婦女接受鄉鎮市區調解委員會調解滿意度影響因素之分析。犯罪學期刊，6(1)，67-102。
   連結：
3. 台南市女權會（2011）。台南市女性權益促進會一百年度「修復式司法」試行方案成果報告。台南市女權會。
4. 法務部（2010）。法務部推動「修復式司法試行方案」實施計畫。線上檢索日期103 年7 月1 日。台灣新竹地方法院檢察署官網。網址: http://www.scc.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=300486&CtNode=33671&mp=013
5. 張錦麗（2007）。從家庭暴力防治新法與家庭暴力防治實務中看受暴婦女困境。2007 年台灣防暴聯盟九十六年度婦幼安全溫馨加元系列活動手冊。
6. Aziz, Sagifta(2010).Should restorative justice be use for case of domestic violence.Internation Journal of Restorative Justice,6(1),1-48.
7. Barbara Oberhofer, Dane,Simon, Barbara, L.(1991).Resident guests :social workers in host settings.Social work,36(3),208-213.
8. Corinna, Seith(2001).Security matters: Domestic violence and public social services.Violence against Women,7(7),799-820.
9. Davies, J,Lyon, E,Monti-Catania, D(1998).Safety planning with battered women: Complex Lives/Difficult choices.CA:Sage.
10. Dutton, Donald G.(2006).Rethinking domestic violence.Canada:UBC Press.
11. Edleson, J. L.(Ed.),Eisikovits, Z. C.(Ed.)(1996).Future interventions with battered women and their families.CA:Sage Publications.
12. Fineman, M.(Ed.),Mykitiuk, R.(Ed.)(1994).The Public Nature of Private Violence: The Discovery of Domestic Abuse.NY:Routledge.
13. Hudson, J.(Ed.),Galaway, B.(Ed.)(1977).Restitution in Criminal Justice.MA:D. C. Health and Company.
14. Juliet, Behrens(2005).Meeting the needs of victims of domestic violence with family law issue: the dangers and possibilities in restorative justice.International Journal of law in Context,1(3),215-235.
15. Michele, Bograd,Mederos, Fernando(1999).Battering and couples therapy: Universal screening and selection of treatment modality.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,25(3),291-312.
16. Phyllis, Baker(1997).And I went back: Battered women's negotiation of choice.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,26(1),55-74.
17. Stubbs, J.(2002).Domestic violence and women's safety: Feminist challenges to restorative justice.Restorative justice and family violence,UK:
18. Stubbs, J.(2007).Beyond apology? Domestic violence and critical questions for restorative justice.Criminology and criminal justice,7(2),149-180.
19. Tisdall, Mark,Farmer, Sam,Robinson, Margaret,Wells, Arthur,McMaster, Ken(2007).Review of the Use of Restorative Justice in Family Violence Cases in the Rotorua District.Wellington:Ministry of Justice, New Zealand.
20. United Nations(2006).Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes Criminal Justice Handbook Series.
21. VanWormer, K(2009).Restorative justice as social justice for victims of gendered violence: A standpoint feminist perspective.Social Work,52(2),107-115.
22. Von Hiesh, A.(Ed.),Roberts, J.(Ed.),Bottoms, A. E.(Ed.),Roach, K.(Ed.),Schiff, M.(Ed.)(2003).Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice : competing or reconcilable paradigms?.Oxford:Hart Publishing.
23. 王增勇(2006)。社工與家庭暴力的相遇：性別關係的複製場域。性別平等教育季刊，37，8-11。
24. 成蒂(2004)。終結婚姻暴力：加害人處遇與諮商。台北:心理。
25. 李增祿(1995)。社會工作概論。台北:巨流圖書公司。
26. 高鳳仙(2007)。諮商與調解在家庭暴力事件之法律界限。應用心理研究，33，1-7。
27. 莊凱琦(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，臺灣大學社會工作學研究所。
28. 郭貴蘭(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南投縣，暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系研究所。
29. 陳祖輝(2004)。淺談社區司法的理念與實踐：復歸式正義的取向。社區發展季刊，107，445-457。
30. 陳婷蕙(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中市，東海大學社會工作系研究所。
31. 黃煜文譯、Mills, L. G.(2004)。錯的是我們不是我：家暴的動力關係。台北:商周。
32. 黃翠紋(2006)。修復式正義理念在婚姻暴力調解上的應用。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集（9）
33. 黃翠紋(2001)。桃園市，國立中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所。
34. 黃蘭媖、許春金(2014)。法務部委託研究案法務部委託研究案,未出版
35. 潘雅惠、陳建宏(2009)。修復式司法運用於家庭暴力事件之探討（下）。司法週刊，1463，2-3。

1. 陳慧女(2017)。性侵害加害人寫給被害人的道歉信之研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，13(2)，55-76。
2. 黃嘉羚(2019)。諮商心理師在修復式司法中的角色定位－以家暴案件為例。諮商與輔導，402，21-24+57。
3. (2016)。臺灣社區工作觀點與保護性社會工作發展之初探。社區發展季刊，156，331-346。
4. (2020)。如何與危機家庭一起工作？以家庭為核心的服務理念與實務技巧。社區發展季刊，172，101-117。