题名

幼兒園中受忽視與爭議幼兒的社會能力探討

并列篇名

Social Competence of the Neglected Children and the Controversial Children in Kindergarten

DOI

10.6246/JHDFS.201212_(14).0002

作者

陳怡君(Yi-Chun Chen);鍾志從(Jyh-Tsorng Jong)

关键词

受忽視幼兒 ; 受爭議幼兒 ; 社會能力 ; controversial children ; neglected children ; social competence

期刊名称

人類發展與家庭學報

卷期/出版年月

14期(2012 / 12 / 01)

页次

68 - 94

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探討幼兒園中受忽視幼兒與受爭議幼兒的社會能力現況與相關影響因素。以臺北市五所公立幼兒園十二個大班,328名幼兒進行照片式社會計量法,選出受忽視幼兒70名及受爭議幼兒52名後進行社會能力評量。主要研究結果如下:一、受忽視幼兒的整體社會能力屬於中等;以「合群合作」能力最佳,最少出現的是「互動行為」。二、受爭議幼兒的整體社會能力也屬中上程度;其「合群合作」能力最佳,最少出現的是「利他行為」。三、受忽視幼兒的「合群合作」能力高於受爭議幼兒;受爭議幼兒的「互動行為」表現高於受忽視幼兒。四、不同性別、排行與家庭社經地位的受忽視幼兒,在「利他行為」方面,女生的能力高於男生;排行獨子的受忽視幼兒,女生的「合群合作」表現優於男生;低社經家庭的受忽視幼兒,女生的「禮貌」表現比男生好;受忽視的男生中,高社經家庭幼兒的「禮貌」表現優於低社經家庭的幼兒。五、受爭議幼兒的各項社會能力,女生的能力均比男生高;高社經又排行老二的受爭議幼兒,他們的「禮貌」表現優於低社經又排行老二的受爭議幼兒。

英文摘要

The purposes of this study were to discuss the current status of social competences of neglected children and controversial children in kindergarten, and to explore the differences in social competences of neglected children and controversial children among their gender, birth order, and family's social and economic status. Results were listed as follows:1. Neglected children scored highest in ”gregariousness and cooperation” competences but lowest in ”interactive behavior” competence.2. Controversial children scored highest in ”gregariousness and cooperation” competences but lowest in ”altruist behavior” competence.3. Neglected children were higher than controversial children in ”gregariousness and cooperation” competences, but lower in ”interactive behavior” competence.4. Differences in social competences of neglected children among gender, birth order, family's social and economic status: (1) Neglected girls were higher in ”altruist behavior” competence than neglected boys. (2) For neglected children, girls were better in ”gregariousness and cooperation” competences than boys. (3) For neglected children in low social and economic status, girls were higher in ”manners” than boys. (4) For neglected children, boys from high social and economic status were higher in ”manners” than those from low social and economic status.5. Differences in social competences of controversial children among gender, birth order, family's social and economic status: (1) In general, controversial girls' social competences of ”altruist behavior”, ”gregariousness and cooperation”, ”interactive behavior”, ”manners”, and ”independence and autonomy” higher than boys. (2) Birth order and social and economic status had the interactive effects only in the social competence of ”manners”. Second-born controversial children from families with high social and economic status were higher than those from families with low social and economic status.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 黃毅志(2003)。台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-32。
    連結:
  2. Ackerman, B. P.,Brown, E. D.,Izard, C. E.(2004).The relation between contextual risk, earned income, and the school adjustment of children from economically disadvantaged families.Development Psychology,40,204-215.
  3. Anderson, S.,Messick, S.(1974).Social competency in young children.Development Psychology,10,282-293.
  4. Bagwell, C. L.,Newcomb, A. F.,Bukowski, W. M.(1998).Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment.Child Development,69(1),140-153.
  5. Berndt, T. J.(2002).Friendship quality and social development.Current Directions In Psychological Science,11,7-10.
  6. Berndt, T. J.,Bulleit, T. N.(1985).Effect of sibiling relationships on preschoolers' behavior at home and at school.Development Psychology,21,761-767.
  7. Chen, X.,Li, D.,Li, Z. Y.,Li, B. S.,Liu, M.(2000).Sociable and prosocial dimensions of social competence in Chinese children: Common and unique contributions to social, academic, and psychological adjustment.Developmental Psychology,36,302-314.
  8. Coie, J. D.,Dodge, K. A.(1988).Multople sources of date on social behavior and social status in the school: A cross-age comparison.Child Development,59,815-829.
  9. Coie, J. D.,Dodge, K. A.,Coppotelli, H.(1982).Dimensions and types of status: A cross-age perspective.Development Psychology,18,557-570.
  10. Denham, S. A.,Blair, K. A.,DeMulder, E.,Levitas, J.,Sawyer, K.,Auerbach-Major, S.,Queenan, P.(2003).Preschool emotional competence: Pathway to social competence?.Child Development,74,238-256.
  11. Dodge, K. A.(1983).Behavioral antecedents of peer social status.Child Development,54,1386-1399.
  12. Duncan, G. J.,Brooks-Gunn, J.(2000).Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development.Child Development,71,188-196.
  13. Eisenberg, N.(Ed.)(1998).Handbook of child psychology: Vol 3.Social emotional, and personality development.New York:Wiley.
  14. Hart, C. H.,Draper, T. W.,Olsen, J. A.(2001).Peer and teacher sociometrics for preschool children: Cross-informant concordance, temporal stability, and reliability.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,47,416-443.
  15. Hartup, W. W.,Glazer, J.,Charleswarth, R.(1983).Peer reinforcement and sociometric status.Child Development,38,1017-1024.
  16. Howe, N.,Ross, H.(1990).Socialization, perspective-taking, and the sibling relationship.Development Psychology,26,160-165.
  17. Hubbard, J. A.,Coie, J. A.(1994).Emotional determinants of social competence in children's peer relationships.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,40,1-21.
  18. Keane, S. P.,Calkins, S. D.(2004).Predicting kindergarten peer social status from toddler and preschool problem behavior.Journal Abnormal Child Psychology,32,409-423.
  19. Ladd, G. W.,Kochenderfer, B. J.(1998).Parenting behavior and the parent-child relationship: Correlates of peer victimization in kindergarten?.Development Psychology,34,1450-1458.
  20. Ladd, G. W.,Profilet, S. M.(1996).The child behavior scale: A teacher-report measure of young children's aggressive, withdrawn, and prosocial behaviors.Developmental Psychology,32(6),1008-24.
  21. Lavallee, K. L.,Bierman, K. L.,Nix, R. L.(2005).The impact of first-grade "friendship group" experiences on child social outcomes in the first track program.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,33,307-324.
  22. Ma, I.(2006).Temperament and peer relationships.Childhood Education,83,38-43.
  23. McFall, R. M.(1982).A reformulation of the concept of social skill.Behavioral Assessment,4,1-33.
  24. Miller, N.,Maruyama, G.(1976).Ordinal position and peer popularity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,33,123-131.
  25. Newcomb, A. F.,Bukowski, W. M.,Linda Pattee, L.(1993).Children's peer relations: a meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status.Psychological Bulletin,113(1),99-128.
  26. Park, J. G.,Asher, S. R.(1987).Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk?.Psychological Bulletin,102,357-389.
  27. Perry, J. C.(1979).Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected: A reconceptualiziation of sociometric status in preschool children.Child Development,50,1231-1234.
  28. Rice, M. L.,Hadley, P. A.,Alexander, A.(1993).Social biases toward children with specific language impairment: A correlative causal model of language limitations.Applied Psycholinguistics,14,445-471.
  29. Rose-Krasnor, L.(1997).The nature of social competence: A theoretical review.Social Development,6,111-135.
  30. Schoon, I.,Bunner, J.,Joshi, H.,Parsons, S.,Wiggins, R. D.,Sacker, A.(2002).The influence of context, timing, and duration of risk experience for the passage from childhood to midadulthood.Child Development,73,1486-1504.
  31. Water, E.,Sroufe, L.(1983).Social competence as a developmental construct.Developmental Review,3,79-97.
  32. Wentzel, K. R.(2003).Motivating students to behavior in socially competent ways.Theory into Practice,42,319-326.
  33. Wentzel, K. R.,Asher, S. R.(1995).The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children.Child Development,66,754-763.
  34. Wine, J. D.(Ed.),Smye, M. D.(Ed.)(1981).Social competence.New York:Guilford Press.
  35. Wohlwend, K. E.(2004).Chasing friendship: Acceptance, rejection, and recess play.Childhood Education,81,77-82.
  36. 吳宗浩、鍾志從(2012)。父母的社交技巧與幼兒氣質、同儕社會地位之關聯。兒童與家庭國際研討會:家人關係─理論與實際的對話
  37. 李駱遜(2002)。教室中的隱形人:被忽視幼兒的研究。幼兒教育年刊,14,91-112。
  38. 李駱遜(2003)。他們還被忽視嗎?「教室中隱形人」的後續研究。幼兒教育年刊,15,14-54。
  39. 邱美嫚、鍾志從(2012)。幼兒的性別知覺與其同儕關係的關聯。兒童與家庭國際研討會:家人關係─理論與實際的對話
  40. 柯華葳(1983)。中國兒童社會行為研究。臺灣省國民教育學校教師研習會。
  41. 張瓊文、鍾志從(2012)。幼兒人際知覺與同儕社會地位之關聯。兒童與家庭國際研討會:家人關係─理論與實際的對話
  42. 梁瑪莉(1987)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  43. 連士慧、鍾志從(2012)。幼兒自尊與同儕社會地位之關聯。兒童與家庭國際研討會:家人關係─理論與實際的對話
  44. 陳若琳(1999)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃,行政院國家科學委員會。
  45. 黃德祥(1991)。社會計量地位分類之研究。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,38,53-69。
  46. 楊國樞編(1978)。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北:東華書局。
  47. 葉連祺、蔡錦美(1997)。比較不同社會計量測量準據的友伴選擇結構。國立編譯館館刊,26,323-354。
  48. 潘秀雯(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  49. 蔣惠珍(1986)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  50. 蔡淑苓(2003)。幼兒同儕關係之研究─以幼稚園大班幼兒社會計量為例。臺南女子技術學院學報,22,117-148。
被引用次数
  1. 葉明芬,黃淑滿,周麗端,吳宗仁(2023)。手足重要?同儕重要?獨生與有手足幼兒社會能力成長軌跡與其同儕影響分析。教育心理學報,54(3),609-635。
  2. 鍾志從、連士慧(2014)。幼兒自尊與同儕社會地位之關聯。人類發展與家庭學報,16,52-78。
  3. 鍾志從、張瓊文(2016)。幼兒對人性的人際知覺與其同儕社會地位的關聯。人類發展與家庭學報,17,27-49。