遭受網路性剝削少女的處境與防制工作：以性別與年齡交織觀點分析

The Situation and Prevention of Online Sexual Exploited Girls: An Analytical Approach of Intersectionality of Gender and Age

許家嘉(Chia-Chia Hsu)

交織性 ； 性剝削 ； 女性 ； 兒童 ； 女童 ； 網路性剝削 ； intersection ； sexual exploitation ； female ； child ； girl-child ； online sexual exploitation

臺灣社會工作學刊

26期（2023 / 12 / 01）

127+129 - 152

繁體中文;英文

在性剝削事件中，少女通常是主要的受害者，其身分包含既是CEDAW所涵蓋的「女性」抑是CRC所指稱的「兒童」，兩個公約對於免受性暴力的行為皆有所規範，然而橫跨在這兩個公約之間的受性剝削少女，透過交織性的觀點發現，社會對於女性、兒童遭受性暴力的既定認知似無法全然適用於受性剝削的少女上，使得這個族群看似皆被兩個公約所涵蓋，實則是被邊緣化的一群。再者，我國為符合國際潮流，亦積極修正人權法規，而在性剝削防制工作上，我國性剝削防制條例的演變係自救援被賣淫少女而起，條文的內涵從救援有性交易行為的偏差少年觀點轉為實質保護受性剝削兒少的觀點；近幾年性剝削樣態的演變已從傳統的坐檯陪酒、媒介性交易轉為不受時空限制的網路性剝削樣態，面對這樣的轉變，我國的防制工作網絡似乎尚未認知到網路性剝削所呈現的傷害已與過去傳統性剝削事件不同，仍以兒童保護的個案工作模式來服務。本文嘗試以性別與年齡交織性觀點，分析在社會結構、權力不平等以及受性剝削少女的多元身分交互作用下，她們是如何被邊緣化的處境以及防制工作的因應觀點。

When sexual exploitation happened, girls are the mainly victim. Girls own at least two identities, one is "female" which is covered by CEADAW, the other is "child" which is referred to by CRC. It seems girls can be protected by these two conventions. However, it shows the sexual exploited girls are easily excluded by preventions, since we are not familiar to viewing sexual exploitation with intersectional approach. Although our government has been dedicating to amending the Child and Youth Sexual Exploitation Prevention Act these years, we are still hardly to realize the intersectional situation which the sexual exploited girls are facing, which makes the Act and preventions are not suitable for these girl-child. On the other hand, we found the patterns of sexual exploitation are changing. Online sexual exploitation is now the new patterns. Due to the technology and patriarchy, online sexual exploitation is no longer limited by time and locations. That is, online sexual exploitation becomes a trend in world, which must be treated in macro perspective. However, we still ignore the girls' situation, which may intersect with power, social divisions, and discrimination. This research is trying to use intersectional approach to explore the challenge that sexual exploited girls are facing and the coping strategies in Taiwan.

1. Ciwang Teyra(2020)。想好好地生活：原住民同志之交織處境與因應策略。臺大社會工作學刊，43，1-54。
   連結：
2. 林沛君(2020)。歧視的交織性－以 CEDAW、CRC 及 CRPD 三項人權公約之交織為思考。台灣國際法學刊，16(2)，7-23。
   連結：
3. 夏傳位(2014)。新自由主義是什麼？三種理論觀點的比較研究。台灣社會學，27，141-166。
   連結：
4. 甯應斌(2011)。極端保護觀：透過兒少保護的新管制國家與階級治理。台灣社會研究季刊，83，277-291。
   連結：
5. 衛福部保護司資料（2021），兒童及少年性剝削案件辦理情形。資料檢索日期：2022 年 1 月 14 日。
6. Cohen, C.P.(1997).The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Feminist Landmark.William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law,29(3),29-78.
7. Crenshaw, K.(1991).Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.Stanford Law Review,43(6),1241-1299.
8. Crenshaw, K. (2016, November). The urgency of intersectionality. https://www.ted.com/talks/kimberle_crenshaw_the_urgency_of_intersectionality?subtitle=zh-tw
9. Dyer, S.,Hurd, F.(2016).Changing perceptions about feminists and (still not) claiming a feminist identity.Gender and Education,30(4),435-449.
10. Gorski, G. C.(2009).Insisting on Digital Equity Reframing the Dominant Discourse on Multicultural Education and Technology.Urban Education,44(3),348-364.
11. Harrison(2006).Cyberspace and Child Abuse Images: A Feminist Perspective.Journal of Women and Social Work,21(4),365-379.
12. Henry, N.,Powell, A.(2016).Embodied Harms: Gender, Shame, and Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence.Violence Against Women,19(2),758-779.
13. Internet Watch Foundation(2018).,未出版
14. Mitchell, K. J.,Finkelhor, D.,Wolak, J.(2010).Conceptualizing juvenile prostitution as child maltreatment: Findings from the national juvenile prostitution study.Child Maltreatment,15,18-36.
15. Payne, M.(2014).Modern Social Work Theory.Oxford University Press.
16. Schwartz, B.,Neff, G.(2019).The gendered affordances of craigslist "New-in Town Girls Wanted" Ads.New Media & Society,21(11-12),2404-2421.
17. Taefi, N.(2009).The Synthesis of Age and Gender: Intersectionality, International Human Rights Law and the Marginalisation of the Girl-Child.International Journal of Children’s Rights,17,345-376.
18. United Nation. (2020). Sale and sexual exploitation of children (Rep. No A/HRC/43/40). Retrieved from: https://documents-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G20/015/49/pdf/G2001549.pdf?OpenElement
19. Yuval-Davis, N.(2006).Intersectionality and feminist politics.European Journal of Women's Studies,13(3),193-209.
20. 牟芮君(2017)。臺北市，國立臺灣大學。
21. 李郁芬(2012)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
22. 林沛君(2021)。,國家科學及技術委員會。
23. 張秀鴛,胡木蘭(2016)。兒童權利再提升－從兒少性交易防制到兒少性剝削防制。社區發展季刊，156，16-25。
24. 陳毓文(2016)。,未出版
25. 游素玲（編）(2011).跨國女性研究導讀.台灣:五南出版社.
26. 游淑華(1996)。臺中市，東海大學。
27. 賀紹庭,許華孚(2019)。安置機構對從事性工作未成年女性價值觀影響之研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，11(1)，227-323。
28. 黃淑玲(2002)。叫叛逆太沉重－少女進入色情市場的導因與生活方式。兩性平等教育季刊，20，66-73。
29. 廖美蓮(2017)。寫在兒少性剝削防制條例施行前夕－接軌國際實踐兒權，我國性剝削防制工作變遷中的保護意識。社區發展季刊，157，82-94。
30. 廖美蓮(2020)。網路性誘拐—兒少影像性剝削實務挑戰。當代社會工作學刊，11，1-31。
31. 羅杏如(2018)。國立臺灣師範大學社會工作學研究所。