中流砥柱：嬰兒潮世代的家庭代間支持類型分析

Family Mainstay: Baby Boomers' Intergenerational Support Types

10.6246/JHDFS.201611_(17).0003

黃秋華(Chiu-Hua Huang)

嬰兒潮世代 ； 代間支持類型 ； 潛在類型分析 ； 代間關係 ； 臺灣社會變遷基本調查 ； Baby Boomers ； Intergenerational Support Types ； Latent Class Analysis ； Intergenerational Relationships ； Taiwan Social Change Survey

人類發展與家庭學報

17期（2016 / 11 / 01）

50 - 66

繁體中文

本研究關注嬰兒潮世代，探討其與老年父母、成年子女三代之間的代間支持類型，並分析影響代間支持類型之因素。運用2011年之「臺灣地區社會變遷基本調查計畫」第六期第二次調查家庭組資料進行分析，選取：1949年至1966年出生之樣本，並且「至少有一名父母存活」與「至少有一名成年子女」之嬰兒潮世代。研究發現：三代的代間支持類型，呈現出「由下奉養型」、「支持上下型」及「低交換型」樣貌。再者，成年子女的婚姻與工作狀況與嬰兒潮世代的家庭代間支持類型之關聯最爲顯著，而三代同住的居住安排則是增加了嬰兒潮世代提供老年父母支持協助的機率。

This study examined a typology of multigenerational support exchange of Baby Boomers, their aging parents and adult children. Using data from the 2011 Taiwan Social Change Survey (Round 6, Year 2, Family Questionnaire). In this study, subjects were born between 1949 and 1966, with at least one aging parent still alive and one adult child were analyzed. Latent Class Analyses was applied to develop intergenerational support types for (a) upward support, (b) support up and down, and (c) low exchange. The Baby Boomers whose adult children were single, or unemployed have a higher probability of falling into the ＂support up and down＂ type. While the Baby Boomers live with their aging parents and adult children, it increases the likelihood to become the ＂upward support＂ type.

1. Hagestad, G. O. & Herlofson, K. (2007). Micro and Macro Perspectives on Intergenerational Relations and Transfers in Europe. Retrieved November 23,2013, from http://www.un.org/esa/population/meetings/EGMPopAge/EGMPopAge_17_GHagestad.pdf.
2. 內政部戶政司（ 2013） 。內政部百年人口歷年資料。2013年4月10日， 取自：http://www.ris.gov.tw/zh_TW/346
3. Seoul National University Institute on Aging (2011). Korean Baby Boomers in Transition.Retrieved March 3, 2013, from https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/mmi/ publications/studies/2011/mmi-korean-boomers-.pdf
4. American Association of Retired Persons (2001). In the Middle: A Report on Multicultural Boomers Coping with Family and Aging Issues. Retrieved December 23, 2006, from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/ in_the_middle.pdf.
5. 內政部（2009）。老人狀況調查。2015年8月25日，取自http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=4696
6. Allen, K. R.,Blieszner, R.,Roberto, K. A.(2000).Family in the Middle and Later Years: A Review and Critique of Research in the 1990s.Journal of Marriage and Family,62(4),911-926.
7. Arber, S.(ed.),Attias-Donfut, C.(ed.)(2000).The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies.London, England:Routledge.
8. Arber, S.(ed.),Attias-Donfut, C.(ed.)(2000).The Family and State in Ageing Societies.London, England:Routledge.
9. Asao, Y.(2007).Asao Outlook on the Retirement Process of Dankai No Sedai, or the Japanese Baby-boom Generation.Japan Labor Review,4(4),121-137.
10. Bengtson, V. L.(Ed.),Acock, A. C.(Ed.),Allen, K. R.(Ed.),Dilworth-Anderson, P.(Ed.),Klein, D. M.(Ed.)(2005).Sourcebook of Family Theory and Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
11. Cheng, S. T.(ed.),Chi, I.(ed.),Fung, H. H.(ed.),Li, L. W.(ed.),Woo, J.(ed.)(2015).Successful Aging: Asian Perspectives.New York:Springer.
12. Cochran, L.,Rothschadl, A. M,Rudick, J. L.(2009).Leisure Programming for Baby Boomers.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
13. Dykstra, P. A.,Fokkema, F.(2011).Relationships between Parents and Their Adult Children: A West European Typology of Late-life Families.Ageing & Society,31(4),545-569.
14. Fingerman, K. L.(Ed.),Berg, C.(Ed.),Smith, J.(Ed.),Antonucci, T. C.(Ed.)(2011).Handbook of lifespan development.New York:Springer Publishers.
15. Fingerman, K. L.,Pillemer, K. A.,Silverstein, M.,Suitor, J. J.(2012).The Baby Boomers' Intergenerational Relationships.The Gerontologist,52(2),199-209.
16. Hogan, D. P.,Eggebeen, D. J.,Clogg, C. C.(1993).The Structure of Intergenerational Exchanges in American Families.American Journal of Sociology,98(6),1428-1458.
17. Igarashi, H.,Hooker, K.,Coehlo, D. P.,Manoogian, M.(2013).My nest is full: Intergenerational relationships at midlife.Journal of Aging Studies,27,102-112.
18. Johnson, M. L.(ed.),Bengtson, V. L.(ed.),Coleman, P.(ed.),Kirkwood, T.(ed.)(2005).The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
19. Lin I. F.,Goldman, N.,Weinstein, M.,Lin, Y. H.,Gorrindo, T.,Seeman, T.(2003).Gender differences in adult children's support of their parents in Taiwan.Journal of Marriage and Family,65,184-200.
20. Lin, J. P.,Chang, T. F.,Huang, C. H.(2011).Intergenerational Relations and Life Satisfaction Among Older Women in Taiwan.International Journal of Social Welfare,20,47-58.
21. Lin, J. P.,Yi, C. C.(2013).A Comparative analysis of intergenerational relations in East Asia.International Sociology,28(3),297-315.
22. Lin, J. P.,Yi. C. C.(2011).Filial norms and intergenerational support to aging parents in China and Taiwan.International Journal of Social Welfare,20,109-120.
23. Lowenstein, A.,Daatland, S. O.(2006).Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study.Ageing and Society,26(2),203-223.
24. Mancini, J. A.,Blieszner, R.(1989).Aging parents and adult children: Research themes in intergenerational relations.Journal of Marriage and Family,51,275-290.
25. Mangen, D. J.(Ed.),Peterson, W. A.(Ed.)(1982).Research Instruments in Social Gerontology.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
26. Mcllvane, J. M.,Ajrouch, K. J.,Antonucci, T. C.(2007).Generational Structure and Social Resources in Mid-life: Influences on Health and Well-being.Journal of Social Issues,63(4),759-773.
27. Park, K. S.,Phua, V.,McNally, J.,Sun, R.(2005).Diversity and Structure of Intergenerational Relationships: Elderly Parent-Adult Child Relations in Korea.Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology,20(4),285-305.
28. Pillemer, K.,Suitor, J. J.(2002).Explaining Mothers' Ambivalence Toward Their Adult Children.Journal of Marriage and Family,64(3),602-613.
29. Pruchno, R.(2012).Not Your Mother's Old Age: Baby Boomers at Age 65.Gerontologist,52(2),149-145.
30. Sauer, W. J.(ed.),Coward, R. T.(ed.)(1985).Social Support Networks and the Care of the Elderly.New York:Springer.
31. Schoeni, R. F.,Freedman, V. A.,Martin, L. G.(2008).Why is Late-Life Disability Declining?.The Milbank Quarterly,86,47-89.
32. Sussman, M.(ed.),Steinmetz, S.(ed.),Peterson, G.(ed.)(1999).Handbook of Marriage and the Family.New York:Plenum Press.
33. Szydlik, M.(2008).Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,39(1),97-114.
34. van Gaalen, R. I.,Dykstra, P. A.(2006).Solidarity and Conflict Between Adult Children and Parents: A Latent Class Analysis.Journal of Marriage and Family,68(4),947-960.
35. Whitbourne, S.K.,Wills, S.L.(2006).The Baby Boomers Grow up: Contemporary Perspectives on Midlife.Mahwah. NJ:Erlbaum.
36. Yi, C. C.,Lin, J. P.(2009).Types of Relations between Adult Children and Elderly Parents in Taiwan: Mechanisms Accounting for Various Relational Types.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,40(3),305-324.
37. 孔祥明(2006)。臺灣「家庭社會學」研究之回顧與展望。「走出典範：五十年的臺灣社會學：2006年臺灣社會學年會 暨國科會專題研究成果發表會」研討會，臺中市:
38. 王濟川、郭志剛(2004)。Logistic迴歸模型—方法及應用。臺北:五南。
39. 伊慶春(2014)。臺灣家庭代間關係的持續與改變：資源與規範的交互作用。社會學研究，3，189-215。
40. 伊慶春編、章英華編(2012)。臺灣的社會變遷1985~2005：婚姻與家庭，臺灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之一。臺北市:中央研究院。
41. 行政院經濟建設委員會(2014)。中華民國人口推計（103至150年）。
42. 李瑞金、盧羿廷(2005)。嬰兒潮世代婦女老年生活準備之初探與因應。社區發展季刊，110，111-127。
43. 林如萍(2015)。,行政院科技部專題研究成果報告。
44. 邱皓政(2008)。潛在類別模式－原理與技術。臺北:五南。
45. 張笠雲編(1997)。九○年代的臺灣社會：社會變遷基本調查研究系列二（下）。臺北市:中央研究院社會學研究。
46. 章英華編(1995)。社會調查與分析：社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一。臺北市:中央研究院民族學研究所。
47. 章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2012)。,臺北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。
48. 黃俊傑(2006)。戰後臺灣的轉型及其展望。臺北:臺大出版中心。
49. 葉光輝(1998)。年老父母居住安排的心理學研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，83，121-167。
50. 薛承泰(2003)。臺灣地區人口特質與趨勢：對社會福利政策的幾個啟示。國家政策季刊，3(4)，3-22。
51. 謝國雄編(2008)。群學爭鳴：臺灣社會學發展史。臺北市:群學。

1. 黃珮玲(2020)。草根組織之性別平等倡議策略探討－以新北市為例。社會發展研究學刊，25，1-40。
2. 黃秋華、林如萍(2018)。成年子女與嬰兒潮世代父母的代間經濟支持交換：生命事件的影響。人類發展與家庭學報，19，15-43。