幼兒園戶外遊戲場空間規劃之探析

The Inquiry of Space Planning in Preschools' Outdoor Playground

10.6246/JHDFS.201312_(15).0004

吳中勤(Chung-Chin Wu)

幼兒園 ； 遊戲場 ； 空間規劃 ； preschool ； playground ； space planning

人類發展與家庭學報

15期（2013 / 12 / 01）

63 - 82

繁體中文

本研究之主要目的在於探討台北市幼兒園遊戲場空間規劃與使用之現況，以了解遊戲場空間規劃之原生性、連動性、感受性、安全性、完整性、近便性、創造性與多元性。在研究對象之選取上，依台北市各行政區公立幼兒園之比例，採分層隨機抽樣，針對68所公立幼兒園，以檢核表與觀察記錄表分別檢核幼兒園遊戲場在地形與地貌、遊戲設備之類型、數量及所需之安全範圍與空間分區，並記錄遊戲場之空間型態與面積等資料。所得資料以卡方檢定、區間估計、單因子變異數分析與迴歸分析等統計方法分析之。研究結果發現：（1）少數幼兒園能夠善用遊戲場之空間原生特色（論空間原生性）；（2）在考量了遊戲設備及其安全範圍後，絕大多數幼兒遊戲空間顯得擁擠（論空間連動性、感受性與安全性）；（3）幼兒園遊戲場具有七種不同之空間型態，不僅普遍不利於教師督導，且部分遊戲場空間之完整性不足（論空間完整性與安全性）；（4）大部分遊戲場空間分區之近便性、創造性與多元性不足。最後，針對本研究之發現，提出可供教育實務工作者與教育行政機關之具體建議。

The main purpose of present study was to investigate the status quo of the uses and planning of public preschool playground space, to realize the originality, interaction, safety, sensitivity, completeness, convenience, variety, and creativity of playground planning. 68 subjects was selected by using stratified random sampling method, which was deponded upon the percentage of divisions in Taipei. The check list was used to check the information about geography, type, amount, and safe range of equipment. Furthermore, the division and the area of space were also recorded. Data were analyzed by employing chi-squre, interval estimation, one way ANOVA, and regression analysis. The results were as following: (1) there are a few preschools could use the originalities of space well (originality). (2) Most playing space for children was crowded after the amount and security region of equipment were taken into account (interaction, safety, and sensitivity). (3) there were seven different patterns of playground space in preschool, and the pattern of divisions was generally detrimental for supervising, and a few playgrounds were insufficient in their integrity (completeness and safety). (4) the divisions were insufficient in approachability, creativity, and diversity in most playgrounds. Finally, suggestions was submitted for practices and educational administrations.

1. 教育部（2012）。幼兒園及其分班基本設施設備標準。取自：http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=GL000628&KeyWordHL=&StyleType=1
2. Wallis, C. (2004). What makes teens tick. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,994126,00.html
3. 教育部（2012）。幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱。取自： http://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/?p=2545
4. 台北市教育局（2012）。101學年度台北市高級中等學校以下學校概況簡表。取自：http://statistic.tp.edu.tw/dialog/statfile9.asp
5. Ball, K.,Wadley, V. G.,Edwards, J. D..Advances in technology used to assess and retrain older drivers.Gerontechnology,1(4),251-261.
6. Baranowski, T.,Thompson, W. O.,DuRant, R. H.,Baranowski, J.,Puhl, J.(1993).Observation on physical activity in physical locations: Age, gender ethnicity and month effects.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,64(2),127-133.
7. Davies, M. M.(1996).Outdoors: An important context for young children's development.Early Child Development and Care,115,37-49.
8. Debord, K.,Moore, R.,Hestenes, L.,Cosco, N.,McGinnis, J.(2005).The preschool outdoor environment measurement scale.
9. Dighe, J.(1993).Children and the earth.Young Children,48(3),58-63.
10. Frost, J. L.(1992).Play and playscapes.New York, NY:Delmar Publishers Inc..
11. Healy, J.(1997).Failure to connect: How computer affect our children minds-For better and worse.New York, NY:Simon & Schuster.
12. Henniger, M. L.(1993).Enriching the outdoor play experience.Childhood Education,70(2),87-91.
13. Hestenes, L.,Shim, J.,DeBord, K.(2007).The measurement and influence of outdoor child care quality on preschool children's experiences.Proceedings of Biennial Conference for the Society for Research in Child Development,Boston, United States:
14. Kern, P.,Wakeford, L.(2007).Supporting outdoor play for young children: The zone model of playground supervision.YC Young Children,62(5),12-18.
15. Leff, S.,Lakin, R.(2005).Playground-based observational systems: A review and implications for practitioners and researchers.School Psychology Review,34(4),475-489.
16. Sekuler, A. B.,Bennett, P. J.,Mamelak, M.(2000).Effects of aging on the useful field of view.Experimental Aging Research,26(2),103-20.
17. United States of America Consumer Product Safety Commion(2012).Handbook for public playground safety.
18. 朱沛亭(1995)。幼兒園空間因應幼教理念轉變之研究。南亞學報，15，219-246。
19. 吳中勤(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學。
20. 吳旭專(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學。
21. 李國行(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中市，逢甲大學。
22. 常欣怡(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中市，靜宜大學。
23. 湯志民(2002)。學校遊戲場。台北:五南。
24. 黃聖茹、施瑋竺(2010)。臺灣高速鐵路自由席擁擠知覺與顧客滿意度之研究。臺灣銀行季刊，61(2)，250-268。
25. 蔡佳燕(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。

1. 蔣姿儀,唐玉馨,林季宜(2019)。幼兒園教師在戶外遊戲場安全維護與困境之研究。幼兒教育年刊，30，47-74。
2. 柯佳君,林志鈞(2021)。一起遊戲「趣」：應用灰關聯分析評估戶外公共遊戲場之規劃設計。育達科大學報，49，1-34。
3. (2018)。臺北市公立幼兒園接送空間吸引性探究。朝陽人文社會學刊，16(2)，199-220。