公辦民營托嬰中心之公私協力方式及托育品質探討

Study on the Private - Public Partnership Model and Childcare Quality in Privately-Operated Public Infant Care Centers

10.6246/JHDFS.202212_(23).0003

楊曉苓(Hsiao-Ling Yang)

公私協力 ； 托育品質 ； 結構因素 ； 托嬰中心 ； private-public partnership ； childcare quality ； structural factors ； infant care centers

人類發展與家庭學報

23期（2022 / 12 / 01）

63 - 98

繁體中文;英文

近年來政府為支持家庭育兒，積極建構公私協立的托嬰服務供給模式，迄2022年6月底全臺已達342間公辦民營托嬰機構，分由20個地方政府設立，然而各地方政府輔導與管理方式間存在極大差異，如何確保其托育品質是眾所關心的議題。過往文獻顯示托育機構的托育品質表現，受到許多結構因素的影響，其中包括地區、機構與班群因素等，本研究探究公辦民營托嬰中心之托育品質樣貌及公私協力運作方式，並探討結構因素與托嬰中心托育品質的關係。由全國辦理公私協力托嬰方案的10個地方政府中，依開辦數量比例抽樣30間公辦民營托嬰中心，以「嬰幼兒托育環境評量表［ITERS-R］」評量其托育品質表現，並收集托嬰中心結構要素及公私協力資料。研究發現公辦民營托嬰中心的托育品質大致良好，落差不大，顯示公私協力的成效良好。而公私協力方式則呈現地方政府、受委託民間團體及托嬰中心三者交錯互動關係，無論地方政府或受委託單位，對托嬰中心在管理輔導面向上多採全面性關注，內容上兼顧行政、教保、衛生安全各層面；在輔導形式與頻率上較採多元且密集方式，對托育品質進行維護與管控。當檢視不同層面結構因素之影響，發現位於台北市、由大專院校承接、中度的內部督導頻率（每月一次）及高度的外部督導頻率（每月一次）的公私協力托嬰中心，其托育品質的表現較佳。

In recent years, the government has been actively establishing a public-private partnership model for infant care services to support families in childcare. As of the end of June 2022, the number of privately-operated public infant care centers in Taiwan reached 342. Twenty local governments established these centers. However, the guidance and management strategies adopted by various local governments vary significantly. Given this phenomenon, how to ensure quality childcare is an issue of public concern. Literature has shown that childcare quality in childcare facilities is affected by multiple structural factors, including regional, institutional, and group factors. This study explores the childcare quality and the public-private partnership model in privately-operated public infant care centers and investigates the relationship between structural factors and childcare quality. Thirty privately-operated public infant care centers were sampled from the ones established by 10 local governments nationwide that implemented infant care programs under the public-private partnership model-according to the proportion of the number of establishments. The quality of childcare was assessed using the Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale-Revised (ITERS-R), and data on structural factors and public-private partnerships were collected from infant care centers. The study found that the childcare quality in these infant care centers was generally good, with minor variations, indicating that the public-private partnership model has produced positive results. The model presented the interlocking and interactive relationship between local governments, contracted private organizations, and infant care centers. The local governments and the contracted organizations adopted a comprehensive focus on the management and guidance of the infant care centers, addressing aspects such as administration, educare, and health and safety. In terms of the mode and frequency of guidance, a diverse and intensive approach was adopted to maintain and control the quality of childcare. An examination of the influences of structural factors on different levels revealed that privately-operated public infant care centers located in Taipei City, operated by colleges or universities, with medium frequencies of internal supervision (once per month) and high frequencies of external supervision (once per month), had better childcare quality.

1. 王舒芸(2014)。門裡門外誰照顧、平價普及路迢迢？台灣嬰兒照顧政策之體制內涵分析。臺灣社會研究季刊，96，49-93。
   連結：
2. 林信廷,王舒芸(2015)。公私協力托嬰中心的成就與限制。臺灣社會福利學刊，12(2)，15-55。
   連結：
3. 林淑馨(2015)。我國非營利組織與地方政府協力現況之初探與反思：以臺北市為例。文官制度季刊，7(2)，17-45。
   連結：
4. 陳雅鈴,高武銓(2008)。中低收入戶幼兒托育品質之探討：以屏東縣市為例。教育學刊，31，45-77。
   連結：
5. Barros, S.,Cadima, J.,Bryant, D. M.,Coelho, V.,Pinto, A. I.,Pessanha, M.,Peixoto, C.(2016).Infant child care quality in Portugal: Associations with structural characteristics.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,37,118-130.
6. Burchinal, M.,Magnuson, K.,Powell, D.,Hong, S. S.(2015).Early child care and education.Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (Vol. IV)
7. Cárcamo, R.,Vermeer, H.,Harpe, C.,Veer, R.,IJzendoorn, M.(2014).The Quality of Childcare in Chile: Its Stability and International Ranking.Child & Youth Care Forum,43(6),747-761.
8. Goelman, H.,Forer, B.,Kershaw, P.,Doherty, G.,Lero, D.,LaGrange, A.(2006).Towards a predictive model of quality in Canadian child care centers.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,21(3),280-295.
9. Harms, T.,Clifford, R. M.,Cryer, D.(2004).Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised Edition.Teachers College Press.
10. Harms, T.,Clifford, R. M.,Cryer, D.,倪用直（譯）(2008).嬰幼兒托育環境評量表－修訂版.心理出版社.
11. Harms, T.,Cryer, D.,Clifford, R. M.(2007).Family Child Care Environment Rating Scale Revised Edition (FCCERS-R).Teachers College Press.
12. Harms, T.,Cryer, D.,Clifford, R. M.(2006).Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale-Revised Edition.Teachers College Press.
13. King, E. K.,Pierro, R. C.,Li, J.,Porterfield, M. L.,Rucker, L.(2016).Classroom quality in infant and toddler classrooms: impact of age and programme type.Early Child Development & Care,186(11),1821-1835.
14. Layzer, J.,Goodson, B. D.(2006).The “quality” of early care and education settings: Definitional and Measurement Issues.Evaluation Review,30(5),556-576.
15. Love, J. M.,Kisker, E. E.,Ross, C.,Raikes, H.,Constantine, J.,Boller, K.,Brooks-gunn, J.,Chazan-Cohen, R.,Banks Tarullo, L.,Brady-smith, C.,Fuligni, A. S.,Schochet, P. Z.,Paulsell, D.,Vogel, C.(2005).The Effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-Year-Old Children and Their Parents: Lessons for Policy and Programs.Developmental Psychology,41(6),885-901.
16. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network(2005).Child care and child development: Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth care.Guilford press Child-Development.
17. Pessanha, M.,Aguiar, C.,Bairrão, J.(2007).Influence of structural features on Portuguese toddler child care quality.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,22(2),204-214.
18. Pessanha, M.,Peixoto, C.,Barros, S.,Cadima, J.,Pinto, A. I.,Coelho, V.,Bryant, D. M.(2017).Stability and change in teacher-infant interaction quality over time.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,40,87-97.
19. Phillipsen, L. C.,Burchinal, M. R.,Howes, C.,Cryer, D.(1997).The prediction of process quality from structural features of child care.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,12,281-303.
20. Schweinhardt, L. J.(2005).,未出版
21. Sosinsky, L. S.,Lord, H.,Zigler, E.(2007).For-profit/nonprofit differences in center-based child care quality: Results from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,28(5/6),390-410.
22. 王兆慶(2017)。托育公共化的最後一塊拼圖：0-2 歲托育政策。社區發展季刊，159，126-137。
23. 王淑英,孫嫚薇(2003)。托育照顧政策中的國家角色。國家政策季刊，2(4)，147-174。
24. 王舒芸(2021)。,衛生福利部社會及家庭署。
25. 林于婕(2020)。國立屏東大學。
26. 施又瑀(2018)。公私協力模式推動非營利幼兒園之探究。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(7)，20-28。
27. 高晶瑩(2017)。國立臺北護理健康大學。
28. 張沂潔(2013)。國立政治大學。
29. 張瓊玲(2009)。探討非營利組織與政府互動的課責機制─以托育服務為例。競爭力評論，13，27-74。
30. 張瓊玲,張力亞(2005)。政府業務委外經營管理及運作過程之研究－以台北市政府社會局為例。華岡社科學報，19，31-59。
31. 教育部等（2020）。我國少子女化對策計畫（107 年至 113 年）核定本。https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=270&pid=9431 270&pid
32. 陳佩吟(2015)。國立中正大學。
33. 陳娟娟(2019)。托嬰教保品質研究綜述。幼兒教育，327，37-50。
34. 陳鳳卿(2005)。臺灣師範大學。
35. 曾冠球(2017)。良善協力治理下的公共服務民間夥伴關係。國土及公共治理季刊，5(1)，67-79。
36. 馮燕,林佩蓉,薛承泰(2010)。,國家科學委員會。
37. 楊曉苓,黃馨慧(2011)。臺北市托嬰機構之托育品質分析：結構特性與過程品質。兒童及少年福利期刊，18，53-77。
38. 葉郁菁,黃秋華(2019)。,未出版
39. 劉毓秀(1997).女性．國家．照顧工作.台北:女書文化.
40. 衛生福利部社會及家庭署（2022）。全國公設民營托嬰中心及社區公共托育家園名冊（截至 111.06.30）。https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=970&pid=9140 970&pid
41. 簡慧娟,簡杏蓉(2009)。從少子女化現象的因應歷程談我國兒童福利服務之展望。社區發展季刊，125，7-19。

1. 張家卉,張武修,李妙純(2023)。機構權屬別與居家托育訪視輔導員健康識能關係－組織承諾及組織文化之中介效果。健康科技期刊，10(1)，18-34。