分析亞洲男子排球接發球攻擊得分、總攻擊得分及攻擊型態之相關性：以2015年亞洲男子排球俱樂部前八強為例

Correlation analysis of Asian men's volleyball service aces, total spiking scores, and spiking types: Using the example of the final eight teams in 2015 Asian Men's Club Volleyball Championship

10.6406/JNCKUPER.201604_48(1).0001

林顯丞

亞洲排球俱樂部 ； 攻擊得分模式 ； 進攻戰術 ； Asian Men's Club Volleyball Championship ； scoring patterns ； attacking strategies

成大體育學刊

48卷1期（2016 / 04 / 01）

1 - 13

繁體中文

本研究主要探討亞洲男子排球接發球攻擊及總攻擊得分對攻擊型態之相關性以及攻擊型態之運用情形。以2015 年亞洲男子排球俱樂部前八強為研究對象，將接發球成效、接發球攻擊得分、總攻擊得分與接發球攻擊型態進行皮爾遜積差相關法，分析各得分因子間之相關性。研究結果(一)攻擊位置：前排以4 號位最多，其次為3 號位及2 號位；後排則以1 號位最多，其次分別為6號位及5 號位。(二)攻擊型態：前排主要以4 號位修正球攻擊為最高，其次分別為4 號位平扣球攻擊、A 式快攻攻擊及4 號位高球攻擊；後排攻擊則以1 號位高球攻擊為最多，其次為1 號位短球攻擊、6 號位平球攻擊。(三)接發球攻擊得分對總攻擊得分與1 號位後排短球攻擊及2 號位修正球攻擊有顯著相關；總攻擊得分與4 號位高球攻擊及1 號位後排短球攻擊有顯著相關。對照過去相關文獻得知亞洲男子排球攻擊位置近五年，前、後排皆以4 號位及1 號位為主。攻擊型態則會因接發球成效而影響，但仍以平、短球為主。而1 號位後排短球攻擊與接發球攻擊及得分及總攻擊得分有相關性，表示1 號位攻擊型態在比賽中扮演著關鍵角色，即當所有球隊都著重於4 號位進攻時，能有效發揮1 號位進攻之隊伍其得分效益較高，獲勝機率增加。

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Asian men's volleyball serve aces, total attacking scores, spiking types, as well as how the attacking style affects the spiking strategies. We employed the performances of the top eight teams in 2015 Asian Men's Club Volleyball Championship for further analysis. Pearson product-moment correlation was conducted to examine the associations across scoring factors including the efficiency of pass, ace serves, total spiking scores, and spiking strategies, with the significance level at α= .05. The statistical analysis revealed that (1) the spiking strategies differ between positions. In terms of front court, the greater contribution can be found for the position No. 4 (44.87%), intermediate contribution for the position No. 3 (24.24%), and smallest contribution for the position No. 2 (24.24%). For the back court, the greater contribution can be found for the position No. 1 (8.77%%), intermediate contribution for the position No. 6 (3.02%), and smallest contribution for the position No. 5 (0.09%). (2) Spiking types are not evenly distributed. For the front court, the highest attacking attempts were the adjusted balls in the position No. 4 (19.72%), and then followed by cross spikes in the position No. 4 (16.08%), type A quick-set spikes (10.52%), and straight spikes in the position No. 4 (9.08%). For the back court, the highest attacking attempts were straight spikes in the position No. 1 (5.11%), and then followed by tipping attacks in the position No. 1 (3.66%), and cross spikes in the position No. 6 (3.02%). On the other hand, the correlation analysis suggested that there were significantly relationships between scores of service aces and total scores and two types of attacks including tipping attacks in the position No. 1 and adjusted ball attacks in the position No. 2 (all ps ＜ .05). In addition, the total spiking scores significantly correlated with straight spikes in the position No. 4 and including tipping attacks in the position No. 1 (all ps ＜ .05). In sum, these results indicated that the major attack positions for Asian men's volleyball were the positions No. 4 and No. 1 for the front and back rows, respectively. Moreover, although the attacking patterns were affected by the effectiveness of receiving, cross spikes and tipping attacks were still the major strategies. Finally, there was a correlation between scores of ace serves and total scores and tipping attacks in the position No. 1. It thus suggested that the attacking at the position No. 1 may play an important role in volleyball gaming. That is, when players focused more on attacking at the position No. 4, the players can effectively adopted the attacking at the position No. 1, thus increasing the success of sporting performance.

1. 吳忠政(2007)。亞洲男子排球攻擊型態之分析研究。大專體育學刊，9(2)，65-72。
   連結：
2. 林學諒(2004)。2002 年韓國釜山亞運會男子排球賽前六強攻擊型態探討。大專體育，70，38-44。
   連結：
3. Forthomme, B.,Croisier, J. L.,Ciccarone, G.,Crielaard, J. M.,Cloes, M.(2005).Muscular and physical features correlated with ball velocity during the volleyball spike.Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering,8,105-106.
4. 余清芳(2003)。2003 年韓國大丘世界大學運動會女子排球賽參賽有感。排球教練科學，3，15-20。
5. 吳茂昌(2001)。亞洲男排四強基本技術與成績表現之分析。90 年度體育學術研討會專刊
6. 李函潔(2001)。排球比賽得分結構的差異性探討。大專排球研究論文集，7，131-138。
7. 林竹茂(1995)。排球攻擊技術運動生理學暨訓練策略研析。台灣師大體育研究，1，123-137。
8. 林啟東(2000)。新規則下排球比賽得失分過程探析。大專排球研究論文集，6，1-12。
9. 林顯丞(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中市，國立台灣體育學院體育研究所。
10. 洪文平、王登基、李惠婷(2012)。大專男子排球比賽接發球進攻戰術分析─以九十三學年度甲組前四強為例。高應科大體育，11，35-54。
11. 張桂青(2000)。每球得分制對排球技術戰術影響的研究。濱洲師範學報，16(4)，57-61。
12. 郭國隆(2008)。我國男子排球比賽扣球攻擊戰術及得分結構之研究─以大專男子與高中男子球隊為例。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，7(2)，163-164。
13. 陳伯作(2004)。2003 年第十二屆亞洲男子排球錦標賽─我國與強隊之實力析。中華排球，111，65-72。
14. 陳瑞福(2003)。亞洲男排選手扣球攻擊的質與量之探討。中華排球，105，107-112。
15. 黃志成(2001)。排球主動得分技術影響比賽之成績之研究。臺北市:富誠出社。
16. 黃幸玲(2002)。淺析如何提昇男子排球強攻扣球技術。大專排球研究論集，8，161-168。
17. 劉建華、陳芳(2002)。男子排球比賽接發球進攻系統現實狀態分析與評價。中國體育科技，38(5)，24-26。

1. 楊總成,郭國隆,翁仲邦,李建毅(2021)。2010－2021年國內排球技術表現科學研究之分析。交大體育學刊，17，78-89。