The Impact of Global University Rankings on Higher Education Management and Policy in Kazakhstan

10.6197/EHE.2012.0602.03

Aida Sagintayeva；Kairat Kurakbayev

Kazakhstan ； Global Rankings ； Higher Education

Evaluation in Higher Education

6卷2期（2012 / 12 / 01）

47 - 57

英文

This paper discusses the relevance of global ranking systems as a policy instrument of strategic planning, quality management and public accountability of higher education institutions (HEI) in Kazakhstan. Being one of the world’s fastest growing economies, Kazakhstan has set priorities on developing a knowledge-based society for global competition. Celebrating its 20th anniversary of independence from the former Soviet Union, the nation has become the first of five Central-Asian countries to introduce its higher education institutions in global rankings. Yet, there is little empirical work or theoretical treatment of the influence of global rankings on the government’s educational policy of Central Asian states. In addition, both the increasing impact of global and national rankings of HEIs in Kazakhstan and the government’s decision to motivate local academic institutions to take top tiers in global ranking systems prompt us to better understand how higher education institutions respond to the rankings.

1. Chau, A. (2011, September 20). Eastern Europe and Central Asia in the 2011 QS world university rankings. Retrieved from QS Intelligence Unit website: http://www.iu.qs.com/2011/09/20/eastern-europe-and-central-asia-in-the-2011-qs-world-university-rankings/
2. Altbach, P. G.(2010).The Asian higher education century?.International Higher,59,3-5.
3. Altbach, P. G.(2006).The dilemmas of ranking.International Higher Education,42,2-3.
4. Clarke, M.(2007).The impact of higher education rankings on student access, choice, and opportunity.Higher Education in Europe,32,59-70.
5. Clarke, M.(2005).Quality assessment lessons from Australia and New Zealand.Higher Education in Europe,30,183-197.
6. Dill, D. D.,Soo, M.(2005).Academic quality, league tables and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems.Higher Education,49,495-533.
7. Global University Network for Innovation(Ed.)(2007).Higher education in the world 2007-Accreditation for quality assurance: What is at stake?.Hampshire, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
8. Hazelkorn, E.(2008).Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders.Higher Education Policy,21,193-215.
9. Hazelkorn, E.(2011).Rankings: Does what gets counted get done?.International Higher Education,65,3-5.
10. Higher Education Funding Council for England(2008).Counting what is measured or measuring what counts?-League tables and their impact on higher education institutions in England.Bristol, UK:Author.
11. King, R.(2009).Governing universities globally: Organizations, regulation and rankings.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.